JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:focal length, focus and silent lightning, stabilizer.
Cons:Price, indecent construction, Unclear.
Opinion:start right away by saying that the 18,105 Nikon is superior in optical quality, bought used at 310 euro does its job as a handyman but if used wisely allows some good shots, very good at f8 and shutter speed 1/320 ... at night you can take thanks to the stabilizer ... the construction is poor the zoom ring too soft with the rubber ring that is dissected constantly ... so if you want high-quality photos in any situation this lens is not for you , if you look for a lens that does everything with dignity can go but the 700 euro worth of new NON them.
Opinion:And my lens favorite handyman, has changed upon you egregiame two objectives that possessed 18 70 70 300 nikon pratichamente and use only that but I do not regret the other two, now I no longer 'fear delrncambio lens with the constant danger of' introduction inadvertent hated powder which invariably is deposited on the sensor of my d2x, and the weight from sobbarcarmi e'decisamenterndiminuito. The color rendition and 'great and the vr in its second edition ago' miracles and the shake-I do not know 'more' things'. Fast reliable silent. Really recommend it to everyone.
Pros:Simply perfect for travel dusty and complicated.
Cons:Heavy, soft wide open, expensive.
Opinion:I think 80% of my photos from the past 5 years have been taken with this in mind. For me it is the only option for photography on the go such as in Jordan, India, or Thailand with a backpack and improvised movements. It always shows a good solution for all photographic opportunities by offering flexibility and a focal VRII very efficient. Of course it is never the IDEAL solution but will not lose any opportunity that presents itself on the road to a traveler.
Pros:Focal length and thus the extreme versatility, wide side rnSul good definition;
Cons:Cut to 200mm focal on min. distance of MAF; rnLato Tele a bit 'soft; rnDistorsione extreme wide-angle side; rnQualità constructive general, in relation to the price;
Opinion:Objective "prince" to travel where it is difficult to change lenses all the time. All in all, honest and able to give good results, knowing the limiti.Non possess it more, but in the case of travel "serious" probably would regret, or whatever you would like at least a second corpo.rnL 'autofocus is not lightning and 18 / 20 the distortion is evidente.Inoltre is expensive, after all, but it's the price to pay for such a escursione.Visto closely together with the 18-300, the 18-200 seems to have done better, but compared to the list price, I would have expected something more
Pros:Versatility, good at short focal lengths: 18mm to 70mm, discreet also the magnification in the macro base
Cons:overpriced, shoddy construction, too much play on the outside 200mm
Opinion:Even for me was very comfortable in my travels, always ready for a variety of uses. Do not have happened to me all the "troubles" that have happened to others, but their last trip I made in Burma, was spun the dial filter holder that I fixed with a few drops of attak. For the rest in my opinion is a very good lens that is used carefully (wisely preparing the shot) to great satisfaction in the use of reportage, even in the portraits is not bad but this is a judgment that do not have a lot of preparation in the field .
Pros:Aim to do everything that F8 gives excellent results across the entire zoom.
Cons:Slightly soft wide open vignettoso
Opinion:Quest'obbiettivo, often considered simple lens of kit, despite the wide range of zoom, allows you to carry a bag of lenses with a very low weight while maintaining good quality. Obviously not at the level of the first lenses or zoom professional but weighs half of a 24-70 f2.8. From the constructive point of view stretches too much to maintain good solidity in the front part, the ring of focus is very small and of little use. Despite these little things is a zoom that while ruining easily outwardly remains solid and functional even after years of snowstorms, salt and salt. Mine has now been around the world several times and found himself in unrealistic situations back home healthy and satisfactory picture.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
