JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Personally nothing... maybe the screw hood, but metal. Typical aberrations of the AfD.
Opinion:A lens that gives great shots, both on FF and APSC: Clear frames, pasty and with the typical colors of Nikon D-series. AC is also typical, and this 35 is not immune to it, however it behaves better than the 50 F 1.4 D, at F2. I use it indiscriminately on both formats, and for both color and grayscale photos, with great satisfaction. It does not cost very little, but certainly less than the version G F 1.8, but it is more aseptic, as a general yield, and my opinion too contrasty/sharp. Small, lightweight, with less ' rough ' character than the 50 F 1.8 AfD. A beautiful object that lends itself to all uses, from Photoreportage to portraits set.
Opinion:simply sublime! both for construction and for optical yield. No defects !!! very good opening, bokeh, resistance to flare is good, almost no distortion, for manual street goes a sword but the AF is not evil. There I am fine, I do not take off virtually never out of my D610. I do a landscape? It works. I want to do street? I do not need anything else. Portraits ?? Well, it takes me a minimum of environment but the result is quality. really really nice !!
Pros:light, crisp, good quality / price ratio, minimum focusing excellent
Cons:for me nothing
Opinion:focus that is also covered by my Nikon 20-35 f2.8, but I wanted to try, found used with metal hood at 190 €, held as nuovo.rnMi am fine light, very incisive an all fare.Su D700 is an optical truly versatile lends the portrait set to paesaggio.rnLa series d is very well chosen, use the 35-70 and 80-200 f2.8 de I am benissimo.In effects this 35 is a perspective that I think is a must in a corredo.Consiglio purchase to all those looking for a 35, good quality and spending ridotta.Non looks good next to my Nikon fixed 15-24-50-105 and 180, makes his figure with a very cost contenuto.rnSe used on 5.6 to its maximum as incisiveness, 2 is slightly soft, but from 2.8 grows.
Pros:incision, contrast, compactness, minimum distance of focus
Cons:vignetting, bokeh
Opinion:Not by chance is the lens (replaced by 35 1.8 DX for APS - C) that still uses the periodic TuttiFotografi to detect in the laboratory of Nikon cameras. Of course, it is fixed focal length and have a rather simple optical scheme helps achieve clarity, but the micro-contrast that I found on this objective exceeds all my most optimistic expectations. It 'a micro-contrast "hard", it tastes like that of a macro lens, and I like a lot, as possessor of Rolleiflex T with Tessar. Even the tonal contrast is crisp, just more suffused with wider openings. Bokeh (the slats are seven and not rounded) is a bit 'nervous but not annoyingly structured. Vignetting is pronounced on a 24 X 36, with the obvious reduction of DX. Reduced size where you feel even less loss of sharpness at the edges, knowing that the image circle is not reduced us to see those extremes. But as Ryuichi Watanabe MTF does not say everything about a lens we are in the presence of alens whose etching the situation in another world, higher than the performance of many zoom, and vignetting is a phenomenon that can be used for artistic purposes, not to mention that diaframmando af 8/11 for a landscape even these limits are convincingly exceeded. A lens by the amazing quality / price ratio and the focal very versatile for a variety of situations.
Opinion:Optics really versatile, allows beautiful close-ups using a bokeh after more than decent. I do not mind at full aperture (d800 and unforgiving). My copy with the d800 does not even have problems f / b focus. I keep it very mounted as a handyman. Wishing they do portraits, street and landscape as well. In short a focal length in the basic kit.
Opinion:I gave him 10 because as the whole series af-d (which for me is the most successful) and excellent build quality af fast the lens suffers from chromatic aberration of any type (unlike other profiles with horrible green purple) I have not noticed in more flare and has a metal hood quite sturdy, lightweight and compact lens I use it as all do (on ff), closed 5.6 is perfect, very resolute detachment I hardly ever (I photographed everything My trip to London) .lo recommend
Opinion:I shot with this lens, mounted on D90, for almost an entire 3-week trip in Madagascar .. without hardly ever change it. And I found great. There is no doubt that the quality that offers amply repay the approximately 200 Euros which are used to buy it used. At f / 2 is actually a bit 'soft .. but by f / 2.8 returns already recorded images and with a touch "Nikon old style" magnificent. To do reportage is exceptional both for its size (you can bring to the subjects without intimidating), both for the weight (take him anywhere without effort), both for the construction, especially if you care mounted its original metal lens hood (you can slam anywhere and he did not bat an eyelid). The blur is not what the cousin 50mm f / 1.4 D (the only other optics that use now), but it's nice and still head and shoulders ahead of the zoom from kit.rnL'unico flaw in my opinion is the AF .. we are talking about a perspective of several years ago and technology has made many strides. For the kind of photography I do is commonque more than enough. With the lens hood I have not had any particular problems of flare .. just not going to cercarselo all costi.rnHo tried a couple of times the new Nikon 35mm f1.8 G .. there is history: the new will be even higher charts in hand, but in practice there is no game we are on two different bands. The 35mm f / 2 lens D has higher quality, is built better, has a blurred more pleasant, is indestructible .. and in fact after years and years worth more than a used version of the new G. rnrnPer Finally, a "must have" if you find it in good condition and at a good price take it!
Pros:Lightweight, compact, solid metal, quality / price ratio, made from f2 to f11, for ff
Cons:af quiet
Opinion:I mount on d300, I like a lot, bought used and maintained well, it is a lens that is used every day. despite zoom bulkier, this little guy is defended very well for the small size and weight with a focal length that can be exploited in various fields (Street, narrow landscape, portraits) and that makes it very well (except claims space) as sharpness and slightly saturated colors. to f2 may be slightly soft but still very well defined. 2.8 onwards begins to grow in denifizione, between 5.6 and 8 from the best. the blurred in f2-2,2 not evil, indeed in the portraits to the children from that special touch mixed with the softness. has no af lightning, to experience with children, which sometimes put him to the test. riding around town, wanting to stay light is a great ally that little is known but gives much. I mount the hood do not hardly ever, and the flare according to taste or pleasure can no.rnpotrà pleasure like no, but it is a lens to experience a once in a life-nikon, deserves the trust.
Opinion:To think is unbeatable value for money although of course you can not expect that it is excellent at full aperture, but for what it costs and the convenience that you have to carry it around in my bag I can not miss a Nikonist used from f4 onwards is great but I had sold it to me've taken another.
Cons:feeling, but incorrectly, perhaps by the lightness of fragility due to those accustomed to the heavy professional lenses like me ...
Opinion:As I said above, the weight of the optical depth. tiring with time, especially in the photograph the street. The 35 f1, 4, according to friends was quite heavy, and after f5, 6 / f8 made as the 35 in question. A friend of mine made me try it and when I saw the files on my PC open with Nikon view2 tripped the spring. Moral of the story, I saved more than a thousand Euro is the rendering challenge anyone to find the difference (resolution) between this compact and professional f2 35 35 f1, 4 ...
Pros:very compact, bright, af fast, crystal clear to f8.
Cons:suffers from the flare, better to use the lens hood
Opinion:Lens Compact, light and a high value for money. I use it on fx and is fixed which is good in every situation because it has a focal length of the boundary between the normal and wide-angle, step back a step forward .. small not to the eye, light for low-light scenes, from the best between f8 and f11 where it is crystal clear. Colour rendering typical of afd, so vivid, a little creamy but very pleasant in my opinion. A consoglio, use it with the lens hood protects the front lens and avoids the possible flare that sometimes you notice.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
