RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on April 17, 2018

Pros: More compact than a fixed lens! Bright enough to be a 3.5-5.6, coupled to the em10 or em5 Pocket machine

Cons: Extends a lot of on (but it is inevitable for the type of goal), has an absurd tendency to balance white towards the gray/beige even under strong sunlight

Opinion: Great lens, it was the first of my fed m43 Kit, and unlike other, a lens that won't sell. WINS hands down on any 18-55 of march more noble, for clarity and compactness. MAF fast enough even in low light, allowed me to take 2 seconds too Freehand into town in the dark by grabbing the moving objects in a precise and clean, I didn't have a real 1:1 comparison but the MAF I think faster than the 12-40 PRO (which is pa ten of my Kit). As quoted in against, pity the absurd tendency to balance white towards the gray/beige even under strong sunlight, nothing irreparable provided you shoot in RAW.

avatarjunior
sent on March 07, 2018

Pros: Compact, sufficiently clear

Cons: In its price range and considered the price, no one!

Opinion: I confirm what was said by the other reviewers, considering the price and compactness the quality is more than adequate! RnAdd that the slowness of the zoom can be exceeded by setting the speed to "high" in the appropriate menu: rnrnMenu -> Utility -> Electronic Zoom Speed -> Still Picture / Movie -> Low / Normal / High

avatarjunior
sent on January 04, 2018

Pros: Compactness, weight, sharpness

Cons: Zoom a little 'lent

Opinion: A good Olympus lens, certainly not excellent (it's a kit lens) but that knows its stuff. Its size is practically nil (it is a pancake) combined with its lightness makes a machine like the OMD M10 practically a compact, which can be in a simple baby carrier. The sharpness is good (especially at 14 mm) and can give beautiful images especially outdoors. To be a kit lens is not bad, especially if you consider its size and weight. Personally, I use it widely in the mountains and everywhere I want a car so light that I forget it. I recommend buying, especially if in a kit.

avatarjunior
sent on November 13, 2016

Pros: Size, weight, aesthetics, colors, quiet AF

Cons: Motorized zoom, slow, diffraction

Opinion: If we consider that is a kit lens, ultra-portable, ultra-lightweight, it is an objective optically good, equal to the APS-C SLR kit for entry-level / midrange. If we want to compare to a fixed or an optical PRO, does not compare. If it's in the kit is a recommended optics, especially for video. If you want to take it on its own, it is not recommended. It is clear from f1: 3.5 to f1: 5.6 over the image pulp, compared to CaNikon kit niditissimo.rn

avatarsenior
sent on September 29, 2015

Pros: Compact size, aesthetics (if it's a pro), good optical quality

Cons: slow zoom

Opinion: I had 14-42 RII, then sold to move to 14-150 (I maintain), I decided to buy the 14-42 EZ outputs "lightweight / compact" and, regardless of whether it is aesthetically perfect for M10 and even if the aesthetic is not the photo, the eye wants its part ... rnNell'uso, however, despite the good optical quality (in my opinion just below the RII), the real penalty is the slowness of the impressive power zoom, if you do not take time to do the problem, but if you want to seize the moment you end ..... rn

avatarsupporter
sent on August 01, 2015

Pros: Compactness, weight, size and color quality in general.

Cons: There is no lens hood, slow zoom.

Opinion: I own the Olympus EM10 and serial I chose this goal, I have to say I was positively surprised by the overall quality of the picture, also a 3x zoom into such a small space is to ammirare.rnSecondo me is a goal to have, always carry with you, and almost you do not know what you have so you pocket, for amateur photos of a certain level recommend it, however, if one looks for something professional well have to go through another ..

avatarjunior
sent on July 25, 2015

Pros: It made really good, compact and lightweight, blow up

Cons: motorization slightly slow, no lens hood can.

Opinion: I must say that I took this view in a kit with the Oly10, that is, only pro, really good, very small and with a good yield, if you really want the bother I can say it's just a little slow the motorizazione. A hood could be handy in some cases but I do not think is applicable, that is, optical Highly recommended for the trip or for those who want a nice small handyman.

avatarjunior
sent on May 13, 2015

Pros: compactness and lightness

Cons: poor sharpness, gives the best of himself outside only well-lit

Opinion: I had it in kit with OMD EM10, if I could go back I would not have ever taken. I think is the most scarce, as yield, between all the objectives Oly, better to invest on other goals: a few bright or some fixed lens-end pro. If you want to appreciate the quality of your OMD EM10, unless you have few claims, is not the choice that is right for you.

avatarsenior
sent on April 17, 2015

Pros: Compact and lightweight finish makes a tutt 'one with the M10

Cons: Zoom ring too close to that of maf, when making zooming if you strike the ring maf activates the 'magnification and you lose the' shot, I would have liked a lower resistance of the zoom ring, no hood

Opinion: Rating 6 for clarity and for the rest of the optical performance, valuable to build a very compact system, the machine goes into a pocket, but if you claim some 'quality must choose another, loses much against the 14-42 Panasonic nothing of that modest overall suffer from flare and becomes low in contrast against the light, I expected more from Oly

avatarsenior
sent on November 27, 2014

Pros: very compact, focal length good enough if we look compact, motorized zoom for iVideo, three aspherical lenses, manual focus, good minimum distance of focus, in overall good quality

Cons: no hood, no aperture scale.

Opinion: I personally took this zoom lens to its compactness, certainly not to the levels of the most renowned professional zoom, but mounted on E.M5 his work he does, then his real death is the Pen, in my long hikes in the mountains I appreciate very much, but even when they are in town to do some shooting street stands out shortly.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me