JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
user120016
sent on June 28, 2017
Pros:Tropicalization, brightness, fabulous blur
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:Professional and robust lens that gives the idea of ??being able to withstand more than a few violent bumps. Optical quality unquestionable and already highlighted by those who preceded me. With lens hood resists good flare and vignetting f / 2.8 does not disturb. Precise AF and VR that allows you to drop off considerably below the safety times. Highly recommended.
Opinion:professional-grade optics a handyman for a few saw not really affordable price rnL'incisione of this zoom is excellent, vr good and given the weight allows you to go below the safety times to avoid camera shake, autofocus is fast but in conditions low light sometimes does not engage immediately, the lens hood is really hurt as hooking you risk breaking it easily rnPer else is a perspective that straconsiglio, 9 vote
Cons:all the flicker of photographers, improvised or inexperienced.
Opinion:sharp enough, true to 2.8 notice vignetting, but I defy any photographer to take full a jerk, a minimum of PP correction cmq to consider. The rest, poor lens hood, various details of fast focusing, responsive vr, etc., all the neuroses of frames, probably not at all satisfactory., We are not all of the talents with every shot. Personally, I find this perspective, professionale.Il rest, lasciaolo technocrats on duty who would go for the woods with sinar to look for the hair in the egg.
Pros:Sharpness, Blurry, price of used, AF, NO Focus Breathing
Cons:Vignette, VR, Weight, Yield Backlit
Opinion:I prefer to VRII mainly because it cuts the focal length of the minimum distance of focus that I think is very important; vignetting that has marked there and it shows to f2.8, but not as serious as many indicate, even in the portrait is not at all (maybe by the sample depends, my will to stop 1.5 extreme edges and it is not so different from a raw portrait for example). And 'crystal clear since 2.8 and diaphragmed reach excellent levels, the AF is lightning as the new but defends himself more than admirably, and not a small thing are excellent for use on the 1000 euro or less. The VR instead is not at the level of the new, in fact, is the same as the VR 300 2.8 that was not much: below this point of view wins the VRII. I have not tried with the TC so I can not pass judgment, but I think that digest at least 1.4x. Clearly we are always talking about a lens big and heavy, but asUsually who buys it knows what they are getting. Between this and the f4 VR I would feel to advise the latter especially for the stabilization and yield much better against the much sharper. It remains one of my favorite lenses but you have to accept the flaws in order to appreciate the advantages.
Pros:Lightweight, very handy, excellent optical quality. Fast and secure AF. VR effective
Cons:The only defect (this is why version II was made) on the FX are practically unavailable 2.8 and 4 diaphragms for strong vignetting (remodable though in PP)
Opinion:In my opinion, I have tried hundreds of goals this is the absolute best in terms of sharpness and blur and all focuses. I believe that it practically bats many fixed focal points. In combination with CTs is fine but the optical yield drops. The AF is a splinter, and especially its extreme lightness makes it very manageable even with manolibera with a really perfect VR.
Pros:Great body on the right and on film even at 2.8
Cons:weakling in backlight, and not too pushed ... I remedied with a longer hood soo craft but makes his ...
Opinion:Lens really sharp, blurred beautiful, fast AF, but AF performance is not the same in 70mmm and 200mm, holds up well the tc 1.4 multipliers can be an alternative to the 300 afs ... even the TC 1.7 is fine but begin to see a bit of aberazine ball that does not "cure" propio immediately by stopping the tce2 II Forget was fine on a d70 now with modern cars come out all the limits optical .. venduto..magari the tc2 III. .rnTrovo very useful limiter f, is a great advantage especially combined with the tc1.7.rnMi have paid for a full day the vr2 (my dealer wanted to sell it to me at all costs, along allla D3S I had not even Scrooge .. never mind, I was afraid to leave the shop) and I immediately noticed the great advantage of VR1 on subjects close to the focal length is 200 and the subjects are more obvious grandi..con vantaggi..per what little I've seen it seems to me that the optical performance is indistinguishable, VR1 vs vr 2 to a position so short in relation to the persons to whom it is addressed, I would say that changes little, at least I find it useless mobile objects fall below1/30 the time when the two worked steadily and surely better, but the picture will most likely move anyway ... then if one photographing the light poles then you, you may want ... get down with the tempi..rndiciamo surely the vr2 will be higher and maybe useful in combination with tce .. here we are ... ..but smooth them. RN12 novembre..aggiornamento, crossing fx, phew !!! I thought I have to change it .... ok I consider myself very lucky after several trials with control off, I notice that my copy is not in the cartoon fx .. (to be picky a tiny corner on the right if you're looking for photographing a white sheet and overexposing There is, but it is really very small in the frame ...) I documented and it seems that they are not a fly bianca..per I have not done scientific tests on the premises of the edges are designed to verify the sharpness, but the nose but not having post-production work to bring out the edges of the "dark" I guess is better already ... rnsarebbe interesting at this point to know what mom Nikon serial numbers give little problem ... I'm probably absurdly quelli newer, mine is one of the first credo..rn
Opinion:Great lens for portraits. A f2.8 gives one blurred spettacolare.rnLa impareggiabile.rnè sharpness is true that weighs and cluttered but if you want quality without compromise ... I personally do not care because when I see the photos are well ripagato.rnè a real tank . the construction is solid
Pros:Speed ??'and quietness' AF, Sharpness already' at f/2.8, lightness, strength, VR effective.
Cons:Window focus distance too "bottom" of the lens, lens hood mechanism fastening and 'easily damaged, tripod ring can not be removed completely (you can' just remove the bracket, but not the ring). Log dust over the years. Price of used a bit 'high after the marketing of the VR II version.
Opinion:Superb lens, sharp, fast. No optical defect. At f / 4 and 'naturally more' clear that in 2.8, but the portraits to 2.8 are absolutely magnificent and perfect for printing. At photoshow 2011 in Milan I compared with the VR II and honestly I did not find a single reason to do the pass. Perhaps the VR2 and 'more' effective, but optically the VR1 and 'in my opinion indistinguishable.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
