|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on August 26, 2021 Pros: Construction, low iso image quality, functionality, weight, ergonomics, amount of customizations and keys Cons: quality that degrades conspicuously with the increase of ISO (>1600), Autofocus not very performing, too many keys that can be accidentally pressed Opinion: Driven by the emotionality and the need to further reduce the weights of my Fujifilm kit (with which I have always had a perfect feeling), I sold all the previous equipment and took this camera by adding top optics such as the 7-14, the 12-40 and the 100-300 panasonic. What you immediately notice, is the care and quality of the materials together with the feeling of robustness due to a body built well and that is perfectly held in the hand without the need for additional grips. The autofocus coming from X-T3 I found it poorly performing, with shots often not in focus and a disappointing af-c (at the levels of an X-T2, perhaps even worse in AF-S). What made me turn up my nose is not so much the noise that occurs above 1600iso, but the quality of the same. On fuji I also shot at 6400 iso (in the gallery I have a landscape photo made at 6400 iso) getting clean images and with a pleasant noise. With the oly unfortunately even at 3200 iso there is an intrusive noise, full of dead pixels (even after remapping the same), especially if you make long exposures. Feeling limited by the sensor and an af not up to par, I gave everything away (fortunately without losing out, having bought used), and took a Sony a6500 that despite having a larger sensor, even has weights and dimensions smaller than m4/3. The question I asked myself is: is it worth investing in the m4/3 when you find more performing machines with a lower weight/ size ratio and now comparable costs? For me the answer is no. Of course, for those who work in extreme conditions and at low iso, the strength and weather resistance factor makes the system a valid choice. We hope that this system will not be abandoned in the future. |
  | sent on July 30, 2021 Pros: robust, space burst up to 20 fps, imperceptible silent shooting, the 20mpx is definitely better than the 16, a pleasure to use Cons: expensive, battery different from the other oly omd10 and epl, flash cumbersome, af good but not too much Opinion: opinion in 2021. they are used but almost new between 600 and 800 euros. in general it is a great machine. very high operating speed, crazy burst at 20fps. the 20mpx is definitely better than the old 16. alone does not justify the investment but that 25% more px help a lot. the af I find it good but not surprising. compared to a classic 7d type reflex is still behind in the moving shot. on still subjects it is fine and is precise. overall it is a very robust and compact machine with which to make great tours in nature or in dirty places. it is still worth buying it. |
 | sent on July 30, 2021 Pros: ergonomics, operating speed, viewfinder, stabiilzzatore Cons: Totally posable screen Opinion: Really performing machine the Em1 mkII where the first limit is perhaps just who uses it. I will always put the stabilizer among the pros for a simple reason: many are realizing how useful it can be [stabilizes any mounted lens] and I often read comments about new models that do not have them: "... but the stabilizer is missing, they could put it...." so I can only think that those who initially despised... It confirms how good / excellent there was on the MK1 and increases in AF speed, burst, ergonomics always top with buttons and rings in the right place ... too bad for the joystick put only in the mk3. Viewfinder beautiful wide and defined. Note out of tune for me was the screen fully articulated ... I always ended up opening and closing it and in the long run it could cause trouble. Much better the classic tiltable than for simple use type cockpit, just tilt it instead of rotating it outwards which also increases the dimensions a lot. However, really good as a photographic medium. |
 | sent on May 05, 2021 Pros: Autofocus speed, perfect handle, many customizable keys,stabilization Cons: I don't find honestly, maybe the great depth of field that goes to the disadvantage of the portrait painter fixed for the exasperated bokeh but goes hand in hand with the landscaper and reportagist. Opinion: My advent to the mirrorless world going from Nikon d750 and d600 that I still own, happened with this little monster of technology. I have to say that I really believed in the micro 4/3 world and in particular olympus. Aesthetically these machine bodies I find them fabulous and every button put in the right place, very rich menu and I must say that initially I had some difficulties attributable more than anything to the translation of the menu into Italian. Very fast in the burst, in the autofocus and also in reviewing the photos taken.double slot... what to say, bordering on perfection then beautiful colors. |
 | sent on July 16, 2020 Pros: Lightness Comprehensive optical park and transportability Ease of use Cons: It is not an FF and getting used to the medium-small size and lightness takes some time. Opinion: When I travel I use this and two Pen F together with the 12-40 Zuiko, the 25 mm and the 40-150 (which I use very little ). Sometimes I also photograph with Panasonic 8-18. The results have always been more than satisfactory. For my needs it is great! I also have a Nikon D3x with several fixed targets, but I no longer take it on trips. I use it for sheer pleasure, or rather to remember past times. Good photography to all |
 | sent on September 13, 2019 Pros: Compactness, ergonomics, battery life, speed, menu completeness (although a bit messy), build quality, great system size compromise/image quality Cons: AF not at the level of the latest competitors, Sensor... Opinion: After using Nikon FF for years (D700 and D610) I came across an Em5mk2 and fell in love with the M43! Slowly I sold all the Nikon kit and I went totally to the M43, I had so many bodies and dozens of optics, and I can say that the Em1mk2 is the best M43 ever! I've never tried the G9 and I keep out the Em1x... but I think even feeling my feeling stays the same... It's an exceptional machine, ready responsive, with the battery that really lasts an infinity... the controls are perfect, all in their place and the dials are spectacular... The dimensions are perfect, nor too small as the Em10/Em5 and too big as the old reflexes... Perfect! The yield is the best of all the machines I have tried to date (em5mk2, em10mk2, g80, gx9, gx7, Pen F) the sensor holds up to 6400 iso and the recoveries are great! The AF is great, very responsive and fast in both afc and afs, the Traking works well, the eye facial recognition is not bad, although that Pana is another level... In my opinion, considering the release date, the car is perfect... certainly today in 2019, with the latest releases of Sony and Fuji, it takes Olympus to give a jolt to two fundamental factors: the AF that must absolutely improve especially in eye/face recognition, and the sensor! The sensor of the M43 we know is not and will never be an FF, but it takes the next generation to take a decisive step forward, as made to high ISO and Dynamic Range! I repeat, I am not asking for a level of the A7III, but I would like to see a decisive leap forward, not the very small improvements that we propose every time... if they can play the game well the M43 can have its say for many years, otherwise I see it hard... the competition is now fierce... |
 | sent on July 24, 2019 Pros: Great grip, size, weight, build quality, image quality, improved high iso hold, excellent battery life, great continuous car focus Cons: No one who is not just a subjective perception Opinion: I'm a digital Olympus user since 4/3 with the e-1 and that I started with the micro from the first Pen. Over time I pulled up in kit made of bright fixtures and zoom pros in addition to having had the em5, the em1 first series, the em5 second series and now the em1 second series, this to say that I know what I talk about when I express myself on the Olympus also because over time I got to to also try several full frames without ever falling in love with the format though. The em1 mark 2 is perfect for those who learn to use it and for those who know how to manage the hold at the high iso of the sensor through a correct exposure of the scene, I say this because I read everything and more and then I wonder if people know how to photograph or not. Up to 3200 iso files are great if you know how to expose it properly, at 6400 the noise is there but it is well workable in post production. Personally I never needed to go beyond the 3200 iso in my life and space from weddings to sporting events as a type. Of course, I think it is logical that if you spend more than 1,000 euros on a machine in front of you put adequate lenses and not those of the kits otherwise it is useless to talk about it. Finally we are with the battery, before I always had at least 4 in my bag, today with 2 I'm in place and the second sometimes I don't even have to use it. The stabilizer is as always the best on the market, thanks to the smaller sensor definitely and with the canvases is a boon. The grip is finally worthy of the name and I do not find my little finger twirling in a vacuum. Even the continuous self focus has finally made that leap forward that had been expected for some time although of my work almost always on the single focus that is lightning. My dream remains the body of the e1 of the old 4/3 with inside the heart of this em1 2 for ergonomics and beauty but also so we are. |
 | sent on February 06, 2019 Pros: Crazy stabilizer, focus, AF tracking, iso up to 4000 more than acceptable, live comp, hi-res, sniper burst, menu (just study it) appropriate and comfortable commands, TROPICALIZED, in hand falls well, construction, weight, optical viewfinder, 4K video, double slot. Cons: so far I can only say that when you wave on the front control wheel you easily touch the shutter button. Opinion: i'm going to have the 4/3 sensor first: I have this Oly after the mark 1 and the 10 mark II that I still have in my kit. This little gem I liked right away, I immediately know the speed and precision of the focus, even while frame from the crosshairs I can move area AF from the pad of the display (crazy) the Tracking AF does not give up the grip easily (perhaps in some difficult cases with little light). The knockout stabilizer, freehand photographer up to 13" without noticing any micromove (it seems to me a dream). Gentle and non-aggressive Iso up to 3200/4000 but with dedicated optics (sigma 30 mm 1.4) on this machine you almost forget them. The live comp is useful, never under/over. HI-res I tried this new element on this OLy PAZZESCO better than my Nicon D750 (only thing trespassing obligation) a resolution and range excellent (I print large-format digital photos) I tried to print with my plotter and I am very satisfied. Comfortable and really responsive controls, those who say that the menu is messed up have not studied it enough once you enter the OLy optics all clearer and faster, every now and then reset all functions and with 5 min refit everything. It falls well in the hand, the crosshairs excellent. It produces RAW and other softw HHRs. SODDISFATTO POSSO DO A LAST MY CONSIDERATION: those who despise it will surely have a 5/6000-dollar machine in their hand and then take crap photos, bha!!! |
 | sent on February 02, 2019 Pros: ... All, resolution, scream stabilization, compactness and transportability, operating silencing.. Etc Cons: Little things and/or trifles that some people try to aggravate, (perhaps for some form of profit)... Opinion: Now I've tried many, the last brand was the Fuji. Nothing to say about the quality of its optics, but everything has changed since I found, to my enormous disappointment, a series of micromossi images that I adored.... Well, blessed that day that I got convinced by friends to buy the brand OLY with its stabilized bodies, from that moment around the world of images that I snapped has changed, but in particular I add to that host of amateur photographers and even Enthusiastic professionals of the excellence of Olympus stabilization. Street shots Freehand at 1/5 of a second, are beautiful and perfect almost not to believe, then its PRO lenses do the rest, let alone with the new flagship that in this field waste all. A news eye also to the silent operation that brings me back to my mind my Leica M6... I must also say that the quality 4/3 is enough and advances in my opinion to the vast majority of amateur photographers. This confirmed by some professionals who also do services for National Geographic... |
 | sent on December 03, 2018 Pros: Construction, controls, features (addictive), Optical park, price of the system, weight Cons: If the high ISO yield is comparable to that of an APSC, the dynamic range is not yet Opinion: Held 3 months, tested in depth during a photo trip of 10 days in Tenerife, where it was taken sand, brackish water, waves, wind and cold: never a hint of fatigue, even after having practically dipped for 20 seconds: clean and broken without flinching. From this point of view perhaps the most durable camera I have had. Sold unfortunately because the illusion to carry less weight with a yield "almost" FF was soon betrayed: I snapped (strictly in ORF) of the net backlight, and where with a FF, but also with an APSC, I would have recovered Benone, here I failed to Recover even Benino. Satisfied instead of the high ISO, on these were made some nice steps forward. For me, to date, the system is not yet mature enough at the performance level, to replace a FF system, also considering the price of the machine body only, if you work in the Landscape. I find it suitable for photos in controlled light conditions (study) or, considering the ratio price-magnification, to those who make naturalistic (you can have a 300 F4, equivalent 600 F4, at a quarter of the price of any other similar focal of any other brand On the market). In this case, features such as the 18fps, the possibility to record the shots as soon as it is focussed (even before you crush the shutter button thoroughly then), the strength of the body, the quality of the lenses, and the yield to mid-high ISO, can make the throat of those who do not It wants or can no longer carry the following kg and kg of equipment. For me to postpone when it will have a really competitive sensor, the system has the cards in order to trouble the older sisters! |
 | sent on July 05, 2018 Pros: Weight, footprint, value for money, ease of use, intuitiveness, menu for many complicated but I find it full of possibilities and customizations (just study), quality files, many Olympus and good optics, image stabilizer, shutter Electronic, Live comp, hi-res, viewfinder, LCD screen, focus bracketing and stacking........... much more. Cons: High ISO limits over 3200-6400 the decay quality would be nice but they serve big sensors.... or other technologies that are coming. I would have liked to have many less objects for the conversion of JPG (filters art a iosa and more are all included in the software of the smartphone, there were enough no?) and have Allmeno 3 other positions customizable on the mechanical selector, those that the I would have used all... Opinion: For me a very nice camera, it makes me take pictures that with others I did not do (I come from Canon, 70D, with 4 optics is not much but.... ah anyway had the sensor that is almost double but the image quality of the Olympus the waste). It allows me a fluency of use which is a pleasure and makes me photograph a lot of fun. I like to have a very nice kit of optics and have the possibility to put them all in a bag that weighs less than the same with the kit Canon inside. It is small, discreet, it does not make you look like a paparazzi and then to make beautiful pictures always counts and especially the handle... (which I do not have...) |
 | sent on June 23, 2018 Pros: Speed and reactivity Autoficus. Very manageable noise up to ISO 3200 (I have them default as Max Range) with filter off, obviously shooting in RAW. Coming from the E-M1 (November 2013) sturdiness and manageability. Cons: I should say no, although compared to the first version more than the pixel increase I would have preferred a viewfinder a little more resolute, say on the 3.36 K instead of still the current 2.36, even if this to take great photos enough already. Opinion: But if there are even people who even landed by the FF systems recognizes a vast amount of merits, not least the very low noise and speed AF. It makes me strange that there is always someone who despise, because either he does it on purpose or photography should be his last beach. If it were for the first case would prevail the bad faith, while for the second there are disposable cameras, not even smartphones, as these also require a... "Minimum" of cognition. |
 | sent on June 23, 2018 Pros: Construction, AF, file quality, responsiveness, viewfinder, display. Cons: menu that as for the Mark 1 seems written by a drunk. Opinion: I start to say that those who do not recognize any merit, those who define bad his autofocus or noisy the file produced should learn to photograph or admit to being in bad faith. The perfect camera body doesn't exist, but this Mark II is really amazing and worth all the money spent. It is useless to describe in detail the pros I have listed because they are well known; I only spend two words on the new firmware that has improved the AF-C (combined with lenses like the 100-400 is a real sniper) and on the hires that on static subjects (macros and architecture on all) allows me to have better files than when I used the 5d3 and the 100L. More and more happy to have ditched Canon. |
| sent on June 22, 2018 Pros: NESSUNOOOOOOO Cons: A real disappointment! Bad and noisy focus Opinion: Attracted by novelty and lightness I convince myself to make the second light kit.... than ever! 12-40; 100-400 PANASONIC. Noise that looks like snow and bad autofocus. Don't compratelaaaaaa. Resold after 15 days.... tried and tested and various settings. Pathetic autofocus. Do not buy and do not be attracted by lightness. Continue with the reflex, if not to stó better point a compact. Nb. I forgot to write an important thing IN AVIFAUNA!!! |
 | sent on May 22, 2018 Pros: Weight, performance, staggering speed, apparent solidity from the first contact. Cons: Menu not really intuitivissimi.. You need to get used to a little.. And it takes at least a second (and also a third..) Battery, for a whole day passed out, maybe with the cold. At the time.. I can't find anything else. Opinion: Got set together at 12/40 and 40/150serie PR0 both f 2.8. (Absolutely exceptional, especially the second), after months of hesitation and mistrust for the transition from Nikon FF, after the opinions of friends professional photographers, after reading any technical sheet and testing a day.. I decided. Consider the results in all conditions, and comparing the files with the FF.. I can synthesize like this: a) I don't regret my cameras at all, and their weight! b) Don't worry about the Micro4/3.. The algorithm with which it was designed, compensates for all the hypothetical deficiencies compared to a FF, from the texture to the chromatic scale. Shots compared, Croppando to 200% (insane..), wanting to be fussy, you can notice small differences.. But you should print posters of 3 meters x 2.. c) But why didn't I take it before? D) my (old) back.. Thank you very very. |
 | sent on February 05, 2018 Pros: Af lightning, file quality, weight, stabilization, excellent burst, viewfinder Cons: At the moment nobody Opinion: Switched from different brands Nikon and Canon from the first shots have remained struck that in others it was not so. I use it only for birdlife with Panaleica 140-400 Awesome JPG files. Quality at high ISO that with Canon 7D MK II arrived up to 800 and then fear. Monstrous shooting. Silent shooting that you do not even notice until you look at the displey I recommend it even if on various reviews have talked about not well but on my own it takes a bit of patience and once you understand the menu is really a treat |
 | sent on December 07, 2017 Pros: Viewfinder, responsiveness, sniper autofocus, ergonomics, weight, sensor quality, battery life, HI-RES shutter, scary stabilizer, burst and infinite buffers Cons: I preferred the tiltabile display of Mark 1, this that have put evolved compact style, it makes me a sense of fragility... Revision of the 06/08/18 I add that with the battery pack, using the machine horizontally, often happens (at least to me), to touch the vertical shutter button usually when I use the adjustments of the machine (menus, buttons etc...) Opinion: Camera for me definitive! Noticeable improvements in all compartments, from the autofocus now practically instantaneous, the stabilizer really fantastic, (I managed to photograph with a time of 2 seconds with 75 mm freehand... Incredible!!) Ergonomics at the highest level, (col Really great battery pack!!). The sensor is greatly improved as high ISO seal, although the stabilizer allows a use that on other cameras is unthinkable, decidedly improved autonomy and fantastic viewfinder, almost even too bright, without the flickered of the old Version. The menus seem to me a little easier to manage, and the personal settings have finally dedicated positions on the upper ring nut. Used in gust to sporting events is a real lust, scary burst and memory buffer exceptional, of course you need a SD a little performante...il double slot allows better management of files. The Super Panel has been further enriched with functions, and allows a rapid change of many parameters, without having to go from the menus. Image quality? Trying to believe... Definitely the best camera I've ever owned! Revision of the 06/08/18 with the battery grip mounted, (subject of which unfortunately I can not do without) I often touch or even press the button vertical Click without me noticing, when I enter the menu or'm putterin' around with the commands Rear. In addition to the possibility of taking unwanted photos, just touching the button, the machine obviously does not accept other commands. The thing turns out to be quite annoying, you have to remember to exclude the vertical position each time with the appropriate lever on the battery. I don't know if this problem happened to others, but maybe a sensor that notices the location of the machine, it would have been much more comfortable... Revision of the 02/01/2019 after about a year of use, I confirm what I said earlier, plus I add that you feel the lack of the joystick focusing, which would be a must and a further complement of this exceptional camera... |
 | sent on September 30, 2017 Pros: Sturdy ergonomic, all keys and dials at fingertip AF performing, high ress even for landscapes with moving elements. Cons: Auto iso up to 6400, but it is not a real against Opinion: I went from Canon 600d to 60d to 7d to 6d to 5d4 short brackets Sony with A7R2 and A72 and finally landed in this beautiful little ml, I was not a stranger to the Olympus world as already in possession of an omd em5mk2 plus some fixed optics, and It was just this little oly to convince me on the transition from FF to m43, but I never expected to arrive at a model of camera so performance in absolute terms. The Em1mk2 overall is the best camera I've ever had, crazy burst af performance ergonomics that seems to fit like a battery glove that absolutely does not regret the slr, truly an exceptional product. The image quality compared to the old m43 sensors has improved, there is not an abyss but the improvement is seen and how, both at low ISO and high ISO. What do I miss with my old kit? Just a bit of image quality that had more than 5d4, but I gained in versatility and above all portability, for the rest now in a tamrac expedition 4 enters me allthe olympus kit covering from 14 mm to 420 and 3 microscopic fixed special optics the mini flash two bodies camera. I highly recommend.rnrnrnEdit March 14, 2018, a few weeks after the release of the 2.0 firmware that has greatly improved the performance af in afc. Now I practically do not use the AFS anymore. |
 | sent on September 13, 2017 Pros: image quality, lightness, tropicalization, stabilization Cons: lack of built-in flash, battery life Opinion: after many years of canon (10d, 20d, 60d, 7mk2) tired of dragging me into hiking and traveling too much I decided to try a mirror m4 / 3. after a brief and positive experience with a used economic oympus I sold all the canon equipment and bought this stain with several goals, including the ones I found the macro 60, tamron superzoom 14-140 and olympus 75-300. made a photo of a month in brazilian and I'm excited about the results. very few wrong pictures, impeccable focus, excellent stabilization and other great ISO hold. for my type of use also includes insect nightshots and other lack of built-in flash is a limitation, though the small standard flash supplied as standard works fine. the battery does not last long, but just take a spare. Ultimately, considering my type of user I would not go back. |
user46521  | sent on August 25, 2017 Pros: General Reactivity, Great AF, solid construction, ergonomics, battery life, Hi-res, live composite, focus staking, large button customization, 120fps evf, incredible stabilizer, double slot, auto management iso Cons: Intuitive menu, price, high ISO above 6400 Opinion: Fantastic camera, in hand is a glove, fast and reactive in every condition, built well and tropicalized by fear you see it's a serious stuff ... a lot of useful features designed for photographers and facilitating their life. Rn Compared to the old have improved a lot of AF And battery life and also the new one-way sensor at both low and high up to 6400.rnBrava olympus! Rn |
user34708 | sent on August 23, 2017 Pros: Fast, accurate autofocus, highly efficient display system, ergonomics, super-detailed menu that allows precise customizations, numerous function access buttons, tropicalization that makes it quiet, great viewfinder as well as screen, small, lightweight (certainly depends more From the goals in use). To conclude live time, live comp, focus bracketing are fabulous, night shots or ND 10X filter and you see the image that appears in front of your eyes. Cons: I just want a bit less noise on the big iso. Opinion: I've been there for three months, I took a couple of thousand photos. I left the aps-c Canon world and did not look back. Fine photographer, thinking only of what I am framing. The Zuiko optics then are moving contrast, sharpness, impeccable construction. Too bad that I discovered the olympus world only now, I would have saved a little money making it more enjoyable. |
  | sent on May 07, 2017 Pros: Impeccable autofocus, fast, engages the moving subject (even the fastest subjects) and will not spring it anymore. Fully customizable, absolutely amazing and excellent ISO image quality Cons: None to date Opinion: So, I spent a few days to make shots here and there with these two objects: M1Mark2 and Zuiko12-100. I state that I have to learn, but if you can help my "review" for those interested, I can gladly! So: I took the Canon 7D Mark 2 with Oly EM1 because I could not take pictures with animals in fairly decent movement, then took it (7D) exclusively for this type of photography. Months later, that not long ago, I bought for the EM1 Zuiko 12-100 and only saw this coupled with already a big difference to the point of no longer take me behind the 7D. Then I decided to sell it and take the EM1Mark2 and now I have no problems! I have to learn is true, but even now I can be very satisfied with the moving pictures that I do! He has a hyper-accurate stabilizer, un'autofocus incredible and I still have much to discover !! I do not really miss and actually more my 7D! It 's true, is not cheap, but it's worth it! Who wants to take that step to do it and not sAnd will regret it! I made photos of the ladybugs (look at my profile to understand!) Last day and there was no light, there was a lot of clouds and a wind that carried away! I had one ear with a grain of wheat where the ladybug was resting and with the other hand I was holding the car to take the photo, so you will understand that the conditions apart from being bad were also "drastic" (:-D) The stabilizer is from Yell, autofocus and speed are impressed! The way he has to hook the subject and not to give it away regardless of the direction he takes (if he or she is running, if he runs far, side, etc ...) is amazing! I was satisfied and already in so few days! What else to say: If you have any doubts about quality, performance and speed, in my opinion it has far exceeded all that Canon 7D mark 2 (including high ISO noise that the 7D is definitely noisy), coupled with A PRO lens is invincible andComparable to the FullFrame (which is not obvious from me). Think of it: lightness and quality all in one. I'm too excited to find something negative to date. |
 | sent on April 10, 2017 Pros: Stabilization, halved in size and weight compared to a APSC, image quality, operating speed Cons: really too detailed menu, the translation of the manual seems to be made with google translate Opinion: Given that come from Nikon system and for the precision from D7000. The machine in question falls well in hand, the controls are all in the right place, for those who wear glasses like me the EVF reads well, the materials are all qualities I would say that it seems an object made to last. As image quality I would say it is in line with my previous car if not better (but I'm an absolute amateur I do not have the technical skills that I read on other comments ...): raw files and jpeg are rich in detail and work well in post-production. What struck me is the stability that is truly phenomenal because you arrive safely at a gain of 5 (five!) Stop. The autofocus is very responsive and accurate and the burst esagerata.rnAnche objectives are well done: I took the 12-40 per kit and is a gem. I read amid criticism that is dear; I disagree: if the same features as the portassimo on a FF body I would like to see the retail price. I feel to advise |
 | sent on March 10, 2017 Pros: image quality, dynamic range, image stabilization, movies C4K, burst, fast and accurate AF, weather sealing, the viewfinder dvf good, good flash included, overall dimensions and weight, and more Cons: Price saltine, missing the opportunity to have raw files in dng well as orf Opinion: I had her on probation for two days with the lens of 12-40 f2.8 Zuiko pro kit, I must say that does pretty much everything and with excellent performance, possessing a 5D Mark III I had a chance to make an objective comparison including image quality, dynamic and ISO performance, etc. variety. ... I must say that holds the head calmly to a FF in most occasions, with amazement the image quality up to ISO 12800 remains excellent and defends all right even against 5D! rnrnLa dynamic range is also excellent and allows a recovery without significant degradation dell'immagine.rnrnScatto shadows burst from "gun license" ... pazzesco.rnrnMessa fast and accurate auto focus, focus bracketing and truly performing stacking focus .rnrnLa shooting modes high-resolution struck me particularly, resolution and detail from fear, from raw 80Mpx converted to tIFF are spectacular, also the version "reduced" to 50Mpx in jpeg created by the machine & egravis; good, but best to stand fast times is even feasible freehand ... if there is a steady hand ovviamente.rnrnLa stabilization is amazing ... I was able to shoot handheld with 2 Exposure SECONDS! Micro moved addio.rnrnFilmati in C4K super, practically professional quality I would say, provided you have an SD very fast, high capacity, excellent stability plays an important role and contributes to risultato.rnrnPro capture very useful in case of photos sportiva.rnrnIl body it is extremely robust, it is quite light and compact, creative, lots of great features and performance in any situation, virtually a Swiss boxcutter! rn |
| sent on March 03, 2017 Pros: lightweight, excellent build quality, practical, stabilizer, image quality, AF speed, double slot, well-defined files. Cons: not fabulous battery. Opinion: The I own a couple of days and already I did about 300 shots in different lighting conditions (dim light, high sun, dark, etc.). I have not had any problems. Shoot at ISO 6000 and not notice the usual noise is pleasant, very good even at 64 ISO. Very fast and precise in AF. The burst and fast and exaggerated buffer. And 'beautiful, solid, compact with the function keys to the right place that limit the recourse to Menu, tropicalization and a stabilizer of 5 fabulous axes. What to say more. It was already fantastic first M1. We're talking about the top of Olympus home. Think I'm a Nikonist always. |
 | sent on February 16, 2017 Pros: build quality, ergonomics, stability, speed, features, image quality and video Cons: No, but do not tell those who "mine is more 'big' Opinion: The EM1 II is one of the best machines for use at 360 degrees, on the market at this time. It will not get the same perfect picture quality of the best FF or MF, but it is capable of giving good results, however for any use they want fare.rnIl af system is fast and precise, even in great afc or tracking. The burst is exaggerated and the large buffer. And 'reactive in any situation and the image stabilizer is impressive. Try to credere.rnCome matters worse is built like a tank, tropicalization inclusa.rnChe more do you want? Rn |
 | sent on January 04, 2017 Pros: image quality, speed, AF, weather sealing, ergonomics, dual card Cons: nobody Opinion: The M1 II is the improvement in the round the old versione.rnE 'mirrorless a very fast and reliable, the feeling of use is very similar to that which has challenged a professionale.rnLa SLR image quality has improved, albeit in sensitive , 64 iso (LOW) are immaculate and also allow significant recoveries and i think the performance at high ISO are improved. Great improvement of the AF system and operations in general. rnIl price at a first glance might seem exaggerated, but working on it you realize that it is actually in line with the rest ... we are talking about the flagship Olympus.rnE 'a professional machine from all points of view ... really good! rn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
