|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on July 03, 2021 Pros: Sensor, autofocus, ergonomics Cons: Live view, fixed monitor, video compartment Opinion: Huge camera, still current six years after release. Starting from the defects I confirm that, like all Nikon SLRs (excluding the D780), it has a primitive Live view compartment suitable for photos on tripods, uncomfortable in freehand use and I would say unusable for moving subjects; another limit (not necessarily a flaw) is the fixed screen. Those interested in videos should therefore turn to other brands or models. For the photographic sector it is instead an excellent camera: very performing sensor, autofocus just as (not like the D500, but still able to meet the needs of most amateur photographers), iso hold in the norm for the aps-c format (still good), excellent ergonomics, Nikon style menu in my opinion very intuitive, excellent battery life. Very versatile, it is perfect for family photography, travel reportage, landscape, sport, naturalistic, macro, and associated with good designed returns excellent images (the versatile and comfortable Nikon 18-140, the bright Sigma 17-50 f/2.8, the Nikon 16-80, the excellent Tamron, Sigma, Tokina wide-angles, the Nikon AF-P 70-300 or 70-200 f/4 canvases, the Tamron 70/210 f/4 to name but a few). After a period of support to the D750 I recently sold it for poor use, but I must admit that in most situations the D7200 is comparable to fullframe versions (at a disadvantage in the high iso seal, the crop factor benefits it in particular photographic genres). Previously I used the Nikon D3100, of which the D7200 is a remarkable evolution in everything, and for a few months the Sony A6000 sold without regrets not being at ease at all (electronic viewfinder, menu, ergonomics and kit objectivesa the greater limits I found compared to the Nikon D7200). |
  | sent on December 08, 2020 Pros: Sensor quality, viewfinder, autofocus, ergonomics, small screen convenient to quickly control f and ISO Cons: Not at all intuitive use, video compartment, weight, size, it lends itself really little to dynamic photography, excessively large and heavy kit optics to be the classic dark zoom lens for APS-C Opinion: I tried it compared to my Sony A6000, which boasts the same 24mpx APS-C sensor with ISO 100-25600 sensitivity. It lends itself very well to static photography, especially landscape, but when you go on dynamic photography or street, where you need to have the reflections ready, it is unusable, it mainly causes excessive weight combined with the poor intuitiveness of the controls (which forces you to know the Nikon world very well). The image quality is good while the ISO seal is also poor compared to other cameras of 2015. At the same price it is better and once the test is over I concluded that the A6000 is much higher |
 | sent on February 02, 2020 Pros: Photo quality, ergonomics, keys in the right place, battery life, ability to mount vintage optics, 51 focus points, precise autofocus, battery grip possibilities, do I have to continue? Cons: Virtually nothing, I could say the video sector but in 2015 it was fine... Today in 2020 unless you have smartphones from 600.00 euros and up is still fine. Opinion: Purchased in the summer of 2019 coming from a d3200 squeezed and studied properly for 4 years. What to say? Do you want to start taking pictures? In my opinion the best aps-c after the d500 (sin that in the latter have not put the flash pop-up, in some cases serves just. Unfortunately, the d7500 has neither the second slot nor the battery grip). The quality of the photo yield is really good, with the d3200 (which for me still remains a great option) the difference is noticeable especially from ISO 400 onwards, in fact in conditions of little light I shot at ISO 800 and cropped to the maximum practically with a little photo shop the noise is as if there was not (to be expected that the photos I print). Shooting in RAW (which I prefer, I do not have any requirements that impose on me the JPEG) and fixing the balance of white, any noise and various parameters (as you would in a post production in analog) the JPEG photos churned out by the post production are exceptional. And that's what really matters: THE PHOTO. My use is purely for my family but continuously, since mine is an incurable passion: birthdays, parties, performances and various events as well as trips. The ergonomics are great (then with the battery grip is perfect), the internal autofocus engine allows you to use quality vintage optics and the arrangement of the keys is perfect (only the lack of the dedicated ISO key but the various keys are cmq programmable). 3D tracking works like a god, so moving subjects are always in focus. The gust is good for an average use, the 51 focus points for taking photos are fine in quantity as well as quality. The double slot is an added value (serves more if you shoot in RAW). Great autofocus but in very low brightness is difficult, but it is normal cmq. WiFi and the nfc in my opinion leave a little time they find (personal opinion of course), but cmq are there and are another added value (when you pass photos with WiFi in your smartphone, for example, the quality of the photo loses in resolution and color fidelity , for this reason I prefer to download the raw in the pc, do the post production and print the JPEG processed by me), the WiFi instead used x turn the smartphone into a remote remote control is an ok idea. Perfect display meter, huge optical park and for all tastes, JPEG churned out by the great machine, lots of features: from an additional 1.3 cutout to the various jpeg processing options. the "auto" selector (which NOT USE) remains a great option to have you take a picture from any person who to make more photos of the smartphone does not know (so at least every now and then I come in the photos). In my opinion a very good camera, very recommended. |
 | sent on June 30, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics - dynamic range - quality/price Cons: Noise starts from 1600 ISO - AWB - AF that sometimes tempses (perhaps due more to optics) - size - live view Opinion: A great machine with which I have a relationship of love and hate. Sometimes I wonder how I can do without it, others I would give it away because I feel more inspired and creative with smaller machines (like GR or Rx100 M3 that I own). Objectively speaking has so many pros: one of all the files that are easily workable and allow recoveries of shadows and high lights that make the difference between an acceptable photo and one that you have to trash. On the other, the noise begins to be visible already at 800 iso. Up to 1600-3200 you can still push as long as you intervene on the noise in pp. Besides it is advisable to go only in extreme cases (I set max iso 6400....more on is useless just that shots). Another thing, often sets an AWB that is incorrect. The burst mode with AF-C, struggles to focus the subject during movement (tried with all Nikon optics). The live view is.... Embarrassing.... I challenge anyone to use it except for some landscape on the tripod. |
 | sent on April 01, 2019 Pros: Sensor, good AF, complete machine Cons: Light Meter, Burst Opinion: Excellent Photographic Medium, has an excellent sensor, really strong retrieves, great detail and allows you to always have a balanced exposure pulling out all the colors of the scene. The AF is great for the camera type, very reliable and fast, it sins like burst, at the limit of the sufficiency with a limited buffer. The light meter in strong contrasts goes crazy, forcing you to use either the spot point or the LV, practically tends to always overexpose if you have an illuminated sky, burning it completely to safeguard the parts in the shade... That would still recover very well if totally subjected. I would have kept it but I had dirt problems at the sensor, I ordered a D7500. |
 | sent on March 24, 2019 Pros: Well-made Body, sturdy and ergonomic, idem autofocus Cons: It Makes plastic photos, I don't know how to define them, then the JPEGS are mixed. Opinion: I've already said it all in the cons. They Look beautiful files only if you have not seen anything else. Bought and sold after a week. Much better at equal price a D700, at least it's a FF. Too Bad because the body is done well, even the noise of the shutter is discreet. It'S like designing a beautiful car but then going astray. |
 | sent on November 20, 2018 Pros: Well-built body (semi-Pro), good combinations of programmable controls, high ISO yield optimal for the DX category Cons: Live view to forget Opinion: The price at which it is today is a bargain! The machine is well studied in the controls and in the body with a minimum of tropicalization (fortunately you can set the ISO key near the shutter, it took me a while to find it). Very good Autofocus, accurate with the right lenses. Double slots and the possibility of hooking the BG are features that make it truly a semi-pro (unlike the D7500). Excellent performance of the sensor, it is also very sharp. The high ISO yield is excellent for a DX format: together with the noise reduction settable from the menu, it produces excellent results even at 2000iso, besides it gets worse but up to 4000 still holds well. Anyway the recovery in post is incredible, the files are super workable. Negative vote for Live View, auto focus from shame and unprecise. In conclusion a very good reflex, will give more throat for a while to the new DX! |
 | sent on November 20, 2018 Pros: What about, coming from an Olympus e520, which, at the time while in 4/3 format was at the top of the entry level and that already had so many functions recently introduced by Nikon, the leap was remarkable. Fast Autofocus, yield up to 4000 ISO and good more up, heavy files and Treatabilissimi. Loving the pushed wide angles, with objectives of this type at full aperture, in my opinion, practically insuperable. Decidedly exhaustive and powerful manual (both manuals about 800 pages), which however allows you, explaining the best, to squeeze it to the fullest. Not using the live view do not express opinions about, but are follower of contortions. Very useful the battery pack that on the 7500 can not be mounted and that allows a autonomy to say the least monstrous. Very useful double slot for memories. As said use wide angle pushed, but also with the zoom 18/140 and absolutely superb, with the 50mm is the Queen of portraits. A nice 9. Cons: Maybe the price even though it's out of production now. Opinion: Super!!!!! Absolutely to recommend and those who find it used, of course in good condition, not if you let it escape in any way. The only way to overcome it is a ff of a good standard and anyway even in that case keep it spare if need be. If I were to buy it back immediately. I still have to try it with the flash, but if the assumptions are these, the result can only be super. |
 | sent on November 16, 2018 Pros: Tropicalization, Semi-Pro, double SD slot, programming keys, dynamic range, AF motor on machine body, high ISO seal Cons: Not having it Opinion: One of the best Dx camera bodies produced. Possibility to insert the Battery Grip (now not so obvious for all, the D7500 can not), excellent dynamic range, always ready to seize the moment and with a really powerful sensor. With targeted optics has a great infinity of details in the shots. Excellent ISO tightness and versatility in various light conditions. A DX to have in your outfit. |
| sent on September 29, 2018 Pros: All. Speed, file quality, build quality, double SD slot, AF also with internal motor, no fears altitudes and temperatures, gust, semi pro body. Cons: Autofocus in Live view, fixed screen, lack of protective plastic on the monitor as on the ancestors (D90, for example) Opinion: Passed from D90 to this, it seems to have made the move to another planet. Very fast machine, autofocus impeccabole that does not miss a shot (as long as you do not use it in Live view) 51 points of mass exploitable, quality of the files and possibility of recovery, excellent tightness at high ISO. The double SD slot then allows you to not miss even a photo. I am very satisfied with the machine, combined with quality optics from its best without making a mistake. The only cons I have found is the slowness of focus when using in Live view, which is very slow and in the hunting Avifaunistica is not the best for the rest, is straconsigliata. |
 | sent on August 12, 2018 Pros: Semi Pro body, good ISO hold, dual slot for SD and AF motor on machine body Cons: Maybe a bit heavy for an APSC but absolutely nothing else Opinion: I used a year this camera body, moving from a Sony a58 with which I have been doing bones for a few years. What about another world. sharpness, dynamic range and semi pro body make it a flagship for the Nikon APS category. Excellent hold of the ISO up to 1600, then the noise is felt... The gust is more than good and the 18-140 kit works very well seeming to be made just for this camera body. Definitely the advice. Changed only to switch to d750 for my needs. |
user115595  | sent on June 28, 2018 Pros: Semi-professional machine body, programmable keys, double SD slot, tropicalised, good dynamic range, AF motor on machine body Cons: Lack of touch screen or tilt screen Opinion: After 16000 shots I can safely say that it is an excellent camera and it is great to have as a second body machine side to any FF. The high ISO kept me slightly surprised. The ergonomics are great, the keys are easy to reach, AF quite fast. I think it's the top APS-C on the Nikon home market as it has the same camera body as the D750. |
 | sent on June 28, 2018 Pros: Eclectic camera, versatile and semipro high-level sharp images, no noise at all Iso Cons: Maybe it's kinda heavy Opinion: I consider after a few thousand clicks, this excellent machine. Maybe the best APS-C on the market. From the best of if even in extreme conditions (high Iso), fast high precision AF, little to envy to superior machines for price and quality. The two cards give you infinite possibilities of shooting. I recommend to anyone buying it for a leap of quality and for almost professional experiences. Kudos to Nikon. |
 | sent on June 27, 2018 Pros: Excellent Dynamic Range, tropicalization, double slot sd, Excellent Iso estate. Cons: Live view, modest burst. Opinion: Excellent machine, a professional in Aps-c although it is called semipro,Good AF in speed and precise, ergonomic handle, versatile for all genres, Raw files that allow PP to recover with great ease, excellent dynamic range,Wifi embedded that through special app allow you to shoot with your smartphone, solid and tropicalized machine body, discreet the burst both in speed and buffer, excellent option of facilitated iso, which allows through the dial to easily adjust the iso when shooting in diaphragm priority. Ability to use the battery grip, and comfortable double slot for ssd boards, excellent iso seal in good light you can safely push up to 3200. In my opinion one of the best Aps-c reflexes out there |
 | sent on January 11, 2018 Pros: Photo quality at the top for APS / C; Fast and reactive; beautiful sight; engraved images with a very wide dynamic range; excellent tropicalization. Cons: With VR 1 lenses, the stabilizer makes capriccirn Opinion: As a happy owner, I think it's a great car. Excellent materials, solid and ergonomic (mostly made of magnesium alloy), tropicalized. The viewfinder is great, very bright to be an APS / C.rnrnLe sensor performance is scary, not afraid of high ISO (we are almost at the levels of an FF), the dynamic range is phenomenal, by contrast to the 14-bit raw files uncompressed weigh a little (30MB and passes), but it is the price to pay to get the most out of this machine. Autofocus does not miss a shot, fast and efficient. But I noticed on various specimens (both machine and lens), that if coupled to a VR lens the stabilizer is not always activated (tested on my own, with my lenses, and with optics and machines of friends, same results), I think it's a software bug. With VR 2 and third-party lenses there are absolutely no problems with stabilizer.rnrnThe operating speed is excellent, and I must say that it also makes excellent videos. Good sound of microphones, too badano practically manual controls during video shooting, but it is a particular of secondary importance (I bought it exclusively for taking pictures). The camera body has everything you need close at hand, good secondary screen, the main screen has excellent resolution (and is also calibrated in both brightness and white balance). I shoot only in RAW but I have to admit that the JPEG files that pulls out are perfectly usable. The menu is endless, has many features and the degree of customization is very high, with many customizable buttons at will (I use for example the REC button to adjust the ISO, very comfortable) .rnrnWhat to say, I am fully satisfied, I do not put 10 only for the problems with VR lenses, it seems that I was the only one to notice it ... rnrn |
 | sent on November 15, 2017 Pros: excellent photos Cons: Heavy and intrusive Opinion: the body costs 1012 euros on amazon, the body longer on 18/140 arrives at 1350 euros. -nnn't get it when you buy second-hand. That's it, it does make excellent, brilliant and engraved photos, great latitude, positively top of the medium format. - I find it heavy and intrusive; I've come to the conclusion that the best cameras are panasonic with sensoresnda one inch.-rn |
user34150 | sent on September 06, 2017 Pros: I think it's a good reflex that, used properly, returns great results. It is clear that those who use it must also put their own in the sense that we need to have a proper knowledge of photography. Cons: I do not think I can detect negative aspects, having a fixed LCD, is not due to defects, but having bought the D7200 as it is, that is, with a fixed LCD screen, I consider it a free and conscious choice that can not be considered a defect. Otherwise, wanting an adjustable LCD, I would have chosen another. What I later did by purchasing an Olimpus OM D 10 that I use in different circumstances. Opinion: Purchasing a D700 with DX Sensor was a choice not for a save but for a number of considerations that made it prefer to FF. In fact I had initially bought a new Nital D610 that, after the first shots, did not more than 50, I preferred to return it to my shopkeeper replacing it with the D7200 (Nital). One consideration is that I use optics conceived for FullFrame that on Dx get better results especially in the case of distortions and vignettes and, in my own way see, this is not a very small one. |
 | sent on September 06, 2017 Pros: controls and body like a professional, iso hold, tropicalization, double card Cons: liveview screen Opinion: Excellent machine, before I had a 5100 and the jump is remarkable, it holds very well up to 3200 ISO, the body is well balanced and holds well in my hand (to understand i tried the 5500 and it is too small), the ability to loading 2 sd cards is very convenient (one can also be used as a backup), the files are sharp (snaps to 24MP) and af at 54 points is fast and accurate. |
 | sent on August 05, 2017 Pros: Ergonomics, definition, weight and size Cons: Liveview, screen Opinion: I have this car body for a year now and I have to say that I am very satisfied with it, great definition and dynamic range that allow good post-production work despite the dx sensor. As cited in other reviews semipro body but that in long mountain trips I find it very practical as it is compact and lightweight (compared with similar solutions). Main defect liveview and back screen quality. Compared to the updated model (d7500) I consider it a little more professional thanks to the dual sd slot. Great starting point for getting better in the world of photography !!! |
 | sent on July 21, 2017 Pros: Body pro and pro controls, iso hold to be a 24MP, photo quality, dynamic range, tropicalization, af even in the dark, internal af drive, the ability to use lenses without cpu, dual sd slot, crop 1.3x, customization commands, durability Battery, no low pass filter, PdC preview, etc. Cons: Incredible live view, lack of sled cover, lack of high-visibility metering. Opinion: What to say, a great car for those who want to make a jump of quality. Excellent ISO up to 3200 (then depends on taste). Great handle and improves with the addition of BG. Great files with the ability to recover on the shadows (obviously avoid impossible recovery) say up to 1 / 1.5 stop. Some have complained about the dirty sensor but personally the seals do their job, so they never had problems. The AF is fast and accurate even in night scenes. The burst could be improved, but it's not a problem for me. If I want to take photographic hunting I go to the D500. Excellent battery life. Possibility to use non-cpu lenses with the use of spot exposure. It is useful to crop 1.3x that is a plus push on the canvas (obviously it is a cutout and consequently decrease the pixels about 16mp). Great customization of commands. Stra recommended. To vote for me 10. |
 | sent on July 20, 2017 Pros: Semi-professional body and excellent technical features Cons: Live view is not exciting Opinion: I bought it because I wanted to make quality jump from an entry level (D3100) to something that was more powerful. After a number of elucubrations, I finally chose her, and so far she has never regretted my choice. RnHigh dynamic range, high ISO quality, a fast and accurate AF, which is the result of excellent NEF files, allows you to work with a 1.3x crop to add to the DX format, and then it has all the features of a Semi-professional body like the internal AF engine, the ability to use optics even without CPU, dual SD slot, dual display, tropicalized, low pass filter, pdc preview button, the ability to mount the BG , The double adjustment dial, the bracketing, the connection system both wifi and NFC (although I've never used either of them) and other details I'm not listing. They are more than satisfied with this car body and I strongly recommend it to anyone I doThey look like a DX camera but with almost professional features. |
 | sent on July 17, 2017 Pros: Semi Pro Body and Controls, ISO Holding, Dynamic Range, Very High File Quality, Dual Slot SD. Cons: Screen not tilting (but not essential) and nothing else. Opinion: After reviewing the small D3200 (my first digital love) and the D700 (the BESTIA), it is now time to review this great instrument, which I have been proud of for a while. Let's start by saying that I think it's a complete machine, it's all you want, and all you do is fine. Of course you have to have studied its potential well and equip it with series optics. The body is semi-professional, with limited weight, double lcd, double knobs and controls in the right place that, once fine adjustments are made through the menu, allow us to no longer access each time. The images that are returned are great, very workable RAW files, dynamic range and awesome shadow recovery, we're almost at FF levels. In short, the Sony sensor does its great job, even with regard to ISO sensitivity, one of the things that impressed me with this APS-C. I did some 3200 ISO shots in internal environments and the result is excellent, returning files with almost no noise. I'mSure you can still go up with the sensitivity, but I have not tried it because I like the beautiful, sharp images, and anyway if even the 3200 ISO were the maximum limit for a good result it would still be a great result for a DX format. The 51-point AF module seems to me very good, as does the ability to focus in low light conditions. Even in AF-C (which I often use as photographic hunting) I find it very intense, engaging the subject very well and always following it without losing it. Even the blast in CH seems to me very good. I miss the shutter noise, typical of the D300S & D700. Another thing I miss (which seems to be a bit more functional than most) is the tilting screen, like on the D750, Sony a7 rII, and others ... in landscaping would often be very useful. I conclude with giving a good 9 votes to this beautiful car that, unlike the D750 that I feel like equating in FF format, is quite successful. |
 | sent on May 11, 2017 Pros: Crazy definition and unlimited crop possibilities, no low pass filter, 24 Megapixel in Dx format Cons: Non-professional command management, presence of the '' wheel '' from entry-level and non-tropical body Opinion: Machine I've owned for several months and I know the features well. In some respects it is unique, it has a crazy definition comparable to that of the D810, but in Dx mode it is less than this D7200.rnSfora file is very clean and detailed if alongside optics of a certain level. I have never liked the management of non-professional controls, the classic 'amateur wheel' on many entry-level bodies that does not fit the quality of this great car. Also at 3200 ISO the baked files are great and cmq. very good . In my opinion, bursts and bursts would give a twist to even the D500, although the latter is considered a true '' pro '' and the D7200 is on a slightly lower step. Done a lot of times I happened to see photos shot with the D7200 that have nothing to envy to those made with the D500 (it also has 3 megapixels more than this) .... with a buoyIn light the difference in the 2 thinks and many times goes in favor of the D7200. In low light, of course, the D500 wins hands low and cmq. Has a more precise focus with a latest generation sensor that the D7200 dreams of. The non-tropical body (but rugged) is its point of view .... but in addition to the price it is proposed, It's hard to ask for more. On the whole, it's a super car that can give a lot in photographic shooting where I think it's still one of the best DX reflexes in circulation. |
 | sent on April 11, 2017 Pros: Iso held high, accurate AF even in low light, automatic file management, image rendering. Cons: adjustments buttons, shadows in the Raw, the sensor is always dirty screen. Opinion: I had the D7000 and passed furto.rnnon 7200 only because there are many differences in everyday use, but in 7200 I noticed that often you run the risk of pressing the buttons as ISO or AF adjustment while bracket and set the machine (not It is happening of 7000, but maybe I have my fingers stripped me). The monitor gets dirty with the sweat of the face, the quick adjustment menu is more dude than functional. you can quickly change certain parameters from the Info menu but to date have failed to change the order of these adjustments, more than once (accidentally) get from raw to jpeg because, as mentioned before, with the finger I did not notice that I pressed a button which by means of ring nut changed the type of file.rnHo often I noticed a lot of noise in the shadows of the NEF file. Removed these defects is a great machine that gives incredible satisfaction even in low light conditions or under the pioggia.rnDimenticavo a big problem that in my known: the sensor gets dirty very easily and I often find myself always with the same pror black spot in your photos. even after cleaning disappears and reappears reappears and disappears. |
 | sent on April 07, 2017 Pros: AF (also in the dark), sharpness, iso seal, dynamic range, customization buttons, body dimensions. Cons: price of the new, eyepiece cover Opinion: B classic piece of plastic, it would be appreciated that it was + as in d500 that is embedded and can be activated with the appropriate button (in such a way as not to lose as it happens). |
 | sent on March 21, 2017 Pros: Body, ergonomics, double dislay, focusing motor built-fire, kept up iso 2000 WiFi for photojournalism, tropicalization. Cons: After little use ISO 2000, buffer with a limited capacity, sensor gets dirty easily, uncomfortable ISO button (fixable with rec button) Opinion: Using this machine since it was first presented, I pulled to the limit; rnUsata in the rain, under the sun cuocente and in humid and dusty environments, has never shown signs of slowing, af sometimes uncertain and poorly luce.rnAggancia It tracks the subject very well both runners or cyclists who enduro races; great for bird life up to 1600 ISO then knead very losing nitidezza.rn |
 | sent on March 14, 2017 Pros: Body, ergonomics, resistance to iso Cons: In my opinion no one Opinion: Beautiful reflex, for its price offers everything it has to offer, I find that his right sensor is very good, similar to the D7100 but slightly improved on the ISO seal. The raw files are rich in detail and widely lavorabil, the colors are very beautiful (maybe slightly less vivid than those of the D7100) rnIl right of SLR format allows you to combine optical and cheaper, thanks to the crop factor, allow you to have greater value of zooming. The D7200 is really good, compared to a full frame as the d750 (which I own) holds the head on the colors, which are very similar, but it does not compare on cleaning the photos and ability to gather details and nuances. The D7200 holds well the ISO, the disorder is more modest and you can shoot up to ISO 2500 or 3200, depending on the context and depends on what we need to do the photos taken. In the field of video cameras is very valid, clearly improved since the previous D7100, shame that the video controls are very limited and shame that moviesThey are recorded in a compressed format h264, which "eats" a lot of quality. |
 | sent on February 28, 2017 Pros: speed, ergonomics Cons: nothing to report Opinion: bought (body only) at a great price, I must recognize that he passed with flying colors the field test. Improved compared to the D7100 (which I had but that did not satisfy me as much) ... maybe a seal in addition to ISO 6400, (but for this there is the D500 ..) still a good APS-C, between SemiPro definitely a best. Find it at a good price made the purchase even more enjoyable .. |
 | sent on February 23, 2017 Pros: Speed, ergonomics, weight Cons: nothing to report Opinion: He had briefly joined the 750 I used it for timelapse shots, more than good machine in the past I also had her sister D7100, so I knew he would not let me down, because in this have been made improvements of small defects of 7100 .rnForse the iso holding not great, but it's still a semi body professionale..rnConsigliata! |
| sent on January 11, 2017 Pros: AF speed and sensitivity, light weight, easy handling, clarity, infinite crop. Cons: poor dynamic, low resistance at high ISO. Opinion: I have the D7200 from 4 months are not disappointed, that's exactly how I expected. I do not understand the writer sealing at high ISO and dynamic, really I struggle. You are unable to recover even a stop on the shadows, the white the start easy and there is no way to recover anything, the noise is already noticeable at 800 ISO. I repeat to me is not a disappointment, I never had any illusions about 24 mpx of aps-c are so many and it is quite normal behavior of the machine. But go cautiously with sanctify it, I got it for autofocus undoubtedly handsome and to be able to exploit the possibility of cutting date pushed from the many pixels available, things that in birdlife indubiamente make the difference. For dynamic range much better my mythical D300 that I will continue to hold and not even so much as a mule. For everything else in my opinion there is only FF. |
 | sent on January 11, 2017 Pros: Body which, for constructive and ergonomic qualities, is very "nice"! Quality AF system and pro Iso held more than satisfactory. Cons: I think no one, at least from my point of vista.rn Opinion: Taken a few months to replace the D5500 sister! Yes, I got infected by the desire of the semi pro and, having lost very little in return, I can say I greatly satisfied. The differences in the quality of the files are slim to none (or almost!), And have lost the touch and fully articulated display was hard to swallow, but the satisfaction of a semi professional body in his hands is priceless. A camera body finally suitable for my "big hands", but did not turn out too! Commands them all ', in propia disposal, ready to make your life easier when you "really need"! RnPer far no cons to point out ... I just have to learn to take pictures and you're done! |
user63386 | sent on January 11, 2017 Pros: Quality very good files in terms of dynamic range, recovery of shadows etc. Cons: the sensor gets dirty easily. Opinion: happy owner of D7200. Produces the high quality files. The dynamic range is so wide that hardly use bracketing. retrieving light and shadow which is a piacere.rni materials are excellent, almost like a reflex pro. the only flaw found concerns that the sensor gets dirty easily. I clean after a few months of use and is now a speck reappearance. for those unfamiliar with the cleaning it is not a big problem (I do it myself). |
 | sent on January 09, 2017 Pros: dynamic range, made at high ISO, gust speed, camera body that sense of ruggedness, commands to the right place, internal AF motor Cons: nobody Opinion: They switched from D3200 to D7200, a dizzying leap. I was looking especially good performance at high ISO without having to take out a loan to buy the camera body. The FF is too expensive for me and then gave me at Christmas the top of the user segment and I have to say that the range has been so much satisfaction. I felt immediately at ease with the menus, everything at your fingertips ... made at high iso stunning and fast burst. Its strong point is the focus system, quick and preciso.rnConsiglio before a training with an entry-level car and then take the plunge with this beauty ... will give you great satisfaction! |
  | sent on December 16, 2016 Pros: AF characteristics, machine body, responsiveness and performance Cons: Nothing to report Opinion: Purchased used from a friend passed to the ML system with only 100 shots to 'active support to my Nikon D610 as a second camera body and action pictures and photo hunting, I was pleasantly surprised to performance and image quality, higher the D7100 which has maintained the quality and reduce defects. Like the D750, I think the car all round the offer of Nikon DX |
 | sent on December 13, 2016 Pros: Autofocus, high ISO performance, ergonomics, dual display, dynamic range Cons: at the moment no Opinion: It gives me great satisfaction, the controls are all in the right place and you seem to have always used, raw are very workable (shooting only raw) when I make some shots session with friends who have the full frame I do not feel less because the final result is very similar, important to match them to the level lenses. I think I will keep with me for a long time. |
 | sent on December 12, 2016 Pros: Great customization, semi-pro body, high ISO seal. Menu is very rich. Time of SCATTO1/8000, which with light optics is a great added value. Professional-level AF. Very high sensitivity. Cons: Nobody! Opinion: It is a lady reflex, with demanding sensor, to accompany with quality optics. The ISO estate is amazing to be a DX (in my gallery, there is a photo taken in Matera, at dusk at 4000 ISO). With heavy optics I recommend the use of the battery grip, also because of the best shutter ergonomics that offers this very useful accessory, as well as the possibility to use 2 batteries, thus increasing the autonomy. It has a lot of features and a bunch of customizations. It is a very versatile machine, usable in any field (street, macro, birdlife, Landscape, portrait) and never disappoints. Use with Lexar Professional 1000x cards, with which the gust is pretty good. The Expeed 4 processor makes it very fast. I can't imagine what to ask for more than a reflex. The Straconsiglio. Vote 10 and praise. |
| sent on December 01, 2016 Pros: It has all the controls within easy reach, broad optical park, large display, good burst and discreet autofocus even with critical light, the raw files are well workable, good memory buffer Cons: Display fixed, some commands annoy me (option use the remote control to insert each time) and little else. Opinion: I had the d5000 and Sony Alpha 6000 (which still use when I want to travel light). The lack of swivel the display and the weight they initially left me somewhat puzzled, but with time I then enjoyed the many positive sides. The first is certainly the layout of the controls (there is rarely need to access the menu to change important operating parameters, dials and buttons are highly functional). Another aspect that I consider important is the memory buffer (if you shoot at night in raw with sony you have a fairly long time to wait before the operation returns camera after the closure of the shutter) and autofocus, fast and powerful even in light conditions criticism. Finally, the optical park, really wide and unmatched in price performance ratio (even canon no joke). As for the sensor I have not noticed great progress compared to the alpha 6000, change some colors and I noticed a slight better grip at high ISO. In conclusion, in the 7200 dx it has few rivals today, after the purchase I assure you will have few regrets. L I have youfor now it was mostly at night and so far it has not disappointed me. In short a nice holiday for the baptism of fire. Good light at all! |
 | sent on November 14, 2016 Pros: Autofocus high performance, dynamic range, at high Iso estate, semi-pro SLRs. Cons: No ... I am far from identifying the limits! Opinion: It 'was my second reflex (source D90) .rnRitengo is a camera just perfect, for my characteristics of amateur and for the kind of shots that prediligo.rnIl AF system is very powerful, incredible dynamic range and a "resistance" the high Iso that really did not expect ... I was speechless in the face of extreme shots, to 12800 Iso.rnIl sensor is "demanding" and, to be respected, requires high optical qualità.rnMi would advise also the 'purchase of good targets along with this more than good reflex.rnAl moment I have not identified the limits and I think I'm far from riuscirci.rnMi accompany you for a long time ... that's for sure! rn |
 | sent on October 08, 2016 Pros: Lightweight and complete with all the functionality that you require a camera. Cons: For now, no. Opinion: My first reflex. After doing a semester of photography with an old Minolta and then being passed to the video I wanted to return to photography with a car that permettese me to do everything, and that did not cost follies: the D7200 is this and piú.rnNon repeat the advantages already listed in other reviews and from my perspective i have yet to find negative points. And a very good car for those who make pictures for passion and not professionally. |
 | sent on September 03, 2016 Pros: Autofocus, burst, ISO held, dynamic range Cons: burst miglirabile Opinion: Now possessor of this fireball from 6 months, testing in many conditions, from landscapes to street, bird life and sports, well it's a really gem. Autofocus always great and accurate even in birdlife with maybe small subjects and far a tracking that does not disappoint, then the 3d sports function is amazing, I tried to take pictures at F1 bullets to 350 km / h and missed shots absolutely zero, has some difficulty on small birds, but what do we expect? It is not a D5! Color rnOffre I think they deserve excellent optical respectable to take full advantage of what I think is a great sensore.rnSe just had to find fault, perhaps I would say that I would still have preferred a little 'more resistance at high iso ( at least for my use at times in a very critical light conditions) and perhaps the thing that disappoints me most is the burst of 14 bits are only 5fps, become 6fps only 12bit and 12bit with 7fps crop + 1.5; even with this combined the results are excellent but I'd prefer a nice burst of 7fps no cropping of the viewfinder that volte inevitably involves some shots cut involontariamente.rnvoto 10 anyway for the value for money. |
 | sent on May 25, 2016 Pros: Burst, autofocus, strong customization Cons: no tilting screen Opinion: I took a few days, I come from a d5100. Well despite the d5100 I have given me much satisfaction I wanted to make a quantum leap without going directly to the full frame. Beautiful machine, extensive customizing buttons, almost mandatory switch between manual. Too many important functions that you have to understand. I might like to have the folding screen type the d5100 but never mind. rnIo I combined with a 24,120 f4, really beautiful photos. Soon I'll use it for a sporting event my daughter, on that occasion I shall be more specific on the results. To date happily satisfied. |
 | sent on April 13, 2016 Pros: compact but solid body as usual Nikon, Great display, Tenuta ISO very good, really good dynamic range, AF always accurate and very sensitive Cons: Unremarkable maybe sometimes it puts a little too much to work out if you shoot in RAW burst and Opinion: Caught up in about a month to complement the D800 and use it mainly for photographic hunting, he immediately impressed me positively to clean files and workability in pp shooting in RAW. The camera body is compact but the touch is very solid and sturdy with controls that are right where they should essere..La at high ISO estate is very good and allows you to shoot up to 6400 iSO and get excellent post production files .. to 12800 ISO the noise is c, so, they are still useable if the occasion requires it to use and you can not help it. The machine's customizations are really many and the AF module is a guarantee, is always quick and precise, a little less when used in 3D mode but remains very valid. The barrage is very good and I find it very useful to 1.3x crop mode in the room even if shooting in burst if not using a good memory card processor takes a long time but nothing compared to the D7100 and for that reason it was really annoying. Finally in my opinion it is a very good butg s also in relation to the cost, really offers and has very few flaws more and if you do not have pretensions to PRO but in that case you should orient on many other bodies with very different costi..In relation to WiFi and video mode I do not comment because I do not make videos and do not buy a machine for the wireless mode which can also be handy but is not necessary for me. |
 | sent on March 11, 2016 Pros: camera body, autofocus, preview HPs Cons: fixed and non-tilting screen Opinion: purchased two days ago after having a D5300 for 14 months, it notices the advantages that give direct manual controls without having to access the menu every time you want to change the shooting mode, aperture or time. I'm still getting to grips with the larger size of the camera body, for me it is a virtue, it is easier to handle (or large hands). The only thing that wins the younger sister is the tilting screen. Very happy with my purchase |
 | sent on February 17, 2016 Pros: high ISO estate, autofocus, dynamic range and tropical conditions, quality of construction, infinity of programs and combinations (perhaps too many) Cons: ... The price difference for the product Nikon UK ... Liveview not up to the rest Opinion: For an amateur photographer I think is the ultimate !! Moving from D3200 (for another excellent entry level) I enter a new world, a real semipro spotless! Good at high ISO sealing (at least until the mid / high) af precise and fast, good dynamic range. Well built and sturdy, practical even in many of the commands with the possibility of various customizations very useful and immediate. Profit for the 1.3x crop function that multiplies the magnification of 1/3. Equally posotivo the system of the creative flash with adjustable settings on the built-in flash. In my (very modest) alert among the industry top. To study before you understand all the features. Additional fees |
 | sent on February 16, 2016 Pros: Tenuta ISO, autofocus and tropical conditions, dynamic range, value (import), weight, timelapse, wifi, battery Cons: with always switched after shooting 17-50 SIGMA 2.8 screen Opinion: I was several months to read a post infinity and participate in many discussions before buying this machine. After 20 days just arrived I immediately put under the fatigue. I state that I had and worked with a D3100 for 3 years, but to go from an entry level to this machine, the difference is substantial. First of all the possibility of being able to shoot at high ISO (although personally I prefer not exceed 4000 iso) with the files that allow a postproduction very clean with the final file, the high-performance autofocus and 80% of cases it works to wonder even in very dark situations (photo disco evenings), a short try the timelapse function that I think is very nice today with the advent of this tendency to do "a little bit where you are", and finally the wifi which I greatly facilitated the passage of the JPEG files on your smartphone for instant publication. I got to test it in various events in this last month, test it thoroughly both in live performances of music, which in nighttime situations come disco nights and / or private parties, and I must say I was not totally abandoned me or disappointed in any moment. The only negative note the screen that does not respect the 4/2 viewing photos when I mount the Sigma 17-50 2.8. For perfect rest, indeed, I not in the least feel the need for what I do I use, a tilting screen, indeed, I would find it too annoying, like a sense of insecurity, then ... points of view. |
user87463 | sent on January 22, 2016 Pros: Held at high iso significant for APS-C, Autofocus, weather sealing, and general build quality Cons: Some commands are very small and a bit 'awkward to use Opinion: Purchased in December 2015 with 'European guarantee' for 879 euro in place of my D3200, which showed significant deficiencies, especially at high ISO (up to 2500 usable for one little post-production expert like myself). precise autofocus though not flawless in 3d mode (subject tracking) on ??uneven backgrounds. Overall I am very satisfied purchase. I was torn between this and the D610 but I think I made the best choice, which allowed me among other things to keep my objectives park. |
| sent on December 31, 2015 Pros: price-performance ratio, autofocus, size Cons: Nobody Opinion: acquired in July 2015 through the D90 to the D7200 I could appreciate the quality of pictures taken. I think it has little to envy the professional camera bodies. Perhaps the only problem, but I think it must still the little confidence I have with the D700 is that moving from d90 some features are quite complex but the potential is truly remarkable |
 | sent on December 30, 2015 Pros: Build quality, excellent price-performance ratio, excellent stability at high ISO, autofocus quick and successful implementation with Wi-Fi Cons: It lacks tilting screen Opinion: Fully satisfied with the purchase. Has very little to envy of professional bodies if not being an APS-C (with associated advantages and disadvantages). Autofocus very fast and effective even under the most difficult light. Excellent build quality as well as excellent are the feelings that once in hand. Straordnaria resistance to high ISO that put it on the top position among the various APS-C, comparable even to some FF medium-high range. Also useful implementation of the Wi-Fi system that allows shots even remotely by phone as well as a full sharing of files with mobile devices. The only drawback the lack of a display tilting even if a defect is negligible considering the overall quality of the device. Rating 9.5 |
 | sent on December 28, 2015 Pros: Semipro body, Tenuta iso slightly above the little sister D7100, light meter in the upper display. Cons: Lack of a swiveling display !!!!! Opinion: I come from a D7100 but for some reason I had to go to D7200. the jump was not exaggerated .. but .. there was rnMessa focus improved with objects in shadow, row of exposures to 9 shots and exposure in the display superiore..rnper regarding ISO poso superior to what sorellina..rnuna I find rather ridiculous it is that despite being in effect a top of the range dx has a swiveling display of cabbage ..... mah |
 | sent on December 11, 2015 Pros: Tenuta excellent high ISO - Dynamic range - AF excellent - Last generation processor Cons: Body perhaps a tad small Opinion: I check in from Nikon D300s and I must say that the generation gap and 'really important for my kind of photography I did not need the FF indeed, so I opted for this beautiful DX and I must say that the car goes really forte.rnUnico just maybe I felt in a more 'accentuated and' the body in comparison to the D300s and 'less "PRO" rnCiao |
 | sent on December 01, 2015 Pros: DX format, speed MAF, semi-pro body, held in important values ??iso Cons: It does not have the protective glass on the LCD Opinion: I bought this car six months ago to tile as the second body, to my D800 and I must say that I soddisfatto.rnA I needed for the crop factor of the DX format and then I got it mainly for sports and bird life, but I have to admit that after trying it, I also like to use it in other ambiti.rnDevo say that, compared to the D800, I do not see huge differences in performance at high ISO. In fact I would say that up to 4000 ISO, the D7200 and D800 behave the same way and I was favorably stupito.rnVedo instead of the RAW file of 7200 is much less "workable" than the full frame and this sorry a pochino.rnNel Overall I must say that is a great machine: suitable for use professionale.rnPer amateur use is toprn |
 | sent on November 28, 2015 Pros: Image quality. Customizing buttons. Features Cons: Slow opening menu Opinion: I come from nearly seven years of D300. I have long awaited an D400 that never arrived and I was very undecided about moving to FX (used D700 or D610) or stay with this DX D7200. After seeing the raw latter deciso.rnDevo I finally admit that the initial impact was traumatic, coming precisely from the D300. The body is quite small but in the end everything is at hand and the settings are changed even faster than the D300. The feeling of quality and substance manca.rnSul field the first big surprise came by AF. While using the same form of the D300 is much more sensitive and fast. Amazing how easily engage in the dark. The other surprise came from the image quality. Color, dynamic range and held at high ISO are above my expectations. A huge leap forward compared to the D300. Mind the grain is quite visible but is so fine as to be visible to the human magnificationsor extremely easy to remove in post. The problem of D300 was that the grain had such dimensions that remove it without affecting the detail was very difficile.rnFino to ISO 10000 color noise is absent, well begins to be felt only over 12800 it gets annoying. So from this point of view I do not regret not being passed to fullframe. Burst and buffer capacity are more than adequate for my purposes especially selecting the raw 12bit and self limited to ISO 10000 (above the buffer is halved do not know why). If necessary, I find very useful function that allows you to increase the crop to 7fps burst while limiting weight and file size, while retaining approximately 15MP risoluzione.rnInfine of the viewfinder, large and bright like the D300 but with the plus Character brighter and visible. Video, timelapse, Wi-Fi are features that increase the fun of using this little gem. |
 | sent on November 18, 2015 Pros: Pentaprism rings and function keys Cons: Every Nikon should have the above pro Opinion: I can finally see something placing your eye to the viewfinder, and think that the old D3100 with pentamirror was more luminous series 3xxx and 5xxx attuali.Finalmente use the buttons to change the functions without entering the various menus and can I use two nuts for Rates & diaframmi.Non it takes not so more to make your customers happy dear Nikon.Praticamente the D90 a bit 'lighter fitted with a sensor with improved performance iso higher, and I think the face of video very beautiful that I will not use. One other good thing is that the autofocus locks very well even without luce.Le other things within the update and then I have to try. |
 | sent on October 24, 2015 Pros: ISO impressive seal, fast autofocus, from jpeg files beautiful already baked by the machine. Really a very good car! Cons: Nobody Opinion: I was the owner of a Nikon D300 for several years, which has given my emotions. The only thing that has always convinced me of the little 300 is that as soon as the light "fell" slightly digital noise was there ready to come out. Up to ISO 800 everything is ok, from there on ...... HELP! RnEro undecided whether to make the jump to FF, maybe a used D700 ..... rnDa them still undecided: rnD700 used .... or I remain on the APSC and go on again? rnQuesta D7200 will hold well the ISO? and the body ???? rnDovevo choose from a flagship of a few years ago and an average time of oggi.rnHo decided to trust the new technology, I went into the store and I bought the D7200. I came home with an incredible curiosity, I put the battery, set the ISO 6400 and made some shots. Result? Additional fees !!!!! The files are really good until 3200, you can 'enjoy with ease the 6400, then if you have time and want to work on the PC you can shoot up to 12800 !!!!!! rnInsomma are really soddisfatto.rn |
 | sent on October 14, 2015 Pros: Af precise and fast, Grande held ISO, Wi-fi Cons: Not good flurry Opinion: Truly compact camera body, but above all with an excellent quality / price ratio. I switched to Canon 6D in this little gem of technology and to my surprise are enormously satisfied. Ease of use with the double ring av / tv is a strong point for naturalistic photo. Great display and its resolution. I recommend it to everyone. |
 | sent on October 08, 2015 Pros: Sensor, ergonomics, AF performance, commands, functions, and weight. Cons: 5 ftg according to real and only 7 in crop 1.3x. Opinion: I come from a D7000 and the D7200 I own a few months. The impression now is a good upgrade. The sensor produces files much more detailed and etched, croppabili very well, in my opinion, more easily lavorabili.rnLa held at high ISO has improved, but it can not be a miracle .... however, not a lover of "milaemille "iso.rnL'ergonomia is excellent, better than the D7000, the hand feel less tired and more secure grip. The AF is then very powerful and very sensitive (proven in a room with dim light hooks always .... the form of D7000 NO!). RnPurtroppo missing a volley worthy of the name of the 6 frames advertised are real only if you set the camera 12bit but full resolution 14bit down to 5.rnPer else is faster, the 8000 second you know there and gets pleasure averlo.rnIl video industry is improved and 60p you will see all with a soft passages video really piacevole.rnCompleta all the possibility ofcreate time-lapse with two moves, the Wi-Fi easy to share shots on the fly (I happened to a baptism) .rnInsomma, a reflex very complete and that satisfies me does not make me regret giving (for now) the shift to FF.rnDavvero advisable |
 | sent on September 07, 2015 Pros: Sensor and dynamic range, sharpness, autofocus, ISO yield excellent, Weight, Battery life, Time Lapse Function integrated, Price Cons: Nobody Opinion: After more than a month of use I can confirm the value of this camera body, I had the D7100 for a few months in late 2013 and noticed many improvements from the point of view of the sensor and the workability of the RAW file. Really good dynamic range, low noise even at high ISO, used safely under special conditions up to ISO 5000/6400 without great loss of quality. I use mainly for landscape photos on a tripod and weather, produces excellent file.rnCon good lenses in front always gives razor-sharp pictures and does not regret much more expensive cars with sensors FF.rnL'AF is great, fast and affidabile.rnE ' light, you hold very well and gives the impression of still having a solid and professional in his hands, commands rapid and optimal duration of batteria.rnHo found very convenient function integrated roll Interspersed with exposure compensation, easy to set to create excellent timelapse.rnHa additional features like WiFi and GPS that personallynot use, but can be comfortable in many people for fast sharing of clicks on tablets and smartphones and geolocation of foto.rnIl price in my opinion is great for what it offers, I have purchased with new European guarantee below 900 euro. The council. |
 | sent on August 14, 2015 Pros: Weight-ergonomics-yield high ISO-speed shooting and focus-controls accessible without entering the menu-sharpness. Cons: For now, no, but a display (viewfinder) articulated would complete the work. Opinion: I come from D60-D7000 and wanted to make a "leap" .rnEro undecided whether to switch to FX (full frame) or staying on the DX (APS-C) also because I have different goals for DXrnBene say that the choice has been awarded and is a fun only with time-lapse and wi-fi that complement the quality of this machine really well done and maneggevole.rnIl transferring images to your smartphone through the NFC feature is useful if you use social.rn |
 | sent on July 20, 2015 Pros: made at high ISO, ergonomics, speed autofocus, sharpness dynamic range and detail of the images. Cons: if we want to insert one is battery power when you turn on the module integrated Wi-Fi ... Opinion: taken about ten days, very satisfied purchase, come from a d5000 and the jump is abysmal surrender ISO, resolution, detail ... moreover the camera body is of a higher category and electronics 5 are a abyss ... I was torn between this machine and go to fx with the D610, but after trying it I was convinced by the quality of the images out of the oven, the yield at high ISO and the ability to keep the optics that I had, postponing the move maybe when they come out to fx models amateur "not overly castrated" ... When not finding defects in title, only a high battery consumption once you turn the module wi-fi, better to use the old infrared remote control smartphone .. . |
 | sent on July 18, 2015 Pros: Resistance high ISO. Handling. Shutter speed. Cons: For now nothing Opinion: Gioiellino.rnSoddisfatto true for this purchase. I come from d7000 I noticed a large leap. The D7200 generates files crazy. Sensor amazing. Access to the app on your phone is very useful. A great gioiellino.rnTestata in low light conditions autofocus surprising. I had problems with the d7000 nell'agganciare the subject. With the D7200 does not miss a beat. |
| sent on July 15, 2015 Pros: fast autofocus, held at high ISO settings easily accessible thanks to the external keys, without going into the menu Cons: to possess a month, and I have not found any defect Opinion: I use it mainly for avifauna.rnottimo tracking autofocus, when engaged on the subject do not lose even the edges of 'shot, while not using tele luminosi.rnmaneggevole and intuitive to' use without taking your eye from the mirino.rnottima required to ISO arise, easily accessible up to 3200 ISOrnpienamente satisfied of 'purchase |
 | sent on July 15, 2015 Pros: Wi-Fi, many commands on the body without entering the menu ', fast AF, etc. etc. Cons: Viewfinder not articulated, but I would have preferred and 'just a personal thing, the rest? range to look '!!! Opinion: great camera for its price range you could not ask for more, excellent sharpness and are multiple adjustments in the menu, where we find a comfortable adjustment of the 'AF fine, great weight with the 18/140, I have found no fault except that I would be happier with an articulated viewfinder, which I think would serve a lot for pictures type to the moon, for example, or macro pictures. on the body are several settings that avoid going into the menu 'all the time, in my opinion the latter have a lot like the pages of the manual of use of the machine and the menu' are more 'than 600 pages certainly many photo ! absolute resistance to high iso shutter modes complete for all. not 'say that with quet needs rnBuona sharpness and fast AF, I think it is great for all sorts of photos from nature to city' always precise construction materials good, I'm trying with six goals, each photo and 'surprise , advice to buy it as a kit with the Nikon 18-140, thereI'm the starting price 'so obvious and the 18-140 and' a goal that ultimately serves and is used, does not stand still in the backpack. I read many reviews, which gave Canon the same band a step up, but reading those people is the highest level of satisfaction of those who own the Nikon! I read reviews of Nikon professional but even then we are more 'happy with the D7200! rnPer me this machine and 'irreplaceable! It is' the last step that separates the amateur from the professional, you can 'say it' s a 750 DX version but with some little thing better not 'dett0 that with this Nikon can not' do a professional job if you the "handle" and a good goal for me ... combined 17-55 to become a beauty! |
 | sent on June 06, 2015 Pros: Camera of "thick" Dynamic range and sharpness, go hand in hand in the details more "fine" ... robust and "savings: intense use with 300 f2.8 with various multipliers, 2.5 / 3 days. Energy. .. held at high iso as a PRO. FX, very valuable all ... The Nikon has recovered credibility with this ... The D7200 'Autofocus is fast. Cons: Two notes ... rn1) The front dial on the handle is too interior ... See also, use with guanti.rn2) would ask more precise autofocus tracking. Opinion: Photographer from standing (always Nikon) initially, and that I still (Furche the 801), FM-2N, 801, F3, F6 (exceptional) ... coming from the film (and continuing), wanting to take the "step" to complement the digital I decided to do it with the D 7200 ... believe me I did not regret and, I venture to say that I recognize all the experience in this Nikon "Piccoletta" ... I had the opportunity to try out various pro . Nikon and Canon ... but this makes the "beard" to many and think that is APS-C ... compact, handy, robust ... I highly recommend the battery-pack to be able to appeal in solidarity in any position it takes hold of the camera ... and I must say that the "little one", he unleashed an uncontrollable desire to take pictures ... exceedingly to save on expensive films ... there are other things you need but in digital. rnTempo permitting, I'll post some photos with the D7200, thanks to the attention given. |
 | sent on April 21, 2015 Pros: Fast and accurate autofocus, Upper display with more information, Buffer incredible speed, sharpness and dynamic range beyond compare, Free Wi-Fi is very convenient and fast Cons: no adverse finding Opinion: Already owner of the D7000, D7100 step to finally purchase today the Nikon D7200 ... for me it's all vita.rnNikon meant it by introducing a new semi-professional model that offers a number of features inherited from the models of the series FX (full frame) and is characterized, above all, by the presence of an autofocus system, Multi-CAM 3500 AF II to 51 points (15 cross sensors central, central point compatible with f / 8), with better performance in the shots in low light (up to -3EV) .rnPoi, a touch up to the minimum resolution, which now for the new Nikon D7200 is 24.2 megapixels, but also a different sensor CMOS APS-C (probably the same as the Nikon D5300, produced by Sony), without low-pass filter for maximum definizione.rnAltra new, a memory buffer more capacious able to handle the shutter speed of 6 pictures per second in JPEG for a maximum of 100 shots, which become 27 in RAW 12 bit, or 18 in 14-bit RAW before the buffer is pieno.rnQuello buffer was a bit 'the Achilles heel of the D7100 along with the "banding" that now should no longer bother to grazi new sensore.rnA board the D7200 also EXPEED image processor 4 (the D7100 running version EXPEED 3), which, according to Nikon, allowed pre processes and after shooting 30% faster. |
| sent on April 14, 2015 Pros: purchased by very little, but it seems solid and powerful ... quality top of the range Cons: file incompatibility .NEF; shutter button very sensitive, shooting halfway seem less noticeable. Opinion: For now raw files can not be opened with Lightroom or Photoshop, EVEN with update to Camera Raw 8.8; CAPTURE NX-D or VIEW NX2 are the only programs for updated files D7200 .... however the gap between the D5100 and the D7200 is abysmal: the seal at high ISO is, in my opinion, is improved by at least 2 STOP. Appearance Adobe developments, but in the meantime I can work a little '. |
| sent on April 04, 2015 Pros: A great car in every part, in fact nikon unalto gem. Cons: For now nothing is perfect Opinion: Just plug !!!! I must say that the long-awaited transition from d90 D7200 and immense. Excellent performance at high ISO, not to mention the crystal bright viewfinder. The thing that struck me most was the ability to use Wi-Fi to share the shots just the facts, now to test it well and I can just post some shots. Every shot is a masterpiece almost impossible to fail. |
 | sent on March 30, 2015 Pros: I must say I was very surprised at the great seal x iso, burst and fast AF ... EXPEED 4 makes the difference in comparison with the D7100 that mounts EXPEED 3..aggiunta the wifi which is good ..... and I must add large color gamut really excellent .... Cons: X the moment nothing special ... just the body and a little bit accustomed with the D300S seems a gicattolino to add the battery pack mandatory x comfort management best ... Opinion: After many years I decided to change D300S camera body, I was very dubious about change but it was not an easy choice, then the decision ... it sold .... I bought the D7200 and I must say that I am very, very satisfied .... Flurry fast and above all the great seal iso, an extraordinary x APSC, display 3.2 and wifi and especially the new sensor EXPEED 4..devo say with the release of this camera body, the game is also open against a foreign superior .... in the week will test the best x add additional impressioni..dopo many shots I have to add a large color gamut colors really exceptional ... I made the right choice ...... do not add more .. .good light .. |
 | sent on March 20, 2015 Pros: Resistance to high iso really extraordinary for a APSC, quick burst and full-bodied, light and manegevvole but with customizations by pro body, 1/8000 that the D600 does not have, af points that cover much of the viewfinder and AFC fast pursuit. Cons: By the time I noticed an excessive intervention of NR on shooting in jpg to iso above 2000 but I wanted to test thoroughly (for me) new EXPEED but that does not ruin the picture. In light situations really poor (I tried it in the theater) AF hesitates a nap before hanging but I'm comparing to D800 and D600 capiamoci then ... is to be taken with the tongs my statement! Indeed, the display tilting or articulated would be appreciated but is not required. Opinion: It was about a year that was expecting a chance to take a D7100 ... well, for just over 150 € more I took this little gem to use as a spare car and I must admit that left me speechless! RnPrima moving to FF I had tried a D5100 cabbage ... here we are on another planet! rnQuesta little one is really sensational than I could imagine. Has a burst faster than the D800 and the D600 but this also say the numbers in catalogs and when they try seriously I plan to add my impressioni.rnLa real feature that left me stone is kept at high ISO, last night I started with the idea that in the middle of the show I replaced with the D800 to take some shots decent home over the evidence I wanted to do ... well ... I finally used all evening without feeling the need to do the cambio.rnNei coming days will test properly in macro photo hunting and to see in those fields where it can go ... |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
