JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Well you after reading all the reviews, I decided, and I bought it myself. Used but like new, great lens and micro macrornversatile, I missed a lens like that and frankly given the period of crisis did not want to spend a fortune, and so after a search are riuscitornad find it used in Nikon warranty and at a good price (170 €) in store in Brescia. When they grafted on my D2X I went into the garden for photos .... well ... and 'perfect I was able to photograph insects and special leaves that before I could catch without a lens like that. Recommended to all ... trust ... hello to everyone. Elgiorn
Cons:Short Throw (not a defect) - DX (sorry for not being able to put on a ff)
Opinion:Using this light about a year, bought at Christmas last year, the very use for the portrait, for macro, although it is a little short for macros, which tell you, I recommend it to everyone, have a yield amazing, really nice, a lot of quality at a price almost ridiculous if we compare it with the same optical quality. Let's say that the only drawback is that it is right and not to support, although there have ever tried the teleconverter.
Opinion:I'm no expert but just a fan, the lens I bought it a few weeks ago, and taking into account the cost and not exaggerated by the focal length appears to be versatile. In the macro if you want to get good results it is only right to use a good tripod and remote shutter release. The sharpness is also excellent magnifying the subject. In my opinion is not bad even if it is used for portraits. However, if one wants to get close to the macro is definitely to be considered.
Cons:40 mm (60 for me that I own APS-C body) are sometimes a few
Opinion:I would say that to be a lens that costs only 200 € is of excellent quality, the sharpness is very good on APS-C and I am comfortable using it not only for the macro. The 40 mm (60 on APS-C) every now and then is not enough. Only drawback is that my lens every now and then especially when I try to open the aperture to 2.8 to 3.0 crashes. Overall, for those who want to bring the world of macro without spending too much I can say that is a lens that most valid
Pros:right balance for money, especially on used, good sharpness is versatile and macro optics do everything, 55mm on APSC.
Cons:fragilino if you use professionally, but there are other optics if you want to do real macro.
Opinion:the whole good optics, entered fully into my kit for some close-up shots and for those occasions where you want to move leggerissimo.Va a little better by closing the diaphragm, the rest is micro.Non looks good with the other lenses in my kit much more challenging (24-200 all f.2, 8) if you want some serious macro I turn to 105, which costs four times tanto.Consiglio optics to all those who want to get closer to the macro picture and those who are thinking of an optical Fixed all do, alternatively 1.8 to 35, gains in versatility.
Pros:Very small size, weight really feather, AF very good, Excellent sharpness, very good price!
Cons:40mm unfortunately are "short" at times.
Opinion:A lens that returns really nice shots, and if combined with a camera that exploits it really as it should be, remains of all without envy nothing compared to other more expensive Nikon! GNI 'only flaw, as mentioned by others, is the focal length, although the APS-C becomes a 60mm is still more usable for static shots, but it is said. rn
Opinion:I recommend it to those who must begin with the MACRO photograph this perspective is the right compromise for the price paid. The lens does its job well and has the 1:1 ratio without the addition of rings or 40mm filter unfortunately give little space to the possibility of catching an insect that flits away without fear. Focus quiet and very sharp details.
Pros:Lightweight and compact, bayonet hood and soft case series, color rendition, sharpness
Cons:engaging in a little plastic 'inaccurate, slow autofocus, fragile thread filters
Opinion:I use it as a "standard" for about 6 months to portrait without flash light often mixed, cut to shape American landscapes for panoramic (vertical, four or five shots then mounted with Pan Make Nikon or Ice) The colors, the plasticity and clarity far exceeds the 18-55 zoom that I think I will soon replace with another fixed lens. In the video, I do not make many, the autofocus is slow, you first hand. rnNon are a fan of nititezza at all costs, but what I have seen from photos taken by others within the meter is already excellent 5.6 f .. I use it in the panoramic f 8.0 and is very accurate providing plasticity and tone just put into words. The filter thread seems very fragile so I use a metal ring fixed and screwed the top polarizer or UV with greater confidence.
Pros:Small, cheap, get 1: 1 without additional optical quality very good
Cons:Slight residual longitudinal chromatic aberration, working distance not extensive
Opinion:For a little over 200 euro new perspective is very respectable. Costs a fraction of other Micro Nikkor but the performance that can provide are not so distant, indeed! Does not shine for the working distance to the reproduction ratio of 1:1, but for 40mm focal length is still far enough away, I would say that I did not notice particular differences with my old Micro Nikkor 55mm. There is a residue of LOCA that is especially noticeable at the widest apertures and in condition of strong contrast, but nothing to worry about. The definition is high, just below that of the micro nikkor 105, but much higher than that obtained with optical zoom or macro lens systems or additional extension tubes. Suffer very little, I would say almost nothing, flare and reflections. And 'only compatible with DX SLR.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
