JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Very affordable price (found again in the store, do not import, just over 500 €), MAF extremely fast and precise construction and finish good, tripod ring supplied.
Cons:Difficult liveview autofocus in low light. Tend to be soft.
Opinion:It's my first 70-200 so I can not comment on that yet exhaustive. I noticed that the colors returned are missing a bit 'of saturation and contrast, at least when compared with photos taken with the Nikkor 16-85. Anyway fixable in PP. The MAF impressed me most is that in afc afs, the rings have a Buna precision and smoothness comparable to nikon. In general, the value of the new is remarkable.
Pros:Quality / price ratio (new or used) - fast autofocus - excellent construction - ring can be removed without disassembling the lens - large rings and fluid
Cons:Soft to 2.8 and the long focal lengths (150 to 200mm) - lens plasticky and hard to take off and put - multipliable but absolutely not recommended
Opinion:It 'was my second 70-200 (after having tried the Canon 70-200 f / 4 smooth) and I must say that for the same aperture that Sigma has behaved really well, on par with the Canon f / 4 like quality. Great autofocus, subjects in focus and Ultrasonic Motor satisfactory, my copy had no problems f / b focus, no matter on 7D I have the AF Micro Adjustment ... the hood in my case was very hard and we put a few seconds of too much to put it and pull it out of soft diaphragms 2.8/3.5 and long focal lengths, is already sharp enough at f/5.6, f/11 churning photos excelled. Tried it once with a multiplier Kenko 1.4 and the result was pitiful. All in all the best 70-200 2.8 as quality / price ratio, slightly lower quality as the Tamron 70-200 2.8 (old version), but much shorter and with ultrasonic motor essential for me.
Pros:Good build quality, excellent in relation to the price; rnApertura constant rnGhiere fluid and precise;
Cons:Soft 200mm f2.8; rnSul my copy autofocus slow;
Opinion:Excellent value for money, although I was hoping to be better wide open, especially in tropical conditions will 2.8.Non but the build quality is very good, sturdy, the dials are quite accurate and the tripod socket is well fatto.Mi like made of contrasts and colors, but it is a lot soggettivo.Perde contrast against the light, but many lenses suffer from this problema.rnConsigliato those who want a constant brightness focus on walking and do not want svenarsi, but personally I would do at home nikon effort and buy at least 80-200 bighiera.rn
Pros:Brightness over the entire focal length, low price
Cons:Lack of stabilization (solved with later).
Opinion:I find a lens valid for both sports photos that try their portrait photos in low light conditions. The fast autofocus, the quality of construction of the lens is good and no one can complain about the sharpness, a little soft at f/2.8 but you can improve in PP. Personally, I was fine and would recommend the purchase of this lens for those who have availability for a nikon / canon!