|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on November 15, 2019 Pros: Price, portability, yield, autofocus, Fowa 5-year warranty Cons: Lamplight, vignette, focus by wire Opinion: For sony A7 it is a best buy, in relation to the price I consider it a great lens, to be carried everywhere. The blur is pleasant and the colors do not displease me. The autofocus has never given trouble (only mole: you can hear the sound slightly). It is sold with 5 years of warranty, which should not be underestimated. The only thing I don't particularly appreciate is the lampshade. |
 | sent on November 15, 2019 Pros: compact cheap light in relation to price you can not look for the fur in the egg Cons: the classic exceptions that can be found on economic optics Opinion: if you do not have high claims for what it costs is not bad with a targeted post production many flaws will conceal without too much trouble. An optic that you can buy for those who have expensive and heavy 35 mm to use as a lens to assemble when you want to photograph in conditions at risk of damage to the lens. I used it with the sony A7r III which with this optics takes on the size of a compact. I managed to put it all in the phone bag of the bike. I think that samyang with this lens has hit a double lens that of those who do not want to spend big sums in optics and want a travel optics that marries the philosophies of the mirrorless system and that of those who have challenging and thinking lenses. I for example i have the 35 mm f 1.2 Art which is an opticof great quality but it is certainly not an optic stomp to take around by bike or boat with little money I have an optics that turns my sony into a compact and I do not have to worry about the damage or clutter. For what it costs has a great yield |
 | sent on November 15, 2019 Pros: Compact, light, nice system for lampshade Cons: Vignette, sharp only in the middle, the rest is terrible, AF slow and inaccurate Opinion: A lens for those with little pretensions, it is cheap and cheap. Used with very little satisfaction on Sony A7RII. The sharpness is bad, it only improves by closing to f8. Cartoon and not a little, sometimes it is incorrigible in post. Af... we do not talk about it, slow and inaccurate, it works well only in AFC, otherwise it is wrong, even eye af is poor and slow. The af dive is too soft. In short, avoid if you have already average claims |
 | sent on June 20, 2019 Pros: Cost, quality, blurry great, details. Cons: Nobody Opinion: Purchased a Sony alpha 5100 I found it necessary to enrich the kit with an average daily fixed canvas , so the choice fell on this goal. Great choice over the supplied zoom (16-50). The results are satisfactory and there is a very good chance of blurring. I think I'm unlikely to disassemble this view from mirrorless. |
  | sent on May 16, 2019 Pros: Af fairly precise, compactness, lightness, optical quality Cons: It gives the impression to expire a bit ' to infinity Opinion: Very light, optical quality better than expectations, transforms the A7II into a compact. It holds the backlight discreetly and has a good yield especially in the closer shots, even if it does not have a very relative optical correction. Yet it gives the feeling of kneading the subjects away even in RAW, but maybe it's just my impression. A pancake I could. |
 | sent on April 16, 2019 Pros: Weight, construction, packaging, optical quality, price, Focheggiatura Cons: Vignetting Opinion: I used it still little, but I noticed that on a FF as my a7rII vignette much, I will try to activate the shading compensation in the menu of the machine to see what happens, otherwise I will go to post, without one or the other at F8 there is a vignetting still in my Very obvious notice. Maybe this lens is better suited to an APS-C where I read that much less sticker. I will continue the tests, however, a beautiful optics. |
 | sent on December 17, 2018 Pros: Price, sharpness, final yield Cons: Construction? But you can't ask €200 the moon Opinion: Splendid optics, especially in relation to cost. Used is about €200, and it's worth them all. It's the cheapest Sony lens there is, and it's one of the absolute most lightweight ever built. Sure it's all plastic, but what do you pretend? The metal weighs, Samyang has been shown to be able to produce qualitatively important optics, but in this case it has decided to save both in terms of weight and cost of production (and thus of final sale). It is not a sharp lens from edge to edge, it is not suitable to make night landscape (not to f 2.8, you have to close really so much for a uniformity as it should be and therefore at night it is unusable), it is a nice handyman for street to carry around without many problems. You cannot expect the image quality of a Sigma Art, but it still restores beautiful three-dimensional images, favored by a non-brutal sharpness and an important micro-contrast. In Summary, for street enthusiasts is a must-buy, it costs much less than the Zeiss (which makes its price its brutal flaw), but still given its ridiculously priced I would call it "must-have" for all Sony owners. Samyang if it continues so it can clear all other third-party manufacturers, managing to offer the right product at the right price. |
 | sent on December 16, 2018 Pros: Very small and light, clear at all aperses, satisfying from an aesthetic, economical point of view Cons: Motorized manual focus, lightweight construction, distortion to be corrected in the room or via software Opinion: After two weeks of use I can express a reasoned opinion. The small 35 Samyang works very well and is equipped with very good sharpness, which also expresses at full aperture both at reduced focusing distances, from portrait, and at long distances: overall it holds the comparison with more emblazoned optics, even if I have not Could compare with the direct rival Zeiss. It has good colors, natural tones and all in all if it is in backlight, in which of course loses a little ' contrast. It has a barrel distortion well visible in the raw, automatically canceled in the JPG in the room or in Capture One. The autofocus is not the strong point of this lens: the focus generates a "robotic" noise that is barely perceptible, but unpleasant; The autofocus sometimes wavers and it is difficult to see if it has hooked the foreground or the background; The motorized manual focus for my personal judgement is neither practical nor particularly precise. The lens is equipped with an elegant removable front plastic ring, which allows the use of filters and plugs of both 40.5 diameter and 49mm diameter. It is highly recommended for full-frame sonists who like the 35 focal length and who need to work light and discreetly, maintaining a high quality in street situations, landscape or portrait set. My Rating: 9 |
 | sent on September 29, 2018 Pros: Light, compact and economical Cons: Autofocus noise Opinion: I've taken from a month the A7III and FF lenses really cost so much. I took this 35mm 2.8 which makes the Sony really compact and lightweight, keeping the spirit of a mirrorless alive. The yield is really good, sharp photos, excellent autofocus and also supports the AF on the eyes. Really compact and focal ideal for video and for portraits set. The only note is that it feels a tad bit af when it needs to focus. Nothing worrying but it is right that you know optics recommended. Taken at the end of September 2018 in a physical store at €255, new and with 5 years warranty. |
 | sent on July 07, 2018 Pros: Image quality, weight, price, TA-edges Cons: AF speed at some junctures, AF-C Opinion: I purchased this lens at the time of my trip to Holland, I was eager to have a lightweight handyman to keep mounted on my A7R III and the choice was between this and its direct rival: the Zeiss 35 2.8. After a few ratings on buying the new Samyang or the Zeiss used I decided for Sammy. The lens is presented with a construction that provides plastic materials but well assembled and with a very negligible weight, I find very curious the "lens hood" (problem that unites with its direct rival) as it is a simple plastic ring screwed on the lens. As for the photographic compartment the lens is really amazing: even at TA it maintains a good quality of the edges and if you close 1.5/2 stop it becomes noticeable all over the frame. In AF-S the speed of MAF is really good and always hooks well (except in low light conditions where it suffers not little), the situation becomes a little more problematic when you decide to switch to AF-C: Easily loses the hook and if you use it in video know that You really feel so much. However for the use that I have to do it goes more than good and I can only recommend it, compared to the Zeiss the real big differences that I find are in the price and in the noise of AF while regarding the image quality nothing to say: very sharp files and Clean, the first few times we are amazed at price & weight visas. For me, since I switched to mirrorless, it's together with the Sony 85 1.8 FE a best-buy |
 | sent on November 28, 2017 Pros: Price, image quality Cons: MAF speed, construction material Opinion: Probably the cheapest autofocus lens to match Sony and my A7II, the samyang is really super compact. This can be a double-cut weapon ... small and light but really short in manual MAF and therefore not very convenient. Minimalist dressing, nice clutch bag to store it and keep it when not used. The hood is included but does not have the usual petal shape as many others. Metal baionette but the rest of the plastic body give a minimal and cheap feeling. I did at present a few tests - especially housewives - to evaluate the set of this lens. The image quality is also good at 2.8 and it is getting better and better by closing the diaphragm. I expected better on the speed side of the maf. I knew the limits in af-c management but, I do not care about this kind of setting. Even in af-s in different situations - which were hardly contrasted - he struggled to focus. Probably the scene was not very contrasted and I also disabled the LED illuminator that often helps in thiscases. Not very silent but you have to be aware that it is not ultrasound. The only alternative to the most beautiful sony zeiss 35mm ... very close in terms of quality but, better built (sony). I'm looking to make more shots to evaluate it better. |
 | sent on October 31, 2017 Pros: light, crisp, cheap and uncompromising Cons: Almost unusable in AF-C Opinion: I was pleasantly impressed with this Samyang, transforming the A7II almost into a compact yet maintaining a good image quality. Quite clear already fully open, just close at 5.6 to have a good definition even at the edges. rnAF fast enough if used in AF-S, unfortunately it is almost unusable in AF-C, it never hooks up, it feels the starter move back and forth to try to hook the subject but without success, sin.rnI have never used the direct rival Sony that is definitely better, but considering the price of this Samyang the choice is almost compulsory for an amateur, it saves a decent sum to invest perhaps in other optics. |
 | sent on September 12, 2017 Pros: Light, sharp, very good manual ring ring, very beautiful aesthetically. Cons: Continuous fire that does not work well, not tropicalized. Opinion: The optics are fantastic, economical, lightweight, nice to the touch and sight and above all it's really clear! The continuous fire does not work well, but I notice that if you set face and face detection on your eyes, it improves things a bit! It's great in the videos. I bought it because I did not spend twice on the Zeiss. Fantastic! |
 | sent on August 23, 2017 Pros: Crisp, really a featherweight, fast af and built very very well Cons: Afc works in a very limited way Opinion: The 35 is really a great focal point, which has a unique mood, this samyang is really a great compromise between price and weight quality, an optic that goes unnoticed in the street, good for landscapes and portraits too. Its sharpness is more than good at 2 , 8 to 5.6 - 8 from the best ......... what to turn the mirrorless into a compact with quality pero! |
 | sent on August 21, 2017 Pros: Small, lightweight, economical, sharp to ta, fast in focus, aesthetically very cute. Cons: Afc works in a very limited way Opinion: I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of this goal, despite the fact that it is very economical for a very nice file with a very delicate blur. It makes the a7r2 almost pockety, I carry it in a handbag, where I still have space for 85 1.8, even aesthetically It's very cute and looks good built, quality plastics. Unfortunately, it's not perfect, at least in my machine it works very well in afs afa and dmf but not in afc.rnIn the continuous focus the subject whatever it is is hooked only to the center of the 'Focus area, and then lose focus just as the subject comes out of that area, the same thing happens with eye af, for those who use a lot of AFC is not a good goal, but if they prefer other modes of fire No problem.rnrnApportion of 28.08.2017rnI have realized that by activating face detection, even afc the face is detected and focused in any part of the focus area. |
| sent on August 08, 2017 Pros: Featherweight, compact light and in my hands good to use Cons: Nobody Opinion: Bought for two days and is soon love, I will love the 35 with whom you can do everything, I take it to vacation for this very reason. RnThe use on 7s where it fits perfectly, does not have fast, precise, and silent fastenings on the jumper.rn You can also use it at f16 where it is sharp corner angle and therefore perfect for long, infrared, and of course landscapes.nnnovative Plug that acts as a mini hood and has a plug-in filters of 40.5 extra and free.rn I recommend it to everyone, with what it costs me to Zeiss do not sell it anymore! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
