|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on March 26, 2021 Pros: read, file quality, commands all at your fingertips, 12mpx Cons: it doesn't have a big screen but it's okay the photos you see them then on the pc! not tropicalized for those who shoot under the snow Opinion: it is an honest machine, it does its job and with good optics it also makes good. it's better than the 5000 series of which I had the d5600 that seemed to me with colors too contrasted and above all not have the focus engine that this one has instead. The controls on board the d90 are better arranged and you should not start to sponge in the menu. The color rendering is softer but I mean, in post production you do everything for these little differences. good holiday machine and very good also for macrophotography for crop factor. the 12 mpx are fine with all the optics, if you mount the vintages you go great! Only thing has no exposure meter with vintage optics. The iso estate up to 1000 is fine, so enough for all uses unless you mount the dark 18 55 from XD kit. Even in analog above 800 iso you never went there also because it doesn't make sense! |
  | sent on March 04, 2021 Pros: All for age, internal motor, double ring, ISO up to 1600, weight, etc.... Cons: fps not really for sports but you live with Opinion: I bought it back after 6 years for my 5-year-old son after a year with the D50. In 2015 used for 2 marriages with the Sigma af 70-200 f/2.8 EX DG HSM OS up to ISO 1250/1600 and its old files are phenomenal but it is my taste. Excellent Semi-Pro SLR and thanks to the internal motor and double beal I mount the bright and professional D series optics................................ First Marriage https://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=235593&l=it#iniziopaginagalleria .................. Second Marriage https://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=235780&l=it#iniziopaginagalleria |
 | sent on November 25, 2020 Pros: Ergonomics, immediacy, colors, battery Cons: Iso, only 12mp (considering we are in 2021) Opinion: A car I fell in love with. Since I turned on the display: crisp, contrasted, colorful. Defects (considering that it is a REFLEX from 13 years ago), it has none except for isos: you can really get up by only 2 stops and it can be a problem for some. It has many merits, starting from good rows with really good colors, to battery life to total ergonomics. Now I'm going to try to resell it, but a little reluctantly ;) she was my first companion of adventures and you never let me down. |
 | sent on February 25, 2020 Pros: The battery lasts a lot, the files are very light of the D300/D300s and Much smaller than the other two that I have been using for many years D300s/D300 - with the D90 I make so many cities, people, monuments, interiors and much more... It has many functions its menus, such as photographing quickly when you are in a hurry... Cons: For now Nothing... Just the fact that she's a little dated, you don't find monitor covers quickly, you have to make them yourself like in cell phones... For the rest and obvious and a NIKON you can't get hurt... Opinion: I just took this machine, Used little, well, very few 5900 shots, and including a Target DX 18-55 VR - 3 batteries, with battery charge from USB and current, not a scratch, Registered machine and lens to niTAL a total of 150.00 Great deal... I advise all neophotographers to take it and check the equipment accessories of the manufacturer. I'm getting comfortable, and for the moment everything is OK put right with its functions, small at the same time and very practical to carry around kind of in the city... in parties, restaurants, buses, even to do the shopping, coupled with a DX 35 f/1.8 I have paired it with three goals, a Nikon DX 35 f/1.8 - a Tamron DX 10-24 f/3.5-4.5 and a classic Tamron 18-270 f/3.5-6.3 I hope as a machine, which behaves well as the D5000 - D300 and the D300s have always done that for now the other two machines do their duty and have other goals a Macro and a telegoal... I posted some photos on this D90 are just tests, it does not seem but I have to get used to even the DX 35 f/1.8 for here it takes a little patience, now it seems that you can not go out because of the Coronavirus soon I will post more photos... Greetings to all... (MGNELLO) |
 | sent on February 04, 2020 Pros: Size weight and maximum exploitability, especially as a second body machine. Cons: For what it does and how much you pay today in the used: NO Opinion: It is one of the few Nikons that really impressed me, the colors are very beautiful and never misses a shot. Always take the picture home. Small machine but that knows how to get its hands dirty in all situations. Always manageable, clear, the battery lasts a lifetime, is not heavy nor bulky. It is not a PRO and its quality is limited, but its 12mega pixels are exploitable ALL, unlike other models even with 24Mpix but that are worth little. After having it for 2 years I'm buying it back now. |
 | sent on January 27, 2020 Pros: BEST CAR WELL BUILT EREDE Nikon D80 Cons: Maybe the CMOS sensor doesn't live up to the competition (Canon) Opinion: Machine body almost identical to the Nikon D80 whose sensor changes which is CMOS maybe not up to the competition (Canon); A resolution of 12 MPIXELIn is a very good Reflex with not excessive weight WITH A GOOD IMAGE QUALITY. I didn't use it too much so I can't say more. I used it with old optics Nikon 80:200 TO POMPA and I got very nice photos. I found a higher overall quality on the Nikon D7100 and Nikon D2X. However overall I like it and I will keep it for a long time. |
 | sent on November 05, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, double ring, handling, bright display Cons: Noise on high iso, autofocus sometimes slow Opinion: After 6 years of non-intense use and for strictly amateur use I would like to say that it is a beautiful machine, recommended by a professional seller and despite being almost out of production, immediately after holding it in my hand gave me the impression of a ergonomics and practicality excellent, the robustness seems good to me (personally proven after a strong fall). The screen is bright and in my opinion well contrasted with the double dial for the main controls and all the functions at handy looks of a much higher level. I'd buy it back right away. The photos are still very good now. |
user161667  | sent on February 04, 2019 Pros: Double ring, direct controls, presence of side display for shutter info, customizable button, possibility of battery grip, built-in autofocus motor, pentaprism, full reflex controls, large optical park, price on second hand Cons: High ISO not very well Opinion: I own the Nikon d90 from Nov. 2012. It is a perfect reflex for those who want to enter the world of photography, having at their disposal all the necessary hotkeys that are not in the series D3xxx and D5xxx. The resolution is fine, beautiful colors, good photos, above 800 ISO you have to be careful, with quality optics and large openings you can push further, with less bright optics better not exceed the 800 ISO (loss of detail, noise intrusive). The backlit side screen (not the main one) is very convenient to take a quick look at the machine settings. You can also mount D-series optics with considerable economical savings and have at your disposal excellent optics at more affordable prices. It is not possible to compare it to the current high-end SLR, however, still manages to crank out photos of excellent quality, especially with lenses of good level even old.. But of a good standard. |
 | sent on December 05, 2018 Pros: Manageability, ease of use, double ring, non-heavy files, photo results Cons: Inaccurate AF in certain situations Opinion: Purchased in 2012 at the end of production is still my first digital SLR from which I had only satisfactions and how little teaches you to take pictures; It will definitely not keep up with recent SLRs, but for amateur use it performs well on its work and has never given me problems. Given the 12.3 megapixels RAW products are lightweight and can be processed by PC not really recent even if I use little photographic programs except to adjust the exposure and some nonsense. With good lenses also still produces beautiful files..... and beyond the 800iso if it is really a problem I always carry with me an external flash that solves the problems of brightness. A future upgrade will definitely be there, but I'll keep the D90 as the second body. The advice to those approaching the reflex system to do school without spending a madness! |
 | sent on December 03, 2017 Pros: Compact, direct controls, top lcd screen, reliability Cons: Minimum iso value 200 Opinion: Very similar to the D80 from the point of view of the "body" has different especially the 12-megapixel cmos sensor instead of the 10-megapixel ccd. The D80 retains the same qualities of robustness (albeit polycarbonate and non-tropicalized) and ergonomics. It has internal autofocus engine, a good rear lcd screen and an equally good top screen, a great pentaprisma sight and all the important controls that are easily accessible. It's a reliable camera, maybe it can't stand very high iso values (let's say it's better to stay up to 800 iso). |
| sent on September 19, 2017 Pros: Practicality, robustness, built-in autofocus engine, ease of use Cons: Self-focus autofocus, high ISO rendered Opinion: With me for over two years, he has always done his job extravagantly, never had a jam, always worked in all environments, from the snowy to -15 to the sea heat at +40, a simple and intuitive menu, and good readability under the direct sunlight. On the other hand, electronics feels that it is dated (2008), it has "little" native iso ranges (200 3200) and the focus is lentina (especially with the internal engine). It is great to enter the world of semi-pro photography, the external lcd screen is something fantastic, you have all the strictly necessary parameters at a glance, even the autonomy is fantastic. |
 | sent on April 24, 2017 Pros: Robusta with internal motor can also be used with the optical af-d Cons: Autofocus slow and imprecise, value for money Opinion: I've had this camera for a few months, then I switched to the d750, the yield of this reflex is overrated, it's a good car, but it costs too much based on the results offered, with the benefit of the doubt, maybe my copy was defective (bought new), I always used nikon d90 but af this made me mad so much that I sold it after less than a 5 anno.rnVoto |
 | sent on November 05, 2016 Pros: excellent Cons: Too many features that you always posting to a point. Opinion: I have 3 changed because now they were the fruit. In 2015 I found a new one in a warehouse (it was a stock fund) and I bought back. I was undecided whether to buy an old out of production SLR or a newer model, I finally decided for the old, the rest of "old chicken makes good soup" ..... RNA part that at the time it took me 10 days before of the manual to study me with the settings he rerouted from one page, then with the experience I was able to set it as efficiently as possible. What can I say ....... excellent reflex, gave me a lot of satisfaction, only flaw is the 18-105 lens kit that leaves desired. In the flea market they are to be found at an affordable price and advice for users who want to enter the world of photography provided you do not get angry if it is not found the perfect setting. Great camera body when paired with a bright lens. |
 | sent on October 04, 2016 Pros: It is in total balance ... it is good for everything, everything in the right place, including the menu, of course not to the maximum levels of professionalism, for which it was not designed. Cons: I do not know .... just to force myself I would say that the explanatory menu "?" It is a bit 'too brief, just to complain about something that for once there. Ah here, by reading I came to my mind, once or twice I said to myself "and 100 iso have forgotten them"? rnPoi add that also cost me a lot, 1600 with € 18,200. Opinion: My car for years, I would switch to a FF but not sell anything, let alone for those 4 money you do not do it justice. Does not rise with the iso? Ecchissenefrega have taught me that the low ones must stay! rnMai a jam even electronic, still I have to learn from the instruction booklet for if it clicks I already know that I'm the one you have set some absurdities incompatible with shooting. It looks new, not a scratch, a small button or a discolored ring that cilocca. rnPer than I never brought to the sea, she likes the pure mountain air, without all the salt spray that makes her the electromechanical sinusitis. rnNella its market segment is / it was perfect. |
 | sent on September 21, 2016 Pros: A highly successful model Cons: For the category none Opinion: Excellent machine, one of the best models of Nikon succeeded. free from defects, lack or almost new firmware release speaks for sola.rnSe 12 mpx there are enough and often not taken over in 1600 iso then get one used in excellent condition 4 money is a bargain! RNPs: I also have a D300S and D3S a d700 .... I like the 12 mpx ..... forgot ... a fuji x30 .... 12 mpx ahahahah! |
 | sent on September 08, 2016 Pros: All lightness, all the commands that are used in the right place, beautiful color, light file .... Cons: Nothing, it is not for the "snob" for those to whom to photograph necessarily need the latest design, perhaps the most expensive, jam-packed with pixels which then put them in crisis ....... well maybe to print a billboard advertising than ten meters by five, I admit, is not suitable ..... Opinion: I have a Nikon D700 but every time I shot with the D90 is as if I used for the first time, never a smudge, even with mediocre goals, it admitted that a Nikon lens can be mediocre. Someone complains of ISO personally never exceeded 800 ISO but trying again to 1600 is flawless. I will keep with every consideration and will be forever. |
 | sent on April 20, 2016 Pros: Body ergonomics, excellent color, excellent layout of controls, internal AF motor, synchro flash Cons: Held at high ISO (is a machine that does its job very well in good lighting conditions, at least up to ISO 800), slow burst that does not allow quick bursts, thus more suited to the amateur evolved looking for excitement Opinion: The D90, along with the D700, is undoubtedly a milestone in Nikon production of the last 15 years. It 'was my first digital SLR, purchased in 2010, and after six years the use even with satisfaction (even in the workplace as a second body, for only daytime news coverage). The d90 preserves essential characteristics derived from the professional series, as the AF motor inside (which allows you to mount old optics with autofocus) and the two dials that allow for the immediate adjustment of shutter speed and aperture (not yet present characteristics in today's bodies nikon consumer category). Combined with good optical, the D90 will always produce good photos, provided that it provides a good amount of light. Already with 35mm and 50mm "G" series returns wonderful pictures, and use it remains a pleasure for both the ergonomics that the limited weight. I 'a car that surprises, especially for the excellent construction (I personally used at temperatures upat -15 ° and it did not give the slightest sign of weakness). So treat yourself to good optics, and the D90 will always return to ride. If you find it in good condition and at a fair price, I recommend you buy it and not thinking too much about, even in 2016, especially if you have little dimistichezza with SLR (with the D90 you really learn to photograph). Though I'll keep it tight. |
 | sent on April 11, 2016 Pros: Nice solid feel in the hand, main controls are accessible in an instant Cons: I do not see for a APS-C Opinion: I'm using it for 3 years. I started with a zoom Sigma "decent" with mediocre results. Then I switched to fixed! And from here I do not move anymore. Now I'm using it with the famous Nikkor 85 f1 / 4 D. Exposing correctly in the right light and diaframmando properly you have your point across. What I mean is that if you have optical fantastic, the D90 body makes her part admirably. As for the noise at high ISO, I made a shot at home with very little light (always with the Nikkor 85 f1 / 4 D) at ISO 1600 with a 1/6 sec freehand leaning on a table. fully acceptable result, I guarantee! Buy optical super and you will never regret the D90! |
 | sent on March 09, 2016 Pros: Tank, ergonomic, lightweight Cons: Above ISO 800 Opinion: Despite his age it is still a very good semi-pro. He can immediately give a feeling of solidity and robutezza without being too heavy. Everything is in the right place, without confusion and without excesses. This will change only when it is "finished" and ask me to suppress it with the big problem of having to think and decide what to replace it with. The only drawback are the iso, already above 800 the noise is noticeable and problematic. |
 | sent on January 27, 2016 Pros: A beautiful semi / pro, handy, good grip, proper weight, easy-access controls, what about a tank. Cons: Himself had the highest iso but no complaints really great car. Opinion: I started with a Nikon Coolpix L16 after the D60 and D3100 are then passed to a D90 APSC semi / pro, in comparison to the first two with the D90 is a whole new planet. Just equip it with a good lens and you have good results. I when it equipped with a Sigma 18/300 3.5 and a 2.8 17/70 Series C. that give me good results. |
 | sent on January 02, 2016 Pros: Body, manegievolezza, double ring, viewfinder (almost everything in fact) Cons: High ISO (high so to speak) to 800 already begins to dislike Opinion: Seems built for my hand this reflex.La first time lho taken in hand ..... thunderbolt (after 1 year canon). For those looking for a good one and can not spend much more than that and I think ideal. To be a machine of 2008 still behaves very well. Abina to a good lens has nothing to ividiare a reflex that cost twice as much. I was not ever disappointed by the D90, in different lighting conditions, meteorogiche, with or without flash. Af good, fast and preciso.buon white balance. The weakness and surrender to the high ISO. Already at ISO 800 ... mhhhh are not totally satisfied. In short, if it were not for the high yield iso not change. |
| sent on December 22, 2015 Pros: ergonomics, double ring, the second monitor Cons: held high iso, micro af, ISO 100 Opinion: and 'my first SLR,' was pretty much love at first sight when wielded by a shopkeeper. And 'perfect for someone like me who was looking for a camera body more evolved than the series 3xxx and 5xxx, but not too complex and full of features for a beginner are absolutely useless and fuovianti.rnIn hand by a great feeling of solidity and robutezza', and not 'too heavy and there''s all there, in its place: a few keys, but the right ones. I did a little test with a D7200 and it not for the most recent sensor - with everything 'that positively it follows - I would not change ever; especially after printing a few photos and noticed with a pleasant surprise that the noise (which aime 'sometimes already' 500iso inside the monitor) is affivolisce so much that I have very good pictures even in 3200 against iso.rni shown are merely taking conscientious of what at the moment (I bought about a year ago) I miss my way of photographing, but it ''s also true that I like it here so well (again, especially after the printed photos)the pros to completely make up for the other new contro.rntra I spent less than half 'compared to that d7200.rnsiete looking for a semi-pro camera without breaking the bank? play it safe: D90 |
| sent on November 27, 2015 Pros: Solid, reliable, robust and long-lived, very complete with 12.3 Megapixels which is more than enough and with shutter speeds from 30 sec. To 1/4000 sec. and flash sync at 1/200 sec., AF accurate, and free of birth defects in that time did not reveal. For reliability and robustness recalls, in proportion to the old system stainless FE2. Cons: No ax to grind in this camera which is one of the major successes of Nikon digital SLR in terms of. Opinion: The D90 and 'still, though no longer in production, a camera full of all you need to do any kind of photos at any level. Furthermore it has a strength, solidity and reliability that the positioning is competitive in the used market. The 12.3 megapixels are fine and are more than enough to get photos and enlargements perfectly crisp and clear. It has nothing to envy the most expensive new cameras with more megapixels thousand. |
 | sent on May 18, 2015 Pros: A semi-professional SLR, double nut for the management of time and diaphragm. Solid but compact and very manageable. Although no longer in production it has nothing to envy to the latest entry-level models offered by Nikon. Suitable for beginners; a model that will accompany you for a long time and will give you enormous satisfaction. Cons: In my opinion only the lack of ISO 100, for the rest I have not found. If one day I decide to pensionarla, I will pass directly to the FF. Opinion: Definitely worth its cost that, after many years from the market, is still "not indifferent" .rnE 'was and still is my first digital SLR, just before I shot on film. Its merit (of D90) of making me closer to this world of light and shadow, of arte.rnIn terms of targets, if you can, better to prefer the 18-105 to 18-55 (as low quality) .rnMi I recommend: always photographed in RAW! You will get a file with image definition fenomenale.rnAggiungo this: in my opinion the 12.3 mp are more than enough, it is important to learn how to photograph well! |
 | sent on May 12, 2015 Pros: Compact controls on the camera body, excellent to combine with a fixed lens. Solid and reliable, despite the thousands of shots, I have never encountered difficulties or crash by the software that manages the recovery. Good post production and opportunity 'to work in HDR. The price paid a few years ago (€ 850 for the body only) is not 'far from the new evaluations, whereas this reflex is not' more 'in produzione.rnAdatta beginners and more: a good understanding of the controls applicable permits make shots even higher new and noble reflex that offer many mega pixels compared to this modello.rnPer what concerns me a great purchase. Cons: The iso are rated minimum value of 200, 100 iso is unfortunate that the value can only be reached by setting L1 in the settings, and from what I understand it would be nothing more than a simulation software and not really optical and real. However this' does not constitute a serious problem, the sharpness and 'assured even at 200 ISO, and the "noise" is heard by raising the ISO value after a certain value, I think after the 800.rnIl built-in flash and not' very powerful, the 'I used very little, and now with a fixed 1.8 meno.rnNulla still more to challenge this "old lady" rn Opinion: In defiinitiva it applies paid. Some say that unlike the rival Canon shots in a more 'cool. In fact it seems to me that takes to overexpose, but acting on the balance is remedied immediately. Certainly with the commands to immediate grip on the body and the thousand customizations, it looks like a semi-professional SLR, not a toy from principiante.rnSe then add a bright lens and quality of 'the machine from the best of herself, sicuramento with 18-55 vr II provided it can not 'expect much. A quantum leap 'I did it by combining it with a fixed 35mm 1.8G.rnBuona and recommended even if used, because now and' discontinued. |
 | sent on March 28, 2015 Pros: Look down Cons: Look down Opinion: The Nikon D90 was my first digital SLR, I bought it shortly after its release and despite the past several years works perfectly without batting an eyelid. Together with the d300 and d700 was one of the most successful SLR Prosumer, and the first to record the video.rnIl reflex camera body is extremely robust and ergonomic, while not the Tropicalised I used under a light rain and a temperature of less than -10 and never have problems. The machine has a good white balance and the meter is accurate and reliable (tends to overexpose in bright sunlight, just underexpose by 0.3 / 0.7), the system put in kelp is given but always reliable .rnLa made at high iso is great for a reflex produced in the "far" in 2008, in particular, appears to be excellent up to 400 ISO, high up a640 / 800 ISO, acceptable at 1600 iso.rnSeppur I find a reflex exceptional today I do not buy it , you can buy the latest nikon d7000 or nikon d300 / 300s at a price slightly higher rn and all three models have superior characteristics compared to d90. To the advice? To those who want to "learn how to make photos" and seek a reflex robust, semi-professional, with all the buttons on the camera body and affordable. |
 | sent on February 26, 2015 Pros: A true SLR semi-pro Cons: nobody in opening of use Opinion: Camera extraordinary, not for nothing is considered as one of the major successes of Nikon. I use it as a second body but often prefer the former to the compactness combined with the presence of all the commands necessari.rnE 'a real semipro, that after a few years of its submission is an excellent choice that goes well beyond any other Nikon camera series 3xxx and 5xxx.rnNe've had three and I think one will always remain in zaino.rnCompleta of what it takes and free of frills and gadgets of dubious hyper utilità.rnrnrn |
 | sent on February 26, 2015 Pros: Ergonomics, ease of use, performance, detail of the photo (also with economic objectives), complete commands, Cons: video industry just enough. Opinion: * * A and castrate entry level, moreover, just a short ride on the web to see and compare photos. Dovendole give a vote, even after many years I'd give it yet "9". |
 | sent on January 18, 2015 Pros: Ergonomics, build quality, reliability, battery life, available commands, double ring. Cons: Noise to "high" ISO, dynamic range, "a few" mpx. Opinion: Excellent reflex to start, the grip is very comfortable as well as the double ring, the controls are located in the right place and the building materials are excellent, it conveys the feeling of robustness of a body semi-pro camera, none of the current entry level Nikon is well done as D90.rnMacchina very reliable, used for three years did not give the slightest problem, the battery has an impressive length, it never happened to be out of the house with a dead battery. rnIl most important problem encountered (for me) is the noise at high ISO, to get a good picture quality can be used up to 800 ISO but noise is very visible before, in some conditions of light / shooting can happen to encounter noise in the sky even at ISO 200! RNLA dynamic range is good but not eccezionale.rn12 megapixels are more than enough if you do not make enlargements and not croppano the photos, but they are very few compared to what we offer current entry level and semi-pror. |
 | sent on December 26, 2014 Pros: Everything good that they can ask a reflex Cons: Nothing, if you get to know. Opinion: An exceptional car, two years ago I decided to go back to taking photos a bit 'more "engaged" and looking for my first digital SLR I relied on the opinions of the site. I have discarded the entry level and the latest news to entrust to that which in the opinion of all was a perfectly balanced machine that is to begin to resume photographing having some experience. No disappointment no uncertainty, if not how would you just look where your error, the other photos are perfect. Makes the best in my opinion with fixed and well stabilized. There are excellent without fainting, maybe investing anything more for a 2.8 that covers focal lengths longer used. Battery life, main commands always at hand, take confidence was not at all difficult. I recommend it to everyone who wants to learn. Feeling the need for something more will require some time and money spent will have been a good investment. Find some new promotional campaign now & egrave; difficult, but if used well maintained, I will not give headaches. |
 | sent on December 25, 2014 Pros: File. overall quality. Cons: tendency to produce files with dominance of magenta; af limiting. Opinion: It 'was my first digital SLR. After a couple of years covering the files, I appreciate even more the quality species with fixed (owned 85 1.8D). The colors are very beautiful, as well as the complexion, the only flaw is the tendency to magenta colors that must be promptly corrected pp and highlights that must be handled with care. The af is older, the build quality excellent. The sensitivity is good at high ISO up to 1600 ISO, I would not go over. I consider this actual car, with the optical fair and in good hands can give files of the highest level. |
 | sent on October 08, 2014 Pros: handle, good viewfinder (to be a DX), robust, eternal battery, internal AF motor, Cons: DX, AF is not perfect, suffers above 800 iso Opinion: I've had it since 2011 (after I had stolen everything, absolutely everything: a F100, af d 18-35 f2.8, 35-70 f2.8 d af, af 80-200 f2.8 all nikon! ) and past the distrust of the DX, I find it even now great, especially putting on some glass buono.rnCi do landscape and portrait and it goes so well that, even though I'm switching to a 610, I think I keep her ... |
 | sent on September 01, 2014 Pros: Ergonomics, price, internal AF motor. Cons: Lack micro lenses, held above 800 iso Opinion: Love at first sight, bought in 2010, has accompanied me everywhere, and it was my school fotografia.rnCorpo compact car, but with the right ergonomics, not Tropicalised but never suffers, as long as you do not soak it or leave it under a deluge, is The ideal travel companion, produces good file if well exposed, and allows a good recovery in PP.rnDifetti I would say besides the fact that it is now "dated" the resistance to iso (above 800 can be seen in video noise, even above 1600 in press), there is no AF micro adjustment, peccato.rnE the "little sister" dx of the D700, then we talk about Nikon made good, no difettino or model changes after a few months, but the bodies that still can have their say, especially if the the photo to search and have artistic ability / nature, then it will never betray you. |
 | sent on August 14, 2014 Pros: Battery life, small and handy, robust Cons: Suffers from high ISO, dx, auto focus video is not excellent (but not a problem if you do not make the video) Opinion: And 'the second camera that I have and I'm entusiasta.rnho also had to hand the D80 and I realized that the D90 has a higher gear, more robust, the battery is almost eternal, fast in focus .. . rnrnl'unica flaw is that it suffers from high ISO, up to 800-1000 no problems, in addition, the noise begins to be felt; rnabbinata to professional goals gives you that little bit più.rnrncome first car is perfect, because as you learn, the D90 "Followers" before saying "I need something in pù" can go a long time, perhaps many years ... ... rnrnè was in the midst of earth, water, mud at -10 ° to + 30 degrees and I've never had problemi.rnE 'a bomb camera. the stra consiglio.rnrn |
 | sent on July 20, 2014 Pros: reliability, manageability, robustness, good shutter speed relative good construction although plastic. Cons: Sensor 12.5 Mb now just a few when compared to the last born of the house Nikon Opinion: A good car to start today and not spend as much on used now is a good price under 500 €, a lot of satisfaction from using generic and also in portraiture, reportage, but gets along well even in specialist environments (I l ' I tried it in the theater with a 70-200 2.8 with ISO 3200 even with jpg files without problems but also unpretentious) has low battery consumption, I affontato a wedding pro. I never changed the stack is generating over 500 shots in RAW and jpg.rnChe say I would highly recommend it has a lot to give yet. |
 | sent on July 17, 2014 Pros: excellent reflex is no less of the more expensive professional stability and robustness are its strong point eccellent building, equipped with internal motor that runs with every goal Cons: so few that it is worth the expense to write Opinion: I use it for a long time and I was never given the slightest problem, you go back before I buy the satisfaction that I gave this product only gave me my first Nikon that I had more than thirty years ago, the famous Nikkormat, an indestructible car true lug, perfect for everything without problem even if the sensor is n little dated does not envy the new machines |
 | sent on July 13, 2014 Pros: Excellent reflex of "starting" ... internal engine ... good solid and comfortable with BG ... large, bright viewfinder ... double ring, the upper display, held up to ISO 3200 ... long autonomy. Cons: AF system limited in birdlife. Functions limited video (autofocus poor), only 1 SD slot, lack Micro AF. Opinion: Good camera ... it was my first digital SLR, used x 2 ½ years. Perfect ergonomics with Battery Grip mounted and doubling battery life (2 slot battery). Autofocus system good, but reactive in birds shows serious limitations ... and in home video mode ... there is practically no permanent autofocus on subjects. Resilience ISO, if you shoot well exposed quietly up chart at ISO 3200. Internal engine ... then can choose optical AF and AF-D with good infrastructure at a very affordable ... both new and especially used ... portfolio ringrazia.rnConsigliata ... and in my opinion even better models entry- current level. |
| sent on June 29, 2014 Pros: ease of use - excellent battery life - sturdy and comfortable to hold in hand - size is not excessive - well done the software even if a bit too long - reliable travel companion recommended for those who want a robust and convenient to take with reflex itself - very well-functioning car iso Cons: the usual faults common to almost all nikon: weight - strong clicking noise - only 1 slot sd - Opinion: Provides good images even though the date of the project, it also accepts the old targets, excellent performance when used with Pro FX excellent targets for those who want to begin to take a little weight and noise shooting are the only defects can not be overcome, perhaps the images provided I'm a little too soft rnper the rest with a bit of experience you can overcome all |
 | sent on June 11, 2014 Pros: Solid machine body with all the necessary buttons placed at the point giusto.Durata battery. Cons: Noise quite evident above 800 ISO. Opinion: I bought this machine recently (autumn 2013), even though I was aware that it was now rather dated. Lowering the price, the countless positive reviews and the advice of a friend who owned it convinced me to buy this. rnQuando keep it in mano..ti realize that the body has nothing to do with the entry-level D3000 / D5000. We are on another livello.rnrnL'ho juice and I am continuing to squeeze it day by day and I realize that more and more that you learn to know that you can enhance it making you give me Result sorprendenti.rnrnSecondo gives the best of himself in the night pictures obviously if you place a 3piedi and give him a good 15-30 sec shutter. In these situations, the sensor can pull out details that you would never have believed it possible to vedere.rn So far I've used it with 18-105 vr with a 50ino AF 1.8D and with the Tamron 70-300 vc series -USD. The color rendition of the latter two objectives is eccellente.rnMe I will keep for a very long tempo..con the belief that it is better to invest in good optics on bodies that stainna more recent with a lot of functionality ridiculous and unnecessary ... rnConcludo billion MPX saying that the battery life is incredibile..rnrn |
 | sent on March 05, 2014 Pros: It 'a "mule" in any condition and situation. Cons: He suffers a lot high ISO leaving a "noise" hateful. Lack of mirror lockup. In this macro is no big deal but that is resolved accustomed to live wiev Opinion: Am here for my first DSLR and I love it. I know that sooner or later I will pass the ff but I also know never sell the D90. Even being out of production takes money and fame, meritandola all. rnAbbinata right returns to the optical colors and sharpness formidable and I can say this despite my short "career" fotografica.rnrnConsigliata. Hello to all! |
 | sent on February 10, 2014 Pros: Reflex practice, with all the controls at your fingertips .... pardon of his fingers. Cons: Do you suffer from high (so to speak) ISO. Opinion: Reflex legendary introduced to photography novices in every corner of the world. A true workhorse, I started taking pictures after the analog with this little / big machine that seems to never end to amaze me. Personally I see the 12 MP as a benefit, the sensor makes it better and also enhances a less noble objectives, it is a balanced DSLR that gives satisfaction in all conditions. Do not ever change it with the new Nikon that seem replicants with more pixels. Always used during my travels is sturdy and well built, the noise at high ISO (1600/3200) is a defect in mind but today easily remedied as well as the dynamic range. A good way to start and to continue in the world of reduced size, gradually discovering that if well directed settings offer beautiful images. To this day I do not feel the need to ask for more, even if it would keep turning to expensive and better performing FF. |
| sent on December 03, 2013 Pros: versatile today than a few years ago 'money, with the right lenses known to be pretty sharp, and the body has many functions and buttons within easy reach of some higher-end machines Cons: noise above 800 ISO usable up to 1600 ISO but losing detail Opinion: I used it for 4 years in all situations from the intense cold, the heat, has always defended superbly giving many shots clean and detailed. relatively compact to carry around, but with a body quite comfortable to hold, with various features of its bigger brother, as the possibility of flash and fill in the little things that for years I did not feel the need to change the camera body, in favor of a D300 d7000 or, in short, a car for those who want to start spending a hair more but knowing that for various time remain satisfied with the shopping, now "dated" but it is located at an advantageous price for the pixels are not too many ili day today but already with 50 1.8 allows generous crop, I cabiata only in favor of a D800 for more fatto.rnla I would not focus fast and accurate, perhaps suffers a little in the dark, but now I'm used to that of the D800 and I might be accustomed too well |
 | sent on September 15, 2013 Pros: Great sensor, ergonomics and semiprofessionalità of the body, internal autofocus motor and shortcuts at your fingertips Cons: Held at high ISO and a few points of focus Opinion: I've had two so I would say that I found myself very well, and the best entry level I've ever done nikon, higher than many entry level and later as d5000, I've done everything, photo at -20 and +40. Degrees and has always behaved very well, I l I sold only to a faster machine for the rest happy, then it will be far better with a body autofocus motor inside and a poor entry level as d5000/5100/5200 benefit to mount optics more old because they could use with autofocus on machine |
 | sent on April 26, 2013 Pros: Excellent Camera I use now for over 4 years in all conditions. Cons: Noise at high ISO. Opinion: Just passed the D800 I decided to keep the "old" D90 as I have always given great satisfaction in all conditions. I travel a lot for work and is a faithful and reliable travel companion that allows you to bring home great shots. The only drawback is the lack of tropicalization that in some circumstances it is very utile.rnNaturalmente with the Full Frame is another thing as well as also the investment, however, the D90 is a great second body with some advantage being APS-C. |
 | sent on November 25, 2012 Pros: Ergonomics, reliability, live view, maneuverability, ability to mount optics without AF Cons: ISO sensitivity limited (over 800 starts to lose quality). Opinion: Personally, I did not know and even the world of Nikon SLR, it was a purchase instinctive, without doing research, look for opinions, I contested and heard me. Despite years on the back is still proving a good camera, capable of taking hit the onslaught of new entry-level armed megapixel.rnSe we take confidence you fall in love. |
 | sent on June 23, 2012 Pros: optimal resolution of dx, ergonomic design, compatible with all Nikon lenses, rapp. money Cons: noise high iso, dx Opinion: I write this review having just passed the d700. In the previous 2 years with the d90 hardly betrayed me, very solid body, not heavy, if you do not stand much with iso (<1600 if not sottoesponi) has an impeccable resolution, a terrific ergonomics, you can make all the adjustments not looking away from the viewfinder. it is just that I have the d700 and so far the differences I found with the d90 are the high iso and the blurred, being a fullframe. I recommend it to anyone who wants to buy a right |
 | sent on April 14, 2012 Pros: double ring very comfortable, not too heavy, ergonomically reliable, made to ISO 200 noise-free, live view Cons: excessive noise at high ISO, lack of double-slot Opinion: Using qs goals 16/85Vr SLR, 50mm 1.8 and 70/300 VR with the addition of multiplier 1.4 kenko. Versatile in complexity 'I still use the camera body one of the best APS-C in the end consumer (mpx if there were some more' would really be at the top). Also with regard to the points AF (11 for the camera body) if there had been someone more 'would not be hurt. Using the MB80 with 2 batteries and Vertical shots and 'very fast performing. Even so H continuous machine behaves in admirable fashion. |
 | sent on October 15, 2011 Pros: Double ring, ergonomics, menus and controls are easy and intuitive, 3-inch display accurate, useful Live View. Cons: Multi-shot (it was better a little faster), noise at high ISO (low light sunsets or generally known already to ISO 200 where the car would make the best), raw images, low contrast or too soft, image processing 12 bit (preferably higher) ... certain that the majority of these "defects" you can control the PP, or can be removed by purchasing a D300 or D700 :)) Opinion: This is my first and only SLR to date and are happy with our purchase, it gave me a lot of satisfaction, for a beginner I think it was the best choice, the important thing is to learn how to set it properly, many factory settings are certainly changed to begin to get the first real satisfaction. Aims to associate recommend the 16-85 VR very versatile and especially by the excellent yield at 16 mm from the various 18-105 (which I replaced) or 18-200 mm less than those two make much difference. Use it a lot, especially in the Live View shooting landscapes also because I wear glasses, but beyond this is very useful, the display is quite large and very sharp and precise, consumes some battery power, but the full charge has always allowed to make outputs of many hours. The machine is light, transportable no hassles, has an outstanding ergonomics seems to fit their hand and the grip is secure and not by feelings of dangerous "slipping", has now been superseded by the D7000, but it will definitely still a lot about if to be used. |
 | sent on September 27, 2011 Pros: Solidity, double ring, internal AF motor, ISO sensitivity, pentaprima, ability to shoot video. Cons: I would have liked some more focus point and lacks autofocus in video function. Opinion: I took this reflex shortly before the finding of the D7000 for an unbeatably low price. Solid body, great ergonomics, dual control dial to have everything at your fingertips and built-in AF motor by which it is possible to use very valid targets without fainting. I must say that even at high ISO machine performs well and allows you to bring home some good shots. Certainly not the ISO it would never be enough, but I can be satisfied. Only note, probably dictated more by personal needs that need to be widespread, I would like to have some point AF in more than 11 available. E 'was also the first camera to allow you to shoot videos of good quality, but when shooting the MAF, unlike cameras Nikon newer home has to be handled manually. |
 | sent on September 24, 2011 Pros: Construction, image quality, portability in relation to weight and size. Cons: Noise at high ISO and lack mirror lockup. Opinion: To be honest this machine now retired was one of the best ever produced by the house giallonera the end consumer. Testifies over the success of sale also the fact that has never been produced for a firmware upgrade the product, with the exception of that of the database of the lenses for the correction of the distortion directly from the camera. The body is strong enough and very good ergonomics. It can also use the lenses AF devoid of internal motor. The monitor what today would be considered as sufficient, is actually still very accurate. Excellent battery life. The yield at high iso is suffiente but not striking. A great device that will populate the second hand market for much longer. |
 | sent on August 10, 2011 Pros: Double ring (thumb and forefinger), AF motor, quality of the LCD display, compact and lightweight. Cons: No defect. I wanted to micro AF, 100% viewfinder and a more robust body and weather sealed but are features that Nikon reserves at the top end. Opinion: It 's my first reflex after a couple of years of good use bridge. I chose it mainly for the high ISO performance (in relation to the price, of course) because it was the biggest flaw of the bridge. I appreciate lightness and compactness excursions and trips while to balance it better with heavy lenses and to improve ergonomics when used in vertical recommend a battery grip. The basic objectives provided in the kit (18-55 and 18-105) are not that great but the presence of AF motor allows recourse to the vast market of optical dated and cheap but still very good (eg, the 50 f/1.8 to € 100). The 18-200 for versatility and 16-85 for quality are certainly better, but worth the price if only you can decide. The seal of the price in used proves the validity of this model. |
 | sent on August 05, 2011 Pros: ergonomics, compatibility with many optical shutter speed media processing RAW camera, live view valid Cons: honestly I have not found if not kept at high ISO Opinion: For me it is a great machine that I took and recommended because of a sense of solidity and compactness much greater at entry level and has great ergonomics almost at the level of pro. The main controls are in fact all on hand as the two adjusting rings, the upper display practical, easy to read, backlit. I also used the snow and the shooting conditions by pro without ever manifesting a problem and now I use it as a second body relying sull'autofocus in the car on comptibiltà then by all Nikon objectives and are not of those with motor of internal focus. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
