JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:clarity at all focal points,colors,three-dimensionality, microcontrasto,lightning,fluid manual focus ring
Cons:weight,vignetting
Opinion: the lens is of a stratospheric quality and then concerning the images it churns out creates a certain dependence... I believe that here we are at the top for a handyman 2.8 the quality' I repeat is very high at all focal points, the microcontrastate colors give a remarkable three-dimensionality to the images, the autofocus is a splinter and even in poor light conditions does not miss a shot, the ring of the manual focus is very fluid just touch it and this is a plus especially for those who make video. in my opinion for the price and yield it offers I would say it is must have!
Pros:Just purchased but I can confirm all the positive opinions read, construction, solidity, sharpness, etc.
Cons:I would like to point out the strong vignetting at 24mm... you settle in a click on real pc but it's still very noticeable
Opinion:I sold the 35f2.8 zeiss the 12mm samyang and the 135mm samyang to be able to take this sigma zoom, I am overdone!! At f2.8 the three-dimensionality is fantastic with a depth effect that from really excellent results Weighs a little but goes well.. I noticed that already some small dot of dust has entered and this makes me turn the Optical balls a little to have absolutely!
Pros:Construction quality on the highest levels. Sharpen at all focal points, minimum focus distance. Paraluce finally done properly.
Cons:After using for a long time I found grains of dust under the front lens and this made me infer that there is no proper sealing. I point out that I've always used in the studio so poor nothing. Another factor that I did not like is the color calibration that I found in RAW, to be then arranged in PP compared to original optics.
Opinion:A professional lens for many uses. This lens is the most used in my kit as it allows me to deal with many work situations without the thought of having to change optics. Excellent blurry (clearly not at fixed lens levels) the construction and fluidity of the rings is excellent. The zummare ring is fluid. It has no stabilization but on Sony A7III - on then it's perfect. The focus is fast and hardly wrong, colors and aberrations are normal and easily corrected in posts. Advisable on many occasions where changing optics is problematic. The weight may be excessive but we talk about glass lenses and metal construction, it is not the usual plastic but a lens for even heavy working uses. Close-up focus allows you to make great close-ups to details by blurring and playing with sealing. Excellent lens for ceremonies where speed is essential to capture the highlights.
Opinion:As soon as it came out I already knew it was going to be my favorite lens. The focal length from 24 to 70 is the most used and such a zoom you have to have it. Sharpness is not denied, following the line of Sigma's Art objectives, exceptional. The cost is absolutely reasonable, especially when compared to the GM version of Sony. Weight is not a problem for me, because it is synonymous with quality. The slightest focus distance is the gem that made me prefer it over Sony. Turning to the cons, he suffers a lot from flares, especially if you want to take a shot in the backlight, maybe to a closed diaphragm to get the star effect. The flare in this case will cover most of the photo, with a star effect that will definitely not be pleasant. It's an important factor for me because I do a lot of landscaping, but maybe it won't be a problem for someone else. As far as vignetting is concerned, even with lightroom automatic corrections it is sometimes necessary to make small adjustments in manuals, since under certain conditions and with certain sectarian conditions, it turns out to be excessive. But this could be a problem that only has my lens, so I can't say any more.
Cons:Maybe the footprint\\weight but for a quality lens it's really the least problem
Opinion:Exceptional all-rounder, crisp already at TA, excellent colors, AC practically absent, distortion correctable already in the body machine ... all this combined with an impeccable construction and sense of overall robustness. Of course it is quite bulky and heavy and almost unbalances the A7R2 but still this is the price to pay for a quality lens. Speaking of "price", in relation to the quality offered I would say that we are faced with an excellent deal considering the cost of the GM consideration.
Opinion:I bought this optics as a first purchase from the switch to Sony, my previous experience in this range of focals was with the 24 70 2.8 nikon, and this sigma proves much sharper, bokeh sharper and above all a much more controlled vignette. I have not tried the sony Gm in order to be objective in the E-mount world, but as a first optic I am satisfied with the purchase.
Opinion:Amazing lens, very sharp already at TA, excellently built, very solid, AF very fast and quiet. I thought about it a lot before choosing it compared to Tamron and GM, for me the 4mm at the bottom were fundamental and I preferred it to Tamron sacrificing the significant increase in weight and size, compared to the GM the only real difference is the cost...
Pros:Construction, sharpness, speed in afc, microcontract, colors
Cons:maybe the weight
Opinion:Exceptional lens to be a Zoom!!! I've been using it for a few days on Sony A7RIV and I was really amazed. Colors worthy of a Zeiss, very high microcontract, almost non-existent chromatic aberrations, almost zero flare at all openings. The bokeh is clearly not that of an 85 GM but it is more than good, certainly better than any other zoom I have tried, including gm. I wouldn't know what to ask for more from a lens that costs almost half the 24-70GM and has equal performance if not superior. Ah, focus already from 18cm to 24mm, a bonus not a small feat. I mean, I'm having a hard time getting it off. The only drawback is the weight that obviously with 800 and broken grams is felt, even if it is always well balanced in the car. Compared to the Tamron 28-75 the comparison does not exist.... The tamron in hand looks like a poorly assembled Chinese plastic toy, this all made of metal and super finished instead gives you a feeling of robustness and incredible solidity, by the way it is a made in Japan lens. Also nice is the very gripping petal lampshade.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
