JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I'm sorry to do a negative review of a parent company lens, but my specimen was really poor, which considering the great variety of reviews makes it clear that the quality control for this lens was virtually non-existent. My model was unusable at the edges up to f5.6, discreet up to f8 and only became performing. Value? If I had seen the MTF of my specimen before the purchase I would not have given him more than 100 euros, but to find one with a good general quality (there are several around) is a comfortable, light and discreet lens, coupled with a light body as the 750 is perfect for street if you are looking for something wider than the 35. The plastic construction is unique, which is a good thing for some as it greatly lowers the weight and also the cost, but absolutely not up to the other professional D-series lenses.
user115595
sent on August 18, 2019
Pros:Lightness, weight, quality
Cons:Blurred
Opinion:This optics are invaluable to me because it was given to me by a dear friend. It is a very small optic, light but of good workmanship. The only flaw of this optics is the blurring it generates at TA. A little too pasty and ugly to see. Just close the diaphragm of a stop and the optics quietly churn out excellent files. It is an optic that still accompanies me in my street and architecture sessions.
Opinion:Great lens for those looking for light optics to take you to the mountains or where you want to go. It's not exactly a sharp knife to "TA" but with some of the contrast mask you can fix everything without any problems. Blurry is not exceptional either, but it is still acceptable. Finally, I like the colors and the overall quality of the files that can sprout this beautiful jewel.
Opinion:Very lightweight lens for street and landscaping. In my opinion it is very suitable for this latter field because of its color rendering. The AF is no lightning, especially depending on the machine on which it is mounted (I remember that AF is not equipped with internal focusing engine). On APS-c can be a good handy handset, as it becomes the equivalent of a 42mm on FF.rnNel complex, the contrast and sharpness yield is, however, comparable to that of a good zoom, and usually from a fixed you expect a little more.
Pros:Compared to the other had D is much more similar to the yield of G for color, contrast and sharpness
Cons:Slight decline in the corners
Opinion:Finally the hard I tried. Small and light as the D, contrast and color much more similar to G (D i also had 20, 24, 35, 50, so I can relate them). The blur is not exciting but the yield to TA is quite good, backlit well, AF D750 smoothly, the angle of view for what is my use of the fixed is perfect. Much better as sharpness and overall results of 24, of which I owned two copies. Very satisfied!
Opinion:Hello rnho a few weeks this formidable lens I use the Nikon D750 .rnDevo say that I have not taken away because it is as if there were not the lightness and dynamism of the contexts in which you can usare.Mi love it !!! I chose the D series for a fact saturation and contrast lower than the G series, of course, imagine that 28 f1.8 G is greater, however, that D has its rne because I assure you that will not make you regret the choice indeed !!!! rn
Opinion:I find it a great goal is the use of right d7000, d200, which fx D610 with much satisfaction, and practical and light is damage close the iris especially on the right, from where the best of themselves .... no stopping down known much difference. of D610 is a slight vignettaura wanting correctable with lr and other programs, however, is a goal from very crisp pleasing colors, I highly recommend it for both reportage landscape
Cons:a bit soft, sometimes kneads but not always, af slow in low light
Opinion:I bought this lens to match it to my Nikon D610 to use it at work in ceremonies and matrimoni.non has never let me down, especially in pre.l'ho also used for environmental portrait and non.restituisce fine details and great color. backlit by the best. lho used for a leisure reportage at dawn with the sun in front of the spectacular photos on the fishermen of my city on the work they do every day, and it came out a good job. I do not know why but unfortunately sometimes kneads the faces perhaps due to lower sharpness compared to 28 1.8g which I hope will one day have. let's say that I switched to Nikon for the 28 g that still can not buy me, and I chose the compromise of this series of which did not let me ... let alone 28 1.8 G !!!! a bomb must !!!!! cmq for recommended reportage, will tell some good stories. But you have to mount it on full frame otherwise the magic of 28 can not find it .... rnrnps avoid it in the concerts indoors, will inc ... are !!!!
Opinion:I recently purchased this lens used, the use on my main body, or D610. I like the lens to the focal length and brightness, excellent color results and returns excellent detail. The blur is great and full frame wide open after all are unable to isolate the subject well. Certainly not a specific lens for portraits but to 'occurrence is not as bad results. It deforms slightly but is still a wide angle. rnOttima for reportage.
Pros:weight and size, construction, optical quality
Cons:nobody
Opinion:I replaced it with a 35 mm in the kit because I used less and less .. but I got to try very very deeply, turning with only this focus on both analog and digital. Great. good yield, the sharpness, the final quality is taking a TA that stopping down. f5.6 to become great for street and the focus is fluid, f8 can focus manually with a simple monstrous even without looking through the viewfinder. really nice!
Pros:Well built, good quality, light weight, small, blurred pleasing, robust.
Cons:not fast autofocus in low light
Opinion:I bought it to have a "normal" on DX, the 35mm seemed too long, this is perfect, almost meets my field of visuale.rnE 'bright enough, has a mass of fire 25cm to 2.8 allows a good blurred and a discrete enlargement soggetto.rnHa a good yield even if it is not comparable to that of 24mm AF-D.rnBellissima the yield cromatica.rnLa version D of 28mm has a different optical scheme and a quality inferiore.rnrn
Pros:Very small and lightweight, good construction (although plastic), already good yield from TA. Of aps is an excellent fixed-rounder. Minimum focus to fifteen cm from the front.
Cons:Distortion and vignetting a little 'marked for a fixed amount of this kind, but hardly noticeable in the common use of aps. AF PTO, the entry is manual focus. F/2.8 is bright enough, but on occasion I would not have disdained an f / 2.
Opinion:I state that the use of D90.rnUna lens to have in your pocket: weighs nothing, takes up even less space, but at the same time has an incredible flexibility of use for a drive, you do everything (well, almost). RNLA AF-D version is very good optically (6 lenses in 6 groups), while the AF version (without the D) seems to be significantly worse (5 lenses 5 groups). rnL'autofocus screw I found it quite fast, reliable, if it has to do from 0.25 cm to infinity is not exactly lightning on D90, but in real situations of use his speed has always been more than enough.
Pros:Focal length of the "normal" on the right; building good, soft colors and natural light, compact, economical
Cons:AF fatigue a little 'low light, sharpness
Opinion:I recently purchased this lens, which I use with D90. The focal length (equivalent to 42mm of ff) is the real "normal", as with a field angle of about 55 ° is like that of the human eye. The three fixed wide nikon 2.8 (20-24-28) suffer a bit 'age, species for the AF (which is not a lightning fatigue and sometimes a little') and for the sharpness, which is equal to that of a good zoom (from a landline you always expect more). The yield is a bit '"old style", having contrast slightly marked and slightly saturated colors, I like it, because I find it natural, but some might prefer a different yield (eg that of the new 35 afs 1.8). While aware of its limitations (which is highlighted in almost all the reviews and tests), however, I took the lens and I find it very very good and very practical. And 'perfect example, as a complement to light (it is easily in the pocket of his jacket) of a canvas, if you do not want to get too full. Having got it used for 120 euro, I think the quality / price excellent. In conclusion, I recommend this lens, as long as we do not expect too much.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
