JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I have the multi-coated auto version. The lens is very sharp and contrasted, it can be used with strong side lights without creating artifacts. On micro4 / 3 the focal length is rather long, but with the stabilization in the car and the small optic weight, it remains easy to use. The focus ring has remained rather stiff, even after careful scrap helium maintenance. Fortunately it's fluid and long so it's still nice to use even on a free hand. I recommend it to anyone looking for a good 135mm bright, hard to expect better for the price it is sold.
Opinion:I recently bought this lens on the bay. The Canon 135mm f2 series L monkey was making heady but could not deal with the shopping after taking the Sigma 24-105 Art, so I decided to give me an idea if the focus was really needed without having to sell the second kidney .rnrnI used it for a few photos "on the fly" outside the door. The manual maf has turned out to be a handicap to which the lens has come up with a fluid and long ring, so that I can focus carefully. I then took it with me for a session of shots at a bar owned by friends and I was amazed that it has not shown aberrations or particular defects, despite the light a bit difficult to handle and I was impressed by the quality of the blur that It will not be comparable to that of highlights and not even Pentacon's 15 blades, but I do not complain at all. This is a "meditation" goal, where shooting preparations are crucial and manageableWith more care than with other lenses. Rnrn For those who want to get an idea about it, I've brought back the most significant images on my profile, in a specially created gallery.
Pros:Compactness and robustness, f2.8, can be found in the new tin of several tens of euros (multi-coated version)
Cons:It suffers from a clear chromatic aberration, the mafier's bell ring
Opinion:Bought on the bay in multi-coated version, so not the bokeh monster version of 16-18 blades, pretty new and paid a nonsense, has a good yield, I fell in love with the 135mm focal (full frame), the reduced number of lamella Is a negligible factor when used in freehand because being free of stabilizer (of course) does not allow the use of short time then compensates by working at TA. Very robust and compact, the multi-coated treatment does not work in a rough way (at least in my specimen) as I often notice obvious chromatic aberrations. I recommend it to those who want to experience long focal lengths at a low price (it's about 40 €) or to anyone who loves vintage. Vote 9
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
