JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lightweight, af, wr, quiet, ois, cost, overall quality
Cons:Lens correction, good sharpness but not at the top
Opinion:Very functional lens that if you think of multiplying it with a TC you will have a slight decrease in non-stellar sharpness on the maximum focal lengths, so it is useless to talk again about why not multiply it. Excellent lens in general, better can not be found as a curve mtf on 70-300 in general, I took it to relax with my Weimaraner, photos always in focus with Xt3 and af small area setting the af on the front displacement, the only flaw that when I see the images rich in detail almost medium format of the 56 wr and 23 wr, I see the images produced by this lens and then I remain bad, the 50-140 too heavy and impossible in the movement while you have to be agile to understand the behavior of the dynamic action and all in all so I stop at 70-300 without big pretensions. Lens above average but not spatial, rating 9.4
Cons:Sharpness towards 300. Not suitable for those who love the detail of distant subjects.
Opinion:I took it used as a whim even knowing that I would use it little because it is not suitable for what I photograph (street-urban). Excellent sharpness except in the last 50 mm where it loses. Photos taken at 300mm. they are not croppable that much. This in my opinion makes it a lens not too suitable for those looking for detail from afar. I gave it away because I shoot mainly between 18 and 60 mm (in aps-c) and I would have used it almost nothing.
Pros:Very light, very good AF, WR, price and many others
Cons:When extended to 300 it is ugly to see
Opinion:Purchased at the end of 2021 and used a lot because in addition to being light it is also sharp with fast AF with the X-T3 but much faster AF on the X-E4, on the latter it clearly unbalances a little. The X-T3 hooks in single AF very well but X-E4 hooks well even in continuous AF. Clearly with the T3 seen the WR of both you go safer in situations of rain and dust. The optical quality surprised me in a positive way and the blurred, while not being like the 50-140 2.8, is very good. Recommended purchase also for the low price.
user63757
sent on August 07, 2021
Pros:A lot of Pro +++++, So much sharpness to give, Rings, AF, Stabilizer, WR gasket for dust and humidity, light but excellent construction, excellent internal profile corrections.
Cons:Not negative only an observation the AF low light but physiological limit, chromatic aberrations at focal length 300 mm nothing dramatic, focal angles 300 mm but seen zoom extension still excellent. A lens not suitable to have the best possible bokeh I would say normal for such an extended zoom.
Opinion:Or bought yesterday Friday on 06.08.2021 this optics 70-300. Really was a nice surprise for me. I had as tele zoom twice the 55-200 the 50-230 and the 50-140. For me the absolute best tele zoom tried ok for what concerns the phenomenal 50-140 with ultra fast AF but or criticized the weight of this lens and I do not even feel so much the lack of this lens. The 70-300 really built very well I also find rings ok the sharpness and stabilizer I just have to say exceed my expectations. Do I have to reflect what can be negative about this perspective? I can only think of the AF with low light but I do not find it physiological negative then sufficient if someone is not satisfied set the AF on Multi Zone. Definitely not a lens for sports action I recommend them go on the zoom 50-140. For portrait not the right optics bokeh better than the Fuji 90 2.0. The stabilizer comes to new records tested with Fuji X-H1 and X-T4 stabilized sensor plus lens stabilizer makes a winning weapon. I find the performance and price ratio really very high kudos Fuji to did a great job. If you buy this lens and don't need large apertures and super fast AF and bokeh cutting edge theme can be nature photos, macros, travel, architecture then this 70-300 we recommend does the same job as a zoom 50-140 sharpness with the advantage comes to focal length 300 mm more super stabilized with the Fuji X-T4 a dream realized.
Pros:Compactness, phenomenal stabilization, weight, focus distance, tropicalization, price, possibility of using focal multipliers
Cons:Lens hood, zoom stroke too hard, aperture ring too soft
Opinion:Well-conceived lens, I bought it as a replacement for the 50-230 splendid lens that gave me many satisfactions but I needed those 100mm more. Top construction, weight greater than the xc but still very contained. Very close focus distance allows you to take pictures of fleeting insects (bees, butterflies etc ...) while maintaining a respectable distance. It is tropicalized, admits multipliers (I hope to try them soon), Fast Af and rarely reed, the stabilizer is a bomb! It shoots at 1/20 freehand at 300mm... I do not think we can do any better! The price in relation to the quality is correct but I'm sure that with time it will settle on 750 €, I L took it to 850 €.... On the cons I could L emphasis on the hardness of the zoom in my opinion excessive, the manual focus and the aperture ring, on the other hand, are too soft, this feature can give boredom in some cases. The lens hood is too bulky if mounted on the contrary does not allow you to use the zoom and is plastic. For a sporting use (trekking, hiking, tourism or sport if not excessively far from the subjects) it is a bomb!!!
Opinion:the apsc format with this lens expresses its incredible compactness. a 100-450 that does not disappoint. Only attention from 200 to 300 mm preferable to use times from .60 and up, at least on xt3. With stabilized sensor I do not know. Optics that will maintain an excellent value over time, I'm sure, it will hardly fall in the second-hand market below 500 euros.
Pros:Small size and weight, good sharpness, fast and quiet AF, zoom lock button, stabilizer
Cons:It is well built but the plastics do not seem to me like other Fuji lenses, the lampshed is very plastic and some compromises have to be accepted; absence of stabilizer selector.
Opinion:Praise Fuji for this compact, well-built and lightweight lens. In combination with the 1.4x tc it is possible to have an equivalent 520mm (630mm with the sensor crop factor), with maximum compactness and transportability. I like the lock button to stop zooming and prevent it from extending when we transport the camera, I like tropicalization, I like the stabilizer and I like the optical scheme that allows you to get good blurry and use the lens even as a macro, given the reduced minimum focus distance. Good sharpness and color rendering. I do not like the absence of the sector of activation /deactivation of the stabilizer on the barrel and I do not like some plastics, not at the top, and above all that of the lampshed that is of a poor level, not to say chinese. The AF works well and is fast, however coupled with the 1.4x TC it seemed to me that it slows down slightly more than with fuji 100-400mm... Future firmware will probably improve it. The best yield comes between f8 and f11. Present on some focal lengths and at certain openings, distortion, vignetting and aberration, all phenomena that, however, arise to a limited extent and not such as to compromise the final result.
Pros:Weight and footprint. Quiet and fast autofocus. Stabilization. Optical quality and macro capacity.
Cons:I have to concentrate: movement of the barrel in strong extension and slight vignetting at the maximum opening.
Opinion:Since I took it, I've had a hard time removing it from the body of the machine. It has a magnification power that always amazes me and is fun for its ability to "rummage" everywhere, detaching the subject that interests me from everything else. The macro capacity was a welcome surprise, making it really a handyman despite the pushes: in addition to photographic hunting, macro, certain street, particular portraits, landscape with strong perspectives. It is also surprising that the price is not exaggerated, especially in comparison with the competition. For optical qualities I can say that also thanks to the really effective stabilization (last night I took a freehand photo at night and when I looked at it on the PC I saw that it was practically free from motion despite having been taken at 200 mm. and a tenth of a second - the images are always sharp in relation to their category , without, of course, achieving the definition of fixed assets. I noticed minimal vignetting in T.A., few color fringes and little disturbance from a strong light in the field. Non-perceptible deformations. At f:11 begins the diffraction that makes you avoid more closed diaphragms. Best diaphragms 5.6 and 8 to 70 mm. and 8-11 to 300 mm. A very fun lens and that, despite the focal point, it is quite possible to take with you effortlessly; I don't know how many kits allow this with a 460 mm. Equivalent...
Pros:Lightweight, handy, crisp, excellent color yield, excellent zoom sliding and clutch
Cons:Nothing, that he found
Opinion:I'm sorry the few photos I could take are limited to buildings in my street. The pictured church is about 400 meters away while the group of houses is about two kilometers away. Having received it yesterday and not being able to move from home I couldn't resist taking a few shots with the X-T4 at 200 ISO and fire 8. It is true, they are photos of no value, but they give a clear idea of the quality of the goal. The realization is perfect, everything works wonderfully, the stabilization, the sliding of the zoomed, the light but very valid light light. I hope as soon as possible to take photos more in line with the quality of the goal, paid 798 Euros, new to pat.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
