JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Goal that use of A6000, optically I have little to say, it makes photos more than discrete, sharp, does not distort particolarmente.rnLa bill is horrible, it's all of mediocre plastic, except the bayonet. Aesthetically it is the worst I've ever seen slow and worsens the already horrendous Sony.rnrnIo body that I came from fuji I was used at other levels of aesthetic fetishism and materiali.rnMa even the canon or 24 STM 50 STM that are of equal-end lenses price, are much higher as aesthetics and materials.
Cons:Some flare but not much and a slight distortion easily repaired in pp, tends to overexpose a lot in low light.
Opinion:First impression from the use of two half giornate.rnrnQuesto "runaway horse" produces on m4 / 3 very sharp images in jpeg files clearly defined and consistent as long as you know how to manage well the light and diaphragms, thus forcing a lot to play with time exposure, management of light and shade depending on the circumstances, diaphragms and iso ... which I tasted because it brings into play the practice of the operator and to force impratichisce things. It seems to have to do with objectives 35 mm 80s, but with a definition of all respect. The loss of sharpness at the edges and almost irrelevant already in TA. A small lens that makes school ... to make up some bones on the field ... sometimes cursing and other rejoicing. focal ideal for street and photos everyday. I will continue to stressarlo (and stress me) soon to find more merits and limitations. I forgot: im MF the focus ring is very sensitive but very well modulated and precise.
Opinion:I bought qiesta lens about a year ago, and the use of omd EM10 II. Has an exceptional value for money, as the whole series art 60mm and 30mm for m43 ... The sharpness is maximum already at TA, we were stunned, closing improves everything, including some chromatic aberration that occurs at RT. The MAF is fast, and especially the minimum distance is incredible. The only flaw, personally, is the focus ring, smooth, I do not like. Apart from this is an exceptional lens, equivalent to 38mm on a micro four also terzi.Ho the 60mm qiesta series, and even those is exceptional, with a sharpness comparable al75mm ZUIKO. highly Recommended
Pros:Economic. Light. clear optical performance and good contrast.
Cons:Poor resistance to flare. Smooth ring of fire, unintuitive. A mixture of classic and modern performance.
Opinion:I use it on sony a6000. And 'economic well-it built, but remains plastic with metal shell. The autofocus on the Sony is fine, with the limit in pursuit afc with points only on the central stage. It is an equivalent 28mm. In general you will find just the rendering of a classic 28mm to 7-8 items. Vignetting not excessive but visible and less sharp edges up to f5 / 6 - f8, the center already clear at f2.8. There are aberrations, magenta at the edges, particularly in high-contrast areas and in front of the plane of focus. Stopping down everything improves. Resistance to flare, is poor, type of lens hood as supplied (round) helps as little would help, place the screen for reflections on the exit pupil. A good lens, honest as usual Sigma, with outstanding performance, without being special, a bit 'like miniwide series of the last century.
Pros:Value for money, sharpness wide open, weight, hood standard, excellent colors of Oly and Pana, fast AF.
Cons:You have to make your hand to ring for manual focus.
Opinion:Excellent lens nothing to say to try a lens bought cheap and compact, and with great surprise I found a large lens quality! RnNitidezza good already wide open, fast AF, lens hood as standard, extremely compact dimensions, the package is equipped with very accurate even the usual soft case sigma, of course proportionate all'ingombro.rnPer now flaws I found none, perhaps the only thing you have to do some hand to ring the manul focus, as not being milled may be difficult to set.
Pros:Quality / Price ratio - Weight and Dimensions - Equipment - Construction
Cons:CA and distortion (correctable in LR)
Opinion:I chose this wide angle compared to the Sony 16 2.8 for the highest resolution at the edges and especially in the center, where already a TA there is absolutely no comparison. The focus is on rapid and Sony A6000 uses the new hybrid system as the other two Sigma lenses (30mm and 60mm). It's not a monster of sharpness but for the price (paid € 160 new) is the perfect all-rounder. Excellent and impeccable construction equipment (container and lens hood included).
Pros:lightness - image quality - F2.8 - Lens Hood series
Cons:I do not know
Opinion:I have the previous version, with the knurled knob, for Sony NEX. Compact, lightweight, excellent image quality, no distortion. Great as to leave attached to the car for photos from all days of quality. Nell'astuccio black Sigma has also put the hood for a simple object and complete. As said for the 18-55mm sony, even if the card says "NO fulltime MF," setting the machine on focus hybrid between manual and automatic (on camera bodies where this is possible), the ring of focus is always active to fix the focus so full time. Straining can not find the "counter", perhaps the ring of focus in my copy is a bit 'leggerina and little braking.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
