JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:excellent sharpness, autofocus and build quality
Cons:undetected despite my pickyness in the tests
Opinion:In doubt in choosing between the 500 Fl Nikon and the 500 Sigma Sport, I was lucky enough to try them both on many occasions, finally opting for the purchase of the second telephoto lens without repentance. Almost identical in the weight and distribution of it, in view of the price-quality ratio, Sigma dominates the Nikon product and not by a little. Impeccable autofocus and very, very sensitive... Associated with 1.4x there is no decay of the image, despite my always present prejudices towards focal multipliers. Very fast in the transition from Af to manual focus, probably in the hypersonic engine of yamaki's house there is a lot and still a lot of high quality technology. The bracket allows a correct rotation on 90 degrees thanks to the presence of a retainer that can be disengaged by operating an unlocking lever (absent in Nikon). The magnesium alloy barrel is of excellent workmanship to say the least, the light screen in rigorous carbon fiber and the optical scheme includes two elements in Fld glass and one Sld (total absence of spherical and chromatic axial aberration) where fld means Fluorite, whose well-known characteristics allow a very low dispersion. The optical stabilizer with accelerometer can be used in two modes, one that allows a certain "generic photography" and a second more oriented towards bird life and sports (in this second function the algorithm used by Sigma allows to work on horizontal, vertical and diagonal axes with unthinkable results). Finally, to add that to the purchase of this magnificent product, there is in the kit a backpack that allows its transport even with mounted machine body. I think it is useless to emphasize how much the Japanese company has been able to do achieving in my opinion a quality equal if not superior to the most branded Canon and Nikon brands. Not forgetting that the latter cost twice as much...
Opinion:Hello everyone wanted your personal opinion , tomorrow I go to test the 500 of the Sigma f/4 sports, evaluating that I now own the 200/400 F4 Nikon "evaluable x now great" however a little short x the naturalistic despite also having the 1.4. Being a Nikon fan, I feel a little restrained towards other optics. I have already realized that 1.4 Nikon nn is compatible and the bracket as you have highlighted is short , Apart from these 2 negativity, I wanted to understand about the AF customization and if it is worth the change. Thank you from the heart to those who answer me and with the occasion I wish you all happy shots ..... Fotolux (Lucio Bertani)
Pros:Ultra Sharp, fast and customizable AF, excellent multiplied.
Cons:Maybe the stabilizer does not equal the ones more noble, but effective enough.
Opinion:I had both the Nikon 500 F4 FL, and previously the Canon 500 F4 ISII. This Sigma has nothing to envy to the other two.... In fact, regarding the AF I would say a step above considering the customizations etc... Really excellent even multiplied, perhaps, but I say maybe, the 500 ISII was a sharper Pelino only DUPLICATED, but I said perhaps (and probably depends on the duplicator, as smooth and multiplied to 1.4 is really exceptional, equal to or better than the other two). They Confirm what I have written the tests carried out by the only site that I personally find reliable and consistent with what I have been able to test in the field during my years of experience. Consider that my photos are almost always very croppate....
Opinion:After months of testing and photos, I can say I'm very happy to have bought it, because it is built very well, solid and with many features such as the ability to use the USB doc with various customizations from autofocus that works so well, I followed by subjects like the little flower or the ruler among the trees that are very fast ,, without any problem ,,, not to mention the stabilizer that works really well giving you the possibility to shoot at very low times that associated with the ,,, brightness Dell lens do yes that you can take home a shot even in bad light conditions .. I said this I confirm that it is a great alternative of excellent quality compared to 500 nikon that costs double ,,,,,, ah hhhh I forgot with the multiplier 1.4 loses a reactivity but the sharpness is the same giving you the opportunity to buy 200 mm that I think in avifauna make the difference to get closer to the subject, more work fine 810 with a bit9; crop and voila you will have excellent results ... I conclude by saying that I'm very happy to have bought it definitely worth all the money spent ,,, oh I forgot, the sigma gives you in addition a very useful backpack done very well for the goal where there is quietly also the camera body and various accessories, really cool because once I was convinced I had to spend another 200 euros for another backpack compliments Sigma ...
Pros:Quality of construction, sharpness, colors, blurry, lightness, AF.
Cons:Brace a little short
Opinion:A wonderful lens. I tried it in the sports (F1) and naturalistic (safari, mountain hunting) and gave me so much satisfaction. AF always excellent, excellent sharpness also in TA, very natural colors, creamy blur. Fully satisfied. Multiplied with 1.4 Sigma does not suffer from any quality loss, never tested with 2.0. A lens that Sigma adds to its latest excellence both in the S and Art series, since Nikonista must thank Sigma for having produced such high performance and quality, in no way second to Nikkor (in fact). Unique, physiological, I have made the micro-regulation AF for a light front-focus. Stubborn lens!
Pros:Lightweight fire lock on barrel carbon hood light price auto focus lightning
Cons:Maybe only pedestal X stands a bit short
Opinion:Fantastic an absolutely objective to have in my backpack, very clear already at F4, used with 1DX mark2 a sniper, I found particular the ability to block the AF field, using the buttons on the barrel just behind the hood, hood in Carbon light, second With a great alternative, to the most expensive original objectives that cost double .rnThank you even for free-hand use
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
