RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Nikon Z DX 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 VR)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on September 05, 2022

Pros: Sharpness, lightness, size.

Cons: maximum opening.

Opinion: Incredibly sharp at all focal lengths, superb at 50mm. despite the limited maximum aperture, detail at 50mm. like the best optics of Casa (guys I shot at a spider hanging from the drying rack putting myself at the minimum distance allowed, enlarging the shot you can see the hairs on the paws). Very smart: small and fast in focusing. If it had been a 16-80 instead of 16-50 it would not have been "a goal" but "The Goal". P.S. for those who denigrate non-metal attacks: first inquire about the type of plastic that is used, I point out that even on the Apollo Spacecraft and on the Shuttle there are plastic parts, just a brief search on the Internet to the Patents of some of these to change your mind.

avatarsenior
sent on February 12, 2022

Pros: sharpness, compactness, stabilization

Cons: max limited aperture, collapsible opening, plastic

Opinion: overall, a gem... optical rendering of all respect for a handy and light pancake. its limited size makes it an excellent choice for a "road" kit. too bad for the strong feeling of plasticity, and for the initial shot necessary that could make you miss the moment. anyway, a great lens!

avatarsenior
sent on January 29, 2022

Pros: Optical rendering, lightness, AF

Cons: All plastic, brightness

Opinion: It is a lens in my opinion exceptional, because it combines an extreme compactness with an excellent optical yield, superior to the various kits around. The only thing that pays off is brightness. I didn't test, sharpness or anything, I just used it and it never betrayed me. The AF is good, the stabilizer is excellent, it makes up for the lack of the one on the body very well. It makes the z50 very compact and if I have to say together with the 50-250 it makes it a best-buy at the expense of the shortcomings it has compared to other competitors. Therefore it is an indispensable lens for the APS-C and that does not find equal in other brands.

avatarjunior
sent on December 20, 2021

Pros: Optical quality, lightness

Cons: Aperture, aesthetic

Opinion: If all KIT lenses were like this the KIT lenses would not be so mistreated. Very very good optical quality, lightweight and built well despite being plastic. Obviously the opening of the diaphragm does not go crazy, but for day photos we say that everything is compensated by the homogeneity of its yield. In conclusion, a very good KIT lens, if you do not need bright optics to begin with does everything you have to do and more. Ah, let's also say that it is not beautiful to see when open, but I mean, we can overlook this topic. :)

avatarjunior
sent on December 14, 2021

Pros: A featherweight I can take pictures on the street among people and they almost do not notice ... I feel invisible

Cons: nothing

Opinion: I state that I am not an expert and my opinion is from such. I needed a small and light lens to take on a trip to places of worship among people without giving too much in the eye ... and surprise also does its beautiful job. Yes, there are the most valuable ones but for my level as a photographer it is enough for me and advances. Believe me it is just a nice functional object. Greetings

avatarsupporter
sent on August 27, 2021

Pros: Most beautiful silver version, sharpness from TA, focusing distance

Cons: Collapsible, you lose time to open it, lack of hood.

Opinion: But you remember the old 16-85.. sharp every now and then and never at TA.. this much reviled 16-50 , a little shorter as canvases but weighs a third, is sharper, VR works better, has half or almost half of lenses inside, that is, less absorption, less flare, so same brightness on the practical side. You can use it at TA.. nn will make the blurry of dreams but you should not close them to f8/11 like the old 16-85. That was not bad, mind you. But this outclasses him. Of course, f6.3 at only 50mm makes an impression but with the old one at 6.3 you found photos kneaded. At least these are sharp. And the 20 cm of minimum focus is a gem. Then if a 17-55 f2.8 with Z attack arrives, this one retires but I have the doubt that it will not arrive so soon and at less than 2000 €.

avatarjunior
sent on May 12, 2021

Pros: Crisp, light, stabilized

Cons: All plastic attachment including... maybe even the glasses?

Opinion: For a first approach to the system it can be more than good... but then you feel the need to want much more... also given the high quality of the sensor and processor of the z50... and a good optics but nothing to do with competition professor lenses! (especially Fuji) I hope Nikon soon gets to market at least two fixed and two zoom opening f2.8... I believe a lot in this ml system! And Nikon is doing great projects!!!

avatarjunior
sent on December 27, 2020

Pros: Lightness, quality, footprint

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: Caught in kit with the Z50 churns out raw not bad. It is very light and adapts very well to the compactness of the z50, they form a beautiful pair. I use it as many times as I want to be light and take home a more than decent shot. I highly recommend it to those like me who walk with the car around their neck its weight is not felt at all and the space it occupies is really derisory. I am very satisfied

avatarjunior
sent on March 01, 2020

Pros: Lightness, optical quality, price, size,stabilizer .

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: It is common for a cheap lens to be paired in a camera kit, with diaphragms that are not open, plastic..... but I'll hold this tight!! A pancake weighing just over 100 grams useful for travel and street, with an excellent stabilizer. For video-goer, zooming is fast and quiet. My modest opinion as a photography enthusiast is to recommend it! It also makes sense to have it with a mirrorles to let the z50 into a purse or pocket.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me