RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Nikon AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Nikon AF-S DX 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on November 21, 2019

Pros: Good color yield and versatility

Cons: The sharpness is not exciting. Price

Opinion: Purchased about 6 months ago is a pleasant lens to use. Good focal excursion equivalent to a 16-36 that allows ample use and the diaphragm (f: 3.5-4,5) is acceptable as brightness (unfortunately it is not stabilized). Great color yield. Weaknesses are sharpness (poor especially at the edges) and distortion (high) to the 10 mm focal and close values. It definitely improves with the longer focal points, I would say great at 24 mm. For those who love the landscape photo and the pushed wide-angle can be disappointing while I find it great for street and interior photos. It is worth if purchased on occasion, I do not find adequate the cost to new. Comment updated on 1/23/2020

avatarjunior
sent on May 14, 2018

Pros: Good angle, lightweight, VR undockable by D500

Cons: Maybe the plastic attack

Opinion: I received it today, tried quickly on Panorama from the balcony in the middle of a forest, disagree on the fact that it is kneaded and soft at the edges, I find it a good lens to travel to panoramas, on interiors maybe distorts a bit, but the 14-24 is unapproachable and on DX would give me a 2 1-36 While I was looking for a zommettino and not that it cost a kidney. Satisfied with the purchase, of course not nital hello

avatarjunior
sent on May 14, 2018

Pros: Good angle, for the photos inside is pretty good

Cons: The corners are too soft, on the views unwatchable, too expensive

Opinion: I used it with my d500 and if it was used for interiors it was acceptable but on the views it looked like a piece of glass, all kneaded. The corners are too soft and I had to do crop often, I thought it was a problem of mine and I brought it to the Nikon and after 2 weeks I have given it back but nothing has changed. I think it's not worth the expense, too expensive for what it offers.

avatarjunior
sent on September 22, 2017

Pros: ?

Cons: the price

Opinion: I bought it yesterday, this weekend I try it. I'm anxious to try it. I'll let you know hi everyone. ------------------------------------ rn ............. .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ...................................... rn ........... .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. rn ................................. ................ .................................................. .................................................. .................................................. ...............................

avatarjunior
sent on April 04, 2017

Pros: excellent resolution at all focal lengths, the Flare is not good maneuverability and focal range.

Cons: A bit 'plasticky

Opinion: Taken seeds of new opportunity and by the shots that I have done I am very satisfied, now I was sorry for not taking the 12-24 (say more professional), but then I changed my mind .The counsel to the largest is a viewpoint that behaves very good, light and well built for the DX machines is a great obiettivo.rnLa definition at all focal diaphragm 5.6 / 8 and fantastic, and then to the superlative center distorts a 10mm ligtroom hair but with just a click and it is all fine, does not disappoint !!!!! rn

avatarjunior
sent on May 17, 2016

Pros: In my opinion excellent lens, low distortion and beautiful colors

Cons: I can not use the FF

Opinion: I have not tried other wide-angle zoom, so I can not make comparisons, but the d5000 at the same focal length with 18,105 kits a difference and 'embarrassing especially regarding colors and nitidezza.rnNei historical centers of our cities and' a marvel before I was even "cornered", now and always grafted on 5000! rnEd being light in trekking and 'a real blessing! rnPeccato that the d700 is virtually unusable ...

avatarjunior
sent on November 13, 2014

Pros: Excellent quality, resistance to flare, light weight, 10mm, ability filters

Cons: Can not be used in fx

Opinion: Use the wide angle a lot, I really like the view it gives. I have tried many but as quality, sharpness, flare resistance I find this superior to concorrenza.Mi sorry to leave it to go where I will meet with optical fx much heavier (and more expensive) .rnrnQualità satisfactory constructive, useful to be able to mount the filters by 77.rnrn

avatarjunior
sent on June 01, 2014

Pros: Build quality on top, flare resistance, distortion at short focal contained, fast focus, little chromatic aberration at the edges, chromatic balanced

Cons: high price compared to the competition but justified by the performance, little light at room temperature, one more stop in enough.

Opinion: I needed a wide angle lens for traveling and visiting palaces and museums and I compared three similar lenses: Nikkor 10-24 vs Sigma 10-20 vs Tamron 10-24. What struck me most was the lack of distortion and tonal balance. It 'a lens that you have to study it and understand how you have to set the camera correctly (in the bubble!) When dealing with vertical lines in architecture. Be creative generi.rnDevo yet to try the other night photos, I do not know how it can most beautiful reagire.rnIl recent purchase! Strongly recommended for wide scenic views. Fabio.

avatarjunior
sent on August 07, 2013

Pros: Angle up for the DX format. Good sharpness for the class. Minimum focusing distance of very low, and permits close up very nice. Mechanically flawless with AF very precise and quick.

Cons: Unfortunately hard to find in used .... those who have it if you keep it! :-)

Opinion: I was long fascinated by extreme wide-angle lenses and tried Tokina and Sigma of friends rimanendone thoroughly impressed, I must say, however, that as soon as I tested this point I did not hesitate and bought it. The yield is 24 to 10mm as very good and the extension of focal lengths can also use it on the road as the only optical. The lack of VR is obviously irrelevant considering the focal lengths, while a bit 'more brightness would be appreciated. Find extremely interesting its ability to focus at about 20 cm with a reproduction ratio of 1:5.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me