|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on October 17, 2016 Pros: Body well-built machine and tropicalized size and weight .. excellent optical view of the ability to mount even the panasonic-stabilization of the sensor- are obtained excellent images up to 2000 ISO-Price flea today. Cons: Dynamic-range ISO unusable over 3200..monitor low-some keys very piccoli- AF-C really ridiculous resolution .. battery life. Opinion: taken two years ago was my first mirrorless, in some situations I was really happy in other less .. the problem was to use this mirrorless at nightfall .. ISO estate is not really poor compared to my 6D. The RAW pulling out and not very workable especially in the recovery of ombre..lo replaced with Fuji XT-1 I am really better especially in high ISO, where approaches to my 6D .. maybe new Micro4 / 3-f pen mark M1 ii will be better than the first EM-5 but I do not see miracles yet .. |
 | sent on July 17, 2015 Pros: Semi-professional camera and tropical conditions. ISO resilience, compared to the size of the sensor. RAW files that do not require much PP. Fast AF. Stabilizer in the body Cons: Function keys poor, the Fn1 is really hard to get to focus peaking or back focus button. Flash not built. Poor battery life. Opinion: I was skeptical, coming from a good D7000, but I got groped by a used as new with battery grip. The camera is now always close to me, ready to shoot! The thing that most impressed me, is that with the electronic viewfinder before you see exactly how you'll take the photo. To my surprise, I noticed that RAW files are virtually ready for use, can not do what the Nikon, and you can retrieve shadows and details beyond what I would have imagined. The noise seems acceptable, also in consideration of the size of the sensor, and in comparison to the Aps-C to her contemporaneous. I wanted a body with internal stabilizer for use with optical vintage, drop the factor 2x, become medium or long tele: excellent result with time otherwise inuttilizzabili! I found out later that you can easily emulate the Focus Peacking, useful when you do not hurry to shoot with manual focus. The D7000 has a more professional feel, with all the buttons in the right place, menu immediate etc., but this is really a moreccolo jewel, embellished by tilting the display, if you do not have it do not you imagine how convenient. And I want to shoot the video, which I never did before, with the button in handy position, perhaps using one of the funny "Art Filters" rn |
 | sent on February 28, 2015 Pros: small footprint, Art filter, quality 'image Cons: suffers iso after 3200 Opinion: The lens of this trip was to photograph and publish photos with minimal post-production, and have with me a little weight and size of equipment for a 7-day trip that was primarily for relaxation and fun. Olympus is the ideal brand, first for its mirrorless, lightweight, compact, and equipped with the wonderful "art filter" that allow you to take pictures in various stli, with each of the "art filter" with customizable conrnicetta, nuances and shades', and complete shooting with the cut (4: 3, 16: 9, 2: 3; 1: 1); according to the optics, small and bright, with excellent color rendering and definition. For photos taken I kept getting a raw file, always comfortable, to be preserved as a digital negative, and in some cases I used the art bracketing, ie the simultaneous release of all or part of the "art filter" previously selected. In a very sunny country like Mexico, the EVF (Viewfinder eletttronico) is very useful because with the display is difficult. For night shooting not use tripods, so help me freehandgave both the stabilizer, selezionalbile in 3 modes, both the quality 'on the high sensitivity', where I got to shoot at ISO 6400 with some success; 75 mm f 1.8 by itself a beautiful hand. The tiltable display both upwards and downwards provides a step from various points of view. I do not like the video, but the red button visible even in the dark makes you want to catch some video clips with a 'high quality full hd. The 5-om-d em defended itself well, thanks to its weather sealing, on a fine sandy beach where the wind was very strong, and also with splashing water went quiet. The touch screen is fun even for someone like me, it is not practical being accustomed to the reflex, more 'is accurate and fast. The flash adapter is tiny because the power is drawn from the body of the machine, for the very few times I noticed the precision used in the shows. |
 | sent on January 29, 2015 Pros: Quality, weight and size, versatility kit available. Cons: Use menu quite complicated in the case of transactions not repetitive. Opinion: Firm supporter of micro 4/3 for the pros mentioned above. In about two pounds or so it carries a kit "universal" that puts in a position to perform almost EVERYWHERE qualsisi shot type of excellent quality with a total expenditure under 3000 euro. Excellent tool: if the photos do not "are" depends only on the photographer. That is enough, good click. |
 | sent on November 21, 2014 Pros: Build quality in general, lightweight, excellent sensor, good electronic sight. Cons: Small keys, battery life, somewhat cumbersome menu Opinion: I have both reflex (currently Canon 70D) and two micro 4/3 (this and the OM-D E-M1). This machine is a great compromise between "transportability" and quality, once put in the bag it ends that you leave at home the reflex forever (in a single shoulder I can fit both machine bodies with their goals). The software is designed to churn out excellent jpeg already "packaged" with a lot of creative variants for those who do not want to try their hand at post-production. Compared to the older sister and, at reflexes, it is not equipped with the ready-to-use keys that I consider indispensable (ISO, AF mode, Exposure, WB, shooting mode). Another important thing not to be underestimated is the price, thanks to the aggressive commercial policy of Olympus you definitely spend less, at equal quality, than the similar kit of a reflex with the additional advantage that .... at the end of the day your back thanks. J |
 | sent on September 19, 2014 Pros: Small and sturdy, quality construction, 4/3 sensor done very well Cons: Battery Life Opinion: I have a little over a month, and coming from a D700 I was surprised by the files that churns out. Excellent well at high ISO in low-light situations. Coupled with the 17mm f1.8 is a knife! I find that the menu is done well, it's nothing difficult. Position of the buttons convenient, rapid selection regarding options through the LCD while recovering (90% in the use liveview). The only drawback is the battery, but with all the technology that encloses the need to aspettarselo.rnSoddisfatto! |
 | sent on September 15, 2014 Pros: Quality construction, large customization, also valid for the video. A versatile tool. Cons: The gradient AUTO pulls out a little 'noise. Lacks the focus peaking and wi-fi (for which I solved with an SD card eye-fi). Tropicalization not fully exploited due to the limited range of optics also yelow. Opinion: A semi-PRO but that is fine for use PRO where you search for compactness and versatility (photo / video). Great OLED screen that you see in almost all lighting conditions (I wear glasses and for convenience I have never used the viewfinder). The tools of recovery (histogram, high and low lights, levels are useful and comfortable to use). Above 800 iso noise begins to be seen. A 3200 is annoying. Menu complicated but the ergonomics of the buttons and dials, once personalized, is excellent. |
 | sent on March 29, 2014 Pros: Construction and materials; reactivity Af and Af touch, stabilizer on the sensor, weather sealing, good iso 1600 Park optics available Cons: Buttons uncomfortable and small, non-integrated flash, shutter lag, speed of operation, size 4/3 (personal opinion) Opinion: The Omd EM5 is a great car, building care, different features, but frankly I did not have much feeling with the system. The Af it is responsive but the time between pressing the shutter and the actual finger feels. The yield at high ISO is really good and also keeps many details, the stabilizer is really valid. I used the machine for about 2000-2500 shots in RAW and developed; recoveries shadow and lights are not at the level of the D7100 to make a comparison with the car that I had, and even the dynamic seems a bit lower. Altogether it is a valid machine but as characteristics put in the order: construction, features, optical system and after the image quality. |
  | sent on March 01, 2014 Pros: lightness, resistance to rain, stabilizer, electronic viewfinder, good iso Cons: poor battery life, some small frets, menus to be studied Opinion: I have the car with the 12/50 series plus the panasonic 45/200 and after 10 months of use I am pleased to be able to handle better Also I added the grip which moreover gives me the chance to double the battery. I was sick to bring me back several pounds of reflex! I have to thank Olympus have done a small car, light but with the possibility to interchange lenses. For optimal stabilization is possible to make good shots even with time low. Before use, it is advisable to thoroughly study the manual for the maximum yield potential of the machine. Recommended for those who want andae around without weight problems and dispazio. |
| sent on December 16, 2013 Pros: Lightness, resistance to rain (with 12-50), stabilizer body, customizing buttons, dynamic range, resolution electronic viewfinder, jpeg quality, do not need a heavy tripod Cons: LCD with improved resolution, frets a bit 'small Opinion: I have a car with the 12-50 series, and after 6 months of use are soddisfatto.rnGrazie to its wide dynamic range, but that 'you can appreciate just at home on the screen or in print, in weight compared to the yield and quality good resistance to rain, I would recommend it to anyone who wants to enjoy trekking and have good photos without carrying around 2kg attrezzatura.rnPioggia: and 'a great release to give a damn great, I did quietly turned on by pictures in the drizzle, to be turned off in pouch around his neck have been there more 'than an hour in a great downpour in the mountains, no problem. Obviously 'must a filter and a lens stabilizer allows tropicalizzato.rnLo with a steady hand to use really low times and then take pictures in really light conditions scarsa.rnMirino: I am very well, has a good level of detail and also in colors, to move from screen viewfinder use the small key 'cause the proximity sensor' and 'a bit' too sensitive, and 'sufficiently usable even with occhiali.rnSchermo: does its job, it can tilt helps a lot, eventhat it would be better if he could lean down another 30 degrees. The touch screen sometimes just use it to select the point of focus and the size of the current focus. Definition and color rendition of the screen instead are definitely improvable: the digital zoom function for fine focus and practically 'usable only with mirino.rnI keys: you' are actually little ones, especially for those with large hands, sometimes I happen to press REC instead of Fn2 or vice versa, ditto for PLAY and Fn1, however, 'is offset by the fact of being able to customize the function of each button in a body so' compact: you can 'have configured keys simultaneously to access the ISO , White Balance, zoom, play, flash, burst / self-timer, type of setup fuoco.rnLa battery lasts long enough to make us a trek of two days, but 2 batteries rise every thought :) rnL'ostacolo more 'big. with the 12-50, and 'non-urban night photography (landscapes or sky): difficult to focus if you do not have a bright star or a lighthouse in the distance as riferimento.rnL' only thing that I miss veramente compared to where I used the Canon CHDK, and 'a timer to trigger every X in automatico.rnIn last, though not negligible for those who go to the mountains, as you can stand' also use things like a cullmann Nanomax 250 (1.1 kg ) without stability problems', and thus save more weight in zaino.rnNOTA WELL: before use, and 'imperative to read this manual completely, and then configure it according to your needs and only lastly you can' enjoy this marvel, otherwise can 'be really tricky to use. |
 | sent on September 06, 2013 Pros: Weight and Size, excellent stabilizer, jpeg quality, fast and accurate autofocus, white balance perfect, rnpossibilità to see the photo in every parameter before shooting, also excellent in manual focus, tropicalizzata.rnrn Cons: You enter a completely different world from the normal reflex aps-c.rnNessun against. Opinion: Congratulations to that with the Olympus OM-5 has created an excellent car travel, with reduced weight and size plus the ability to change lenses, you can always take home photos. Unlikely wrong fire and in case of rain being Tropicalised you can safely continue taking pictures, very useful for those who make trekking.rn |
 | sent on August 15, 2013 Pros: The pros have already been mentioned by other forum members, with which I fully agree. Cons: Zoom with low light, but then to maintain compactness and ergonomics of the mirrorless system, do not believe can be differently. The keys are very small and close together, other criticism on the menu ': a little confusing, but with some effort you are unable to extricate themselves in the system. Opinion: After I "broke" the weight and overweight and related reflex optics and systems canon, nikon that, yesterday held at the total system oly .... well I just did some test shots, just to take a little ' practice .... what to say: handy, light, files that generates nothing to envy at least as regards the APSC .... even at high ISO noise generated is not so intense and unmanageable in PP .... |
| sent on May 04, 2013 Pros: Lightness, construction, quality files, image stabilization system. Cons: Battery life, operating speed good but room for improvement, addictive :) Opinion: With today I bought my second OMD ... For years, Oly was the true extent of my photographic mind (what little I have ..), tired of the rumors that have made me switch from the 4:3 to other brands, either because driven by the beats of the companions of photos you want desire for change, in the end I always found myself back on Olympus. With the birth of the Micro and subsequent growth, the company is committed and issued a 'good car that looks good at all with its rivals ... Body robust and waterproof, operating speed fine (although improved), held at high iso (exploitable at least until 2500) and image stabilization system among the best ... Last but not least, the quality of some otiche that allow you to the peaceful use of the same in the field of vocational (goals tilt apart and photo hunting penalized for now ..). I sincerely hope that Olympus continues to churn out products like this! Super recommended. |
 | sent on May 03, 2013 Pros: Dimensions and weight almost compact system antimosso very effective, fast autofocus and very responsive to all the abundance of electronic, touch-screen display crisp and precise, park quality optics without bleed out, rotatable display, jpg files usable without further changes in PP, always optimal sharpness and contrast even in RAW, sensor cleaning with ultrasound, high ISO levels of the best APS-C, Flash access, high customization features, full HD video than many dedicated cameras, range shooting. Cons: Management menu "messy" buttons arranged with improved ergonomics, support for AC correction Raw only with dedicated programs, improved dynamic range, extended depth of field if you do not use optical lumoinose or tele, EVF that automatically activates too easily. Opinion: Many advantages and few defects if I have to summarize the 9 months of fun with this fotocamera.rnProvengo from FF 24Mmpx and for having made a leap in half size I left behind a lot of mistrust and difficulties iniziali.rnPer my limited experience I have say that you will be disappointed and you will fall in love with the ease sistema.rnLa technology has run its course, and the sensors are always improving and this camera is a response to those who criticized the Panasonic philosophy of its sensors. The only limitation is the physical depth of field inherent in the system that will never be at the level of a FF but the downside is that in low light conditions already allows all the focus where instead with the FF had a duty to treppiede.rnPiccola, responsive and always in action, never replace a FF in all your photos where the depth of field is a must but in travel photos or street where you need discretion speed and agility is a real gem and notwithout it you will know meno.rnIl electronic viewfinder is also valid if it can not compare to the pure optical but also allows the "previews" impossible except through this technology and there is still room for improvement. rnIl sales success worldwide is deserved, not only for innovation in the market segment but also for the quality it promises and does not disappoint mai.rnSe I have to leave a negative note is for the management menu that often put me in trouble : abbreviations that are associated with customization of the buttons create vortices in doubt use unraveled only after a re-reading the instruction manual. rnUna camera friendly little user.rnSarebbe the perfect camera with a hybrid AF system logic easier in the menu .. but in any case you will not be delusi.rnConsigliata for everyone! |
user5087  | sent on April 27, 2013 Pros: Machine body is very compact, but still conveys a sense of solidity. Lightweight optics. Menu commands fast and intuitive. Excellent image quality. Cons: Control keys fast maybe slightly smaller. Opinion: Happy owner of a Nikon D7000 and a park optics of all respect and for all tastes, but the weight of which he broke his neck and threw myself back on this mirrorless. I saw her for the first time to a photographer friend (former owner of a Canon 5D mark II and also in this case of optics of all respect), and I started to think about it. For months I read the reviews, the pros and cons of this system. And then I decided. And at the moment I would not go back. I have yet to get the hang of, because for the moment I have not had favorable opportunities to exploit it properly, but the few shots that I did made me happy with the choice. Not to mention the lightness of the whole photographic industry. I went from a camera kit with that camera body and four lenses weighed almost 3 pounds in a camera kit that the same optical weighs only 1 chilo.rnAvevo need to have with me all the optics so as not to get in front of photographic opportunity, unawares of what I needed. And I think I made the right choice. Many argue that the system and the qualityimage may not be at par with my previous D7000. I have never criticized this machine but gave satisfaction truly remarkable. But for my needs and the needs everything began to be too unbearable. And seeing the pictures taken with this small mirrorless I can not find the criticism from moving. You just have to take my hand. In the past I went from Canon to Nikon and I had trouble but then I was able to pull off something decent and I hope it happens even now. My advice .. for those who want a quality machine with optical respectable and you can always have with them their dowries without making choices due to the weight or space .. the little OMD is the right choice. |
 | sent on April 26, 2013 Pros: Dimensions and weight, image quality, system stabilization and tropical conditions, product features and functionality from "semi-pro", a large park optical yield high iso, retro aesthetic (for me is a plus), live view screen and high-quality yield (pure touch), autofocus commendable, physical dials to adjust exposure time, aperture and shooting mode. Cons: Obviously being small is being appealed worse than a big body, the menu is a bit 'hard-working, the buttons are too small and rubbery. Opinion: I travel often for work and I love to shoot in motion in his spare time, so I was tired of the weight and footprint of my 7D and related optical so I made the purchase of the OM-D. The reviews are all flattering, nevertheless I was surprised by the performance of this product. Truly a gem, nothing to add! My previous mirrorless, ever since I used because it was too far from the 7D, it is light years away from this. The OM-D both in quality and functionality is really very close to a reflex of a good standard for a simple photo amateur like me is a really superb product. Really amazing stabilizer, an impressive effectiveness, enables handheld shooting in situations really impossible for other equipment! RnPenso that from now on I will leave home very often the 7D! RnrnGrande Olympus! |
| sent on April 08, 2013 Pros: compactness and lightness of body and of ottiche.rnqualita 'image with elevati.rntropicalizzazione iso image stabilizer and autofocus OLED viewfinder and monitor fast. Cons: I do not know Opinion: are appassionatissimo photography, and also very demanding I must say that I found this om-d even exceeded expectations and 'a great machine with a huge weight and extremely compact compared to traditional DSLR consider the catafalchi.rnpoi as I wrote in the pro the quality 'of the images the excellent behavior with low lights and tropicalization used heavily during the last nevicate.rnottimo too fast autofocus and image stabilizer on 5 assi.rnottimo also the viewfinder and monitor oled. |
 | sent on February 14, 2013 Pros: Construction and sealing, small size, stabilizer, electronic viewfinder, menus and focus on touch screen, focus lightning, double ring, tilting screen, high ISO noise and lots of other little things. Cons: Just keep it in the grip with one hand, the arrangement of keys a little too "compact", lack focus peaking Opinion: As a former owner of the Canon 30D I can not be satisfied, the IQ is comparable to any SLR aps-c in circulation and perhaps even the operating speed. The stabilizer is extraordinary in my opinion recovers 4 stops and also on the focal length makes its effectiveness. One of the strengths of the OM-D is portability: a housing compattona there is the machine with the 12-50 and a pancake (another point in favor of the system m4 / 3 are the objectives, all compact, lightweight and high quality). The noise at high ISO I was not satisfied, the grain is fine and no special artifacts. The electronic viewfinder has a 1.15x magnification and allows you to focus when focus by hand without the magnification feature. Let defects: to maintain a design original OM has been sacrificed handle that is "slippery", not as material but as a form, making a battery grip "necessorio" (by the way, in this case the BG is divisible fantastic, sooner or later I'll buy it). The buttons are sometimes too small / neighbors / inditches, nothing dramatic but ... Another shortcoming is the lack of venial focus peaking, riddled as it is with last generation electronic effort could not. |
 | sent on January 29, 2013 Pros: Pros: Light weight, small size, 5-axis stabilization, image quality, high efficiency even with 6400ISO, 9 frames / sec, C-AF Tracking superlative, Live-View with touch-screen, electronic viewfinder with pre-visualization effect balance white correction + lights / shadows + level, fixed targets bright, large dynamic range, lens adapter for 4/3 and OM, the only mirrorless tropical, etc. Cons: Cons: zoom low light Opinion: I write the same things as Savior because I agree in full what he writes, the lightness and the quality of construction and the operational qualities for me are favolose.rnI results are truly excellent, the cost to bring in a park not optical fantastic touches of 1 / 3 the cost of the same park on full frame or apsc.rnUn optical lens as the 100/300 4,0-5,6 (200-600) and a zoom lumix not very bright but a 600 5.6 in full frame as would be the weight ratio of brightness? rnSono really happy I'm in love with this car and I decided to replace my D300 excellent, but I made a nice change. |
 | sent on August 22, 2012 Pros: Stabilization of the sensor, Burst two thresholds up to 9 shots / sec, JEPG clean and brightly colored, well-workable RAW and with an excellent dynamic range, high output up to 800ISO and good until 3200ISO, size and weight, adjustable monitor , autofocus in live-view and contrast among the best (2012), fully customizable via the menu, tropicalization. Cons: Park optics limited and lack of remote lights, bizarre and unintuitive menu, AF does not work with gusts greater than 5 shots / sec, difficulty MAF manual in case of very low light and with heavy use becomes tiring holding it. Opinion: A great car the E-M5. Over the years I have passed under the hands of virtually all machines m4 / 3 manufactured by Panasonic and Olympus and I can say that this little gem is a step forward at all, but from here to say that it can replace a DSLR use professional there passes. I would like to do a little analysis starting right on the image quality, which is really very high, I would say easily on par with a 7D. A FF as the 5DMKII manages to pull off some shade more, but we're talking about subtleties. JPEG files are clean, bright colors and pleasant, the RAW instead need a good pass to PP but you can also recover photos heavily underexposed. Worthy of note is the excellent work on the sensor (made by Sony) for the noise reduction: up to 800ISO there is no difference with a 5DMKII (I did not think the images of DPReview and instead I had to change my mind). However, even in 3200ISO the grain is not annoying and you can easily removewithout losing too much detail. Above ... only for emergencies. As far as the mere mechanical performance, the award is up to the EVF / live view: really great. Even in low light there are no trails or false color and, except take pictures in a dark room or the stars at night, making it virtually impossible to focus, there is no difference with the pentaprism viewfinder of an SLR. Excellent also the burst, not only for the maximum speed of 9 FPS, but also for the fact that is customizable with two thresholds, whose value of FPS can be set using the menu. The contrast AF instead of suffering in some situations (subject to uniform color, strong backlight, low light), but in other cases it is very fast and accurate. If conditions are optimal then the MAF is almost instantaneous without hesitation. A sore point is that it is disabled in the burst faster than 5 FPS, and sports photos for the E-M5 is sconsigliata. At the software level, the menu is chaotic and not very intuitive, but it allows the customization of almost all physical buttons on the machine. For me, also its greatest value (miniaturization) is also a drawback: the controls are very close and intensive use is not a simple press of a button at a time, especially with their own hands by little woman Japanese. In conclusion, it is a great car but the lack larger than a traditional SLR camera is the optical park: but the last fixed zooms are still at the "amateur". I hope that the two objectives announced by Panasonic (the 12-35 f/2.8 and the 35-100 f/2.8) arrive early and do not betray the expectations. Then again, in my opinion, can not replace a reflex "profescional" as 7D, 5D, 1D or worse. But for street, Sunday outings, evenings with friends or family is perfect. |
  | sent on August 16, 2012 Pros: Extreme portability and lightness, both the body and the optics, 9 sec ftg fast tracking, correction of lights, stabilization in the camera body with the benefits resulting from it. Optical high quality and according to tradition lumunosità Olympus.Lettura Raw a bit complicated, at least for me. Confidence in the brand that this room has set a specific target. Cons: Electronic viewfinder which must do the habit. For professional use I do not feel usarla.La miniaturization has reached the maximum, those who want to stay light has to give up something, you can not have everything. aspect of the camera as retro and attractive is not reassuring and does not go beyond the simpaticità product. The Park and optical accessories is very limited. Opinion: In the opinion of the Olympus OM-D E M5 is implicit in the question: should break your back with heavy cameras? Looking at the pictures that the aforesaid equipment generates, answer truthfully. YES Does just effortlessly. Recommended for those who want to experiment with a new product, or want to play out slowly from the craft and relax. |
| sent on July 20, 2012 Pros: Lightweight, compact design combined with robust construction, magnesium alloy body and especially to tropical autofocus lightning in all lighting conditions, virtually no noise up to 800/1000 ISO, excellent management until 3200 and also very good at 6400 iso , excellent AF-C tracking, unique 5-axis stabilization system works spectacularly speed 'operational 9 frames per sec.riprese video magnificent, excellent management and quality' in both jpeg in Raw, definitely excellent viewfinder and sharp even in low light, inltre information-rich, high-quality touch display 'very good. Cons: As far as I'm concerned none of relief, and 'a new system and as a first approach to define the product unique and quality' really beautiful at 360 ° .. Opinion: I think the OLYMPUS OMD EM5 a unique product and superior to restricted competition, its success and 'due largely to the huge demand that prompted both domestically and not, the Japanese are' really doing major numbers that recall the success output in 1972 of the OM series, which gave much trouble to the competition of the time, it happens in the first place CANON and NIKON. Personally, I use to work also with bodies CANON 7D - 1D Mark III - 1D Mark IV with different optics, but I must admit that I prefer to take the exit of the WCO with the latter usually harbor with me 3 complete bodies of battery pack + 10 / 11 optics and everything weighs as much as a MARK IV equipped with the zoom 70-200 IF L II, for what concerns the quality 'not nothing to envy to the big market, I believe that only the FF sensors can really make a difference . Over the years I've gone from embracing different genres to CANON NIKON OLYMPUS four thirds and to another, but the quality 'of this camera leaves you flabbergasted, and many of my professional friends have been banned in the view filesthis jewel can bake, characterized by dynamic range and a micro-absolutely gorgeous. Another praise the quality 'optical undisputed Zuiko lenses for Micro Four Thirds that sometimes come at a cost equal to one third of the houses more' noble but with a quality 'truly amazing. Now you can not 'nothing but wait for Photokina where for sure there will be new news' and also' to confirm that the system is' young and growing, but that the product 'can, in my opinion to tackle any photographic situation, from reportage to landscape, fotonaturalistica (pending optics right) to the photo studio etc etc without any limitation. |
| sent on July 19, 2012 Pros: size, weight, image quality, image stabilization, screen, building, park lenses. Cons: ring secondary pulsed play fn1 and placed in position improved. activation sensor with digital viewfinder "shot too." Opinion: Owner of a 5d mark II, tired of bring on the "rump" too much weight and bulk, I buy the 'om-d ... fantastic body, light and compact, full of buttons (for a mirrorless), built in magnesium and also weather sealed! The menus are less aesthetic and clear of nikon and canon but feature-rich, the stabilization is effective, if we count the advantage of always stabilized mount optical lenses consist of groups less complicated and even cheaper ... does not seem bad! The display less detail than some competitors, made amends in terms of convenience, that is, with the ability to focus and snap directly on it being touch, and is also more overhead. AF good level of speed and accuracy even in low light (comparable to that phase of many reflex) but your self-interest is very dynamic photos with subjects ... forget the 'om-d! Coming to the point, the quality of 'image of the kit om-d + 12-50 compared to my 5d II + 24-105 and absolutely comparable, although less expensive optics and a smaller sensor I find that olympus has more optical quality and range dynamic, and has made a big step forward with respect to the noise, not even comparable to the full frame but certainly compared to the aps-c. Make sure to read the various reviews like digital camera, etc. all photographers ... is even really worth spending so much $ $ $ for a full frame + optical?? |
 | sent on July 13, 2012 Pros: Jpeg high quality raw much poison, light weight, outstanding ergonomics, very attractive retro design, can be used by advanced photographers and beginners, excellent performance at high ISO, customizable menu and very comprehensive, high-level stabilizer, tropicalization, fast autofocus even in low-light conditions. Cons: The raw is read only with the latest versions of Adobe Photoshop cs6, elements 10, lightroom4.1. Supplied software that can give you installation problems, especially with a view, menu is not always intuitive, optical kit is not exceptional, f3: 5 Opinion: The Olympus OM-D is a fantastic camera: light, compact, although a micro 4/3 has nothing to envy to the prosumer SLR, to put it as D-Prewiew: if you want superior image quality with this camera you will have to spend a lot more for a camera, because you'll need a full frame. Has a fleet of high-quality optical equipment, and if coupled with the Summilux Panasonic Leica 25 F2, you will have in your hands a real gem. (Personally I like fixed lenses because they allow me to think more about the composition) For me it is finished the time of the reflex bulky and very heavy then use once a year if all goes well. The small house of Olympus is one of the best cameras Micro4 / 3 around, you bring back more often, not heavy and is in a small bag, is very quiet and discreet, the black board for those who make street. . If I have to make comparisons with other mirrorless: Xpro1 probably has a slightly higher image quality (especially in sharpness and Raw) but has a lower and few autofocus lenses, even if those who are top notch, but it also costs the double. The Nex7 has a larger sensor, but a design from "box engaged with a can of coke" (definition not mine, but the CEO of Leica), and an optical kit significantly lower than that offered by OM-D and this camera costs about € 400 more. |
| sent on June 18, 2012 Pros: Light weight, small size, 5-axis stabilization, image quality, high efficiency even with 6400ISO, 9 frames / sec, C-AF Tracking superlative, Live-View with touch-screen, electronic viewfinder with pre-visualization effect white balance + correction lights / shadows + level, fixed targets bright, large dynamic range, lens adapter for 4/3 and OM, the only mirrorless tropical, etc. Cons: Zoom dim Opinion: I bought the OM-D for use as a second body (after the E-5), I realized that by now has become the first body and the E-5 is the second! Even fellow users of Canon / Nikon have wondered for outstanding performance in the field of this little gem ..... OLYMPUS At this point, you need to spend so much money reflex heavy / bulky / expensive? |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
