RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF (1987 version) : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Nikon 80-200mm f/2.8 AF (1987 version))




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on December 09, 2019

Pros: Sharpness, blurry

Cons: Weight, uncertain autofocus and lack of tripod attack

Opinion: I read the various opinions and found that more than photographers you are a computer. Eye point out the difference between the 3 models of the 80-200 that also have the same pattern of lenses Companies that make comparisons with sophisticated equipment can not be so precise. I think you all agree that in all 3 versions anyway is a great goal, too bad that in the first one misses the attack for the treppiede.co I still prefer it to pump without moving the hand I can zoom and focus. I'm the usual polemic. Good light to all :)

avatarjunior
sent on March 28, 2019

Pros: Optical Quality and Sharpness

Cons: Autofocus sometimes slow and noisy

Opinion: I Have been holding this lens for more than a year now and I have to say that every time I am surprised by optical quality and sharpness. Squeezed properly in some situations it has proved even so slow, as it seems sometimes, perhaps because of the noise it makes when it goes back and forth looking for the focus. In any case also saw the price to which you find recommend!

avatarjunior
sent on January 25, 2018

Pros: absolute clarity and guaranteed results

Cons: it makes you fall in love

Opinion: I had found it online for 390 euros two years ago. It is an ancient lens, even if slow, but professional and reliable. Although it was born in other times it is built with superb glass. The weight is the main peculiarity that determines a pleasant and reassuring feeling of metal between the hands, which can also be used to avoid blur. Evaluation, framing, relaxation, exhalation and away! Also grafted onto a D 50 and with only 6 megapixels, and especially in the portrait, can prove to be able to make real masterpieces. With the D3, then, once again provoking the provocative young of the past.

avatarsenior
sent on July 02, 2017

Pros: Spectacular

Cons: Missing tripod ring

Opinion: The AF-D lacking in the appeal ;-) Bought on the market of Juza in awesome conditions by my friend Adriano of Pesaro.Octically, I think, the incomparable second series of the mythical "pump" model, a legendary optical scheme coming from Very famous 80-200 f / 4.5 of the 70's (in my possession), impeccable construction like all AF-D, colors and bokeh I think unmatched ... but the tastes are tastes. Monstrous quality-money ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on May 18, 2014

Pros: quality / price ratio, excellent blurred; tough; excellent mechanical; excellent lens; weight

Cons: Autofocus is not comparable to the younger generation; not stabilized;

Opinion: I once used the model ED monoghiera analog, F3 and F4; now I have discovered the optics of D300 and D90, finding AND D model, which is better than the first model citato.rnLe differences with the True union are not worth the difference price on second quest'ultimo.rnConcludo of counseling, for those on a budget figures affordable and have a 80-200.f.2,8, buying this ottica.rnI new 70-200 VR are other things, but this will give you great monoghiera soddisfazioni.Per use on stand on a robust machine as the D300 is not as big problems, otherwise it makes up for with a bracket, available on the market but it is not very difficult to use the DIY! My model, which is one of the last built, is fine with a 1.4 teleconverter Sigma, keeping all the automatic, have a 420mm on DX f.4 not male.Ho purchased a d700, proven optical, also excellent in FF.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me