|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on May 26, 2020 Pros: Stabilization,very comfortable functions,very well-groomed construction,size and weight, very good image quality up 1600 iso Cons: Small keys,a bit complicated menu,size (it's also a counter),suffers from 2000 iso and up Opinion: I bought this model having found an excellent opportunity in kit with the 14-42 and the 40-150 as the second body to use for light travel, as I think have done in several,without expecting much as image yield and instead I have to say that it is wonderful and not little. I say that I normally use a Sigma dp 2 four,so I think I am very "demanding" and fussy in terms of color rendering, sharpness and IQ and this is my first m4/3, a format that has always attracted me but that for one reason or another I have never even tried.... and this first approach is very very positive also in terms of IQ as well as obviously portability. I think it's one of the ideal machines for doing street: perfect stabilization, high operational speed also has useful functions as well as fun functions such as live composite and livetime. In short, using it you have a lot of fun and you always take home good shots. I'm not a fan of the post so absurd recovery of shadows or extreme "malleability" of the file can not give me less but anyway the files that churn are also discreetly workable,as long as one knows how to shoot decently. The body is small and light and obviously the keys and grip are what they are but all things have the downside. I would say that paradoxically it is a machine suitable for both novices and the opposite for the smive and navigated photo-amateur. In my opinion for the vast majority of amateurs the m4/3 is more than fine (instead of inflating with FF or apsc you spend half and you have great photos). For everything else there is the Foveon and the middle-formed :) p.s. Made me want to take a G9 or an M1 mk II ... Sigh! |
 | sent on December 09, 2019 Pros: Stabilization! Compactness, materials, lightness, versatility, price value, speed to set parameters and customisation of keys. Cons: Noise at ISO highs, from 2000 and up. Focus tracking and focus c. Opinion: It took me a year to choose before I bought it. Chosen mirrorless instead of sLRs for size, chose olympus instead of fuji x stabilization. Fantastic materials, you feel you have a jewel in your hand, vintage charm but in step with the times. The only flaw the focus c and the tracking, did not meet my needs. At the high ISO a lot of noise. I didn't appreciate it until I changed my lens from kit 12 50, and I switched to a fixed, and to the pro series. Great for those who want to start, great for those who want to travel, if you take a 12 100 pro, you will not need more x travel. Great if you pair it with pro lenses, you save in the machine body but invest in good-crafted optics. |
 | sent on June 01, 2019 Pros: Small, compact, metal construction, Stabilizazzione, viewfinder, JPEG file, wide choice lenses. Cons: Little pronounced Grip, battery Opinion: I'm really happy to have bought this amazing camera after "blew" the previous purchase. This camera is another thing, it's a pleasure to turn and take pictures with her. Menu really rich in functions, must be studied, but by many satisfactions. The ring nuts are sturdy, very comfortable, well made. The vast optical Park allows you to choose without faing. Purchased with 14-42 II R Kit, which will not be the best, but to study it at the moment is fine. I added a 25mm pana that works great. Looking forward to buy 17mm and 45 Zuiko. Really a positive experience with Oympus. When I never took it before. |
 | sent on May 31, 2019 Pros: Excellent aesthetics, wide menu, excellent material quality, micro 4/3 system. Cons: 4k is missing but we are talking about a camera and not a camera. Opinion: I've started from a very good SLR D750 & D5300 with the Nikon 1j5 the world of mirrorless. Both the purchase of the Xianoyi Yi M1 (Sony 20MP sensor) and the Panasonic gx80 and Zuiko Optics and Panasonic made me put almost to the side of the small Nikon1. The experience with Olympus is gorgeous. It is not compact but not even massive or heavy like a reflex. Nice to see (I chose the grey and black) reminds me of the om20 I own. The wide menu beats the Xianoyi too simple but nice and remains an alternative to the GX80 of equal quality but less pleasant aesthetics (it is obviously a subjective judgement). |
 | sent on November 19, 2018 Pros: -Construction quality (completely metal), lightweight, compact, Yummy OLED viewfinder, LCD touch, dial and key functions abundant and comfortable. -Sharp images, wide dynamic range for the commercial segment in which it is located. -Silent shot, functions (screen magnification, Live Comp, Live Time, and others), AF good, stabilization on 5 sensor axes -Battery in my opinion good, given that it is a mirrorless. -WiFi connectivity. -Excellent value for money, varied optical park at quite low cost. Cons: -Acceptable videos in FullHD 50p, the department is good, but if these are your priority better to opt for something else, lack for example mic input. (Lumix for example) - Absence of tropicalization (but at that price you can not have everything). -LCD not tiltable 180 degrees, for me a detail still useless. -The sensor, small but powerful, at ISO 1600 in my opinion no longer works in an acceptable way. Opinion: After skimming for two weeks I excluded the GX80 and the A6000 in favor of this one. First mirrorless, fantastic, which facilitates the transition from the reflex world (3/31 to the right place, dials, etc.). Rich in features that take it to a much more advanced level than just entry-level. Good JPEgs but I shoot pretty much only in RAW. In combination with the 14-42 IIR and the 40-150 f/4-5.6 is reasonably compact and hyper complete. In short, a jewel, especially if you dedicate yourself mainly to photography. Very recommended! . . More than a year later, I confirm everything. |
 | sent on July 13, 2018 Pros: Small, light, versatile, excellent sensor, octice various and not always expensive, good autofocus and good performance at high ISO. Very customizable Cons: Low lasting batteries Opinion: I am very satisfied, it was my first mirrorless, now use it since 1yr and never a problem. Beautiful and small is perfect for the street, the tiltabile screen adds practicality and dynamism to take pictures. Excellent sensor and overall yield, and also high ISO resistance, whereas it is a small M4/3. The batteries last a little bit but you just have one or two spare. I will never sell it, using it I discovered that the M4/3 is my system, at most can think of associating it to a FF for other types of photos, type landscaping. Even in that, but the little girl is doing well. Recommended to the Great! |
 | sent on April 23, 2018 Pros: size, image quality, high iso, seal construction Cons: grip, battery, auto focus in low light condition crisis Opinion: My first olympus. Purchased in a kit with the 12-50 F -5.6 3.5 right away you notice the build quality and fittings and the compactness of the camera body, the amount of unclean customizable function keys is very convenient, the buttons except the button fn3, are exactly where you aspects, stabilization on 5 axes is perfect as well as the use of a hand. The machine is able to process images without the aid of post production. The only painful notes are: a slow autofocus in low light conditions, even if it proves fast in high brightness conditions, the lack of a firm grip (especially for those with big hands), but fixable by any external handle and battery life that may not be enough at the most intense days, however solvable by buying an additional spare battery |
 | sent on January 18, 2018 Pros: Image quality, lightness, ergonomics Cons: grip (easily solved with ECG-3), battery life Opinion: My first serious camera. What to say? it was love right away. I was looking for something light to always carry with me and so it is. I wear it around my neck almost always and it's like not having it. I was skeptical enough for the m43 sensor which turned out to be a wonder! Never ever would I have expected such a high image quality. Combined with "Prime" lenses, it really gives its best by giving images of surprising quality. RAWs are easy to work with and JPGs have a neutrality of colors that I did not have with my old camera. A bit 'annoying the handle (I have big hands) but with the addition of the ECG-3 all is easily resolved. For the rest, ergonomics is fantastic. Every key is where you expect it. Maybe the menu is a bit 'complicated but the "small" M10 is really a den of technology (fantastic livecomposite function!) And allows really fine settings.After a while you get used to it and in any case there is the quick menu with which the basic settings are made in a moment. The battery life is poor (fairly well-known scenario in the mirrorless) so it is advisable to do low additional batteries (duracell offers a compatible battery that does not cost more than 15 euros). What else to add? A dream! |
 | sent on January 11, 2018 Pros: small, light, comfortable for journalism and street,robust little high iso noise (up to 2500) excellent stabilization, great live, good WB adjustments. Cons: REALLY poor BATTERY, slightly messed up menu. Af at low lights is a little difficult. Opinion: I bought this machine by matching it to my (car park) as a pocket machine always ready, I caught in the really comfortable sign always below, images like the Nikon 300s reflexes if not more incisive, made very good, even in jpeg, i recommend in addition to the 12/40 f3.5 series optical kit 17/25/45 from f1.7 you will have the top. In pp working on a RAW you can correct shadows and lights without the finished jpeg spiling. Infinite possibilities to customize keys and dials, touchpad for focus, even peak for manual focus, trak fire chase good subject. In the shooting menu many interesting fixed options. I recommend the purchase of additional batteries. It also returns great files to the natural without having to go too much to work in pp. |
  | sent on January 06, 2018 Pros: Lightweight-weight, image quality, stabilizer, built-in flash, adjustable screen, has many features that have high-end professional machines, double exposure, customizable PP Raw with proprietary program, excellent quality / price ratio, WIFI, peak function in MF, silent shooting, Liveview Cons: Battery life, High iso noise high, grip (improves a little with optional grip), loses focus in continuous AF (not an action camera) Opinion: I had many Reflex cameras both analog and digital. When there was the change of generational I started from a Canon 300D and then have the 350D / 20D / 50D / 7D ... all good machines but I was not content with the output files This Oly turns out already beautiful JPEG very usable and without going so much of PP. rnWhat I was most struck was that despite being a base Mirroless, has many features and features worthy of the various flagships of the Canon & Nikon Brand ... rnThe grip is not the best, but it is a convenient machine and not bulky to be worn on various occasions. I also use it for Hunting Photographic Nature and I must say that having little weight and size you can take many pictures ... of course, the action picture is not his forte! I have added the optional handle and with this you gain a bit of manageazza.rnOther convenient thing is the built-in flash, something like the OM-D E-m5 has not !!! rnNot miss itof the various digital SLRs that I had, also because it has a multiplying factor of 2x that serves in Naturalistica, and then all in all it is not so bad even at medium high ISO, something like the 7D as everyone will already suffer at 400ISO for do not talk about the old machines I've owned. A car that does not want to replace it, but to keep it maybe even in the future, like a second body. |
 | sent on November 10, 2017 Pros: Price, comfort, always ready, robust materials, low noise at high iso. Cons: Almost no one, but if we just want it .. uncomfortable without extra grips, bracketing a bit confusing, battery life Opinion: I bought this body machine paired with olympus zuiko 12-50, 3 months ago.rnTilt mirrorless, good value for money, top quality design. I had to use it for macro photos and with her "focus bracketing" really does a great job. Very fast AF with the right lighting, 5-axis stabilization that allows me to shoot even 2 "hand-free, really touchy touch screen (I recommend applying an anti-reflective glass film) .nn I strongly recommend especially if combined with a series lens pro, it's really special. |
 | sent on September 16, 2017 Pros: Metal body, aesthetics in general, size, sensor stabilization, good image quality. Cons: 12-bit Raw, confusing menus, battery life, contrast-resistant, very low fatigue and unused continuity Opinion: Fascinated by its vintage style, I bought this room coupled with the pancake 14-42 kit and an extra (original) battery. RnIn this configuration the olympus is really small, it can be easily carried in the pockets of a jacket or in a not necessarily photographic bag. Having a reflex, the first impact is remarkable. Transportability, however, is paid in terms of ergonomics, which in my opinion is not the best especially when holding the room with the right hand only. In fact, there is no real front grip and the only way to firmly grasp the room is to use the "claw" behind leveraging with the thumb. rnTo zoom pancakes or other light optics there are no particular problems, while with optics like the 12-40 pro it starts to feel the lack of a steady grip. The stabilizer on the sensor (5 axes and 4 stops) is fantastic and allows you to have micro-motion pictures with all the optics you decide to usewhether they are vintage or whether they are new but without stabilization. The machine has many interesting features, especially if you consider it the entry level of the OMD series: the electronic level, the depth of field preview, the histogram in the viewfinder and the display, the ability to have real-time 'exposure preview, focus peaking, the touch screen that can be used to change the point or, better to say, the AF area. Image quality is high, especially if you snap in raw and expose yourself well. I've noticed that jpg files are as good as chromium and details at low iso while they tend to be kneaded and lose detail as the machine sensitivity increases. Also, even taking raw but flipping out is not so easy to retrieve photos, especially if we are above the 1600 iso and not just talk about the grain that is still thin but of the colors that tend to rub. rnLaf is good for static subjects and in good conditionlighting while struggling in low light and continuous where even in full light does not go right. You pay the scoop of having an AF again to detect the only contrast. The autonomy is good but not comparable to a reflex, even entry level. In any case, to extend the useful life of the battery, you can activate a whole host of options such as stand by the room after a few seconds of inoperability and use a good electronic viewfinder. RnPurchase of at least one other battery is almost an obligation if you want to be quiet too because charging that only happens via external charger is not the fastest. rn |
 | sent on August 07, 2017 Pros: Reduced size, silent shooting, as with Olympus tradition, a perfect body! Cons: Not even one! Opinion: Bought a few days, but keep an eye out for a lot of time! Comfortable Amazon's competitive price, I could not resist and I did the gift. What to say! Nothing to envy with the older sister EM1, in some ways I prefer her. I have equipped it with the 17mm Zuiko and the coupling is great. Small size, not too noticeable, ideal for making street: I love it already! As always Olympus is a guarantee: well-spent money and photos are perfect. Of course you also have to be able to take pictures! It is not enough to have good equipment. If you want to buy it, I can do nothing but recommend it ... battery ok, nothing wrong. |
 | sent on May 15, 2017 Pros: Lightness, dimensions, practicality, controls in the right place, sense of quality Cons: Maybe a little slow from an operational point of view: But for my kind is not a problem Opinion: I bought it for about a month and I posted here on Juza some pics so I made my own little experience. I come from a Pentax outfit that started from multiple wide angle lenses to fixed optics and a telezoom for a total weight of my backpack associated with the tripod that you can't understand. Tired of everything I decided to buy something tiny and light. So mirrorless and specifically Olympus and especially you the EM 10 mark II. Spectacular: light, practical, compact and especially portable. Having a camera always with you is no longer impossible. Superb quality of the images. I have already associated with my small camera: The 9-18 I think weights around 150 grams, the 14-42 pancake: Fantastic and the 40-150 I will use little but that is always present. The whole thing is in a small and comfortable bag. Waiting to complete my kit with a 17, 25 and 60mm fixed. (bought later on 17 and 25) Someone complains about the low battery life but frankly I did not notice, for other I have a second reserve. The live composite is a crazy gem to photograph the fireworks, bright trails or to make the startrail. The touch screen works very well and I like how the screen rotates. What more? I'm definitely satisfied that I bought another one. |
 | sent on April 22, 2017 Pros: size, weight, aesthetics Cons: grip for large hands, the viewfinder too eyelet protruding with respect to the monitor Opinion: I bought it a couple of weeks ago to replace the faithful X30 (which I used as a second camera body, for the Street, leaving behind the heavy FF) and I was afraid to regret. But it did not happen at all! I am very glad I did. It has about the same size, but the files it produces are far superior. Of course, it depends on which lens mounts! But I can change it, while the X30 was not possible. The commands are more at hand: ferrules diaphragm and shutter really enjoyable. And on fn3 button there I set the ISO. The fact is that I do not fiddle around with the menu. If it helps I do, mind you, but I prefer the manual controls. Simple and fast. And the E-M10II have one! When I coupled to a Lumix G 25mm f / 1.7 and since me satisfaction! Imagine if you decided to buy a higher quality lens! And I dare not think about the E-M1 II! 'I'm Micro 4/3 I guess I have a little' underestimated Almost ... almost ... :)))) |
 | sent on February 08, 2017 Pros: Metal construction and quality. Light and compact in size. Image quality in both RAW and Jpeg. 5-axis Stabilizer on the sensor, ideal for experimenting with vintage lenses not stabilized even with very long shutter speeds. Good noise resistance even at 6400/8000 ISO. Rather vast and quality optical park, constantly expanding. WiFi included in the camera body. 3 function keys with high customization. Not bad price. Sfiziosa. Stylish. Cons: Battery life. Lack of tropicalization. The wide angles on the M4/3 sensor are "transformed" into normal and the normals become "Tele" (only limit to the use of vintage optics). Opinion: This was my first camera body. Now it's together with an EM-1 MkII. Before going on with the reading of my opinion, take into account two important things: 1) is an entry level advanced (very well done, but still such) 2) is a different format and smaller than the APS-C and the FF despite this , it has a nice resistance to relatively high ISO, which can only please. I even used it at ISO 8000 and little more, it makes good if you pay attention. This feature, coupled with a 5-axis stabilizer on the sensor, makes it a unique mirrorless in its price range. Its design is "peculiar" but original for today's times and with a high quality structure. Who has very large hands can compensate for the small size of the machine body with an accessory, the external grip ECG-3. The only defect, the metal construction transmits easily the cold and the most sensitive to low temperatures would do well to buy some gloves from photography (or the Gloves TAKE HEAT TOUCH for sale at decathlon). It would have been a nice thing to find a tropicalization on that camera body, kind of what was done with the Pentax K50 or K70, but so much. The stabilizer allowed me to use with more tranquility a fixed 50mm f/1.9 X-Fujinon vintage as an optical for portraits. Same thing with a Zenith Helios 44m-6 58mm. The tilting screen is useful for taking photos from multiple angles, like placing the camera on a monopod, selecting the timer of the shot and raising the whole to take pictures from above while not having scales or similar points of view elevated. The optical park is really pretty good, taking into account how young this photographic format is. On Olympus body You can safely use the (dedicated) optics of the following manufacturers: 1) Olympus 2) Panasonic and Panaleica 3) Sigma 4) Tamron 5) Samyang 6) Laowa 7) Any others I may not now know about. The quality of the images is very high, both on RAW and on Jpeg. The function keys are well positioned and easily reachable despite the small size of the body (obvious, if then one has big hands like those of Shrek is another speech). The internal menu is complex, but not impossible (be it clear, eh!). The price is really deserved (apart from the lack of tropicalization) and, despite being born as a possible second camera body to be accompanied by a reflex, is quietly able to become the main machine. The dimensions are compact even for the lenses and this is a really nice result. I, for example, I bring the camera body and 5 optics in a backpack photo with limited weights and dimensions (update-----Currently my kit is based on 5 lenses and two bodies, always very reduced footprint in terms of overall weight). Combined with a fixed pancake or zoom, but also at a small fixed Olympus/Panasonic, then, it still increases its compactness and lends itself to be delightfully used even in the crowd (type in local folklore events or big events where you are taken to rubberized) with the only limitation that currently the pancakes do not yet have a particularly high quality or do not excel in AF unlike the Olympus Premium fixed and Panasonic and Panaleica fixed. It is necessary to buy at least a couple of spare batteries in addition to the one that is supplied in the package, given the autonomy of about 3/4 hours. Note. The total weight of body + 5 optics does not go beyond 2 kg and we are talking about optics from kits that still have a very good quality. Update----2 bodies + 2 Olympus PRO Optics (7-14mm and 12-40mm) + a Sigma 60mm f2.8 + 1 Panasonic 100-300mm > slight weight gain, but negligible compared to FF and APS-C counterparts |
 | sent on December 16, 2016 Pros: Dimensions, Body price targets, rings, JPG Cons: Hum stabilizer, curtain blocked after a few months Opinion: I come from a PEN E-PL5, thus promoting it as a secondary body I had the opportunity to share with the OM-D E-M10 II optics and accessories such as battery and charger with a significant weight saving and money. What, respectable machine. It is not tropical conditions as the E-M5 does not have the endless customization of the E-M1, but for those who do not need these is the perfect compromise. Cost content and a great leap forward compared to the previous version. I find it very comfortable and very well done ferrules the viewfinder, also notable JPG product that allows an easing compared to RAW when not essential. Ease of use and personalization keys, definitely a good product that is enhanced further by pairing it with fixed optics or new age old school (5-axis stabilization in the body). Two own words on the stabilizer, highly effective but the buzz for me unbearable indoors in quiet environments. I must say that I took with 75-300 300 free wildlife in hand with respectable resultsOly .. Brava! RnrnUn small but important update, a few months away from buying the car is locked with curtain closed after taking in a simple aperture-priority mode. Even removing the battery there was no way to reset, she left me standing in the middle of a photographic journey! He points out that he has never seen sand, water or other. Fortunately I have a PEN that I carry around always for security, which allowed me to take home some pictures .. but I can not share the bad experience. Now the body is being repaired under warranty, expected time 20 days, deluso..rnrnUlteriore update, at 2 months later I still have not received the body from Polyphoto. Disappointed increasingly Olympus stessa.rnrnUltimo update, the ML after 2 and a half months is back. Apparently everything works, we'll see in time .. |
 | sent on October 11, 2016 Pros: image quality, complete software, wifi fast file transfer, size, stability, variety of optical and other advantages of the Micro 4/3 system Cons: Buy yourself an extra battery Opinion: I'm not a professional but I was looking for a quality machine and with the Olympus OMD em10mii I found it. After extensive research I had narrowed it down to two for the price range similar machinery and equipment, even if based on different technologies, precisely the omd10mii is fujifilm XT10, the day of purchase trovandomele both I had no doubts at hand. I preferred to design (it is an object that may be in a jewelry), construction (reminiscent of the elegance of Apple products), stabilization on the sensor, choice of targets Micro4 / 3 (Olympus - lumix - sigma), size. I combined with a Zuiko 45mm f1.8, spectacular images for quality, clarity, color and bokeh. It has a full menu and all, the app (Olympus share - IOS) that allow you to import photos to phone and check the camera is well done and fast. If you do sessions lasting more than 3 hours you will need an additional battery (12 €), I think it is due to the ener consumptiongy given by the display that provides access to the various machine settings. |
  | sent on September 06, 2016 Pros: Size, weight, design, quality image, internal stabilizer that can also shoot at 1/4 second freehand, optical vast park on both economic and PRO Cons: battery life, slow in general than an SLR, at high ISO is a little hard Opinion: Possessor of FF, I bought for a small camera you always have in your bag. He has left me thrilled for image quality. I always say never sell my Nikon kit and actually I can no longer using it. Professional lenses are like those of Nikon, but cost half. The kit of the goals is fantastic. The thing that I appreciate is that despite not having a great performance at high ISO, can take pictures with low light as it has a stabilization system inside the camera exceptional. With the added purse 40-150 I do not get home anyway with back pain as with the nikon. It is the flagship of the Olympus, but I recognize that the quality of the files is excellent. Not Tropicalised but people who need this requirement should be on 5 MarkII knowing that though the quality of the files is the same or older sister EM1. I with two raindrops riponevo also the D750 in your bag, so for me the diskBear does not change. I'm in love with his vintage design, among other things I have the limited edition Brown, very beautiful. I recommend at least three batteries and the grip handle, for a man's hand takes to correct the size of a little "mini". The advice for budget travelers. E 'damn comfortable. One major flaw in the field of optical lack of choice for wide angles. Whereas the 4/3 system on which rests a 7 mm is equal to 14, the only wider wide angle is precisely 7 14 14 28 so that it would be that costs over 1000 euro.Spero more to come altri.Ha functions internal as the composite result that the live view with which you can take pictures of the stars or nocturnal easily develop seeing the photo as the display. In short, was born to a camera "second body" has become the only one that I'm using. |
 | sent on February 05, 2016 Pros: Excellent file, good seal at high iso for micro 4/3, stabilized, compact body, quality of materials, optical park large and of excellent quality available, the command deployment. Cons: battery life, a little uncomfortable for those with large hands Opinion: I purchased not long ago I was amazed by the quality of photos. I used full frame (canon 6d) and APSC SLR good level (7d mark ii) but I decided to switch to more manageable machine bodies and content to lighten the backpack. Well I can say that I have not regretted the choice. I use it for all kinds and I find it really good. The stabilization of the sensor is really very efficient and dynamic range, in my opinion, is very good. The command distribution is well designed and the car is very customizable. The optical park available is very large and of excellent quality. The only drawback I found was the poor battery life (but easily remedied by buying a spare). The lack of weather sealing do not consider it a defect, but for those who feel the need there is always the sister em-5 mark ii. The highly recommend. |
| sent on January 30, 2016 Pros: Portability, design, Resolution, Materials, Viewfinder, Video Stabilizer, Price quality objectives compared to other brands of equal brightness Cons: a bit 'slow when coming from an SLR Opinion: My opinion is great for the price qualità.rnLa thing that struck me first was the quality of materials and design, then later making some shots I began to appreciate all its caratteristiche.rnUna machine, always use at any situazione.rnPurtroppo not tropical conditions, but just be a little 'more alert and some shots you do equally well in adverse situations but not estreme.rnIo I added a handyman 14-150 ED II and now I have with me the car at any time allowing it to enter into a small handbag to shoulder. rnCredo that if you put a nice fixed 25mm, we can do anything and go home with photos incredibili.rnLo image stabilizer for video spettacolare.rnMessa is in good hands, this machine does not regret sisters maggiori.rnE 'the last jewel as regards the series O-MD therefore has improved slightly and bring it closer not much more to the OM-D 5 Mark II that the old O-MD 10.rnPer professionals, recommend the purchase of 2 ottichThe first and the 17mm 1.8, 45mm 1.8 is the second and then we add a handyman. Or put a 25mm 1.8 by adding an optical PRO series "Obviously depends on the style and needs" rn "Keep in mind that the mm must be doubled so the 25mm is actually a 50mm etc etc ..." RNLA advice to those who want to get closer the world of photography but also as a second body for professionals or even better for those who travel a lot and have a passion fotografica.rnL'unico neo, in my opinion, is for the objectives grandangolari.rnrnrnrnrn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
