|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on March 09, 2019 Pros: Light, sharp, flare resistance Cons: Sharpness to TA Opinion: Used as normal on D7200, it is the optics that I prefer as everything do both for visual field and for brightness. Only flaw a little soft at 1.8 But those aperci is there. For the rest excellent resistance to flare and great sharpness across the frame. Distortion on DX almost absent. I recommend for those looking for a normal on DX that has superior performance to the classic 35 1.8 |
 | sent on February 17, 2018 Pros: Lightness and optical quality, blurred Cons: the ring of the maf is a little plastic Opinion: really excellent optics on D800, with something more than 35mm with regard to the composition of the image. Optically it is really great, you can use it from portraits in interiors to landscapes and as a shade is not too "cold" like other AFS and in post you work really well the file (apart from sometimes some slight dominant) .rnI had sold for the sigma 35 art but after some time I decided to buy it back (already sold the art for several reasons). blurred very good and better than 35mm in general. very recommended rn |
 | sent on January 18, 2018 Pros: Lightness, sharpness throughout the image, excellent colors, low distortion, autofocus speed, price Cons: vignetting Opinion: I have had this goal for about a month. so far I have appreciated almost exclusively its merits, the remarkable sharpness even at full aperture, brightness, lightness. I had abandoned the idea of ??bringing with me the SLR in the long hikes in the mountains for the weight, but with this lens feather I could again bring it for some fantastic shots. I use it on Nikon D750 and so far I have compared it with the Nikkor 24-120 4.0, and I must say that the 28 af 4.0 is clearer throughout the image. rnThe only flaw I have encountered so far is a vignetting evident in certain situations, but correctable with a click with Camera Raw. A goal for the landscape to have in fact ... |
  | sent on July 25, 2017 Pros: Sharpness, lightness, low distortion, colors, speed af. Cons: For me nobody. Opinion: I've definitely whispered this lens during the holidays just spent in Salento. What to say ... I'm "in love" with this goal. I used it at sunset, I used it in Matera with sunshine, I used it at night in Otranto ... no disappointment in yield in these conditions. I also used it for some set portrait and I have to say that the 28mm have one because in this kind of photos. The colors he returns are fantastic.rn |
 | sent on March 14, 2017 Pros: High sharpness, colors, precise autofocus, held against the light. Cons: Focus Ring. Opinion: I recently took this lens because I wanted a normal hard on my D7100, the 35 was too long while this is great according to my tastes naturalmente.rnLa optical quality is excellent, already very high sharpness at maximum aperture, autofocus is fast but above accurate, non sgarra a colpo.rnPurtroppo the focus ring has a little game and is not soft compared to my 60 2,8G, however, is not a problem since there never will work in the manuale.rnBuona held against the light .rnP.S. DX is fine 35 1.8g, economic and crisp too, my was an appropriate choice for that focal, then in the future, you never know, it is already to FF. rn |
 | sent on August 17, 2016 Pros: Optics by phenomenal performance, treating the nanocrystals, AF without hesitation, sharpness, price / quality '. Cons: actually loose nut not up optics. Opinion: I have used and continue to use this view for several years and I must say it 'absolutely the best wide that I have ever tried, resolution and' very high already at full aperture throughout the frame, blurred and 'great and the colors thanks to the treatment N are wonderful, I bought it to try it and I can not take it off for fear of not finding another perspective on your height, I would try sigma art to realize if this spell that you can really talk equalize with the wonderful general features that this perspective offers, for reportage consider it irreplaceable; price 'absolutely appropriate when you consider that the material does not give the feeling of solidity' you'd expect from a lens with these qualities'; not least the precise AF and not miss a beat, absolutely optical Highly recommended if you prefer a few millimeters less than the 35mm, will not disappoint '. |
 | sent on October 04, 2015 Pros: - Very low nitido- distorsione- good sfuocato- leggero- fast AF Cons: - Construction plasticky (like all G), however, I think is more robust than you might think. Opinion: Optical definitely valid, clear already at full aperture, ideal for street and landscape, it is probably also the best ever made by Nikon 28mm (I had the excellent 28mm / 2 AIS). It must be said, however, that, to F1.8, 35mm / 1.8 is a bit 'meglio.rnBei right colors and contrast. rnAltre qualities I have already written in the "pro" Ideal to be attached to a 50mm and a 20mm |
 | sent on September 02, 2014 Pros: Superb optical quality, both in terms of sharpness as a capacity to hold up to the light. Great focus. Valuable handiness and lightness. Cons: Like all G series lenses lack the aperture ring; the construction is not comparable to that of the corresponding zeiss, but then costs infinitely less. Opinion: What can I say, the optical qualities are absolutely top-notch, unless the construction, in the sense that it conveys the feeling of fluidity (v. Dial manual focus) and solidity of a zeiss. However, it is lighter, easier to handle and much less expensive than the 28 zeiss zf. I am very satisfied and, in my opinion, it is a perspective that would look good in any outfit nikon. |
 | sent on August 05, 2014 Pros: Lightweight (but it seems sturdy), sharpness and versatility. Cons: In some cases suffers (almost unexpectedly) CA, the ring of MAF manual is a bit 'loose. Opinion: I bought this lens for my D7000 (APS-C) aware that this lens is essentially intended to FF, because I needed a more objective light and compact enough to bring me back. In my kit over this range of focal lengths I have the Sigma 18-35 F1.8, but it is bulky and heavy, and since I also have the 50mm F1.8 AF-S, I found that a 35mm (although it is much cheaper of it) was too close. In the end I chose this lens (purchased used on Ebay) and I can not claim to be happy with purchase. On APS-C it is equivalent to 40mm lens and now has become the "standard" on my camera ... I've used it for portraits and pictures of babies, birthdays, street and some landscape. A great drive "all-purpose" short and that allowed me to bring the camera to the sea without having too much weight in a backpack. For direct comparison to TA sharpness is less than the Sigma (Sigma and I prefer to tell the truth even complexion) but gets along better, however the 50mm which has a simpler construction. Onagainst which I have indicated, the ring MAF is a bit 'loose (maybe it's just my copy, as used ...) but all in all it is accurate given that night gave me back some good shots; the CA is present instead, significantly to TA and also in the absence of particularly strong contrasts. I do not know what is due, but I got to the point to take advantage of this feature so "artistic" (where you can not correct in PP). It must therefore pay a little 'attention, however, already in F4 and F8 fades very disappears altogether and the lens becomes a lama.rn |
 | sent on July 12, 2014 Pros: Sharp already at room temperature, fast and accurate autofocus, excellent resistance against the light, lightweight and compact Cons: Construction plasticky optics kit: a lens for more than € 500 I would expect better; especially the ring of MAF manual gives the idea that Nikon is going to save from the point of view of materials. Opinion: A great wide angle thanks to the excellent sharpness already at RT can find many uses: from street / reportage photography in critical lighting conditions, the landscaping (good resistance against the light). On the other hand saw the price not to kit lens un'pò I would have expected more care in construction: perhaps it was better to equate it to the Sigma 35 f/1.4 as the price (we dance around 150 euro) but offer a built in line with the product Sigma. |
| sent on June 01, 2014 Pros: Sharpness and yield especially at RT. Lightweight and precise AF Cons: Case supplied with ridiculous (they have reduced the thickness of the microfiber), diaphragm blades 7 (instead of 9) and nut maf very entry level (could cure most of this aspect). Opinion: Optics has excellent color rendition is wonderful and stra even sharper at RT. Very good against the light. taken to replace the heavy Samyang 35mm 1.4 I have to say that as yield and sharpness has nothing to envy, and in addition is AF. I had also considered the Sigma 35mm 1.4 art, but I gave up because of the difference in weight (similar to Sammy) and the euro more to spend. Do not be fooled by the plastic construction, the lens is sturdy and solid. The lack of 1,4 does not feel, considering the high ISO performance of today's DSLR. It would have been a must-have if he had the 9-blade diaphragm. |
 | sent on April 23, 2014 Pros: Good construction Small and handy metal seal and attack Great Wide Price / Quality excellent yield very sharp, beautiful colors, luminoso.Non miss a shot in the viewfinder AF (always only central to my taste) Cons: non-VR (so you have to take all necessary precautions for the blur) But queso point can be overcome with the necessary arrangements such as taking twice the focal length of time as, or set the AUTO ISO with a minimum of time and safety at work Aperture. Opinion: The Wide angle lens with G maiuscola.Una that is worth much more than what I costa.La a lens light and very nitida.Si Bride with FX.rnrnQuesta format lens allows you to shoot in low light conditions, even in TA proves to'' altezza.rnrnSecondo my opinion is that a lens inside the backpack must necessarily find a place. |
| sent on February 09, 2014 Pros: Absent distortion, sharpness even at f1.8, very fluid ring MAF (it is easy to focus manually even view the focal length) Cons: MAF sometimes slow to engage the subject, especially when you are close to the minimum distance, construction is not optimal Opinion: A lens that is worth more than it costs, allows you to take in all low-light situations without pushing too ISO.Adatta more to the FX format because it corresponds to a 42mm on APSC. Excellent for portraits settled, offering the max between f2. 8 and f4 rnIo as personally I preferred the 35mm focal length, I recommend it to those looking for a wide angle of light and qualità.rn |
 | sent on February 08, 2014 Pros: Lightweight, virtually no distortion, treatment with nano crystals, a minimum distance of focus and sharpness already f/1.8 Cons: I have not found Opinion: Also in my opinion, one of the best wide-angle super bright products by Nikon for quality / price ratio, the minimum focusing distance of just 25cm allows you to actually take a few cm from the lens being able to accomplish so much creative and unusual shots but keeping to the proportions and without noticeable distortion. The sharpness is excellent at all apertures so you have a multi-purpose optical panoramas even at night, portraits and ambientati however in all those situations where you have to shoot in low light without going overboard with too iso.rnA my opinion the construction goes in line with the band price lens of € 600 paid now by me Nital, and I do not complain if you think 2200 was to shell out for the 24mm f1.4 28mm This allows you to do "almost" everything. |
 | sent on January 11, 2014 Pros: Sharpness at all apertures, optical design with cutting-edge treatment to the nanocrystals and aspherical lenses, light weight compared to other wide-angle fixed last generation, no distortion (!) MAF exceptionally fast and accurate Cons: MAF ring tends to be a little 'slack ... Opinion: 6egrave, much less from all points of view ...) |
 | sent on September 12, 2013 Pros: Exceptional performance in any iris center to the edge ... without compromise Cons: Shoddy construction plasticky and far from the old standards. Nikon shame! Opinion: One of the nikon lenses in the price with the best quality / price ratio. Incredible optical quality, distortion nonexistent, bright colors, very low flare, MAF fast and accurate. Suitable for various applications, from portraiture to landscape photography notturna.rnMolto recommended to those seeking a quality wide-angle fixed |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
