|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on November 03, 2017 Pros: very worthwhile price, endless battery and lightweight body machine. Cons: maybe a big noise is raised, a few points of focus Opinion: it was and it is my second nikon in dx and I have to say that I was really satisfied with it .. thanks to the practicality of the buttons that for the lightness the battery lasts an eternity it never lets you walk virtually..forse to big raised sounds a bit of noise but with good tools and good control of the camera you can relieve and make good shots even at night, I highly recommend you to start approaching photography. |
 | sent on August 31, 2017 Pros: Compactness, competitive price, durable battery (350 shots), great materials, 24-volt sensor that resists great at iso iso and beautiful images. Cons: Few focus points, high iso produce unimportant photos of nikon name, microphone personally think it is poor or nearly close to sufficiency. Opinion: I think it's a great reflex, bought for a price with 18-55 lens (certainly not a whole thing) and tried for just under a week I'm noticing the great utility of the car. The pictures are spectacular, and above all it's very intuitive. Maybe I would have a better microphone but do nothing. Very good price. An entry level to have. I'm looking to buy a 1: 1 macro lens to test the beauty and sharpness of the images to the utmost. |
 | sent on July 19, 2017 Pros: Low price, intuitive, durable, lightweight battery Cons: Few focus points, raw compressed, multiplier compatibility and extension tubes, does not have an internal AF engine, does not support macro calibration of targets AF Opinion: Surely it's a great car to get started, with its 24MP (6000x4000) sensor capable of taking images up to 3200 iso, instead of "clean" images you can have up to 800 iso. Not having the anti-aliasing filter the images are sharp and contrasting. Unfortunately, after 1 year of use, the shutter button sometimes does not work and if you want to add old multipliers or extension tubes without pin, you will find yourself in a manual without an exposure meter. At shutter speeds it is good to be a reflex entry level, although the 11 focus points are few and in poor lighting conditions make it difficult. Ergonomics are more than good, even for those with big hands, will always ensure good grip. Battery lasts about half day and little more than continuous use |
 | sent on July 18, 2017 Pros: Weight, value for money, image quality, automatic programs for those who approach the photographic world Cons: Just ISO enough, few focus points, no touch screen, no wi-fi connection (for social addicted) Opinion: I bought a D3300 a few months ago to replace my old bridge and for now I'm very good at it. Rn I was impressed with the ergonomics of the machine, a bit less materials and finishes. Anyway, it's a great entry level (maybe the best for your band) to get into the world of photography. The positive value, of course, is the value-for-money, low weight and good image quality thanks to a great sensor. The mediocre ISO-hold (fine photos are obtained up to 1,600 ISO and no later), few focus points, no touch screen, which is now a widely-used and widespread system. For social network fans, there is no WI-FI system to share photos directly online. My opinion is a good entry level (if not the best) so I can only recommend it |
 | sent on June 26, 2017 Pros: Quality of materials, comfortable in the grip, great feedback from touch materials, durable and best value for money to be an entry level, versatility at the top Cons: Produces very rough, medium to high ISO photos, it's great to get into the photographic world, mono microphone Opinion: I bought this D3300 to introduce me to the reflex world, with Kit 18-105, the optic is not bad, but let's remember it's always a kit. The car is comfortable, and versatility is one of its great qualities, great for getting into the world of reflexes, I'll always keep it with me even when I'm upgrading the body. It is very difficult in situations of low light and moving subjects. Associated with a 70-200 2.8 I made good shots. RnrnI recommend you to enter the world of reflex, I did not feel the lack of touch or swivel display, or wifi. rn |
 | sent on February 27, 2017 Pros: 24 mp sensor that resisted well at high iso.rnPoco weight, small size, excellent quality dell'immagine.rnErgonomia. Cons: only a doubling adjustable ISO values. mono microphone. Opinion: It has become a bit of time I own this camera, the more time passes the more I appreciate his skills, the value for money and the prestazioni.rnIniziannelme I seemed to have taken an entry l. Too basic, seeing the program guide menu that has ecc.rnMa then using it I realized that ... it is a machine for end location must be accessible to novice users, but it is also powerful and efficient and It lends itself to large to be used in situations that require versatility, convenience and qualità.rn |
 | sent on January 28, 2017 Pros: Great sensor, image quality, ISO up to good rn1600 / 3200, excellent Raw. Cons: Very few. It is the best of this price range, but if I find some, I would say: the body slightly ergonomic machine for my hands, af perform poorly, and a few buttons. Opinion: After about 4 months of use I can give you a more accurate opinion. RNLA D3300 is an excellent aps-c, the counter described above are normal for the price range, but I can assure you end up here. It also plays a reflex of the higher-end competition, just go DxOMark and make the sensor compared with that of the other. His Sony sensor has an excellent sharpness and dynamic range, although much color tends "cold" but it is not a problem. The B are great, it retrieves it, although a little less in underexposed images, also the whites depart a bit too much. jpg are excellent up to ISO 800, it starts to drop to 1600 but the noise is barely perceptible and can be used even for large prints, while in 3200 the noise is more evident, if only luminance, but you can safely use this sensitivity "standard" for prints. The 6400/12800 is better not to use them, because the noise is heavy (it takes a FX), but maybe if you expose a well ismpa little you can do. 25000 are only for the "marketing" because they are devastated by the noise. |
  | sent on January 04, 2017 Pros: sensor with excellent performance, light weight and ergonomiarnottima held at high iso Cons: so far no Opinion: I purchased this EntryLevel reflex after reading several recensionirnprovenivo by years of compact and passion for photography led me to buy a SLR this end my views economichernma meager resources at the end are more 'than satisfied and then .... photos makes the photographer, no ??? in the future I will choose 'buy more' perfomanti objectives than those of the kit but the camera body for street and landscape (favorite genres) and 'really eccezionalernla advice for those who want high performance at a fair price, you will not regret |
 | sent on December 04, 2016 Pros: Excellent entry-level. Value for money. Robustness. Quality Cons: No one ... it is an entry level and it's normal that something is missing ... Opinion: Just put a good optical and changes ... not to stop the optics of the supplied kit (for those who have bought a kit). Ok to start ... then you'll be amazed by mounting targets "serious". My first lens (outside the kit) was a Tamron 24-70 f / 2.8 Di VC USD. It 'was like going on a new planet. No need to spend thousands and thousands of euro on the camera body ... first you must exploit them, perhaps by mounting optical quality. |
| sent on September 21, 2016 Pros: light Cons: Focus, in the dark creates messes Opinion: I have this camera for almost a year and sometimes surprises me, but sometimes I deludernIn occasion suffers the lack of light and take pictures of stars, black sky seems made crayon, even at low ISO (800) if you look well, is not a defined black problem also found in photographs with light, if you zoom in the picture is not quite clean, but maybe it's the fault of the objective basis 18-105 f3. 5rnComunque it gives a lot of satisfaction! |
user104939  | sent on September 14, 2016 Pros: Light, easy, as before exceptional reflex, light. Cons: I have only one day, but not finding them. Opinion: Bought just yesterday on Amazon with Nikon shoulder strap, lens 18-105 VR, lexar card 8 gb x200. What can I say, I am already in love. Light, beautiful to carry around. Great white balance, fine manual functions. Very bright as macchina.rnNitida, very beautiful colors, excellent due to the 24.2 megapixel Xpeed processor 4. I do not I can do without, will always be with me, at any location. |
 | sent on August 09, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, easy to handle, excellent as a first reflex, battery lasting, very bright. Cons: Few of focus points, the price. Opinion: Purchased first SLR with two lenses 18-55 and 55-200 VR II VR II and paid € 550 we say that to me it went well but looking at the various prices has in fact taken a much higher cost than it really offers ... but however, beautiful car, as first reflex is EXCELLENT I'm not complaining at all of ottenuti.rnAnche results as a second camera body is quite helpful as far as weight because it is LIGHTWEIGHT and offers great ease even in the use regarding esterni.rnContentissimo keys purchase done and advice for people like me who makes it a amateur use. |
 | sent on May 16, 2016 Pros: A good sensor that holds up to 3200 iso, fair burst for an entry level, enough number of keys on the body, and last but not least, 700 battery life without flash and display. Cons: Is an entry level and should be taken as such. Opinion: This small home of Nikon surprises. You can not ask for this price range anymore. Progress made at iso level is remarkable, 11 AF points are not many but allow it to go away in many situations. The burst is not photographic hunting. The sensor does its job well, always delivering full detail and high resolution images, convenient and useful in the crop phase, never loses quality and allows large format prints (beyond 50x70 without grinding). The body is light enough to avoid fatigue and the handle is all comfortable. If the lack of the movable display weighs you go to the 5000 series. Be careful with the use of optics without an internal AF motor, the machine is unprotected and it would be difficult to use them. |
 | sent on May 10, 2016 Pros: really notable quality sensor! Iso held high. Compact size and lightweight! Price Cons: He did not, of course, the commands available to higher-end SLR. The body, lightweight, also appears quite fragilino ... we say that should be treated fairly with regard to everyday use. The 24 mpx, in my opinion, are even excessive! Opinion: The D3300, if it were a car, it would be a Fiat 500 with a 3.0 engine from 300 hp V6! rnIl camera body is definitely entry level, both for materials and for commands available .... but ... trust me .... it is not necessarily a flaw: with 50cc carries around really a feather! .rnVengo from D300 ( complete with a battery grip), with a sturdy dinosaur of commands and functions infinity but ... with an "engine" far less powerful and handsome that, the evidence shows (photos), takes "pay" in almost all situations this his granddaughter! RNLA D3300 is really, but at the same concentration of technology as "essential", "minimalist", almost ..... and then, very, very handsome! rnAlla order still allows you to work in manual fine without having many "keys in sight ".... in my opinion all you really need, there is! rnIl sensor "holds" fine too Iso very high ... the ISO 2-3000 are still fully fruibili.rnNon least, has an Octoberimo automatic white balance, significantly more "crafty" and reliable than, for example, the d3100 (also owned by me). |
 | sent on April 27, 2016 Pros: A lot of quality to the base of NIKON, really entusiamante. Feather weight and size very appropriate. Cons: Could integrate the WiFi standard, it would increase the catchment area and whetted many to move toward SLR bodies to express their creativity by telephonists-social. Opinion: Really great job for NIKON! RnUna entry that really allows many possibilities at an attractive price. Those who want to start or re-start a new journey in the photographic world has found a companer adiscreta and fun for many small to really efficacernDimensioni occasioni.rnPLUSrnPeso piumarnSensore, but ergonomics intelligenternMINUSrnNon put the WiFi and NFC standard .... hopefully if I remember in the near modello.rnMa the real surprise is lived by downloading pictures to a PC monitor and trying to elborare some RAW files !!! SUPER! The risultai speak for soli.rnDifficile attribute the high quality of baked for an entry level file without knowing it !!! |
 | sent on March 12, 2016 Pros: excellent dynamic range and quality of the photos Cons: I have not found it Opinion: The glorious Nikon D3300, capable of churning out quality files, a good and loyal companion, the many advantages, such as its commendable dynamic range, and its good iso estate, and the extreme sharpness of the picture, thanks to the fact which is devoid of the low pass. Beautiful colors of his photos, high resolution 24 mpxel, very well managed by its commendable Xpeed processor 4. A great camera to capture our memories. It 's always ready for adventure, to meet all conditions of light in which one comes to visit, and it always comes out with dignity, without sfigurare.- It' a camera that you love and appreciate. |
| sent on February 11, 2016 Pros: Light, small, price-performance ratio Cons: Limited diopter adjustment compared to other models Opinion: Small in size and light but with good ergonomics. When paired with lenses such as the 35mm dx or 50mm 1.8 manages to give excellent images, it does not excel in the high iso but still defends well. Very recommended as a camera to take you on trips and on all those occasions when you want to keep discreet, it also works well with the 18-55 vr ii of the kit |
 | sent on February 01, 2016 Pros: Easy to use, simple, lightweight, bright, battery life Cons: Few points of fire, resistance to iso, Opinion: I bought this d3300 as the first personal reflex and I have to say (comparing it to my father's d300) is compact lightweight and essential, in my opinion is a great handy camera to carry around to enjoy learning photography! It certainly does not give the d300's robust feelings but fortunately lost about half! After nearly 2 years of use, I must say that it does not qualitatively desire the most advanced apsc bodies like the d7200, because the sensor is that (there are differences but not so important to justify almost 1000 euros for switching to D7200)! Thanks to this camera I realized that the lenses are essential, but the car body is much less! I think I'll just change it to switch to FX! What starts to stare tight is iso hold (800 is perceived a bit of noise) and the poor precision of maf in dark environments, I think Raw making it is quite workable, but going to FX I would definitely have a lot much more! ConcludingI think it's a very good reflex, far superior to the entry level of canon, I think it's so good that it could reduce purchases of numerous high end Nikon Apsc! The battery is very large and allows you to make almost 1000 shots (without using LV). It has everything you need to be a springboard for the semipro and pro world! I recommend the boundle purchase with 18-105 to newbies, and anyone who needs a 2nd compact apsc body! |
 | sent on January 16, 2016 Pros: Easy to use and light Cons: Equipped little basic Opinion: excellent reflex whole different world than the D3200 ... Excellent resolution, as each is equipped with Nikon initially a 18-55 objective with which it is not possible to get 100% the potentials of the body ... Very good quality price. The D3300 is an excellent base machine that accompanied a good goal, it might be a way to get into the semi-professional photography. |
 | sent on January 10, 2016 Pros: Light comfortable and functional Cons: Fixed screen which does not rotate Opinion: Purchased before the honeymoon to get closer to the world of SLR, who was ecstatic to say nesono between the entry level Nikon in my opinion is the best. brilliant photos x learn how to use an SLR is the ideal ....! Unfortunately the long this passion leads you to buy more and more goals x the joy of my wife !! He he! |
| sent on July 12, 2015 Pros: Handling ... light ... small. Cons: Problem of Iso that doubles and a few points in fire .. Opinion: Gift fattomi postgraduate, as the first machine I used my father's D7000 ... but now given the weight and convenience in carrying around this gioglielloposso only be contento.Quindi I recommend .rnHo purchased other objectives beyond the basic kit where I had a 18_55 rn vii I added a 35mm 55_300 1.8 and 4.5 / 5.6 and taste. |
 | sent on December 08, 2014 Pros: lightness and ergonomics, quality (!), external buttons ... is so small that no one will notice in the street or take seriously Cons: if I have to find one, rather than the few points of focus, or exposure meter does not last generation, or no coverage of the viewfinder, I would say the stops on the adjustment of the ISO: the fact that it will double every lap of ring I creates a bit 'of disappointment, especially in the transition from 800 to 1600 Opinion: I took it as a second camera body light to bring me always behind, in a kit with the 18-55 collapsible, which by the way is really good ... Since the first release I was amazed at the lack of weight, not seems not to have her neck, but then using it impressed me even management functions thanks to the external keys (Fn set to adjust the ISO and you're in), but above all for the image quality, even at high ISO ... in the past I have also had the D7100 and no known differences ... In short, for a total of € 403 is a bomb of the camera, I think the D610 with all the kit lenses will often at home :) rnTirando sums: I am enthusiastic and the council passionately! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
