|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on April 19, 2021 Pros: Viewfinder, fairly simple menu, film simulations, jpg quality Cons: ergonomics, battery life, Opinion: I've really taken it for a few days but I like to write a "hot" opinion about the new toy. What I imagined in the crosshairs was respected: it's really nice big, maybe not really defined but it's a really nice sight. For the moment I am using it in manual with vintage lenses and having focus peaking is a salvation... on the contrary, there is also the focus with a broken image, but I must learn to use it well; in fact I can manage it easily only with very open diaphragms. I also knew about the goodness of jpg files and so it was. If you expose yourself properly, meticulously, the file is almost 100% ready making the use of heavy RAW vain. Like so many mirrorless it has various buttons that you can set at will to make it even more enjoyable in use. The ergonomics can be improved, I took the grip to have more grip with my fingers and avoid unintentionally pressing with the index finger the button on the front. I would have preferred the keys a little more embossed instead they are flush body and not very fast to activate. Accustomed to the Olympus menu which was really articulated with so many voices, this is quite simple and fast... sigma sd4 type. Battery really scarce but with a few euros you take 2 and you are quiet. I haven't tried the af, for now I'm shooting with vintage lenses... but in any case I didn't need a lightning bolt. |
  | sent on April 02, 2021 Pros: Rings, sensor yield, construction, film simulations, viewfinder... still in 2021 makes very good. Cons: AF in low light, not really long-lived batteries, cladding dinghy that over time may come off. Opinion: Still in 2021 he can calmly say his own. It is an excellent machine, very pleasant to use, solid and compact. Even though I have big hands, ergonomics doesn't suffer, and it falls into my hand very well. Honorable mention to the rings, only the noise produced while rotating them deserves purchase. The AF is very usable and quite precise, but in conditions of low light or important contrast it suffers a little. AFC just enough, does its job. Note of merit for the viewfinder, always fluid and quite faithful to real colors, with a little lag exclusively in extended dynamic range mode. The sensor is really great, it returns beautiful images with beautiful shades of color, but do not ask him crop because with 16 MP they are not feasible, if not very small. Excellent jpeg as per fuji tradition, with the possibility to make changes directly in the room, with interesting and certainly comfortable results for those who do not want to spend hours working on the PC and for those who want to immediately share the shot taken. Nonetheless, raw is very workable, especially with capture one express which for fuji is free. Rendered at high ISO interesting, the grain over 1600 is there, but only over 4000 becomes clearly visible, while maintaining a very, very "retro" look that does not mind at all (I also shot at 12800 and 25600 without hesitation). Batteries do what they can, which is generally no more than 350 shots. Dinghy with time tend to come off, especially in the corner under directional arrows, a known but annoying defect. To sum up, it is an excellent machine in many respects, it can still say its own, it makes it very well both with proprietary optics and with viltrox, and does not make you regret the FF, both in terms of yield and in terms of maintenance costs, and in terms of size. If undecided, take it, you find business to date, and among other things it is also easily resaleable. |
 | sent on March 16, 2021 Pros: Quality of jpgs, rings, vintage aesthetics. Cons: For my hands a little too small, AF can be improved Opinion: I start from the fact that I really like Fuji's vintage aesthetic. The fact that I have the rings for all the fundamental parameters for me is a great convenience. The less I get on the menu, the better. Film simulations are very interesting. The grain of the photos has something reminiscent of the film, something that when you see a hole taken with a fuji recognize it, has the trademark. This vintage style in both hardware and software marries my taste and I really like to see how it goes with advanced technology instead. I also appreciate the Fuji updates, sometimes really significant (see for example speed of the electronic bull optics brought up to 1/32,000 allowing you to shoot with very bright targets such as my 56 1.2 even in full sun). We are now at XT4 but I really struggle to think about replacing but my XT1. I feel very good in terms of balancing with the battery grip but I have very large hands. However go trekking and carry with you such a light tool but with such high quality it is really priceless. I think the natural matching of this machine is with fuji fixes. I have the 35 1:4 and the 56 1:2 and really the Quality of the files is remarkable, it makes you fall in love! I sold My Nikon kit to lighten up with a bit of fear but I would never go back especially I who love the ready-made Jpg of the xt1. |
 | sent on August 03, 2020 Pros: High quality files for sharpness, colors and grits. Cons: On-off button to use continuously. Insufficient battery life. The Joy stick is extremely complicated in use, because it is very small Opinion: This camera confirms fuji's exceptional level in this area. Used with the 16-50 proves all its quality. The battery life is not remarkable, but with the grip, it increases the range and also the ergonomics. Like other x-series cameras, the ability to use the "film" type greatly increases the results. |
 | sent on May 22, 2020 Pros: Great electronic viewfinder. Great jpeg and raw files. Great iso estate up to 3200. Good ergonomics of the commands and very useful quick menu. Many customizable function keys Cons: Battery life, bad. Gust and insufficient buffer. Good focus but insufficient for scopes with fast moving subjects, sport type. At 6400 ISO the yield is bad and the files difficult to use. Opinion: I had bought it as a second machine to accompany the Nikon D610, especially for the compactness and for the electronic shutter. In fact, it immediately became the first choice for almost all activities. Particularly when I work for classical music concerts where working conditions are very difficult, for little light and need to be silent it turned out to be an excellent instrument. I shoot quietly up to 3200 ISO which with proper exposure makes excellent photos with well-controlled noise and above all fantastic colors. The automatic white balance is not foolproof but good and in case easily corrected in Post. The greatest value for those who work on events where you take hundreds of photos is that the jpgs are already almost ready and the post-production work is reduced to a few corrections directly on the JPGs. The use a lot also for street and urban photos and works great even if it is a bit slow and sometimes if you do not anticipate the photo you risk losing it. Coupled with the 50-140 and the 16-55 can also be used in some professional areas, the photos are very popular with customers and I often deliver directly the jpg that has churned out the machine with two touches on tones and color. Definitely from the X-T2 onwards all aspects have been improved but for my work on the concerts the X-T1 I prefer because at 3200 iso contains better noise, the files are still three-dimensional and the colors are still of excellent paste, and therefore I continue to use it. For landscape photos, however, I continue to use the D610 because the files are much more detailed and especially the yield on the greens and blue I prefer it much to Fuji. At the end of six years of its release I still can't completely separate it from it. |
 | sent on February 08, 2019 Pros: Retro style of controls combined with many useful modern functions (electronic shutter completely silent, focus peaking and electronic viewfinder with dual frame for MF Precisissima); Exceptional electronic viewfinder, extremely low weight, quality of the produced files, perfect white balance in artificial light, focus and AF. Cons: Flash system. Battery life. Opinion: I took it as a second system, from alternating to Nikon full frame. What to say, it's a marvel. The files that you get are always very close to what you want to achieve by shooting in natural light and are well workable in the recovery of lights and shadows. The raw are always very good already departing and wishing you can always apply with Lightroom in post production the assembly color of Fuji, type Astia or Velvia. On the Iso seal side I can not express myself objectively, in the sense that I should compare it to other APSC that I no longer after switching to FF: For me the yield is good, comparable to D7100, maybe better. But I read a little everywhere that the Iso indicated by Fuji in the car actually... are not real so any cross brand comparison is out of my reach and my purposes. The native optics are all of quality and I sincerely admire Fuji for having given the APSC format the dignity that other brands have denied when they stopped investing in the creation of valuable optics. The XT1 is a very powerful machine that in the simplicity of transport of a system composed even by a few essential lenses allows to shoot with satisfaction reaching a remarkable image quality. The manual ring nuts must please: it is more a question of style than speed because on balance the controls of the Nikon type d700/d8 * * are faster (at least for me I'm used to that layout of controls). For me the strong point is the viewfinder (as big as the D800 with DK17M mounted) and aid to manual focus: I rediscovered the pleasure of shooting with vintage optics with the certainty of a perfect focus. |
user112477  | sent on July 26, 2018 Pros: Sharpness, excellent JPG, good dynamic range, convenient controls. Cons: In certain situations: poor lighting, confused background, strong lighting points the AF leaves you a little distracted. Opinion: I had almost all the Fuji APS-C, the XT1 is the one that gave me the most satisfaction considering quality/price. Combined with 23 1.4 beats many FF. The only caveat, in my opinion, is to use when you can the FM with "the Help". Maybe it's not suitable for highly dynamic scenes. Shooting a long burst in JPG + RAW heats up a bit. arrives quietly at 1600 ISO even if the best I got it to 400. Above all, he does not close the shadows as he tends to make his elder sister. Good bargains in the used if you know who had it. |
 | sent on July 26, 2018 Pros: Aesthetics, build quality, ISO, size Cons: Practicality Opinion: I had some of Fuji: X30, X-M1, X-E1, x Pro1 and X-T1. Of course the XT1 was the best. I will not be able to reiterate things that I have already read below about the indisputable photographic quality of this top range but I'll just tell one of the reasons why I was not well: what just stood me tight of the XT1 were the ring nuts. I love the street fast and for this kind of photography I need a camera from the immediate controls because I can need more or less field or I can pass in a short time from a very enlightened situation to one of twilight or backlight. On the X-T1, which with the street should find its raison d'être, setting the shutter speed dial, I do not know, at 1/125, I could not then quickly use the wheel to pass, just to say, to 1/1250. I had to unlock the ring and reposition it! The wheel only gave me the margin of one stop at the bottom or the top. Same speech for the ISO ring. I had an Olympus whose ring nuts were in range of thumb and forefinger and also acted as wheels! Now, with the Sony A7R II, I have all the scissors at the wheel range. I can move from minimum to maximum without having to go even for the ring nuts. Why two commands for the same thing, where then the wheel serves little and nothing? (The only thing I miss about Fuji is the aperture ring on the lenses: I adored it) As I see it, in addition to the compensation ring, it needs one to switch from M mode to A, S or P (which then instead this ring here, which serves, on the X-T1 is not there). In short, fine ring but totally useless (critical that I could expand even to other models Fuji, as well as later). Surely some fanboy will resent this affront! I beg your pardon. |
 | sent on September 01, 2017 Pros: Intriguing vintage look, tropicalization, first choice materials, ring nuts, swiveling display, fabulous viewfinder, high-performance AF, customization, file quality and high ISO handling (raw) Cons: Jpeg files a little planed at high sensitivity, even with NR -2. Opinion: Review of the review after 6 months of use.rnPacked in kit with the 18-135 WR at a really good price I was immediately impressed in terms of sensor performance and ease of use. Once the zoom is sold and a 35mm f / 2 is purchased, the image quality is further increased. The speech autofocus depends a lot on the lens used, with the latest models the speed is very very good. The viewfinder is wonderful and very customizable, with different display modes (normal, larger or double for manual focusing) and aids, such as focus peaking and split digital image. I have disabled all the information apart from exposure, shutter speed, ISO and aperture to have an experience of use in my opinion even better. The convenience of seeing exactly what you shoot before is now essential, although sometimes in situations of excessive or insufficient brightness the user experience is affected a bit '. Great ergonomics, everyonethe keys and dials are in the right place. High ISO files perfectly usable for amateur purposes even up to 6400 in Raw while in JPEG things change. The files are too planed already at 3200, even setting the noise reduction to -2. On the video speech, as I do not, I can not express a judgment.rnrn |
 | sent on May 22, 2017 Pros: Great compromise lightness-quality, optical park, used price Cons: Autofocus not really lightning Opinion: I bought this used car, 1 year ago, from happy owner of 5D and 70D. The feeling is great, the plenty of keys and rings makes the shot even more enjoyable. The image quality is very good: as colors is better than Canon, in my opinion, good dynamic range, good ISO resistance. I took it as a travel car and kept it in the bag together with goals like 18, 27, 35 Fuji becomes really cumbersome. After 6 months of affiliation I sold the 80D, which I used little, now alternating with satisfaction at 5D. Compared to the 70D I find the image quality slightly higher (not much difference even from the 5D first series), convenience and enjoyment of use are superior. You definitely lose the AF side: do not expect miracles of the series "equal to the reflexes", but not spar on uselessness. It works well on single subjects, very precise though somewhat slower than the 70D of day, it makes a little more effort at night;You will never miss any shots due to the AF if you do not do avifauna.rn Last note about the batteries: with a few things (no pre af, no light af if they do not), and if you are not compulsive of the shot, Is to worry. |
 | sent on May 14, 2017 Pros: Well constructed, beautiful to look at, so many JPEG filters Cons: Files most artifacts, high sensitivities there is a lot of cleaning, unfortunately I find them too planed, I always get the impression that the camera put the hands of the raf. Opinion: Camera bellissima, unfortunately I can't digest files it produces, are always very strange artifacts, in portraits they look waxy, landscapes, I find a few grades and steps in the colors ... are probably not very personal impressions all fail to love the photos that churn out the Fuji with x trans ... too bad for real, beautiful to see and take pictures. The sensor with special lights breaks down creating real Buckshot of flare. |
 | sent on February 15, 2017 Pros: construction quality, feel, taste, image quality and jpeg, viewfinder. Cons: video management Opinion: For those who started with film cameras and is used to the use of nuts, this is manna from cielo.rnCe've had it for almost a year and is giving me great satisfaction, above all, I want to carry it around with me, what that does not happen to me with 5d.rnHa defects like all mirrorless fuji but is appreciated for the constant firmware updates that often risolutivi.rnA my opinion is a great car. |
 | sent on February 04, 2017 Pros: Body, aesthetics, image quality, ergonomics, functionality, analog-style dials, JPEG Cons: poor video department, the management of the RAF by some software, AF-C sometimes a little 'uncertain Opinion: I took this ML after reading a lot about it and it was love. I come from a D7000 and the jump was huge in terms of image quality. It 'a machine that either you love or hate it, once triggered the feeling, it is literally fast by its vintage look that makes it beautiful davvera even just to look at her. On the photo department is very complete, there I joined the 10-24 f / 4, 18-55 and 50-230 XC full kit. Still used on a few occasions, I must say that the image quality is all, even on the optical fuji XF. If I have to find a counter, it is the video department that is really poor. The video quality is good, but the room really manage without adjustments (to change aperture, ISO, etc. must stop recording). I expected something of this department worthy of the other qualities of the room, but at home have focused on Fuji X-X-T2 and T20 and abandoned probably more implementazioni.rnSicuramind will be my traveling companion for the next few years, the quality is there throughout, the RAF began to give less problems with the main and JPEG files are really good right out of the machine software. Used at temperatures around 0 ° C, because of the metal body, the car was cold but after diversse hours of use has not given any sign of insecurity / problemi.rnPer Finally, for those approaching the world of photography or looking for a body to be attached to a camera, the X-T1 is now a good deal (he also takes 500 €), for those who want to buy a single body, council contact the X-T2, X or ML-T20 Sony home (A6300-A6500). |
 | sent on September 27, 2016 Pros: Ergonomics, durability, lightness, sensor, features, ease of use Cons: life batteries, keys a little sunken. Opinion: A very good car fotografica.rnPotrei stop here ... for my needs, I find it simply excellent in almost all respects. The exploit more fully and has never let me down. Never missed a shot. Workable files and enormous potential ... pity that Adobe, is so determined not to consider the Xtrans a sensor worthy of attention, forcing us users to stunts to get the most out Fuji.rnL'unico system neo pretty sore, is the battery life. The X-T1, lasting very little ... It consumes as much as a Boeing 747 !!!!!! And if you use third-party batteries, yet last for less. Needless to set the machine at its best, thinking to save energy; it still consumes too much !! Unreliable the charge indicator that suddenly tells you battery and the next moment you find yourself with the machine switched off. Dead. Kaput! RnProblema that is not present on other models, such as the X-E2 I own, where the batteries (including third party) last much longer and the time lapse between the low battery warning scarica and the consequent shutdown of the machine is greater than or at least leave you time to even take a few pictures before dying completely. The joypad keys are slightly sunken ... On the one hand, it is good, so you do not inadvertently press, but become a bit laborious if you have to press while holding the eye in the viewfinder. The body is solid albeit slight, it is holding well and the buttons are so many, so as not having to dig deeply in to instant settings menu. A great sight, clear, complete, customizable and with which it easily takes confidence. rnScattare with a T1 (or a Fuji in the same segment ..), is disarmingly simple. It becomes really hard to go wrong a picture or wander exposure !! RNLA focus was (and is ..) in the spotlight for several reasons ... I come from SLRs like the D300, D700,5D2,5D3,6D. .. But the whole is slow Fuji, just I do not see it !! The yield / general behavior of FA, depends very much on opticsused, but the percentage of the shots lost for a wrong or not focus is equal to that of 5D2. AND IN ANY CASE, for as I see the difficulties you can only meet in unfavorable conditions for most of the AF systems. In any case, I shot with 35 1.4 to a race car, but the results went far beyond my expectations and photos "good" were 90% .rnCon latest optical and next-generation AF motors, problems are further reduced. 90 f2, for example, is incredibly accurate even in reduced difficili.rnPeso situations. How nice it is to go out for a photo walk without having huge backpacks and tendonitis wrist ?? Impagabile.rnInoltre, for the moment, Fuji is proving to be a big company, attentive to its customers and growing. Appreciated the update that was released months ago for the X-E2, that will leave more long life despite the exit of E2s.rnInsomma, the X-T1 is a really good camera, and recommend moltissimor. But buy yourself at least two batteries in more and original, not to stay dry !!! |
| sent on May 13, 2016 Pros: Size, retro aesthetics, sturdiness, viewfinder, rendering jpg, ease of use through the ring nuts. Cons: Nothing Opinion: It made me rediscover the pleasure of taking photographs in manual. In hand with a pleasant sense of solidity, compactness and excellent management, because thanks to the many switches and dials there is not hardly ever the need to enter into the menu. spectacular and faithful in the viewfinder really report what your eyes vedono.rn |
 | sent on December 07, 2015 Pros: , Size, weight, nuts, iso, objectives Cons: af, smaller dynamic range SLR, flare Opinion: It 'was the camera with which I learned to shoot. It 'nice to the touch, the eye, and is even more beautiful photograph us. love at first sight. It 'a mirrorless, perhaps the best and as such it has the best AF and the dynamic range and the flare is not the massimo.rnPerò objectives XF Fuji offer a real car professionale.rnBellissimi the jpeg, perhaps the best in the market. Excellent B / N.rn |
 | sent on October 18, 2015 Pros: Quality, optical viewfinder Cons: Auto focus button video Opinion: The own for about a month, after the first shock with lots of photos out of focus, I set differently and I have learned to understand it ... Now I would not go back. Beautiful sight. Recoveries which permits are extraordinary, dysfunctional key video. The RAF in some situations are hardly compatible with LR much better with one or caputure Irident. Taken with the kit 18/55 optical favolosa.rnResa exceptional color. |
 | sent on October 11, 2015 Pros: best quality Cons: noise over 1600 iso Opinion: excellent machine gives me great soddisfazioni.mi seems to use an old SLR with cutting edge technology, regarding the autofocus a bit slow I think that has been resolved with the latest update of the machine downloaded from Fujifilm, I found a splinter, great speed and more ....., today I would not change |
user79007 | sent on October 10, 2015 Pros: Quality is constructive and performance Cons: Af Opinion: Too bad for the 'autofocus that is not' at the top, and for everything else 'as expected. RNLA quality sensor and 'excellent, the controls are all in the right place and the design a little vintage I piace.rnIl graphite and beautiful but expensive .... Too. Even the optics of the series x are exceptional but expensive. Tried the 35mm ottimo.rn |
| sent on September 21, 2015 Pros: Build quality, ergonomics, electronic viewfinder, quality sensor Cons: poor battery life, SD card door just solid, button activation video Opinion: Really good: I align all the positive comments already reported by other users. I shall focus on the electronic viewfinder which is a jewel of technology and does not regret even one of my old Nikon F4, let alone that of modern cameras. It produces jpeg files ready for use, or allow processing RAW -> jpeg already "in the room": the results are always amazing to be fair and above a sensor capable of exceptional dynamic range, which allows you to recover almost everything still being PP, if necessary. The architecture of the sensor and the processor allow a definition very elevata.rnMi would advise then, if you have the optics antiquated drawers, with adapters now available anywhere, of rispolverarle: I have some optical connection m42 who still have a lot to say thanks the XT-1 and its performance on the field (see electronic viewfinder with focus peaking) .rnPur not doing videos, I realized that for pure test button used in this function is absolutely unnerving: noI know it is a problem of my XT-1, but does never want to shoot movies. If for you is an important function, better reschedule it on another button. |
 | sent on September 20, 2015 Pros: Ergonomics, tropicalization, electronic viewfinder outstanding Cons: Battery life especially if you use electronic shutter. Opinion: Must have. I tried all fuji, x100, x-e1, e2-x, x-pro1. I have always been skeptical of t1 because I preferred the line leica style. Now I also have this and I'm fascinated. Light and tropical conditions, a viewfinder to excellence, never seen anything like this. In my opinion even surpasses that of Sony a7. With the latest update the af is great (at least for my kind of photography that includes sports and the like). Swingable rear screen high definition and, above all, all the essential commands to wheel as in analogue photography. The electronic shutter helps in bright light allowing you to take full aperture but beware, consumes a lot of battery. I noticed, also from happy owner of x-e2 that the battery is lower, so I suggest to have at least 3 if you need to do an output that makes you worry. Pleasant can customize the controls at your fingertips. The sensor is identical to that of the so mistreated x-e2 for which you do not expect miracoils. Speaking to staff Fuji, I reflected that it would be able to turn off the screen rear exceptional as in SLR. In fact you can do, but in this case the deactivation of the screen allows you to see the photos taken after if not through the viewfinder. It only needs a simple firmware update |
| sent on September 10, 2015 Pros: Lightweight, compact, robust, advanced, well built, solid and manegevole, light. With the latest firmware update 4.0, it has brought new improvements and especially the new AF system mounted in the recent X-T10. Another quality that enhances the quality and value of this jewel of technology. Cons: Battery Life Opinion: After reading various reviews and always positive and watched several videos on Youtube, I decided to buy it without hesitation. 10-24 and with a battery grip is top.Quando keep it in your hand you feel that it is not just a toy. The collars are ideal for use in all conditions. Very suitable for use in outdoor, reportage and street, with a 18:55 f / 2.8. I tried the xt1 with animals and I assure you that is wonderful, if you're tired of the backpack and kg to carry around? Fuji XT1 is your perfect camera. |
 | sent on August 20, 2015 Pros: Performance SLR, compact, technology Cons: Battery Life Opinion: As for battery life I can say that used with use of the monitor, on a day trip out of the classic two batteries are not enough. To date I have solved only by setting the use dell'evf with eye sensor function, the machine starts to consume only when approaching the eye to the viewfinder, the monitor remains disabled and is only activated if the preview in the viewfinder does not satisfy us . For the rest I can only say well with a note of surprise at the quality of the file and for the immediate usability of the jpg, comfort not just for those who have no time to lose to the PC. |
 | sent on July 27, 2015 Pros: lightweight, compact, robust, top performance Cons: Limited battery, slow AF, nested functions in the menus, buttons a bit small (but proportionate to body size) Opinion: I changed my equipment canon fuji in choosing this top model in the home. The machine is a combination of technology. When you're holding is felt that it is not just a toy. The collars are ideal for use in all conditions. Very suitable for outdoor environments, photojournalism, reportage and street. With proper optical lends itself to still life. Level high even for photo studio (portraits). rnNon I have not tried the xt1 with animals and sporting events, but I think in this case the performances are lowered significantly because of slow dell'AF.rnIn ultimately I find a good machine suitable for most uses, even pro. If to this we add the range and quality of optics available, then you have no more doubts about the performance and the results you can achieve. |
 | sent on July 10, 2015 Pros: Camera evolved, well-built, solid and manegevole, light. With the latest firmware update 4.0, it has brought new improvements and especially the new AF system mounted in the recent X-T10. Another quality that enhances the quality and value of this jewel of tecnologia.rn Cons: Nobody. Opinion: After reading various reviews and always positive and watched several videos on Youtube, I decided to buy it without hesitation, and two days ago I retired from Fujifilm Italian official dealer in my area. Mounted grip battery assumes an aspect professional and elegant comn the benefit of not being on foot saw not long battery life. For the focal part of the kit, I opted for the 18-55mm 18-135mm instead of having the prospect in the future to buy the 90mm fixed. I tried it yesterday and today making some shots and I was excited for the color rendering with sharp images and brilliant. Purchase recommended. |
user62173 | sent on April 19, 2015 Pros: So much beauty aesthetics in both versions classic black and new Silver graphite. Maneuverability and transportability. All you need at mano.Mirino electronic as great as that of an SLR full frame.Selezione AF points efficace.Splendida comfortable and the chance to see the final photo in real time to changing settings. 18:55 lens kit with a yield more than decent. X-Trans sensor capable of recoveries on highlights that many other APS-C 7 sognano.Ben useful customization recalled at the touch of the button Q and the use of a ring. Cons: They say AF C perform poorly but not significant for my esigenze.rnConsiderato everything I put two slots memoria.rnPrezzo the Silver version that I definitely got that but compared to 200 euro more leaves you a little bit thrilled. Opinion: Taken to correct the mistake of having sold at a time of little enthusiasm the D800 ... made me rediscover the pleasure of going around to take some foto.rnSenza too many mental saws !!! rnCon grafting grip 1 cm fits perfectly with my big right hand ... and is held on stand by with only a mano.rnQuello which left me pleasantly stupitornè yield optics supplied in kit ... rn18.55 f / 2.8 variable that has nothing to spartirerncon equivalents at home and Nikon Canon.rnStanchi backpack and kg to carry around? rnVi interested in taking photos and not collezionarerncorredi photo to feed your ego? RNLA Fuji XT1 is your perfect camera. |
 | sent on April 15, 2015 Pros: Compact and tropical, vintage style, super performance, robust, good sensor, low noise, complete functions, tilt monitor, optical park excellent. Cons: only one memory slot, rear collar a bit hard (maybe just in my example). Opinion: The X-T1 is the artwork of Fujifilm! I come from a very good X-M1 already has moved me enough, but this is really superb. All that was missing in the X-M1 here and there some functions are also improved. I do not want to mention the quality of the 'great aps-c sensor because it has already been said enough. I found it very compact and wearable, is very sturdy and sits quite well, I did the upgrade of 'Shutter ... wow !!! Main functions all at hand easily, the rings are 7 !!! Autofocus that did not disappoint me, sometimes seems to falter a little but nothing that is quite accurate and fast. I have not tried the 'continuous autofocus but will soon. Vintage design that makes me go crazy, really nice aesthetically. The menu is fairly rich in features and options, however, is a bit complicated and not very fast in the choice. The tilting monitor is utiland but not required, the viewfinder is very bright and full of information even in the dark. Unfortunately has only one memory slot would have preferred that he had had 2. In my example the ring back just above the focus assist button is too hard, not quite smooth. Some rear button could be better positioned such that the trash, for me it is a bit uncomfortable. I would have preferred a fill flash concealed as in X-M1, not the standard that should be fitted every time, but I understand that there was more space to put a retractable flash. Function focus peacking excellent, for me absolutely necessary for a car like the X-T1, allows you to use any objective and focus properly. Someone uses it for weddings, I say that in some cases the machine is worth more than a wedding ... Excellent for street, reportage, macro, landscape, portrait. Coupled to the 16-55 f2.8 is a big bomb !!! Too bad for the little workability files .Raf ... So, overall it is a machine really extraordinary, delighted and pleased to have you purchased, highly recommend! |
 | sent on February 15, 2015 Pros: Construction of high quality, high image quality, yield at high iso amazing sight that opens up a new world, park original optics of highest quality and with an excellent value for money. Cons: Small button for recording movies a little 'uncomfortable and quality raw image is not exploited to its full potential because of the lack of a dedicated software. Opinion: Back home Fuji (I had an X-M1) after a brief spell with Sony A7 of which I was not satisfied, I must say that expectations have not been disappointed at all. Camera with a capital F that recalls the mechanical reflex of a time, solidly built and characterized a perfect ergonomics. Management of capture simple, especially for those who used mechanical cameras of the past, rich menu and intuitive enough, viewfinder and monitor wonderful bascullante effective, especially thanks to the faithful live view which allows perfect control of the parameters of recovery. Narcotics are the yield at high ISO, dynamic range and color fidelity. The only real flaw, in addition to the small button for movie recording that is a bit 'embedded in the body and that sometimes it is difficult to press to start recording, is the lack of a software capable of effectively demosaicizzare Raw, exploiting all the capabilities of the sensor x-trans II. Useful updated firmware (3.0), which provides, among other things, the shutter completamente electronic. |
 | sent on February 03, 2015 Pros: Compact, lightweight and well constructed and accurate as true made in Japan.Parco optical high livello.Tenuta at high ISO, actual colors and noise very piacevole.Nessuna vibration during scatto.Sensore in my opinion maybe one of the best on the market . Cons: Some keys slightly protruding and very difficult to find during the scatti.Batteria sometimes with limited autonomy especially with temperatures basse.Un only sloot for mindful card. Opinion: Amazing machine to use in many casi.La quality 'file and' very high that comes close to FF.Il advantage that goes unnoticed like a compact is remarkable in fotostreet .The lightness puts you in a position that the belt becomes superfluous and keep camera in hand without stancarti.Stile back 'beautiful technology moderna.Ho sold everything kit Nikon FF with relative optical switch to a light kit and built to perfection: metal and glass and not plastic which, although of excellent quality' is plastica.Un always great advantage are the files that come with the perfect style film as a volta.La advice to many photographers tired of weight and size. |
 | sent on January 22, 2015 Pros: -Compattarn-Leggerarn-velocern-held high-quality immaginern stupefacentern iso-available comandirn-customization menurnrn Cons: -Duration Batteries Opinion: Son passed to XT1 after having for a year the XE1, if the first I was thrilled with this are more than happy and satisfied, it has everything that I look for in a camera, grades from FF in a compact body, excellent file, rapid in FA, nothing to envy to SLR, only the battery life is not perfect, but with a few € take batteries of competition and the problem is risolto.la control layout is intuitive and convenient as even the most noble reflex, but it is a matter of taste and abitudinma, but have physical controls, especially the principal, at your fingertips without having to search through the menus is priceless .... since the last update with the addition of the electronic shutter is really the top.Provata this is really hard to think back to a reflex.Consigliatissima! ps who you ask differences with XE2 say are innumerable, but I had tried handling the camera and its menu are not up to find, difficult and convoluted, in addition to lacking some accortezze.da prefer to unabashed though optimto XE2. |
  | sent on January 18, 2015 Pros: Doc construction, small but solid, weather sealing, rings etc. iso times. estrepitoso large viewfinder, high iso, no noise, color rendition and dynamic range, produces exceptional file, and finally light and aesthetically very beautiful with a vintage style Cons: one memory slot, key pad tiny and uncomfortable, I do not know more Opinion: as said by many FUJI has churned un'altrea machine of the highest quality ', with color across. the sensor xtrans second generation really is loved in the sense that churns jpeg files already 'ready, color rendition and dynamic range to gape. short of defects if they are not at least I can not find them removed perhaps the pad with tiny darts and therefore uncomfortable. Fuji has and is creating a park-optic high-quality 'FUJI sure you pay but the quality has a prezzo.consigliata |
user39751 | sent on December 31, 2014 Pros: Construction nearly flawless. Small and solid. Tropical conditions. Ferrules iso / time / exposure compensation. Viewfinder wonderful. Click 'muffled'. Absence of color noise and color rendering balanced. High iso excellent. Netherlands iso free of noise (up to 400). Tilting the screen back, comfortable and crisp. Management highlights by reference. Development Raw drive effective and versatile. Firmware updates and will continue to be important part of the house madre.rnEsteticamente beautiful (subjective opinion). Cons: Duration limited battery charge status icon and just indicative (recommend buying a pair of excellent Patona reserve). Tripod thread off-axis. Flaps sd / connections / battery plastic seemingly economic. Free external microphone obsolete (is 2.5mm, the problem of secondary but there you are). Opinion: A jewel. I reiterate the pros: image quality, dynamic range, precision autofocus (slower than the better performing srl but impeccable) are amazing. The viewfinder opens a new window on the universe. The goals fuji not disappoint, even the cheapest (the 50-230 I find crystal clear and well stabilized, for the price ... 14 and 35 are stellar and 60, despite the slow autofocus, is no exception. ..). The wi-fi allows complete control of the camera via smartphone / tablet ... rnTradizionale and modern at the same time, it is an ideal tool for the purists of photography, allowing immediate and intuitive adjustment of the basic parameters through the rings (including modes of play , focus, metering, multiple exposures, and much more, thanks to the dedicated keys programmable). I use it in RAW and then often in machine development, given the excellent jpeg output and the multiple choice of parameters to be adjusted is that of 'style film' typical fuji. Of course, volendo the RAW file, properly processed with appropriate programs, offers potential elevatissime.rnImpossibile not apprezzare.rnAddio nikon ... I keep the best optical and buy an adapter for this and the Sony Alpha 7II arrivo.rnCon equipment in such a available, SLR cameras have now only makes sense for the action shots, sports or photo hunt ... it's not for long, I think. |
 | sent on December 03, 2014 Pros: Viewfinder, many wheels, high iso Cons: Video button in awkward position, inability to customize some features with the buttons. Improved PAD Opinion: The use 3 months now and it amazes me more every day. Does not regret the SLR. Excellent file that churns. The impeccable jpg. A little difficult parts of the nef to work but with ACR once taken the hand, there are no major problemi.Mi expect the AF slightly more responsive but overall works egragiamente. The use in the 18-55 and the 35 fuji. Both excellent. With the lens of 3rd parties to focus on is facilissimo.rnPer now I feel happy with the purchase. Appearance new firmware for the limit of 1 / 4000.rn |
| sent on October 14, 2014 Pros: among others: the quality of the files, especially in BN; held at high ISO; viewfinder that resembles a large format. Cons: the advantage of having many physical controls available, makes you forget the role we have assigned to a particular key. Opinion: I bought the XE1 to enter the world fuji coming from a canon 5D with 24105-100 2.8 Macro IS - 16 35 4 IS.rnCon the addition of xt1 the decision to sell the kit Canon was reasoned but serene. I often use old manual lenses and the focus has never been so easy (broken image). rn |
 | sent on September 24, 2014 Pros: Sensor fantastic range very high ISO and noise management at large, excellent menu functions, the useful swiveling display and the viewfinder with digital indicator of proximity and integrated virtual horizon, vintage excellent controls, great weight and strength. Cons: Battery not excellent, keys (arrows) on the menu too little protruding then are pressed strongly, optional accessories far too expensive. Opinion: Fantastic camera, the sensor is Awesome! Excellent dynamic range and with a range of high ISO, as well as excellent noise management tnato from us personally done a comparative test with the D3s and I have to say that the two rooms were head head up to ISO4000 / 6400 (depends on the situation). rnIl weight is great, it is very lightweight and compact, it holds very well even though those accustomed to large SLR will definitely make a bit of trouble early tempi.rnIl 18-55 kit is not exactly the best, it is a good lens at both optical and constructive, even being a very fast 18mm f / 2.8, but also 55mm on APS-C are not many, in fact I was already thinking about the exchange rate with the 18- 135mm that could be a great tuttofare.rnNon excellent battery life, of course you have to consider that there is always at least one display access during the long exposures, the display is always on, but disabling some features like Noise Reduction, etc. can be resparmiare battery overcharge and especially much less processor could sfuttare the X-T1 for timelapse without straining it troppo.rnOttimo autofocus, fast and accurate, definitely improved, but we can not complain, we say that is very good for a wide range of applicazioni.rnIn ultimately a mirrorless excellent quality that could seriously take the place of some relfex in the kit because of its great quality! |
user26730 | sent on June 25, 2014 Pros: A lot! Cons: Battery Life Opinion: I decided to change the system after thinking long and documented myself a lot. I come from more than 20 years of Canon and a lot 'of optical series L.rnQuesta X-T1 does not make me regret absolutely nothing of what I leave on the shelf! The Fuji machine is appreciated at first sight for ergonomics, compactness and lightness. Then using it and learning it is appreciated for a lot of things. Amazing image quality (I use the 23 and 35 f1, 4) management and high ISO that until yesterday with the 5D mark II and 7D with me dreaming! In 3200 with the Fuji seems to shoot with the 5DII 800. The menu is rich and allows you to do a lot of things. The EVF and stratospheric and shows you how it will be inquadri even as your photo, then setting everything properly the X-T1 produces files that you do not need any kind of post-production. The cutting can be done in the car! Here, then, that no more shooting in RAW, so here it also decreases the weight of the storage memory and everything becomes faster and more enjoyable. I'm going to giro with a high quality machine and two lenses of the highest level, taking with me only a pound of stuff! RNLA ability to connect to the machine via wi-fi to iPad or smart phone may seem rather frivolous and useful on many occasions. Type in uncomfortable positions where the car is on the ground or in the studio where the positions on the stand and immediately see the result of your work and decide immediately what to save, what to import and what and to whom to send the photo! RnCome already mentioned, the only Neo and I find that the battery life but having a spare on hand everything risole.rnNel field of APS-C you can certainly find cheaper machines of this but certainly not performing too! rnConsigliatissima |
 | sent on June 05, 2014 Pros: wifi light and tropical, great for travel and street copagna I sold the lenses canon 24-70 f 2.8 70-200 f 4e 5dmrkIII only use the more 'with the 300 f 2.8 and 2x doubler as possible with as autofocus for wildlife (tracking animals and birds) we have not yet meVeramnete for a product level Cons: none for the moment I have a very short then we'll see Opinion: I'm getting good at first glance but the optical viewfinder gave me some problems especially in shortage 'of light rnottima yield at high iso proven in church and at high iso and' some astonishing with this machine I am 're shooting in jpg, never done before .. big difference from the material previously ... the weight ..... at the end of the day I no longer 'backache rnrn1 5D kg 1 kg 1.5 kg 70-200 24-70's a big difference ... |
| sent on May 19, 2014 Pros: Tropicalization; wifi; evf; tilt monitor; held high iso, ergonomics Cons: I have not yet found Opinion: I had the X-PRO1 and, I must say that this has significant improvements. First, the weather sealing, precision and focus speed is comparable to that of my Nikon D700, only for the Continuous AF must be careful to configure from the Shooting menu option PRE-AF for optimum operation. The WiFi module works well and allows, with the Camera Remote application to interact with the camera changing any shutter speed, ISO and aperture. In comparison to the X-PRO1 the ignition control has a mechanical movement more precise and less soft so it is more difficult to occur accidentally switching on the camera. In addition, the battery life has improved notevolmente.Le upper rings are easily maneuverable. Overall, I think, for the moment, satisfied |
| sent on May 03, 2014 Pros: evf, precision autofocus, ergonomics, held at high ISO Cons: small buttons on the joypad, f continuous improvement Opinion: I made the switch from eos 1dIII to this body, for the most lightness and portability while traveling, do not regret it, this is the premise, now my opinion, well-built ergonomic body, all the buttons and dials are located immediately except small buttons on the joypad that my fingers do not own a goldsmith I have some difficulties to find and crush without looking, excellent viewfinder in all situations, monitor adjustable comfortable and usable, great burst, continuous autofocus is not very precise but definitely improved via firmware , single responsive and accurate autofocus, manual focus is so well attended that focus peaking with a broken image, my camera body does not have infiltration problems luminose.wi fi convenient not only to download photos but also to take into remote fly in the ointment is not does decide the times bulb and then therefore requires external remote control, if you add this function is perfect. battery if used wisely allowed me 1043 shots in RAW in the theater, then good for me. |
 | sent on April 09, 2014 Pros: EVF spectacular AF responsive and reliable enough, dials and buttons in the right places, good high ISO performance, excellent ergonomics and materials, wi-fi (remote control from your smartphone is fabulous!) Cons: 4-way pad keys are too small and not very "sensitive"; ring EV + / - diopter adjustment and poorly placed; Firmware still immature; battery not lasting; jpg mixed in fine detail (so-called effect "watercolor); lack of a touch screen, which would have eased a lot of some operations Opinion: Ordered before the exit, I arrived at the beginning of March, with the 18-55mm kit F/2.8-4. I used only about ten days, after which it went into service for the problem of the "leak", ie the entry of light on the sensor with the door left aperto.rnMi immediately gave a great feeling, well made, responsive , and once metabolized small flaws / little choices intuitive menus, quite straightforward to use. But in all honesty I have to say did not fire the shot that fulmine.rnrnPremetto is my first and the very first mirrorless Fujifilm, so the lack of feeling may be due to the fact it takes time to break a bit 'longer for someone like me that in the last ten years he has only used SLR (both analog and digital), but at the time I was not convinced totalmente.rnrnAlcuni details then I have made up their noses: the ring of the exposure is not "drowned" in the upper frame, as in previous models, so it tends to be moved inadvertently and partially hinders the p8selettore DRIVE, left) and the exposure metering mode (switch right) tend to move often, during transport and use, so we need to keep an eye often. RnrnSegnalo Finally, the aperture ring on the zoom kit, the 18-55 is too "soft" and is positioned as it is easy to accidentally rotate during use. rnrnIn general, the user experience is positive, but for a more in-depth look judgment to come back from ' assistance, when I will use it with the 14mm and the 23mm, which I plan to buy soon. Only then I can give a definitive judgment, which for now is positive but with some reservations. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
