JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Quality of image in relation to the offer of competition for the price range. Lightness.
Cons:Very dark. It's an XC, a lot of plastic and it lacks the diaphragms selector.
Opinion:Arriving from zoom kits from other builders I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of the image. The sharpness drops significantly, moving towards 230 mm, while remaining at excellent levels. It is practically unusable indoors because it is too dark, but when used outdoors with daylight it can offer satisfaction. It is located at great price (also new). Unfortunately fuji alternatives are very expensive, so it's the only choice if you're on a tight budget.
Pros:optical quality in relation to price - lightness compared to the focal
Cons:lack of the diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm - breath of air -- dark -- autofocus
Opinion:It is true that with little expense you take home a zoom tele with optical quality of respect, but you have to be aware of the compromises that you go to meet. Inside at 230mm does not focus! Aside from focusing manually, you can use the trick to focus at 50mm and then zoom in: usually (not always) it manages to get the fire right. Otherwise endless hunting, erroneous focus, impossible focus: for close-ups in the interior I would say that is not the right goal. I count on the outdoors, but also to shoot safaris and birds in flight you need good autofocus performance. In addition, it puffs air from the viewfinder (directly into the eye) when zooming out and forces you to use the bad front wheel (X-T30) if you want to adjust the diaphragm.
Cons:Sense of fragility, but due more than anything to lightness.
Opinion:I bought this lens for a few months and I have to say that it is a lot of fun. Paid only .150 new. For those who do not want to spend much and have a very good zoom optics, this is the right choice. Especially for those who don't have this type of photo as a priority. The f6.7 is not a problem by raising the iso, now most mirrorless keeps the noise well at least up to 6400. I took some pictures of flowers with the wind moving them and they came out sharp thanks to the stabilization. I also really like blurry, certainly not at the level of other zooms, but much more expensive. Recommended.
Pros:Lightness, sharpness, stabilizer, fantastic value for money
Cons:Lack of diaphragm diaphragms
Opinion:I can only spend positive words for this economic objective, but with surprising results. The build quality, although almost all plastic, is on high levels, as always in the house Fuji.Ne certainly benefits the weight, really small, does not even seem to have in hand a focal lens equivalent of 345mm. The sharpness is great, in line with other more ephaly ephaled Fuji lenses, even at full-opening it offers more than acceptable results and a pleasant blur. The stabilizer allows you to shoot up to 1/80-1/60 even at the maximum range of 230 mm. If you do not want to spend too much, maybe for those like me who make tele a sporadic use, it is an absolutely recommended goal, used species that is about 150 euros. Rating 9.5/10.
Cons:Diaphragm selectable only by camera, a little too plastic (but then it would be heavier), relatively dark.
Opinion:I'm using it with my son's X-T1, which paid him off at 149 euros. I was surprised by the speed and precision of the AF in good light conditions while in the dark or with little light it struggles a little and it is preferable to sevelare by hand. Even for close-up the hand sealing is better than the automatic one, at least on the X-T1. Excellent stabilization: I made perfectly focused and sharp shots at maximum focal (230 mm. equivalent to about 350 mm. on f.f.) freehand with crazy times of 1/52 degrees, 1/46 degrees and even 1/42 degrees, but normally you get good freehand photos with crazy times of 1/52 degrees, 1/46 degrees and even 1/42 degrees, but normally you get good freehand photos with crazy times of 1/52 degrees, 1/46 degrees and even 1/42 degrees, but normally you get good freehand photos with crazy times of 1/52 degrees, 1/46 degrees and even 1/42 degrees, but normally you get good freehand photos with crazy times of 1/52 degrees, 1/46 degrees and even 1/42 degrees, but normally you get good freehand photos with crazy times of 1/52 degrees, 1/46 degrees and even 1/42 degrees, but normally you get good freehand photos with crazy times of 1/52 up to 1/125 degrees without having to hold your breath. The yield, in terms of sharpness is very good, especially from f. 8 to f. 16 while at T.A. I could notice a slight drop of light at the edges of the frame. Maybe it's a little dark, but it's not an obvious flaw because the viewfinder and mirrorless monitor return an adequate view (mounted on a reflex you would notice). In conclusion, I can say that I would not have expected such a good optical performance from such an economic objective.
Opinion:I state that I paid again about 160 euros, having bought a XT3 with 18/55 2.8 and so I wanted a Telezoom a little more pushed. Honestly I did not expect so much surrender with so little expense. At the moment I am satisfied with everything. Of course, in low light, it's a little bit, but the stabilizer does its job great. I will never sell it!
Cons:Management colors and contrast, brightness, building, allungamneto barrel.
Opinion:I begin by saying that it paid very little, new with guarantee of course; gray in color and with original box is not, however, a price that satisfied me fully. rnPremesso then that is worth more than it costs, I can say that optically worked just fine in nearly all focal lengths; I noticed a loss of sharpness particularly when climbing almost to the limit of the focal zoom. Probably not too inferior to optical optically excellent as is the 55-200, and given the low cost can satisfy many users. RNLA construction is obviously plasticky and barrel that comes out while zooming is anything but beautiful and comfortable, but the only problems that I feel I indicate to him in color rendering and shadows that under certain conditions find absolutely unsatisfactory and difficult to machine also in post. still speak of an about 15% of the shots I effetuato us and are a relatively low percentage. RNE 'true then that the lens is a bit' dark sabilizzatore though it almost always works to the great kingndendo little problematic shots even at times not quite "shipped." Overall it is a lens that must be taken for what it is, a lens that can really give you great satisfaction in relation to the price that I recommend to all those who make sporadic use of tele. rnHo added ultimately the 0.2x zoom ratio which is the largest of the three zoom 50-140, 55-200, 50-230 and allows anyway to experience a bit '.
Pros:Sharpness, light stabilizer, value for '/ great price
Cons:plasticky construction, dim
Opinion:I bought this lens for about two months and I must say that I am thrilled .rnPagata new € 190 worth much more 'than it costs, has an excellent sharpness, is very light and has a very good stabilizer, I performed at the first shots / 13 to 230 mm without any sign of mosso.rnNon has the aperture ring, but can be adjusted with the wheel, and 'little light, but with Fuji raise his asa is not a problema.rnSicuramente the 55-200 has something in more ', but it costs three times and weighs twice .... it's worth it? rnSoddisfattissimo purchase recommend it to all who want to take good pictures without fainting, considering the price it deserves a 10.
Pros:Sharpness and quality of color reproduction, good stabilizer and autofocus
Cons:slightly dark
Opinion:I purchased this light to match it to an X-E2, I chose the zoom tele less expensive both to complete the kit is because for my kind of photos do not often use the tele. I must say that from the first test shots show an optical quality that surprised me is the clarity, both for color fidelity. Even the built-in autofocus and stabilizer do not disappoint. Does not have the build quality of the more expensive big brother but also has a weight and greater portability and is at a price that is 1/3 of the older brother, and after all the final quality is not bad. Then some adjustment in less kind lack of aperture ring and the ability to disable the stabilizer only menu. Brightness is undoubtedly its weak point but when you consider that with the X-Trans sensor you can get detailed photos and clean even at high ISO, it can be assumed that the quality of the sensor at high ISO allows me to recover 1 or 2 stop in less than luminosity. Be highly recommended to those who want to approach the Fuji system without fainting.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
