|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on December 30, 2021 Pros: cheap, lightweight, small, optically fantastic, blurry fantastic, razor-sharp Cons: nothing Opinion: I've had it for at least 6 years. I rarely use it but every time it returns fantastic images. fantastic in all inclusive price. I don't see a reason not to take it if you use the m4/3 system unless you want to avoid fixed ones for reasons of changing lenses. for the rest it has all the characteristics of the perfect optics: cheap, light, small, very well built, optically fantastic, sharp and blurry beautiful, abundant character. all optics should be like this. |
  | sent on December 30, 2021 Pros: Microscopic, sharp already at 1.8, cheap, lightweight, I like to play with the removable ring when I get bored, 2 colors :D Cons: I can't find any Opinion: I have been using it for the last 3-4 years as a lens for very narrow portraits. I never thought badly of it, not even once. Also when I go to dinners with friends it is the only lens I wear. It's one of the best (all things considered) lenses I've ever tried, if not the best: it costs nothing, it's bright, it's light, it's small... It's not tropicalized ok but I don't think its main use is in the rain. |
 | sent on July 03, 2021 Pros: Size, yield, price Cons: nobody Opinion: It perfectly reflects the m4/3 philosophy: optical quality and sharpness in a very light and tiny lens. I don't particularly like fixed goals, but this Olympus 45 f/1.8 (like the Panasonic Lumix 20 f/1.7) is really a lens to have in place. The price (also new) is really affordable, and in return you will have a very portable optics that offers brightness, excellent optical yield, sharpness, good af speed, a pleasant blurry. I find it indicated especially for portraits but it can also say its own for landscape photography and close-up. Even those who have the excellent Pro zooms in place can find in the small Olympus 45mm a lens to put in your pocket and to use when you need brightness and compactness. |
 | sent on July 03, 2021 Pros: Size and weight,overall optical quality,fast and precise autofocus,price Cons: Lack of an af-mf commando. Opinion: It is so small and light that you risk losing it or forgetting it in some compartment of the bag. Plastic materials attack apart, but built very well. Very fast and precise autofocus. I didn't like the lack of a button or bee that switches the lens from autofocus to manual focus. As far as optical quality is concerned, it is excellent. Crisp already at full opening becomes a blade if closed at 2.8. Bokeh pleasant as long as you keep the proper distances between subject and background. Very well controlled chromatic aberrations. For the price you find used it is certainly a lens to take. |
 | sent on June 16, 2021 Pros: Very light and extremely compact (in pure style m4/3), bright, good AF, very low price (especially in used) Cons: Non-exceptional colors (they remain a thread colder and less natural than the PRO series such as 12-40 or 40-150), blurred a "nervous" thread, but still good for close-up portraits Opinion: What to say, a lens that well represents the philosophy m4/3 (lightness, but good quality). I have a double kit, FF + bright fixes (which I use for portraits) and m4/3 with ZOOM PRO 12-40 and 40-150 (which I use for travel, hiking, nature, sports). Since, if space allows, with 40-150mm f/2.8 pro at 150mm come excellent portraits, with an excellent blurry, I wanted something more "compact", to take me with me on occasions when the FF could not find space. Read some reviews and "discarded" the fixed Olympus PRO series (spectacular lenses, but too expensive for use that I would have made), found a great offer on a guaranteed used in a store, I convinced myself to buy this little guy. What to say: net of a few weeds, I would say that the value for money is certainly in his favor. The images are also sharp at TA, especially for close-ups/half busts (the genre I do the most), and if you can properly space the subject from the background, the blurry is also absolutely pleasant. For full-length portraits, the typical Pdc of the format comes out and the blurry loses a little (to say, with the same equivalent focal length my comparison term is my Zeiss Planar 85mm f/1.4, which provides a much better blurry, as well as my other portrait favorite lens, the Zeiss Planar 50mm f/1.4), but I would say it is more an intrinsic feature than a defect. For portraits set indoors in full length (for which I use 35mm f/1.4 on FF), it is a bit too long, but the equivalent focal point on m4/3 (17mm f/1.8), while excellent, has far too little blurry and at that point I prefer to use the 12-40. The colors are not bad, but they are slightly desaturated and less natural than the PRO series lenses. In any case, with a couple of clicks in PP everything is solved (and then I often convert portraits to BN, so it's not a problem). What to say: do not expect a Zeiss from 2000€ (it would be stupid, I would say!), but for just over 1€ per gram on the used market (116g, it is located on 140-150€), it is an excellent lens to always have behind it, which, with a few precautions, can provide excellent results. Vote 9 |
 | sent on May 04, 2020 Pros: small, sharp a blade Cons: Nothing Opinion: If you make portraits this optics and phenomenal a fabulous bokeh for the eyes of those who know how to look and settle, 180 euros you bring home a lens pro or almost... who says that with the m43 you can not make a very good bokeh does not know what he is talking about. I highly recommend I am a lover of the blurred and not of the jams you see around.. |
user109536  | sent on January 07, 2020 Pros: All Cons: Nothing considering the price paid but the judgment would have been the same even at full price. Opinion: Small, light, crisp, excellent blurry! I was able to buy it for ca 125 euros, at a Christmas promotional sale of Olympus targets of a well-known Swiss department store, sale unfortunately lasted only about ten days (I missed other very interesting goals ). It's the essence of 4/3 and since Christmas it's constantly on my GX80. Ideal for portraits but also for street, night photos and landscapes. After years of zooming it made me rediscover the fixed focal point with which I had started photographing a life ago ( Olympus OM 2 with 28-50-135 ). |
 | sent on December 09, 2019 Pros: Small, light, crisp Cons: Nobody Opinion: for a Sunday photographer goes beyond expectations. as big as the palm of one hand, featherweight, you can put it in your pocket and if necessary mount it. on a compact like the GX9 it is a perfect combination: light and non-bulky system (if you do a bike ride or a hike load up so much ballast is not the best). excellent final quality, crisp enough for my needs. |
user144605 | sent on August 22, 2019 Pros: Small; Light; Economic Cons: TA sharpness Opinion: The portrait lens par excellence for Olympus Micro 4:3 (I did not have the opportunity to try the 75mm). At TA the sharpness does not excel (you need to close at 2.8, better still at f/4 or f/5.6). The focal equivalent FF of 90mm inevitably makes it limited but there is, given the fact that size and weight allow you to carry it in the bag without noticing it. The price is great, so much so that I recommend the purchase. |
 | sent on August 11, 2019 Pros: Value for money Cons: Nobody Opinion: After about a month of use, I also add a review to those already present, and with which I fully agree, only because I mount the lens on a Panasonic machine body and sometimes, in the forums, I notice the skepticism of some in adopting optics of different brand from the machine body, even if they belong to the same system. I can say that this lens mounted on a Panasonic GX9, retains all its excellent qualities. I took it on a trip together with the Panaleica 15mm f1.7, and it did not disfigure at all, despite costing half. In fact, at f1.8 it also has sharper panaleic ness in the same opening. In the micro 4/3 system there are several alternatives of higher quality, but none can boast the same lightness, and the same value for money. I love travel photography, and I thought I could do it all with a 30mm equivalent. Then I took this Zuiko to try my hand at the portrait, but I found that an equivalent 90mm, around the streets, can be beautiful. |
 | sent on March 08, 2019 Pros: Small, light, bright. Economic. Excellent optical quality, nice bokeh. Cons: The lens hood must be purchased apart. Opinion: It is equivalent to a 90 mm on full frame and is therefore very suitable for portrait. On an Olympus OM-D body enjoys the stabilization provided by the camera body. The optical yield, already at full aperture, is very good. Closing a little the diaphragm becomes very good. Being a micro 4/3 is very small and very light. Its high opening makes it possible to use it also in low lighting conditions, for example indoor portraits even without using the flash. When you focus on the face of a subject you have to be careful to focus on the eyes, especially if you use a high aperture to exploit the quality of the fuzzy, the so-called "bokeh". Having to choose only one lens to put in the bag photo, maybe in addition to the standard zoom, I would choose this Olympus. Like all fixed focal lengths, it has to be "rediscovered", especially if for a long time, maybe because of laziness, we are limited to the comfort of the zoom. |
 | sent on December 28, 2018 Pros: The classic medium-telephoto light from portrait, with all the features it must have (sharpness, blur, colors, disconnection of the planes), but with in addition a value for money and a build quality compared to the excellent size. Cons: Not excelling focus on EM10 II (according to my personal experience) Opinion: I have a particular relationship with this lens, because its existence was the main reason why I switched to micro 4/3, coming from Fuji X, where for a medium-telephoto portrait bright and quality, I would have to shell out a few hundred euros more... At the beginning I was very disappointed, because on Olympus EM10 II, (using it mainly for spontaneous portraits not laid down), I thought it had a too soft rendition; So I sold it and passing through 25 1.8 (beautiful) and 75 1.8 (wonderful), I resumed to rationalize a bit ' the outfit, having passed to EM1 (Mark I) and wanting to invest more on other focal. As a little ' I suspected, the yield a little ' soft on EM10 II was due to the difficulty of the machine to focus perfectly with subjects in light movement and my photos were simply not perfectly in focus. On a more performing body like the em1, I could finally appreciate the spectacular rendition of this small and wonderful lens. It is not lightning in the focus as the 75 1.8, the blur and sharpness are a bit ' lower, but not enough to not be able to enjoy the optical quality however remarkable. For my needs is already at the top and the focal is the one I prefer for the portrait. |
user124620 | sent on June 13, 2018 Pros: Sharpness already at TA, price, quality, size, colors, Cons: Nobody Opinion: I really never expected such a beast, I had read it well, but then I took it and when I tried it... very small, is on a palm (a 90mm f 1.8) with a small diameter, but that colors.. What a brood.... boh I do not know... that "Magic" (I'm not crazy take it for good)... my favorite focal is the 35 (on 35mm) but really I had trouble removing it from the car and in fact now I decided that it always take behind... and then the invoice, really well done , solid, robusto...so that there are those who say that blurred of the M43 bla bla bla....ma this... they are speechless. With a "small" investment you bring home a lens that has to sell grit. Paid to today under the new €250 from a well-known site in Amazzonia...io I recommend it, even to those who think of using little focal ones, is a lens to have in the drawer for what it costs |
 | sent on February 12, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, brightness, quality even at TA, weight, use of the focal characteristics, price, construction and much more. Cons: Okay, the lens we buy it is not original, so is the same thing. Opinion: I own this lens for years and this review is a dutiful tribute to the little traveling companion who has always done his duty exceeding all expectations. The 45 1.8 (reparametrato FF 90) is apparently a view to remove a whim for the first floors, purchased under the pressure of fans of the various forums. Then NO: the quality of the lens in hand is realized. This little gem is a surprising little short canvas that gives everything in "studio", at home, in the street, and in the landscape. On the mqt, wanting to have fun shooting around light and fast with "limitations" of weights and encumbrances but certainly not of quality is essential by going double with Panaleica 15 or with 9-18; very good tripletta along with 12 Oly (three-dimensional!) and 25 (good both the two Oly and the Panaleica). Thanks 45! |
 | sent on January 27, 2018 Pros: Pocket size, price, performance, possibility to complete a street set with a medium wide angle. Cons: For me no one, I could not detect really important ones. the photos I do with this lens satisfy me fully. Opinion: Objective with excellent overall performance, light small and with a truly superior overall performance. Perfect for portraits. I also have a 75 mm and the 45 also defends well against him considering that the price is also significantly cheaper. I use it very often preferring it sometimes to 75mm especially for its size. |
 | sent on January 08, 2018 Pros: All Cons: Paraluce sold separately at crazy prices Opinion: You can not find faults in an optic that costs so little and makes so much. Very light and even if plastic (metal attack) very well built. From what I've seen the black version holds up better over time. Classic portrait lens excellent already at TA and considering the double Pc of the m4 / 3 you will hardly have an eye on fire and the other not. I compared it with the 12-40 to 40mm and ... there is no history I'm sorry the 45 wins big. For the price / weight / yield that you should not miss in any kit of an m4 / 3ista. Blurry nice, sharpness right (in the portraits better not to have too much), Af always ready. Take it with your eyes closed you will not regret it. |
 | sent on January 04, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, weight, price Cons: Nobody Opinion: Superb optics. With a low price (but really content!) You bring home a lens that knows how to make the most of their car, especially in portraiture. The definition and the detail are impressive and works well even in TA with a definition that reaches its peak at f2.8. The bokeh is beautiful, creamy enough, and returns excellent portraits up to the full body in which it begins to feel the crop factor of the system (2x). From the constructive point of view, if you accept the plastic as a material, nothing is missing. Each part gives back a good feeling to the touch and its lightness, together with its small size, makes it an optic to always have with it. A "must to have" that can not miss in your m43 kit. |
 | sent on November 10, 2017 Pros: Image quality, lightweight, excellent value for money Cons: A little plastic, but given the price I do not think we can even claim the quality of the materials ... Opinion: The first optic that made me into the Micro 4: 3 world. Incredible as such an economical optic (if they are also found in 150 in the used ...) it has such a superb quality.rnPrincipally to be used for portraiture, I have also noticed a discreet versatility in other genres. Diaphragmed with the little needed to make a landscape, it gives an impressive clarity and detail. In an M4 / 3 kit you can not miss even those who do not use the medium-sized portrait focal lengths. Its price quality makes it a unique piece! |
 | sent on September 21, 2017 Pros: Colors, sharpness, bokeh, ridiculous weights and footprints, unbeatable value for money Cons: I did not find it. Opinion: I had two. I got stupidly the first one I had .... but not even six months and I have to "repurchase (use) .rnHe has the micro system 4/3 MUST buy this optic! The price on the used is very convenient (we are about 170-180 euros), and even wanted to resell it, it's virtually a circular check. The most obvious feature is the size of the optics: I also have two 85mm for reflexes and I guarantee that this 45mm is really small. On the Oly EP3 it is almost disproportionate (in the sense that the machine looks too big in comparison to the lens) ... it weighs very little ... and gives unrivaled shots! The focal point, which is the most popular "classic" portrait (corresponds to a 90mm on FF), there is nothing like this 45! rnThe 2.8 zoom aperture is still more expensive, and not even the 42.5 Panasonic (1.8) which, in my opinion, has less pleasant colors. rnBokeh VERY good, greatsharpness, fast focus, beautiful saturated colors, vivid and contrasted .... seldom feel the need to "counter" the photo in post. rnThe owners of the zoom 14 - 42 f 3.5-5-6 of the kit: do you have the portraits that returns the 42mm kit zoom? rnEcco ..... this 45 will give you another thing! Everything else! RnrnOne other m4 / 3 system optics are great .... but they cost an eye. You bring him home with a cigarette! |
 | sent on June 05, 2017 Pros: Light, small, practical, effective, economical, what I wanted! Cons: Still not found problem (no hood and no filters but venial), the only flaw is in my car body that stops at 1/4000 and sometimes in TA in the sun are walking ... Opinion: If there was to be a reason not to abandon the system 4/3 well then this is the reason, light trip but I missed a focused lens for close-ups and details, found to be used at 180 euros, now makes me think about shots that before ' I would solve 'with Pana 14-140, inconsistent the result, (in addition to that I gave me an additional Macroprocessor P.01 lens) recommended to all fours, down with the cable with Oly 9-18 so now Just go ahead |
  | sent on May 27, 2017 Pros: Small, lightweight, practical. Incredible blow. Great resolution! Cons: No hood, available separately. Opinion: I have bought this lens mainly for two reasons: to make portraits and why it is very bright. At first I was skeptical because I was not convinced of the materials that are made, but once removed from its packaging, I must say that the plastic is of the highest quality. It holds good in hand and in any sense of presence. Even to the eyes it looks small but solid, well-built and above all to define a "little grain" that must not be missed in our set of goals. It's not a pro lens, but it behaves as if it were. His blurry personally liked me so much and his precision and speed did not surprise me and even disappointed it was what I was looking for! I had confidence in this purchase as I read the various reviews on it and I must say that it mirrors what one looks for. In my opinion, the lens is worth more than it costs (300 euros complete with hood and UV filter). Searching for the users are at great prices and for those looking for photos especially for portraits, Is not wrong. It does not distort the image, it is faithful to reality. Accurate and beautiful full colors. I advise. |
 | sent on April 21, 2017 Pros: sharpness, bokeh, dimensions, optical and constructive quality, price. Cons: missing, hood and ring passage by AF-S to M. Opinion: I recently purchased this lens and I'm delighted I did. Nice to see, light, crystal clear even at TA, beautiful colors and natural, making fast and accurate focusing. A great bokeh that it did not proceed very much inferior to the optical full-frame, obviously made the appropriate consideration between the two optics (David is a the other is Goliath). Highly recommended for 4/3. |
user62049 | sent on February 23, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, color, bokeh, qulità for money, lightweight, fast AF Cons: Nobody Opinion: One of the many objectives of Olympus home that it is impossible not to have in the kit micro 4/3. rnUna great price-quality, beautiful colors and a blurred super! rnNon I can find fault why I recommend it to all who are looking for a quality fixed. I've also used for landscapes and street and I must say that behaves very well |
 | sent on November 05, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, size and price Cons: Anything Opinion: Bought new on the internet recently, the use of OM D EM10 II.rnObiettivo very small, I have a ff Nikon kit, where I use a 85mm 1.8D ... to think about having a large 1/5 lens but essentially the same makes me smile .. ..without count that 45 ZUIKO is better than Nikon ..... Sharpness sensational, if closed a bit '(or even too much), has a nice bokeh, AF speed is very very buona..preciso and nothing rumoroso.rnRestituisce detailed images with blurred pleasant and brillanti.rnSe color you want less sharpness, for example portraits, leaving at f1.8 and acting a bit 'in pp you risolve.rnConsigliatissimo, quality / price ratio very high |
 | sent on September 23, 2016 Pros: sharpness and bokeh. autofocus speed. lightness. EXCELLENT optical quality. Compared with 85 f / 1.8 on full frame it does not make me regret absolutely full frame system, indeed ....! With 85 Canon can not I get the same definition and nitidezza.rn Cons: I would rather have an AF ring that allowed the transition from AF-S to M simply by moving the focus ring forward or backward. The optical quality seems poor relying only on the optical tactile feeling Opinion: I bought this lens because everyone says is a must-have remained enthusiastic m4 / 3.rnSono system of AF speed and lightness of lente.rnOttima sharpness already at TA. The bokeh is pleasant though not comparable to that of a full-frame (but do not know can have the same things as these are different systems) .rnNon I never thought that a lens so small I would be able to get a quality as well eccelsa.rnPeccato for the lack of the lens hood in the package. I've purchased separately original and does his duty. |
 | sent on March 23, 2016 Pros: Excellent bokeh, light, crisp, good value for money Cons: Hood absent in the package Opinion: The Olympus M. Zuiko 45mm is really one of the best lenses of the micro 4/3 view: the sharpness and detail are at the top, the colors are wonderful. As those who preceded me, I can not recommend this objective for all those are looking perspective around 45mm. I would "condemn" the lack of lens hood (sold separately - in even very solid plastic - to over € 30.00 !!). Another drawback: if you use it on the car bodies from the fairly large size (for mirrorless), such as the Panasonic G, GH series, the lens diameter is a bit 'tight to reach the ring of focusing with ease . Anyway, nothing insurmountable! ;) |
 | sent on March 16, 2016 Pros: Lightness, quality, small Cons: Nobody Opinion: I took me several months to convince me to buy this lens. I had known before! Wonderful. Color, definition, sharpness ... there is everything! Do not do as I do! If you have half a mind to buy it, do it immediately because it is a wonderful lens! What struck me, in addition to the lens, it is the packaging. Olympus as always, looks at every detail with the utmost seriousness. I always had a soft spot for this brand and I must say that in 30 years their products are always the top for me. very valid products. |
 | sent on May 08, 2015 Pros: light, bright, nice to see. The color version of metal, has an elegance pazzaesca, goes well with small mirrorless, Micro Series 43 Pen Cons: I do not find fault, even if it does not perceive. The value and price is absolutely amazing. Opinion: wonderful. I only say this, to a meeting with other photographers, I had a colleague. I asked him about, and he said, "is so beautiful, that you can place in a cabinet as a piece of furniture." I bought it right away !!!!!! rnrnDa then use it often, as its main objective. In a 43 it becomes a reality in 90 mm, but in a fairly large room installation is fine. |
 | sent on September 15, 2014 Pros: Outstanding optical quality, compact size, value for money. Cons: No one. Opinion: My best purchase ever: the extraordinary optical performance and compact. At full aperture is visible, but only by enlarging a lot, a bit 'of chromatic aberration already at 2.8 disappears tutto.rnE' so small and light that I use it pretty much as normal, still mounted, preferring to auks more canonically handyman 14 2.5.rnNitido as a razor up to f / 8 also covers the needs of a greater depth of color campo.rnL'aberrazione as the slight distortion, the latter practically invisible, are corrected effectively by olympus viewer. |
 | sent on September 12, 2014 Pros: size and lightweight, excellent lens in scope m4 / 3, if evaluated / compared with other systems you resize a lot, low price and convenient, always remaining within the m4 / 3 ..... the end is a 45 f1.8 and the FF and mopeds of this opening cost less and cover larger sensors Cons: not particularly sharp at TA, suffers from AC, it would not be permissible for a modern lens and designed from scratch, difficult to find and ND filters for use in TA in full sun (blurred) time to 1/4000 is not enough, unfavorable feeling of "plasticosità" in handling Opinion: For a small kit to be attached to a more "authoritative" this lens is a must, small, light, very sharp, good bokeh, I use it together with the two standard zoom 14-42, 40-150 and the fish Samy , and it is my travel kit, everything is in a microborsa audiovideo. Recommended for compact and lightweight systems trasportabilissimi with whom you want to have a good IQ in scope m4 / 3. |
 | sent on September 11, 2014 Pros: weight, size, creamy bokeh, image quality in CT, lens exceptional value for the price and yield incredible Cons: at the moment I can not find fault maybe the hood to buy separately Opinion: carried away with about 200-odd euro, a really excellent lens by calculating the ratio price quality ', offers a very pleasant blur, clutter to a minimum, to have and carry with them', I understand the success of OLYMPUS and its system. advice in the most 'absolute. offers a truly incredible performance, in short, a must-have, as already stradetto quality fixed. |
 | sent on March 16, 2014 Pros: Image quality already at RT, bokeh, a minimum distance of MAF, weight, size, price Cons: Absence of the hood (which is expensive), slight chromatic aberration at TA Opinion: I can add little compared to those who preceded me: the lens is tiny, lightweight (116 grams), but has an amazing quality: clear already at room temperature, better yet prepunched to a stop. The bokeh is creamy, fast and accurate AF. If we consider that with a modest (new costs 290 €) you will come home to a beautiful glass portrait, I would say that there is little to add. It should also be considered to be the minimum distance of MAF (50 cm), usually longer on this medium telephoto (85 cm. 1.8 for the excellent Canon 85). rnL'unico drawback is the absence of the hood, plastic and also expensive (about 30 euro): Olympus makes us look bad in here. The slight chromatic aberration sometimes present in TA in areas of high contrast, almost entirely because I do not speak in normal lenses so bright (affects targets are also much more expensive): everything is resolved fairly easily in PP. rnrnInsomma: a lens must-have for anyone who loves portraiture on m4/3.rn |
 | sent on May 13, 2013 Pros: Dimensions - Weight - Blurry - Quality / price high Cons: Still have not found. Opinion: A lens that is incredibly more than it costs (I used him away for 200 €). It has a pleasant blur and the yield is already an excellent TA. When you consider the paltry weight of 116gr and size is a lens that can not miss in one kit micro 4/3! RNE 'recently also released version of this lente.rnrnp.s BLACK. I did too much tenderness the cap ... a little larger than that of a bottle of beer! : P |
| sent on May 03, 2013 Pros: Incredible, incomparable as the price-performance ratio. Cons: Hood mount, plastic effect Opinion: Incredible value for money. Things to buy with your eyes closed for those who use the medium of television m4/3.rnL 'only flaw is the type of plastic used, which gives a sense of fragility that leads to an erection optical system currently m4 / 3 to its maximum expression in terms of quality-prezzo.rnConsigliatissimo |
 | sent on February 23, 2013 Pros: Weight, quality TA, price. Cons: Light Purple Fringing. Opinion: Objective compact and lightweight, has a nice yield even F1, 8. L 'only flaw is a slight Purple Fringing which however is seen only slightly in magnification to 100% (fussiness) and easily correctable. It 'a lens that should not be missing in a kit MFT, both for the size you want for the price (ridiculous for the quality it offers), want to surrender .. Highly recommended! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
