|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.user226515   | sent on December 14, 2021 Pros: All Cons: To be picky, it has too many adjustments. Opinion: Before the D610 I had the D700, which was already great, this is better, not only for the quality / price ratio. With high quality optics the image quality is excellent, never had problems with the autofocus, even in dark environments, excellent general reactivity, the 6 fts and the 1/4000 "are enough and advance even for uses -professional- knowing what you do, very robust, I fell more than once, and was exposed to the weather, without ever giving problems. |
 | sent on November 04, 2021 Pros: Sensor, ergonomics, number of lenses available, cost of used specimens, suitable to start exploring the world of FF. Cons: Autofocus, sharpness, in general it is an operationally slow machine, the sensor gets dirty, only 1/4000. Opinion: It has a wonderful color gamut and a quality sensor with which you can work without problems even at very high ISOs. The resolution also allows important crops without losing detail, the file is very workable. Unfortunately, the big flaw of this machine is the general reactivity. The AF works well only in bright light, in dim light and with low light you throw away many, too many shots. It's a tripod machine. Even the sharpness is not the best, although it also depends on the lens with which you shoot. Suitable for thoughtful and comfortable shots, therefore: no street, no sport, no fauna. Its quality shows it in studio portraits, with studied lights, the sensor returns a good softness and slight tonal passages. It is probably the field in which he does best with the landscape. I bought it used for mere curiosity, kept very well paid little, almost as a gift. Honestly the fact that it is FF does not compensate for the low overall performance of the machine, especially of the AF module, whose points are all central and with little light it never hooks well. What is the use of a beautiful sensor if the camera does not shoot? I prefer a noisy photo to a blurry one. In the end I don't feel like recommending her, she does everything quite well, but nothing really well. |
 | sent on October 25, 2021 Pros: Ergonomics, RAW file quality, robustness, dual SD slots, good ISO seal Cons: AUTOFOCUS never accurate. Very limited and inaccurate autofocus points, it is better to make do with manual focus to reduce the shots to be thrown away, Live view unusable for night photos or at dusk. Saleability Opinion: The Nikon d610 is in itself an excellent full frame considering the cost. However, it is not reliable as far as autofocus is concerned. I recommend it to landscapers who have plenty of time to focus manually. I do not recommend it to Wildlife photographers, sportsmen and portraitists. Getting 7 out of 10 photos wrong at a wedding wouldn't be the best. I tried to resell it to RCE but it is not interested. I will keep it until you decide not to shoot anymore |
 | sent on September 27, 2021 Pros: File quality, iso seal, dynamic range (fantastic sensor), tropicalization, dual sd slots, ergonomics Cons: No preview of exposure in live view, some models are not really exempt from the problem of excessive dirt on the sensor present on the D600 Opinion: Currently, September 2021, I think I can not be denied by saying that it is the best full frame in terms of value for money, perhaps not only from Nikon. Amazing sensor. Infinite dynamic range, excellent iso seal. Massive, tropicalized. Heavy pecca for those like me who do almost only landscape (and night) and often on a tripod does not look in the viewfinder: the lack of preview of exposure in live view (the variation of aperture is manifested by turning off and on the live view, iso and times have no effect on the LV preview). Given the price at which it is currently located, I would buy (maybe I will) a second one to have 2 camera bodies and always keep at hand wide angle pushed and medium canvases during excursions, to minimize changes in optics in humidity and wind conditions and try to keep it cleaner. Sore note the latter: some models suffer from dirt on the sensor, reading on the net (also here itself) many complain of too many (and too frequent) stains on the sensor, which go beyond the dirt that of course sometimes ends up in it during changes of optics. Unfortunately I am among them, my sensor gets dirty more than the sensors of the cars of all my hiking photographer friends. Patience, I had a good reason to learn how to clean it well and now I do it periodically. The baked files do not fear any comparison with those of more modern and much more expensive machines, and it is the feature that most interests me and makes me use this machine with pleasure. |
  | sent on March 23, 2021 Pros: Solid, dynamic range, high iso yield, dual slot, economical, yield with af-d lenses, sensor, addictive Cons: Iso key in uncomfortable position, low light, maf points too central, 1\\4000 Opinion: Bought during the year of release and still today I use it as the main machine. Very reliable on every genre I made, from macro to nocturnal, from portraiture to fauna. It keeps the noise at high iso without problems of any kind, 6400 I use it normally without fear and if necessary I also go up (today it may seem normal, but she is from 2013...) Superb dynamic range and the great double slot sd for long shots or backups. It is addictive, I have found myself so well with her that I am afraid to change her risking that with another machine I would not have the same results and the same very high satisfactions, unfortunately her flaw are the maf points maybe few, but above all too close to each other, in conditions of poor light, she struggles to focus a little. Now it is used at very affordable prices and stands up to today's machines without suffering from the result of the final file, I recommend it to everyone. If you really want to be picky, it doesn't reach 1\\8000 |
 | sent on March 20, 2021 Pros: Excellent dynamic range, yield with AF-D optics, general solidity Cons: Low light performance (autofocus), current value hold Opinion: I used the D610 with pleasure for four years and about 200,000 shots, then replaced to switch to Medium Format. I found myself well in almost all shooting situations except those where it was necessary to stress the autofocus system as birdlife and low light shots. For the first one I solved by adding a more performing DX body such as AF, while for poor light it is enough to work in manual focus. Nothing to say about the performance of a sensor that I still see is still among the best and certainly can represent an economic entry point (in 2021 now a lot) in the Full Frame. I have never had any problems or hesitations and it seemed to me very well built and able to withstand even some mistreatment. |
 | sent on March 13, 2021 Pros: Sensor, Dynamic Range, excellent high ISO yield, double SD slot, robust Cons: Points Af few, central and not very precise. Opinion: Great car, paid very little. Too many people talk about it badly, the first thing they mention of oil stains on the sensor. After two years of much use and change of optics only a speck with very closed diaphragms and cmq will not be oil. The colors are great, the ISO seal is perfect. Of course if you photograph sports and birds it is not the top but for an amateur photo that does not have the obligation to deliver photos to newsrooms is fine. |
 | sent on March 04, 2021 Pros: Value for money (especially for used in 2021), sensor still current, good dynamic range, good yield at high iso, indestructible Cons: Weight, size, shallow grip, inaccurate autofocus and too concentrated dots in the center, not very sharp sensor, terrible video department, unarticulated screen, lack of dedicated iso button. Opinion: To date it is clearly a dated tool with considerable limitations when compared to the current mirrorless of nikon house. I believe, however, that it is still a valid alternative for those who want to start taking photography for little, but having in their hands a tool that, after 8 years, still guarantees excellent image quality. I find the D610 sensor less "sharp" than that of the D750. In hindsight I wouldn't have bought the D610 but the D750, and I generally recommend the latter more. I have often had Front/Back focus issues pairing this body with nikon native optics. It's also a really nice brick; heavy, ungainly, and with a grip that does not convince me much. |
  | sent on March 04, 2021 Pros: Sensor quality still current to date 2021. It digests all the goals well, it buys used at a good price. Cons: None that are not in the characteristics. 1/4000, central maf points, limited burst buffer, non-tiltable display. Opinion: In my opinion camera sometimes underestimated. Focus is often given as difficult, not suitable for dynamic scenes, not sensitive to light. I have had the opposite experience, dynamic shots I take them home without problems, even at night I generally do not need the flash lattice and when the machine stops focusing we are really without light. For example up to 12800 iso f1, 8 1/40 I still have autofocus working, at least on the control panel. For the rest, complete machine. Good iso seal, good dynamic range, light raw to manage. Sore notes, some random error at low temperatures - 20, The torque of the focus motor is not high and in particular conditions slows down in moving heavy lenses without internal motor, e.g. 80 200 2.8 in the cold. However, a very valid reflex for general use. |
 | sent on December 26, 2020 Pros: Dynamic range, price, file quality, ergonomics Cons: Autofocus Opinion: I've been owning this body machine for three years now. It was my first Full frame. The machine is very good, at this price, especially if you buy there in the used market, you can hardly find something better. Of course, having come out in 2013, it cannot stand the comparison with modern SLRs, or mirrorless. His work is more than satisfactory. I mainly use it for landscapes, and the file quality is really great. You can recover shadows in posts in an exceptional way, as evidence of an excellent dynamic range. Above 800-1600 iso the noise begins to be heard, but with one click everything is resolved in posts, and you manage to have very usable photos. However, I recommend never exceeding 3200 iso, a value beyond which, in my opinion, the grain is beginning to be important. Lately I've been using it for sports photography, in motorsport. Autofocus is certainly not the workhorse of this REFLEX, but if there it is combined with quality optics, and used in conditions of good light, you can still take home interesting shots. Would I buy it back? Probably yes, although to be honest I prefer Canon colors much more than Nikon colors, but these are just personal opinions. Despite everything, if you want a machine to do everything, at a moderate expense, and that is Full frame, this is for you. |
 | sent on October 17, 2020 Pros: Sharpness, dynamic range, ISO seal, weight, price, dual SD slot, wide optical availability, tropicalized body, size. Cons: Maybe the viewfinder a little dark, AF points grouped in the center. Opinion: Does buying a Nikon d610 REFLEX in 2020 still make sense? I think so! It all depends on the type of photography you take. I do mostly Still Life, portrait and landscape, so I don't need a fast car, with lots of focus points, wifi or Bluetooth connections, 4k GPS videos and more, just take off and insert the sd card into the reader of my old PC to transfer the images. There are on the market Full-frame with impressive resolutions but they also need up to the hardware, PCs with powerful processor video card and abundant ram and large hard disks, and then find that for publishing on the web you have to lower the resolution a lot. A machine with double SD slot, tropicalized body, to which you can mount 50 years of Nikon optics and also the right optics of the Nikon Apsc, obviously with crop. It has a good battery that if used without the use of the display can safely exceed a daily photo output. For the most demanding there is the possibility to buy a battery grip to double the autonomy and for a better grip with vertical shots. The full format sensor is fantastic, returns a clean and well-workable file in post production, in laboratory tests Dxomak achieved a score of 94. A few negative notes, if you can call it that; The viewfinder that I think is a bit dark, but then you get used to it. On the other hand, the LEDs of the settings and the exposure meter are clearly visible, which drove me crazy in my old Pentax. AF points are grouped in the middle but I don't make a drama out of it, I'm used to working with just one central point. I focus and hold down the shutter button i recompose the scene. What made me fall in love with this machine and the feeling of solidity, the well-arranged controls that allow you to work faster. I believe that it is also the ideal machine for those who approach photography, without spending a fortune, many complain about the excessive cost of optics, but just use the fixed lenses, in addition to being very cheap they are also brighter. Especially for newbies they help to better understand the photographic composition than the zooms. The only precaution to be taken is that most fixed optics are without stabilizer so it must be taken into account, using shooting times /safety exposure : In simple terms a good camera for photographing. |
user198779 | sent on February 11, 2020 Pros: Iso estate, ergonomics, compact and cheap. Cons: For me the uncomfortable iso button beyond measure. Opinion: It has been for years the gateway to the FF Nikon, cheap and well made with commands arranged as the 7xxx series so that those who come from that series will immediately be at ease right away. The value of the D610 lies mainly in the excellent dynamic range, the iso seal and its 24 megapixels which in my opinion are the right compromise to churn out files not too heavy and quality. It's not an action camera that's too quick as sport or photo hunting where autofocus shows its limits. As soon as production output is still new at prices more than halved an opportunity not to be missed for those who want to change its old reflex. |
 | sent on January 08, 2020 Pros: weight, sensor, price Cons: AF, WB Opinion: Machine used under any climatic conditions, snow rain fog -12 and never missed a shot. For the new/used price a must for those who want to start, sensor with exceptional dynamic range. AF that just comes down a little light that abandons you and you are forced to sechedo by hand. sometimes incorrect white balance if set to auto |
 | sent on February 02, 2019 Pros: Sensor, EXPEED3 processor already very good, noiselessness shutter, dynamic range, ISO tightness more than good. Cons: Maybe (but really maybe) the concentration of 39 points autofocus and burst not very fast, but only for those who do naturalistic photos. But that kind of photography unless you talk about camera bodies from 51 points and 10 fps burst, the rest is too little anyway unless you talk about a D4s or a D5. Opinion: I bought it two years ago, coming from the D700, then already a fantastic reflex. The difference in dynamic range and acquired details is very relevant, as is the ISO seal. The controls are comfortable and even the ISO setting, with the ISO compensation feature, becomes easy to handle with the camera's rear wheel, avoiding the automatic ISO mode, not always adequate. Sorry that you miss the rear AF-ON button. The discussions on Pro body, semi Pro or FF entry level are academic, because everything always depends on what the camera body we want and what kind of photography we do. I do landscapes and street predominantly and for this kind is widely satisfactory even in low light conditions.. But with a good lens you compensate. The weight is not impossible and always better than the 950 g of the D700. The D750 that I possess has something more certainly, starting with the sensor Expeed 4, but the D610 is really good. The true flaw more than the concentration of autofocus points is the number of autofocus points (39) and the focus speed, but it always depends on what kind of photography we make. For a passionate landscape photo goes excellently and also in the macro is very good. I'm satisfied. |
 | sent on January 03, 2019 Pros: Dynamic range, ISO seal, price Cons: Autofocus points Opinion: I have this car for a few months now and I have to say that it was a surprise right away. It will be the huge leap from my old D80, it will be that of against this machine has very few, but I can not find obvious flaws except the limitedness of the AF points. The dynamic range is extraordinary, the ISO seal is very convincing (I find the images produced with 6400 very usable). It has the double SD slot (huge comfort) and the socket I find it, personally, very comfortable. Of course it weighs a bit, but it's a fullframe! Would I recommend it? Yes, at today's used prices. To pick it up new, with the market in fibrillation post entry in the scene of Nikon Mirrorless FX, I would think twice: with a relatively small effort plus you manage to bring home the d750 which has a better AF system. |
 | sent on December 03, 2018 Pros: Full frame sensor, dynamic range, noise Iso high Medil Cons: Weight, slow af low brightness (good to high light) Opinion: I own this d610 for a year, coupled with the mythic "Tamron 2.8 VC first series and the immense 50ino 1.8 g Nikon! Mind-blowing sensor, phenomenal image recovery, ISO hold up to 4000 very good ISO, at 6400 grain present, but correctable in post! The dolelent note is the weight. Also used during the trips is felt on the shoulders and neck, but it gives you images of a bill so high, that makes you forget the bad ones taken because of him. Great price in the used, I highly recommend to switch to FF. Odious the key to the ISO that forces you to remove your hand from the lens to modify them! |
 | sent on October 10, 2018 Pros: Perfect Cons: At the price of €600 in the used no one Opinion: Perfect machine to enter the full frame, and except professional needs of niche, also excellent for working. Sensor, autofocus, dual SD slot, ergonomics. I don't understand what you want more from a car. Sony offers a car similar to 3 times the price of this (A7III), and sincerely except sports Photography The difference is not there. In fact, with this you can stop having the anxiety for the batteries. Maybe now for 200 \ \ 300 € should go directly to D750, but they are calculations that everyone must make themselves. About the ergonomics then in my opinion Nikon is coming years ahead at all. Gripping a Nikon seems to have an extension of its arm. Maybe less resistant in time than a Canon 5d, but as a feeling of use are unparalleled. I now use Sony and I wouldn't go back, but I still miss grabbing a Nikon and feel how ergonomic the grip is... For those who do not know the Nikon sensors The dynamic range is exaggerated, you will recover the impossible. Also excellent for amateurs who want a car to enjoy photography in serenity without many technological bells of dubious usefulness |
 | sent on September 07, 2018 Pros: sharpness, color range, ISO seal, weight, price. Double SD slot. Cons: ISO key inconvenient, slow AF. Not very ergonomic handle. Opinion: Excellent reflex. a clarification. If you set the Flash to 1/200 * and you have a high speed flash you can shoot up to 1/4000. I took a bat in flight at 1/1250 with Flash godox 860ii. I own the d7500. The d610 is slower in AF, but recovers in sharpness or crop. I find it fabulous for macro (even freehand) color range and sharpness higher than the d7500 that I remember mounts sensor and processor of the d500. I highly recommend it. |
 | sent on March 27, 2018 Pros: FX sensor, Dual SD slot, Artificial horizon Cons: Limitations to some PRO functions, noise at medium high ISO, AF not always at height. Price. Opinion: I bought it in 2016 to go to the FX format (I came from very good Nikon D90). rnrnIndoubtedly, the jump in quality was sensible, especially as regards the response of the exposure meter to the adjustments (larger sensor, more accurate ISO sensitivity in the 100-400 range). But for some things it gives the idea of ??a deliberately castrated device compared to the older sisters of the same "family" (D750 / D810). On all AF management and the yield to ISO 800-1600 that does not seem to decrease proportionally, as it happens in the range 100-400.rnrnFor the rest I was particularly satisfied, combined with sufficiently bright optics (f / 2.8). rnrnVery good for travel photography, good results also in the studio. It is not very suitable for events in low light conditions (eg concerts) for the above problems over a certain ISO value. The double slot on more than one occasion saved me, not so much for the extended capacity (use SD 64 / 128GB), how muchbecause of the fact that often I forget to put back the extracted memory to download the photos on PC.rnrnrn |
 | sent on March 01, 2018 Pros: ISO seal, shade / light recovery, dynamic range, second slot Cons: Af with little light, Af point layout, ISO button Opinion: I have been happy about the D610 for about 2 years, premising that it is used exclusively for landscape, night and rarely naturalistic photos, this machine performs its job very well. RnTowing from the D7100 the first thing that stunned me was the workability of the files, I would define the comparison almost embarrassing, compared to an incredible recovery shadows / lights. In the night photos I found a good resistance to ISO, but I think it is a gamble to exceed I 4000 ISO (subjective opinion cmq believe). The only real weak point that I found is the AF a bit 'undecided with poor lighting conditions. The AF points are perhaps distributed a bit 'too much in the central area and perhaps for those who treat a kind of very dynamic photography can be a limit. Too bad for the ISO button in an awkward position and not attributable to other programmable keys. In conclusion, thanks to the experience with this machine in the landscape field, I would definitely recommend it to those coming from the 3000, 5000 and 7000 series. |
 | sent on January 02, 2018 Pros: Sensor, high ISO strength Cons: AF, AF points arrangement, buttons layout and programming, handle Opinion: I often shoot at high ISO and on APS-C it becomes a problem, unless you have machines of a certain level (D500). So I decided to take the D610 because I have heard very well of its sensor and the quality of the files and in fact I had no surprise under this point of view, indeed, the details are clearly visible even at 5000 ISO. However it depends very much on the intended use of the photo but certainly looking at full resolution from a distance of about 50 cm (monitor) is not really the best way to appreciate the quality. Excellent possibility of recovery from underexposure. rnL'af is not really performing in cases of difficult light but with a bright lens you could earn something. I have used it on several occasions and conditions and in any case I have always taken photos home without too much effort. 39 points at the center that do not make much sense but that still seem to be a feature of the Full Frame. In fact, looking at the arrangement on top machines like the 750 or the Serie 8xx, there is not much difference despite having more. Certainly for those who come from APS-c with a 7100, initially it is definitely unsettling.rnI keys ... Nikon decided to give priority to editing on camera, even devoting a key ... Already this is an absolutely negative aspect , according to my point of view, because I consider it a decidedly useless function. Not content with this, it is not possible to change this setting but the thing even more depressing is that the same identical function is activated even when you press the "OK" key of the cursor, when you view the photos, and even this you can not change . So two identical functions on two different keys that can not be programmed ... Basically on the machine I have two keys that I can not use, and this I consider a real idiocy because it would take a firmware update (which by now there will not be, given the age of the car) to solve the problem. DAs I understand, however, the programming department of Nikon has some problem in creating something that has a sensible logic ... rnThe handle is not particularly uncomfortable but for me it is not enough because the little finger is going to end up under the body and over long sessions it suffers. So I bought a battery grip to better balance everything. But this is an absolutely subjective aspect because it depends on the size of the hand. All in all, it is an excellent machine that produces excellent files. Some flaws at the operational level but nothing that can limit the photographer. Given the price, it is a machine that is worth buying. |
 | sent on December 27, 2017 Pros: Low noise at high ISO, image quality, workability of files Cons: key position iso Opinion: My first FF, coming from a nikon d3200 (used for 3 years), the jump is huge. The files he makes are impressive. Very high image quality. The real difference, however, is the use of the machine in low light conditions and with high ISO values, here the difference with the D3200 is abysmal. Very satisfied with the purchase, for the amateur use that I make it is perfect. Rated 10 |
 | sent on October 15, 2017 Pros: Great Sensor, High Lights / Shadow Recovery, Highly Managed High ISO, Excellent RAW, Dual SD Slot, Price Cons: Vagal AF with little light, which becomes unusable with very little light, MAF Point Arrangement, Awkward ISO Button, Buffer Opinion: The sensor has a very high dynamic range and returns saturated colors at the right point. In addition, the noise is contained, practically almost absent up to 640-800 ISO, and becomes visible (but easily attenuated) at 1600-2000 ISO; usable with criterion up to 4000 ISO, at 5000 the color begins to be "puffy", so if possible it is best to avoid pushing so far (the maximum ISO value is 6400, the next values ??are with extension ). The dual SD slot allows 3 very convenient modes of use: slot 2 as slot extension 1, slot 2 as slot backup 1 (if you need to take home shots at odds), and 1 RAW slot 2 JPEG slot. Even ergonomics are fairly good, weight is low and present tropicalization. Now let's go to the defects (alas). It would be an excellent car, if the AF was not so poor. Low light conditions are enough for the AF to sometimes attach the subject too late, and if they lower slightly &%2339; the lights (obviously not speaking of darkness, but much more than a shade), the AF starts to go back and forth several times, until it ticks or ticks it and stops infinitely without hooking anything, or gets a cramp to the finger ! Also, the layout of the MAF points on the frame is embarrassing: too central, and reflect the low qualitative quality of the D610's focus compartment. Other sins, certainly not as bad as the poor AF, is the ISO button position: bottom left! It would be far more convenient to swap it with the bracketing activation key, placed under the flash key. Even a slightly more powerful buffer would not be a bad thing given the maximum burst of the 6fps.rn D610 finishing, there are few users complaining of oil stains on the sensor (the defect it suffered from the D600: the D610 was born from the D600 just to eliminate this design defect). I did not have it, and some of them later discovered that it was dust rather than dustoil. It is still possible however that a sporadic construction defect causes the oil to splash on the sensor ... |
| sent on July 18, 2017 Pros: Sensor with recovery shadows and monstrous lights, very well managed sound, 24mpx more than enough, ISO great up to 640 usable up to 1600 with very little denoise work Cons: Sensor oil (!), Af inaccurate in light condition, unobtrusive sight for long poses, 1/4000 Opinion: A great car for those who like me comes from d90 (however dignified). It takes a bit to trust the histogram because in pp you can recover incredible things. Absent noise up to 500/640, minimum up to 1600. Honestly, who believes usable iso 6400 I think I'm telling you why subjects prefer tablecloths. Buffer a little slow in the burst (ok until 10/12 photos then slows). In my opinion, it was an exceptional machine if it were not for two huge ones: the almost blind autofocus (the d90, 10 years old, seems to me even better in the shade) and the fact that up to 15,000 shots dirty the oil sensor type Pugliese . Clean 4 times in a very simple and fast way anyhow annoying defect because you notice when developing you need to clone spheres around. It overloads a bit. Perfect for everything except conditions that put the whip in low light. Here is not enough. In any case, as much as it costs and how much to recycle it with closed eyes. |
 | sent on July 17, 2017 Pros: Weight, size, battery, very well-recoverable files, high ISO hold, buttons available except for ISO Cons: ISO Button poorly positioned and not programmable, no wifi or Bluetooth, very bad AF as soon as the light conditions are not great, AF-C for nothing accurate Opinion: Former possessor of a D3300 I decided to buy my first FX the D610 now 2 years ago, and I think now I have accumulated enough experience to be able to "review"! From passionate about landscape photos, street and portraits (more than portraits are stolen shots at some party, but I also did from "photographer" to some friend graduation) I thought that the full format was the right thing to choose, and after 2 years I do not regret the choice , indeed, I'm super satisfied, but I realize that the D610 is very far from being a great pro (or the ultimate machine), I would call a good entry level of the FX format! Who wants to buy it, especially now that is found by RCE at prices even around 800 euros must definitely consider that the AF is scarce, but really very poor, as soon as the light falls will not be able to focus virtually nothing, forcing you to Go look for some bright area of the frame to get it hooked, the points of MAF are was and distributed so much in the center (let's say that if you focus in the center and recompose you do not care, but I often use the points of MAF instead of recompose , I say it is annoying), the ISO holds them very well (but what does that mean?! They Come out acceptable files with little noise up to 1600-2000 ISO, then you have to know how to act with software for the NR, and at that point are recoverable files even at 6400 ISO if the right conditions of light). Note about the battery, really amazing, I found myself several times with the battery in the middle of the charge at the beginning of a day of photos and it held up fine until the evening, provided not to use the LV. I would buy it again, yes to the selling price that is now! When I took it, at 1100 euros used, by RCE, was a bit ' overrated, at this time rather I would take a D750 that I think is the FX with the best value for money and that manages to fill all those small gaps in the D610! |
 | sent on May 01, 2017 Pros: Lightweight, robust, dynamic range, shadow management, excellent raw, dual sd slot, sensor, good burst Cons: Eyepiece that can not be fliped automatically in long exposures, 1/4000 max Opinion: Happy owner of this jewel for 2 years, used almost always for work and with excellent results. It is light but not to the detriment of quality. Absolutely positive my review, I always found it perfectly associating it with high-quality optics. An excellent product in line with the price that I quietly recommend. |
 | sent on April 12, 2017 Pros: Lightweight, durable, produces raw lavorabilissimi Cons: White balance is not always excellent Opinion: I waited a while to write this review; I came from a 3300 and then switch to a 610 has been how to switch to a Ferrari coming from subcompact; conclusion? if you do not know how to drive you go to crash. At first I had to get to know in order to understand some things, such as the fact that tends to overexpose a little bit open. When I do landscapes in broad daylight sottoespongo almost always, and the result is excellent: it has beautiful colors and a dynamic range of all respect; produces excellent raw that when opened in pp give the very idea of ??so much stuff. The machine is robust, pleasant to hold, you feel it is a superior lady car, the controls in the right place, always use the manual, you easily tamed and the results are obvious, once you learn how to use it not do more for less. Some numbers the AF points in the center as a flaw ... well, in this case, coming from a 3300 I have also noticed the leap; & egra6egrave; to be recommended even if the price is perhaps excessive, I have taken second hand still NITAL warranty. Perhaps, as an amateur that I am, a new D610 I would never have taken. |
 | sent on April 12, 2017 Pros: lightweight and well-built; dynamic range. Cons: -arrangement of the buttons on the left; -arrangement AF point Opinion: A Nikon is forever. It was my thought at first taken in hand the D610 because the weight made me feel good. We saw a car that I could even bring it anywhere without worry of weight and in fact was this: me I can take anywhere with a view without thinking. I use it for more macro than anything else and I'm quite satisfied thanks to the fact that I can put on objectives not Nikon's home that are good company. But, changing general, the enthusiasm of lightness, color and compatible optical park is not enough: the D610 has a serious problem with its focus points all concentrated at the center. In macro, this has very little but in many other cases of use, the arrangement of the AF points can be problematica.rnDopo the D610, I think because for now it is a machine of which I'm quite happy for my use. Like all mid-range and high Nikon cameras, the D610 can be used with Nikon lenses of another time (AI, AI-s) and not only optical AF. This retro-cOMPATIBILITY is a serious subject. |
 | sent on February 26, 2017 Pros: weight,resolution, depth color and dynamic range,double slot sd Cons: non-shutterable eye automatically in long exposures, ISO key can be improved Opinion: I find it a camera with an excellent value for money, the colors are wonderful and the dynamic range is very extensive, even in the shadows you can see for example the colors of a sunset. the maf points are in my opinion well manageable,they are not the 51 of the d3 but they are sufficient in the portrait and in the landscape and in most situations,focuses even almost at night. I recommend buying it without any problems considering also the price of the used. (January 2019 update) used thoroughly x 2 years. ceremonies, macros, landscape and portrait. it does not fear any competitors and often very often does better than the competitors.... |
 | sent on February 15, 2017 Pros: Lightweight and compact, excellent image quality, rich colors and good sharpness of the sensor. Rafica discreet for a varied use Cons: Arrangement of iso wb commands and what not arranged in a very comfortable way because sometimes you press by mistake the menu and activate the display. I would have preferred the arrangement of a d800 and d3 d4 with these commands on the wheel. It does not take much it costs so much to get them. Opinion: L 'I bought it recently so I can only give a partial judgment. It looks very compact but the precise and careful workmanship, by a sense of solidity. The controls are well laid out except for iso wb buttons and what that force to detach it from the eyepiece and look sometimes accidentally you press the menu button brings up the display, I would have preferred the following on the pulley, and a suitable control mode close to that of exposure compensation as modeli pro ... I do not think it's a change so expensive to do for the manufacturer. The images that gives are very workable, beautiful colors, excellent definition, I would say the right compromise between resolution and the file size. In fact they have become a standard 24 mp. The burst is good, although sufficient for the sport if you know the right moment to capture without having to strafe randomly 1000 photos that then you will go to trashing. Good behavior at high iso, 6400 usabilissimi smoothly. The autofocus is decent, good speed and precision, the points are piuttoI'm in the middle but compared to canon 6d are the most versatile motorcycle, also often use the central point which is the most efficient and recompose the picture in just one second, for the rest nothing dramatic. Has dual slot sd then becomes very versatile in both photo and for videos, also by a certain security to have the photos saved on well 2 memory cards instead of 1. In the video performs well except for the usual story of the diaphragm which is not it can change in live view ... but we realize? It went out on the market to 2000 Euros and still maintain a problem that belongs to entry level SLR ?! The screen is not adjustable like the d750 .. and frankly I prefer it, it gives me more security and a sense of robustness compared to d750, the reflex is to be a robust and spartan tool that has to follow the photographer anywhere in the world, with that removable sometimes walking taking it in the neck is removed, the risk of rupture. In conclusion, for now I can say it is a good reflex that you can buy at competitive prices and offers versatity and quality at high ISO, has made almost identical to the d750 and I think we can safely support this. I would have preferred a full tropicalization but unfortunately Nikon must give the quality a little at a time with the count drops, making you shell out much |
 | sent on December 21, 2016 Pros: Price, quality sensor, dual SD slot, body weight Cons: 1/4000, AF too central points Opinion: FF Use this for over a year and I have to say that from a landscape which I can not reproach anything! However, apart from photography landscape a little flaw on some fronts: the focus positions are too central, and if you are not working in live view you find yourself in most cases have to redial. I would expect from a FF 1/8000 me even if it is a "counter" pretty sorvolabilern. |
 | sent on October 22, 2016 Pros: high ISO sealing, ergonomics, controls in the right place Cons: Nobody Opinion: Taken from a couple of months, I'm really satisfied. very workable files, recover shadows and amazing lights, the Af is always accurate in situations not the limit. Q so that really allows fundamental silent shots in certain situations allowing you to work without concerns. The AF points are very central, forcing you to have to recompose the image after the MAF, but it is not a real problem for me. Excellent quality / price! recommended |
 | sent on September 21, 2016 Pros: fx sensor, high ISO sealing, versatile light-bodied, quality 'image Cons: nobody Opinion: I took the D610 used but almost as new with only 3500 shots with equal exchange of my D300S d7000 in store with a one year warranty and I must say I have not regretted it at all indeed astonished 'cause I have to say that it also works well with the average optical quality '. also having a D7100 and d700 (another story primarily as body) I must say that the files produced by the D610 are superior .l 'af x me not' a problem since I had already 'on the d7000. the straconsiglio to those who feel the need 'to go to the full size. |
 | sent on August 28, 2016 Pros: sensor quality (ISO, dynamic range, color), quality of the body (versatile, excellent command), affordable Cons: 1/8000 does not, does not change the aperture during live view, no wifi, no swivel screen Opinion: I use it for years now, and before I had the D600, virtually identical. I'm happy with everything except the things written in the hand, all of which has the D750 (apart 1/8000) then now would be my first choice (but too expensive). For me the fact that the AF points are all at the center is not a problem because you just dial after locking the fuoco.rnPer cons that did not I'd use it for professional video-making and sports photos (low gust speed). Great for portraits, landscapes, nature, macro, still life, events. |
 | sent on June 17, 2016 Pros: Stratospheric seal high Iso, dynamic range, and controls like my D7100 Cons: The 39 AF points from exhaustion, 1/4000 which restricts to use ultraluminose optics. Opinion: After Nikon switching from Nikon D60, D90 and currently still use, D70s Nm720 infrared with D7100, I took used the D610. From the first impressions I must say that I find really good because it has the same commands as my D7100. Finally I tried it during a communion, the AF with 39 points very close to me have created some problems when I wanted to photograph the parent posts to the side, then became normal use and I did not notice any more. For the sport we will see, I did some testing but the 5 fps and not 6fps are very slow and I prefer my D7100. Very satisfied. |
 | sent on February 08, 2016 Pros: lightweight, dynamic range, held at high iso Cons: -1ev, Af few points and too central, 1/4000 sec Opinion: I do not like a product review after 1 month of use so I'm doing after one year and an intense use. I made 39k shots and a photographic trip to Cambodia with this little gem and I must say it is a very formidable machine, sealing very good at high ISO, dynamic range stratospheric, relatively light, perfect for traveling. Do post production with files that churns out is really embarrassing for the resilience of shadows and lights. I decided to change it solely for the af ... to focus maximum -1ev often proved frustrating, and the few points of f (and very central) I find it restrictive. I do not hide that f is not the most reactive. Another shortcoming is the lack of 1/8000 that with optical light serves. But this one can fly, I can safely say that if the af did not do tantrums in non-optimal lighting conditions l would have held. For the rest excellent machine definitely recommended to those who want to switch to FF and have a respectable machine. |
 | sent on February 06, 2016 Pros: Good photos at all, that is after 2 DX the D90 and the D7100 the big jump, just hold, beautiful ergonomic in my humble opinion has it all. Cons: At the moment no objection. Opinion: Great Nikon, after 2 DX APSC the D90 and D7100 2 beautiful semi / pro machines I own and still use with great satisfaction, the great leap the beautiful D610 FX, a whole new world, combined with the 24/120 4.0 from kit fabulous, I amazed me the option that can be set in DX and consequently take and use objectives for APSC, with the battery grip remains well balanced view of the considerable weight of 24/120. I did not notice anything and I did not notice any kind of problems that lead to judge me negatively indeed as I said I made a big jump. In my humble opinion, for those who want to go from DX to FX without fainting This is the advice for quality / price. |
| sent on January 26, 2016 Pros: Sensor, construction, iso Cons: Limit flash to 1 / 200s, every 7000 shots go clean the sensor Opinion: Beautiful beautiful beautiful. The feel is that of pure love. Power and high performance packed into a jewel. I can not imagine the picture without. It has everything and more, he does not lack anything. If the flash allow a speed higher than 1/200 would be a real treat (now beginning to shoot with flash and separate sync is bound by this maximum speed ..). However I did not feel right to criticize it .. |
 | sent on January 12, 2016 Pros: Sensor, ISO, dynamic range, color depth, sharpness, Weight, White Balance Cons: Exposure metering, AF area, only video at 30fps Opinion: Use this stunning reflex for a year: the sensor is fabulous, very crisp with a yield at high iso crazy. The dynamic range can recover quite detail in both shadows and in the lights. The colors are superb and are returned in the shades of the colors truly faithful, then if you use a color profile as Prophoto rgb we realize the continuity of superlative shades of all colors. The burst is discreet enough buffer for 14 nef. The nef baked weigh between 30 and 40 MB and are really lavorabilissimi. The estate iso is good, it is clear the luminance is also present at 800 ISO, but after you retrieve a good detail even at 6400 ISO. The AF module covers a small area, to me is not a problem since I always use the middle and then recompose, but for those who may be affected birds so I put in against. The exposure is not very reliable tends to overexpose by 0.3 stop and in situations of snow or a lot of white on the scene is in crisis. White balance is excellent and indovina 90% of the scenes, removed the autumn where if it finds a point of gray bust colors. Summing up, you have before a Full Frame SLR at a moderate price that returns a detail superb and with a sensor really dream. I use it for portraits and landscapes, and recommend everyone. 10 vote for the quality of the sensor and the great price. |
 | sent on October 19, 2015 Pros: 24 MP sensor FF excellent priced human, beautiful ISO up to 6400, two SD slots useful, excellent grip and weight balanced, popup flash when needed Cons: AREA AF too central, lack of WIFI, disguised D600 Opinion: I had sold the D600 (had no problem) after some ML I returned to FF D610 with this, let's face it is a D600 which have replaced the shutter I would expect from Nikon that would put some more features like Wifi or screen Tilting to distinguish it somewhat from the D600. Notwithstanding this is a machine that for an amateur covers many fields, has a sensor that combined with excellent optical restituice adequate image quality, if he had an AF area wider type D7200 perhaps would un'ammazza flagships (and perhaps why Nikon has castrated!) for my kind of picture still is not a limit use to 95% the focus and recompose and very precise. I recommend it to those who can not afford the D750 with which I think we can close the circle (for the moment) |
 | sent on October 19, 2015 Pros: Super Sensor! High ISO at top level, spectacular shadow recovery, sensitivity and color intensity, AF accuracy, 6fps, partially magnesium and tropicalized body, 100% wide and luminous viewfinder, very customizable controls and functions, DX crop in room, great The white balance meter and white balance, dual battery sd slot. Cons: Area a little wide Opinion: As described in the really cool Pro Machine, I thought long before I bought it with canon since I started going through the full frame and for my budget there was to decide between the canon 6d and the nikon D610 and eventually I chose to make the jump to the ff with nikon never the best choice, car in my opinion extraordinary. With the 70d I had was fast in the af but on 5 photos it was wrong at least 2 the af of this d610 does not mistake a shot even with Low light now I have a lot of extra security, with a sd samsung series pro u3 I can make 16 uncompressed unbreakable gusts before buffering with buffer emptying that takes place in 7/8 seconds, only for a comparison of the raw to iso 6400 of the d610 Are the same if not the best of the 1600 iso of the 70d I had this nikon has an embarrassing iso hold! Natural color rendering at low iso the raw have a workability that with the 70d i dreamed of. For the rest the d610's advantages are listed above Straconsiglio m Great acchin in everything! |
 | sent on August 18, 2015 Pros: Clarity, strength, weather sealing, resistance to high ISO up to 6400, double solt expansion, sensor, definitely good value for money, etc .. Cons: Only 1/4000, video (in the sense that I would have preferred them did not) Opinion: It 'a little over a year now that I switched from my d5100 the D610 and I must say that the leap was remarkable. I quickly familiarized with the FF even though I paid the price of having to adapt to new optical full size, in fact none of those I owned before the d5100 I managed to maintain. However, once re-set a standard kit, the satisfactions that knows give you this gem from Nikon have, at least on a personal level, paid the price of each piece purchased .. A fantastic car that lends itself well to all kinds photography. Unique (to me at least) two faults are the shutter, I would rather come at least until 1/8000 and the video mode, a feature unused by me, then excessive. After almost a year of use are increasingly satisfied with the purchase and advice for those who still harbors some doubts on this machine, to buy it with your eyes closed. Only possessing it we become really aware of the potential that it has for the hands. |
 | sent on August 17, 2015 Pros: Campattezza, sharpness, held at high ISO, relatively light for FF Cons: White balance difficult Opinion: The car is very well balanced, light enough, handsome. Women, with two camera bodies always carry, I can Essene happy. Good resistance to high ISO, sensor well studied. The only flaw, found by me and by other owners I know, is the automatic white balance. Changes dramatically from one shot to another ... same shots (camera settings), the same lens d700 and balance completely different, both setting them automatically. Forums say they update the firmware ... now I try, I hope to improve. Also possess the d600 and has the same problem. The other benefits it fully satisfies. I use it for reportage, street and ceremonies. Unobjectionable in various conditions! Shock resistant! :-) The sharpness of the final images is really good. |
 | sent on June 15, 2015 Pros: Performance sensor crazy, holding ISO, light, strong Cons: so far no Opinion: After several thousands of shots I can say that it really is an excellent machine. In his hand is very well balanced, does not weigh too much and moves around with pleasure, the performance is at the top, especially for people like me to get a Right will be impressed by holding iso. For now I have used the D610 in sports photography, ceremonies, photographs landscapes and reportage and I'm never disappointed. |
 | sent on June 01, 2015 Pros: made at high ISO. weight content. Affordable Cons: not using the autofocus not know Opinion: I have this machine for some months now and I must say that the yield even at high ISO (6400) is remarkable in the woods and photographing plants this feature is essential for me. stabilization is perfect. you can photograph freehand also 1/30 despite the weight of the machine but is tolerable and forgivable given the quality that returns |
 | sent on February 28, 2015 Pros: Images to ISO 6400 used safely, tropicalization, compactness, lightness, strength, image quality, low price to be FF, unbeatable value for money, the central point of focus good Cons: AF points are too close but honestly you get used Opinion: I own this camera body for a few months, I have to say that the sensor is fantastic (of course not at the level of the D800 at low ISO) and in my opinion for a FF body the number of megapixels is perfect just 24, the sensor in this way is not too dense and files not weigh like boulders (unlike the D800). For those who want a FF camera body without having to pay an absurd figure is the perfect camera body, straconsigliata. Now there is also the D750 improve it would seem that in many ways (AF and held high ISO) but it costs a few hundred Euros. the choice is yours: D |
| sent on February 03, 2015 Pros: Yield high ISO, sensor, dual slot Cons: Video only gradually Opinion: A good machine, I came from D300S and the difference you feel, and how. rnIl sensor FF is a show, well-defined photo to a reasonable weight. The estate at high ISO is something "I do not see I do not think", but after shooting even to 3200, the photos are perfectly usable, and the disorder is relativo.rnL'unica flaw if you can call it, is the ability to turn video only gradually, some better quality, but a drag effect when you go to play on the TV. |
| sent on December 24, 2014 Pros: Sensor superlative high ISO performance of high-level weather sealed magnesium alloy body as a pro, crystal clear optical viewfinder, dual memory slot, recorded without compression. Cons: In a nearly perfect car, what would potuo make a slot for compact flash ................. but real defects and find none. Opinion: Camera for sensational quality 'sensor, image sharpness, made of high iso, weather sealed body notevole.Una car that expresses its high potential in nature photography and paesaggio.Abbinata my nikon vr 70/300 stabilized, he did not makes sure the same brightness', has made a photographic fantastica.Complimenti to nikon, which has continued churning out masterpieces, which make very proud. |
 | sent on November 24, 2014 Pros: Sensor fx very valid! Tenuta high iso spectacular trimensionalità raw files very pleasant! RnPrezzo affordable, Af accurate with low light, battery life! Cons: The AF points are Pochini ... with goals mf sometimes is a limit. Lack of raw files to 16-bit. Opinion: L 'I have purchased a few months at a price "gift" from a forum user in that he had made a wrong acquisto.rnL' I tried it with the Zeiss Planar 50mm F1.7 in my possession and I must say that returns the amazing shots. rnih coupled to the 24-120 f4 nikon vr is really complete and sfruttabilissima practically in many situazioni.rnHo made some time laps with jpeg normal indoor with bad light and the result was surprising, has an AF module that despite having "only 39 points "hooks up with very little light! Held at high iso lodevole.rnLa very wanted, I managed to buy it and I'm happy, I would never go back, goodbye D7000 and D610 welcome! I'm happy, I highly recommend looking at the move to FX without fainting but with the 'opportunity to have a camera complete and valid. |
 | sent on November 05, 2014 Pros: Tropical conditions, sensor dream, strength, color depth, contrast and sharpness drugs, etc .... etc ..... Cons: I think they are irrelevant. Opinion: Machine just gorgeous and very interesting, strong and well built, has a good degree of weather sealing, super ergonomics with the addition of batterygrip, which brings the camera body to a balance with amazing optics from 800g up, a little flaw is scale exposure no display on your shoulder, maybe he might miss if it is used in M, (I got used to it after the first shots then you live just as well without), irrelevant rather a lack in shutter priority or aperture .rnLe colors are amazing, very close to reality, the jpg are great and they are super raw with two clicks .... the car lends itself to customization is versatile and easy calibration good for me ....... machine very valid and worthy, the FF sensor that mounts is really amazing, however it is unnecessary to add another has many qualities to be discovered, the really recommend to all professionals and amateurs. |
 | sent on October 31, 2014 Pros: Sensor, Full Frame, made at high ISO, detail, tropicalization Cons: AF points too central (Just adapt) Opinion: A great car for passage to fullframe. I come from a D90 and the quality has bewitched me! Light (as I was used to) and scope (now) many pockets. Returns superb images. Customizable to the right point and above allows the management of Attic old without cpu. A good way to revive the old AI that I used with the FM2. Recommended. |
 | sent on September 24, 2014 Pros: Sensose fx crazy, high ISO performance, quality raw files, double slot, built-in flash, continuous focus, menus fast and accurate Cons: Shutter 1/4000 - No GPS - points of focus at the center Opinion: This machine is amazing and has nothing to envy the largest d800. Frankly, I had a period for the canon 6d and the comparison is merciless in favor of the Nikon D610. I must also say that the sensor has an exceptional makes the images and the noise is acceptable in 6400 ISO.Mi'm in love with this car ....... |
 | sent on August 31, 2014 Pros: Robustness (to be a entry level). Quality RAW files. Dual slot. Cons: The points of MAF positioned too close to the center. Opinion: I come from a Canon 6D and the difference I felt above all as regards the robustness with which you hold the SLR. I really like the ergonomics of the D610. RAW files without changes have an exceptional range and brilliant clarity. I'm impressed! Coming from the world's Canon (this is a completely subjective opinion), I found the controls of the two rings very comfortable when shooting. I'm really happy to have made the switch to Nikon. |
 | sent on August 14, 2014 Pros: Great RAW files, low noise, headphone output for audio in the video, the possibility to use it as APS-C. Focus continues. Compact size. Built-in flash. Double SD slot. Cons: all AF points in the center and neighbors. The ability to use it as an APS-C is due to the fact that has the same AF system of the D7100 and then in the larger part of the sensor (compared to the D7100) no points of focus. No wifi. No GPS. Opinion: It 'an extraordinary machine that has a long life of many years, there is everything you need, even for video.rnSulla paper is higher than both the Canon 6d that the Canon 5D MkIII. In some points of view, even the D800 Nikon.rnPerchè on the podium at TIPA Awords there is over the canon 6d? rnhttp: //www.saggiamente.com/2013/05/06/tipa-awards-2013-canon-dslr-wins-on-nikon/ |
 | sent on August 11, 2014 Pros: Solidity and strength, very good sensor and good behavior also go up with the ISO Cons: Apart from the points of focus concentrated in the center (but you know) I have not seen others against Opinion: I have a car for a very short but ever since I took it in my hand I'm loving it; I came from Nikon d40x and d90 and the difference in quality is seen. The files are relatively light and easy to manage. Nothing to envy to other machines much more famous and every day is a pleasure to explore further the features of this beautiful body. Highly recommended !! |
 | sent on August 02, 2014 Pros: Lightweight, quiet, sensor amazing, spectacular (I come from canon 5dmii) Cons: Shutter limited to 1/4000 and battery life Opinion: Well it's a fantastic car, my dad made me try along with a dealer friend of ours (I wanted to buy the 6d, since I had the 5dmii). I can not explain why this insane choice. But do you believe in love at first sight? Well I'm from that day. I chose the D610 and I'm excited, I always carry it with me, and the silent shutter, helps me in different situations. |
 | sent on July 26, 2014 Pros: rugged, lightweight, fast silent autofocus sensor, fantastic, nikon successful .... congratulations ... better than the d700 use with vr 24 85 35 70 2.8 afd, afd 90 80 200 2.8 macro tamron 2 8 af 28 2.8 50 1.8 afd af all optical sensor for this worthy Cons: points of focus central to my way of photographing is not important Opinion: excellent machine ... I am very satisfied from nikon d 200 nikon d 7000 of which I still use with great satisfaction, the sensor acting and however another world yield a very different format than the right, and once you try it hard to go back makes it hard (my opinion) I recommend the use of optical grip and better balanced with heavy machine ... so good |
 | sent on June 04, 2014 Pros: Full Frame Sensor magnificent, high ISO well detailed, many functions menu, fast AF and accurate color and exceptional sharpness Cons: All AF points in the center and Battery Life Opinion: Great car, coming from a D3200 the difference is abysmal, very important to double memory slots, but the best part is the sensor that shooting in RAW makes the photos full of color and sharpness. I use it often with lens Nikon 24-70 f2, 8 and the yield is really unica.rnImportante and not least, the possibility of also using DX-format lenses, although I feel not the best choice, but going from DX to FF, gutted ... maybe not, you can still use the "old" goals. |
| sent on May 26, 2014 Pros: Excellent image quality, light weight (for a full frame) Cons: Shutter limited to 1/4000, time synchro flash limited to 1/200 (I would have preferred 1/250). Opinion: Very versatile machine with excellent color rendering, details and even the dynamic range. From user of D700, as I prefer the image quality of the D610 even if the camera body of the D700 is much better. I really like the fact that the car is small and makes it possible shots without attracting attention. Convenient to have deu memory slots. Another advantage is that the camera flash can also act as a commander than external flashes. rnDopo passing the bathroom of the D600, I can say that I reconciled with Nikon. |
| sent on April 23, 2014 Pros: body similar to the d7000, light weight, excellent autofocus, accurate .... Cons: af few points, all in the middle! Opinion: Check in from a nikon d7000, the body itself, is practically the same, I find it very light! autofocus very fast, quiet, and accurate! ISO up to 3200 .... excellent! Color, sharpness and excellent details! I really like the possibility to use only part of the sensor shall we say, to be able to shoot with the right optics ...! |
 | sent on January 18, 2014 Pros: fantastic, super sensor, autofocus fast, very versatile, options / infinite adjustments, excellent performance at high ISO. Cons: Autofocus points too concentrated in the center, and wi-fi Opinion: very good machine, the sensor works fine in high iso, autofocus very fast, too bad points too concentrated in the center, very good to use DX lenses. or push the normal optical selecting the DX. The Shooting Setting menu offers many opportunities to better customize the performance to your liking. Using the Tamron 24-70 f2, 8 I got excellent results, while the Tamron 70-300 f4 / 5.6 discrete I would say the sports photos, I just have to decide whether to keep this or take the nikon 70-200 f4. I accept tips in merit. thanks |
 | sent on January 06, 2014 Pros: Sensor FF exceptional. High ISO well manageable and rich in detail. AF fast and accurate. Weather sealed body, ergonomic and durable. Cons: AF points concentrated in the center of the frame. Battery life Opinion: The strength of the new Nikon D610 is its exceptional sensor encased in a body of limited size and at the same time durable and ergonomic. The 24 megapixel NEF files are always very beautiful and rich in detail, the sensor works well up to ISO 3200 and can be reached if necessary, a higher ISO, up to 6400 photos are still very workable and detailed. The AF system is really powerful, fast and accurate but the points concentrated at the center of the frame, I personally do not think it is a real flaw, but perhaps in some types of photography can be a limitation of this machine. Interesting are the functions of the accelerated photo and interval shooting. Lower than expected battery life, 600 pictures on one charge (probably my tests are not entirely reliable because I shoot very often at low temperatures). On the video I do not have enough knowledge to be able to give a judgment. |
 | sent on December 25, 2013 Pros: Lightweight body, rugged, ergonomic, and the image quality stands out for sharpness, color rendering, engraving, detail, (Nikkor 24-120mm f4, a great coupled that allows you to do many things already and turn light) Excellent performance ISO 3200 and ISO 6400 in the accettabilissima; convenient quality / prezzo.rn (As for movies not using them I do not know judge) Cons: If you really want to find some defect lacks the integrated wi-fi that in some cases it might be useful (the mountain on the D5300, they could do it on this version with new D600's shutter) Opinion: The transition from the high-performing D7100 is nonetheless was a great leap forward. It will not be the D4 or D800 but for people like me who wanted to go to FF without fainting is a good choice, I would do it a thousand times scelta.rnUn this small advantage is that you can also use DX lenses that I already had (although according to me it's a choice penalty). I tried, however, to use the excellent Sigma 8-16 mm super wide angle DX and I have to say that I have achieved excellent test results. (But then reassemble it on the D7100) (however, for wide-angle to take into account is definitely the purchase of the Nikkor 14-24 mm) rnHo found it convenient ring on the choice of shutter mode have also added that there is no remote control mode on the D7100. |
 | sent on November 24, 2013 Pros: Compact, fast and precise multiple functions, sensor ff fantastic, rich in drawing pictures, rich in detail, fantastic color reproduction, well-built with a sense of durability. Built-in flash, shooting format Ff-Dx, professional quality video. Cons: No built-in GPS and wi-fi as my Canon 6D.rnAltro I have not found, perhaps more pesantina my first camera body Canon 6D. Opinion: I have to say that the Nikon D610 is great, there I am in love now, I'm addicted over time, I can not really put it in the bag, every day I discover new sensations and many things you can do, I have it from a security below, I do not feel the limitations that may give other SLRs (600D ... es.Canon, my new friend breaks them tutti.rnDevo yet to discover its secrets well, in fact recently I have gone with Nikon cameras, in fact, come from bodies Canon machine that are still happy possessor, this machine is not anything to envy to his sister, more powerful, I am excited dell'acquisto.rnLo would do it without a shadow of a doubt. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
