JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Equal to the Zeiss if not better as optical quality
Cons:AF Noisy
Opinion:An incredible lens, impossible to ask for more from a optics of about €500. It has superb image quality, it is not comparable to the Zeiss not because it is poorer, but simply because "different". It has a more creamy bokeh, we could define more "artistic" than the Zeiss. Obviously has some functionality in less than the latter, such as the various keys on the body and the aperture ring declickabile very convenient. Loses in sharpness but the differences are appreciable only with the sensor 42mpx with extreme crop, on 24mpx are identical. Unfortunately only huge downside is the AF really noisy. It is at the edge of the annoying if used indoors, and absolutely to avoid in contexts where the silence is required. Another big problem is the fact that the MAF is electronic, so even using in manual the Ride ring by wire (very precise compared to a classic) there is the annoying noise of the internal mechanisms. It is therefore the question of advising it or not with respect to the Zeiss, which I find unfortunately overcrowded (although it is a virtually perfect optics). Make your considerations but do not plan to buy the Zeiss for image quality, but for the AF well more usable in working contexts. PS: Note how this lens actually is a 1.2 F and not F 1.4. It seems absurd, but compared with the Zeiss is a more creamy bokeh and a greater light transmission.
Cons:At times, the f (The species af-c) is not very fast - Slightly Noisy, but I okay
Opinion:Originally I wanted to take the optical Sony Zeiss Planar T * 50mm /f1.4. But it costs much more. So I at the Samyang 50mm f1.4 for my Sony Alpha A7SII. I 'amazing perspective, I use a little for everything (especially in street art photography, I do not know if I have written well). The lens quality is impressive, it's not like the zeiss sony, however, the Samyang, is not a view that is just beautiful to see. Everything works great. Perhaps the only fault, it is the autofocus, especially in AF-C, is a slow pelino. But it is the noise of the optical engine is a bit noisy (something when register, is felt), but that's okay. I highly recommend it. Rate 9
Pros:Sharpness in whole opening of the famed Zeiss (which costs 3 times), Three-dimensionality, detail and very good color, accurate autofocus, fast, very real colors, frame everything detailed without points recently nitidi.a low lights can give a three dimensional ' and detail
Cons:I would say nothing to the disadvantage of this jewel.
Opinion:superb optics, the cost to reach for a gem like this, speed 'AF, complete with a hood ... Mr. paraluce..non like Fuji. big house next purchase ... Samyang 14mm, costs little and then move to the background is just as good at Zeiss, comprehensive professional packaging of bag and hood very nice, the mistake of Samyang is the low-cost sales ...
Pros:Sharpness in whole opening of the famed Zeiss (which costs 3 times), Three-dimensionality, detail and very good color, accurate autofocus, fast, very real colors, frame everything detailed without points recently nitidi.a low lights can give a three dimensional ' and detail
Cons:I would say nothing to the disadvantage of this jewel.
Opinion:superb optics, the cost to reach for a gem like this, speed 'AF, complete with a hood ... Mr. paraluce..non like Fuji. big house next purchase ... Samyang 14mm, costs little and then move to the background is just as good at Zeiss, comprehensive professional packaging of bag and hood very nice, the mistake of Samyang is the low-cost sales ...
Cons:Autofocus pelino a slow, but it is not so okay so Ultrasonic
Opinion:I am thrown by failing to advise the riguardo..e me it worked out great. well-made fiber, for the price that makes it so. Excellent risolvenza on my A7 II. I got to try during a Fowa day, the Batis 85mm and, in comparison, Sammy does not disfigured at all in terms of sharpness and faithful restitution of colors .... the Zeiss is prohibitive for me so I hope very much that the Samyang me gifts another 85 AF up optics.
Pros:Price, contrast, sharpness, and construction materials
Cons:Chromatic aberration to TA, AF motor rather noisy.
Opinion:For what it costs, it is worth all the money spesi.rnLeggermente slower AF compared to the competitor (by price range) Zeiss 55mm 1.8. rnHo performed comparative shots between these two approaches can be found here and judge for yourself: rnAlbum Samyang: https://flic.kr/s/aHskKwbJXf rnAlbum Zeiss Sonnar: https://flic.kr/s/aHskKwa1G5rnrnPer be a 50mm f / 1.4 weighs a little too
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
