RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Fujifilm X-Pro2 : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this camera.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Fujifilm X-Pro2)


What do you think about this camera?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on May 01, 2023

Pros: Aesthetics, robustness, image quality

Cons: Delicate viewfinder rubber, non-swivel LCD.

Opinion: One of the last cameras before Fujifilm's minimalist turn. It has everything you need in the right place, practically perfect. Machine body of exceptional quality, MADE IN JAPAN, solid, ergonomic, shame about the rubber shell of the viewfinder that tends to detach if not to crumble ... I have some spare ones that sometimes I have to replace ... The image quality is typical of the XTrans family to which it belongs... It's maybe my favorite, and if only they had updated the simulations, it would have been a perfect camera.... The buttons are many and all in the right place. The thing I find annoying (perhaps the only one) is that during the review of the photos, a zoom like the 15-45 retracts, I honestly do not understand why... wasting time and consuming battery. All in all it is the only nonsense that I would like to report, for the rest I think it is an excellent machine in everything, from the yield to the hybrid viewfinder, from the positioning of the keys to the double slot ... You couldn't want more. The viewfinder is in my opinion exceptional... I did not imagine it could be so well studied, even considering the age of the project. Too bad that in EVF mode it is not so performing, but in the few cases where I need it (with ultra wide angle and with telecommunications), I do not feel like complaining about it.

avatarsenior
sent on February 22, 2023

Pros: The best xpro, detach the xpro3

Cons: extremely delicate finish, viewfinder that crumbles even just to see it, software deliberately castrated by Fuji

Opinion: A beautiful machine, which could have been serenely a definitive machine if Fuji had not decided to abandon the idea of Kaizen of some time ago. Abandoned and deliberately castrated in functionality, simply inserted through updates, but never done. There are no film simulations, no color temperature management features, so many things are missing... But the body is perfect: full of keys, all reachable, and so solid! See for yourself the difference in construction between the xpro2 and the xpro3, find an extremely clear video on youtube. Every door, every button, every bezel, is all GRANITIC. The shutter itself clicks with a sound of a beauty that today I struggle to remember in other machines. Unfortunately, however, a GORGEOUS body has been weakened by a ridiculous viewfinder coating, which crumbles after a thousand shots, and is not even replaceable. Or rather, it is but through the use of cyanoacrylic glue, because making an interlocking system would have been too simple, so no! In fact, the ones you will find for sale will all have no eyepiece covering, and it is quite inconvenient to use. At the time I replaced it myself, but still a rough solution, clearly crouched. For the rest, note how the xpro2 also mounts the best optical viewfinder produced by Fuji, with the best magnification ratio, higher than that of the xpro3 (why remains a mystery). Digital viewfinder instead not excellent, but I do not see why use it sincerely ... Without dwelling on the machine, if you have the opportunity to try it do it because today it is the best Fuji interchangeable optics for NON-professionals (but if you want given the double slot you can also use it for something serious), and for film simulations just set in the name the values to be entered in the color temperature, and you can bypass the SHAME that fuji has not added through software update the ability to tie color temperature values to the various custom settings (something present on newer and low-end bodies for other ). At the right price it can be a nice toy to keep. I much preferred it to xpro3, incredible chip...

avatarjunior
sent on January 20, 2022

Pros: Jpeg/raw quality, perfect colors, discreet in size, high iso seal, operating speed, buttons always in the right place, philosophy of use, waterproofing

Cons: Beautiful optical viewfinder, great fujifilm for demonstrating this technology.. but for what purpose? it is useless; sometimes slowness in afc, but maybe it's me who does not know how to calibrate it well

Opinion: I have been using sony a7 various for years, but I have always had the monkey for this body, so compact and discreet, so I took it together with the 23 f2. Coming from the color science of sony I found in my hands a jewel, fantastic colors and with great space for customization, in terms of emulations. 90% of cases I keep and use jpegs directly with few adjustments, I have almost never used raw, just because I find jpegs of a quality and with colors that is difficult to find on other systems. I was amazed by the yield at high iso, an apsc that holds well the 12800 is rare, as well as it is fantastic not to have chromatic noise but only full-bodied grain that most of the time is also pleasant and does not need to be removed. Despite being a parallelepiped it is not inconvenient to use and the keys are put in the right place, but there is also the possibility of customizing a lot. Optical viewfinder you know, useless but great technological demonstration, I used it only to make pride of this jewel. Waterproofness: I had an accident with this car, I fell into an icy puddle in the high mountains, the car fell 2 times into the icy water, it was slammed (it was more important to save your skin) on the snow several times, it remained about half an hour between water and frozen snow, but nothing, it still works perfectly, great hold. I will hardly change it, except to try the xpro3.

avatarsupporter
sent on February 09, 2021

Pros: Waterproofness, quality of JPEG and RAW files, rings, held to high ISO, ease of use, his poetry.

Cons: Image stabilizer (although this is subjective anyway). The iso ring that anyway for moments where you have to be faster, slows you down a little.

Opinion: What about... I love her. I fell in love with her a couple of years ago (having never tried her). I have a mostly Sony kit but you know, the monkey when it comes only leaves when you buy... So, as an additional gift for my passion I took the XT2 at the time (sold after a few months and not because I didn't like it, but because it was the most expendable in my kit to have other work optics). After that, not knowing how to give up fuji files, I took the x100F... But the XPro ball was always there.... So, after a moment of madness, I gave away my Fujina... She switched to the Pro2 with the 23 2.0 kit. Graphyte model. What about... The other night at a photo shoot, I posed for my Sony and only snapped with her. And not because I compare the two machines. I wouldn't even think about it.. but for his poetry. It gives me incredible files even at high ISOs. I was amazed when I took at 12800 ISO and the photo was very used (I published it here too). I got the focus wrong, but other than that, I wanted to publish it to show its high quality even in very bad conditions. Fuji colors are amazing... I can't even describe them: they're poetry. Something full-bodied that when you look at a photo you feel like you've been touching it since it's full-bodied. I like it! As an AF I did not find any kind of problem but for this I want to test it better to be able to say something more. I thought I'd keep it as a machine/hobby... But I'm actually going to support it with my work machines without any kind of problem, from weddings, shootings as well as my free time.

avatarjunior
sent on July 30, 2020

Pros: it is the most beautiful camera made recently (aesthetically) and a great machine throughout.

Cons: cool but useless optical viewfinder.

Opinion: Crazy. I took this machine to flank the xt2 6 months ago for the 2020 season in place of the x100f. Machine that I wouldn't know what to add except fantastic. really recommended to those who want to be a photographer a little less to those who also want to make videos because then the xt2 is better. Crazy files like that I've already written for the xt2 and the xe3. Here maybe I expected a little more from the buffer.

avatarjunior
sent on January 22, 2020

Pros: ISO estate, constructive solidity, retro aesthetic

Cons: Optical sight, non-orientable display, ISO dial

Opinion: A machine that I have owned for a few months now, and that I use mainly with vintage optics or with the 27mm XF f2.8; I get to say one thing right away: it's a flagship, and you can see and feel it in every detail. Although exceptional machine, it is not immune to some defect, or at least for those who write; In detail: 1) viewfinder, cute and definitely of wow effect, but then in everyday use? With tele optics?! Practically useless. Great only for street/landscapes/grandangles. 2) a little slow at times, I can not say that it has inputs, but for sure, it does not always maintain the same fluidity (quiet ly have always used it in high-performance); 3) the quick menu often makes you inadvertently set the automatic bkt, big break that there is no option off; just navigate the menu, hover over it, and zac! You find it activated. Fujifilm wake up!! Otherwise it is an ESPERTMACHINE machine, when you hold it in your hand (and it is not true that it has grip problems, and I have big hands) you immediately feel that you have a machine, a solid and reliable tool. The ISO estate is then something exceptional, it looks endless without any kind of noise, even above 11,000 ISO there is a very light grain but very very pleasant. The jpg files, are the usual and famous jpeg Fujifilm house, beautiful and ready-made in 80% of cases. To conclude, if you do street, reportage and landscape, I recommend it with my eyes closed.

avatarjunior
sent on December 29, 2019

Pros: Hybrid sight, tropicalization, ergonomics, speed.

Cons: Prohibitive eyepoint with glasses. Shutter dial block button in "A" mode.

Opinion: I used, for work and pleasure, many analog and digital cameras. From medium format (Hasselblad and Mamiya) to 35mm (Nikon F3, Fm2, d300, d700... etc). I believe that the Fuji system and, in particular, its cameras with decentralized viewfinder are, for those with the dominant right eye, the non plus ultra for street photography. They are: light, ergonomic (especially for those who come from the analog cameras of the time), discreet and with an excellent image quality (both in color and in b/n). The x-pro2 has all the keys in the right place, a fast and precise AF and a "one and three" crosshairs, really extraordinary. It's the best of itself in pairs with fixed optics (from 18mm to 35mm). 2 weights to improve: 1) really reduced eyepoint (problematic for those who use glasses) 2) the superfluous shutter key pad in automatic mode, which greatly slows the transition to normal shooting times.

avatarjunior
sent on April 08, 2018

Pros: AF, iso, color range, weather sealed body, weight, viewfinder, jpg and raw.

Cons: Maybe the price ...

Opinion: I decided to write my first review after years of study and tests made on almost 10 models feel former House canon. I made my choice to sell everything the kit a week ago (I used to buy a X 100 I was amazed at the color range and compactness). I had already tested the system Fuji x, which I have always felt great and versatile. The choice was made for a very simple reason ... photographic journey-7D2-300 2.8-17/40 .... the trip gave me a lot of satisfaction but also a great photographic backache. Back I tested for a week (through a friend) the xpro1 and it was love at first sight (target:).) Great detail, great viewfinder, great system, but above all great lenses (I tried it with the 35 1.4 and 100-400). I then sold all the much-loved 35 mm canon Kit for a 18-55 and Xpro2 ... Finally I can go everywhere without thinking about space, extra luggage, or various trucks ... so I changed my way of photographing with this system. Body talking I particularly appreciate the foresight and the ability to customize almost all commands. The estate of 5000 iso are easily usable and above all the JPEGs that shoots out, with a little care while shooting pretty much are already usable and Hello to the many changes of the raw of my 7d2 ... recommend it to anyone who is undecided about trying to realize the idea.

user81826
avatarsenior
sent on July 01, 2017

Pros: Building with numerous seals to withstand dust and weather as well as a typical operating temperature range of the machines good form factor that improves the portability, aesthetics, perfect grip for lenses like the 16 f/1.4 , continuous firmware updates, numerous goodies programmable up to 15 times software like minutes, making remote remotes that are no longer needed, signalling lights burned in RGB, AF pretty quick and reliable in all room types, functions essential software all present unlike other brands, we speak for example of intervalometer which among other things automatic delay calculation, face recognition AF, dual SD slots, EVF responsive, quality raw and well managed with good range Dynamics and low chroma noise, LCD very good also for when working under the Sun, simple and intuitive menus, rings that allow you to manage the settings even when the machine is off, very lightweight and compact optics ecosystem with all weight advantages arising from the need for smaller backpack and tripod, white balance of extreme reliability, simulation film and managing jpg in the room really useful and well made, possibility of transmitting to the smartphone the jpg to instantly, the brand's service a bit slow but reliable and with good communication.

Cons: Battery a little limited to me is not a problem but it could be improved upon, optical viewfinder fun but not very useful (for me at least), AF as mentioned very good though a step behind the competition Sony, who give the best of themselves with specific software as X-Transformer or Capture One, third-party lenses with AF that at the beginning of 2018 is still limited, not compensation ring using optical tele still very limited, no tilting LCD or rotatable, viewfinder not as large as that of Q2/H1, firmware updates slightly limited compared to those of sister T2, big devaluation in used especially in the first two years, so much that I recommend to anyone to wait at least a few months before getting a new model.

Opinion: I use it now for a couple of years and in hindsight, although on paper maybe there would have been more logical choices, absolutely do not regret the purchase. The things I liked least are:-some limitations compared to T2, finesse more than anything else, except for the tilting screen; -optical viewfinder which for me has been more a curiosity than a real alternative to the electronic viewfinder; -large devaluation than other brands. Things I liked: there are so many; a camera with a capital which has so much to offer and effe that gives an experience of use, in itself and in its system, which few others can afford, not to mention that in my opinion also remains one of the most beautiful on the market.

avatarjunior
sent on January 09, 2017

Pros: Body vintage (who likes) quality of the files, excellent high ISO held until 8000, simulation films and B / w.

Cons: smaller viewfinder than xt series, ISO ring absolutely put option with a front bezel.

Opinion: I was not love at first sight so nn I found myself for the ergonomics, for the small viewfinder and decentralized, nn I like the optical viewfinder because you see in 99% of cases the objective in 'framing. so I decided to move to xt2 and are aware of having maintained the same excellent quality of the files, especially in jpeg but I regained the confidence in shooting thanks to a large and central viewfinder and ISO auna ring and self-locking as well as that of the times.

avatarsenior
sent on January 03, 2017

Pros: rugged construction, portability, quality of the files, the viewfinder

Cons: poor battery life

Opinion: The own for almost a year and use, along with a EX2s, almost exclusively for travel reportage, urban landscape and street, only with fixed lenses (16,23,35,56mm). For the natural landscape, however, I prefer to use my Nikon Df, which I think I ensure wider tonal gradations and delicate shades and, in general, cleaner files. Fuji X-Pro2 is a very robust and solid machine, precise, easy to use and highly customizable (once you understand all the functions provided in the menu). With his bright optical viewfinder Frames (excludable when you want an electronic style vision) is very reminiscent of Leica, even if the manufacturer has chosen not to emulate the proverbial simplicity and practicality, providing a flood of electronic functions which may initially scare. In fact, once you make your own choices, everything becomes simple and use this device becomes easy and very profitable, given the extreme overall quality of the files, which helps the extraordinary resto the fixed optical mentioned above. Contrary to what has been said by others, I prefer to use it only shooting in RAW and then developing the files with PN and LR. Although the greatest number and thus the smaller the pixels, finally, I did not notice, at least up to 3200 ISO, more noise with respect to the sensor EX2s.rn rn

avatarjunior
sent on November 14, 2016

Pros: beautiful, super commands easy to find, nice viewfinder, it holds up very well in hand

Cons: high price

Opinion: I just picked up this machine I immediately had a good feeling, which I do not happen with sony a6000, if they did an x-pro2 full frame would take it on the fly, we hope we think, sin does not have the reclining rear display, aftertaste very apt also the button to switch from the rear display to the very intelligent viewfinder, sony has developed a sensor that consumes the battery in no time!

avatarsenior
sent on October 05, 2016

Pros: HVF, layout of controls, the file quality and ease of use

Cons: EVF "smallest" of the series xt

Opinion: Ok, the ISO dial can be strange or uncomfortable for those who are not from the film, but in fact is perfectly in line with the design and functional choices fuji.rnNonostante have x-t1, t2-x, and x-pro, the latter it is undoubtedly my favorite if I go out for pleasure or fun. Unlike x-t2 which is a means of prissy and hyper practical work, the x-Pro is the perfect tool for an experienced photographer looking for an entertainment and amusement in his passione.rnTutta the machine is built to last and transmit a feeling back that you can not fail to appreciate. The functions are all there, maybe less accessible than in the x-t2, but all are customizable. RNLA quality of files then combined with fixed ob as the 35 1.4 is extraordinary. With HVF and a pair of fixed stock exchange it becomes the fuji more fun and rewarding.

avatarjunior
sent on October 05, 2016

Pros: Jpeg fabulous, weather sealed body, fast AF

Cons: price, reclining display, iso ring

Opinion: I come from XE1 and x100t, this is another planet, in every respect, has a casino functions, but the thing that most impressed me is the AF, compared to the other that is really responsive. I do not know if suitable for sports or nature photography since genera are not practical, but it's really veloce.rnPerò at a price so high, the display must be reclining, there is nothing to do, is a handy accessory in many cases. The iso ring is uncomfortable, aesthetically beautiful but uncomfortable, a dedicated wheel would be more appropriate and more practical. The jpeg is the usual wonder fuji, perfect as it comes out of the car, never from this point of view I'm biased, I love fuji. I personally recommend it.

avatarsenior
sent on September 07, 2016

Pros: Image quality, Jpeg Room, construction, ERF (Optical + Digital), Film Simulation, Black and White Room, Double SD slot

Cons: Ergonomics (enhanced with half Gariz houses), sometimes the EVF digital viewfinder has some delays, excessive heat dissipation in High Performance, Price

Opinion: This X-Pro2 is the machine that raises the bar in the house Fujifilm. And 'it improved in many aspects, reactivity, AF, construction, dual SD slot. It 'fun to use and the optical Fujifilm you can really get the highest quality photos. E 'portable and charming in its own style. Pros and cons I have already written them. In my humble opinion I find the price too if you think that with a few hundred euro more you can have a Nikon or Canon full frame. It 'a specialized machine though ... and then or you hate it or you love it. Another small flaw is the heat dissipated in High Performance. I'm curious to try the new NP-W126 S batteries that should (theoretically) solve the problem. In conclusion I am very happy with the purchase .. especially because for recreational use if you have a bit of care during shooting, then there is absolutely no need for post-production!

avatarjunior
sent on September 06, 2016

Pros: QUALITY OF IMAGE, portability, construction, performance at high ISO.

Cons: Ring of iso, raw pesantini from 50mb (but I'll try the raw uncompressed), problem with backup battery which will keep you updated. BATTERIES LITTLE LAST

Opinion: After the experience with x100t that I love, I went hunting for a xt1 used. Then it happened on the occasion and I took this. SENSOR IS GREAT, more dense therefore more detailed and at least one lead-stop at high ISO than the x100t. Focus on fast both with 28-55 that with 35f2. truly remarkable image quality, shooting in raw, often I magnify 1: 1 and I must say I am very beautiful file. Remains the desire to Full Frame not because the yield to high iso and for the ability to "detachment" that despite the 56 1.2 will never be that of a 85 or a 1.2 or 1.4 35 1.4. My model has problems with the battery, I read that happens. In theory with the use you should recharge, I will keep you updated.

avatarsenior
sent on July 24, 2016

Pros: jpg quality, ergonomics, style Retro Humor

Cons: lack of an integrated flashlight for emergency use ... lack "Panorama" function room.

Opinion: B bellorndefinito really tired and not the three-dimensional vistarneffetto garantitornrndisplay back really well fattorncopre the luminous range, without breaking as in many other Fuji.rnrnpensavo to keep it just for the trip to Russia and then sell it ... I think I've changed my mind and keep her .. .rnrnun largest neo? rnl'impossibilità creates panoramas during shooting that I consider essential for an ideal camera to take in jpg and churn out "ready" rnrnprovare files for credee

avatarjunior
sent on July 01, 2016

Pros: Maneuverability, file quality, viewfinder

Cons: Price (?)

Opinion: Coming from the xt1, already great car, I was amazed at the ease of use and quality of the pictures. I did not test if I did not summarize the files "prepared" by the machine because I just clicked in raw and then processed the file (50 mb!) To almost invariably get a B & W, but jpegs do not joke anyway because they are rich in detail. It is a true extension of the photographer's hands, even for the Leica-style viewfinder, which favors a wider vision, as well as providing some extra possibilities in choosing the image when used in optical form. The sensor forgives a bit more than the previous version, which is of help in the evening and in the street version, and from the satisfaction even with non-original optics (I sometimes use Zeiss lenses of the Contax reflex series with more "round" results than not with Fuji). Being an "analogue" photographer until a few years ago (in fact, con reflex Contax) just recently converted to digital with Fuji, I can not express comparisons with the celebrated Japanese brands with regard to focus and shooting speed. I can still guarantee that to do B & W, street, portrait, a lot of other things but, I imagine, not sport, is a phenomenal machine. Rnrn .... After a run-in period of 23 f 1.4 (exceptional) I add that this seems to me the ideal combination for machine and optics. The street view is exceptional, and the fact that you can "dominate" the scene even by looking at the "outside" of the car with the side viewer makes it literally a glove in the photographer's hand. I almost no longer split machine and lens, and I understand authorship report authors summarizing their equipment in "a car and optics" as much as to turn between people and capture the faces that make reportage unique.

user26730
avatarsenior
sent on June 19, 2016

Pros: Aesthetic (subjective), AF improved than other Fuji models, more powerful sensor, ISO held, dual slot, tropicalization, EVF, white balance.

Cons: Price, light reading (sometimes inaccurate), lack of internal stabilizer

Opinion: Machine I tested intensively in the field without any specific or scientific tests. In my photographic applications (street and reportage) was detected very congenial. Reliable and efficient. The new sensor produces even more detailed files of the previous and the ISO seal is improved by one stop. Occasionally has a tendency to overexpose and therefore I always keep adjusted with -1/3, and the problem is solved. The battery management is better than that of other Fuji models. The electronic viewfinder is simply fantastico.rnTropicalizzata well and has everything you need at your polpastrello.rnPrezzo high for the category and lacks the stabilizer to sensore.rnConsigliata to all those who want a serious machine, light, beautiful, reliable and truly suitable for street and reportage as well as for ritrattistica.rnVoto 9.rnMax

avatarsenior
sent on April 25, 2016

Pros: build quality, file quality, speed.

Cons: Price maybe ....

Opinion: A machine for a particular type of photography, of course you can do it but it is not a machine especially designed for sport or birds. I know understand the type of viewfinder that mounts, an optical viewfinder that the doors open you to a different approach to street photography. The files are very good, more detail (given by the denser sensor), a stop on the iso more grip than the old xtrans from 16mpixel, more vivid, more rofondi, more pieni.rnL'AF improved but I can not say what we saw I do not use this machine in situations where it puts to test his machine reattività.rnUna not for every use so ... but a great machine to use for which it was born.

avatarjunior
sent on March 28, 2016

Pros: General quality of the files, compact weight, yield comparable with full frame, Hybrid Viewfinder

Cons: Battery life is short

Opinion: 3Bimpressione of solidity and of being well done. Autofocus for what I do is good. Now I just buy some optics. For now I use 27 f2.8 which still seems to be a wonderful pancakes (perhaps best of my beloved Canon 40 f2.8). It 'a machine that makes' pleasure to have with him'.

avatarjunior
sent on March 06, 2016

Pros: Is a real propia professional machine around !!! quality of the spectacular images in both jpeg and in raw..facile to use

Cons: none.....

Opinion: I always had to fuji x100 to xe2 x-pro2 ... but this is another thing, what about spectacular !! fast a real gem ... the year files a frightening sharpness I recommend it to everyone, especially the viewfinder eccezionale..la use even with a fuji adapter with Canon 50mm f1.4 Sigma spectacular art !!!!! what about the speed mf I do not believe ..rapidissima, of course the price is not low but the quality you pay hello to all ....

avatarjunior
sent on March 05, 2016

Pros: Resolution to all ISO, color depth, dynamic range, compactness, light weight, ergonomic (*), technology GOGO, aesthetically beautiful, easy to use and fast ... Very FAST.

Cons: Battery life, the thumb grip very edgy, although customizable on other key lock standard exposure is a bit far away and we must get used. I would have preferred a button rather than having to press the front and rear selectors. Price.

Opinion: For years I drooled for the X-PRO1 and when I could take it, I diverted my attention on the X-T1 (a real gem). Now it has just output the X-PRO2 I decided and I did the c ..... ta. The body is amazing although aesthetically very similar to the X-PRO1. To the touch, however, it is much more sturdy and robust and feels that it is made in a single block copolymer of magnesium. Apart from the exposure lock button which, in my humble opinion, is too far to the left the rest of the keys is in the right place. Everything is comfortable and then everything is customizable: the hybrid viewfinder. A pleasure !!! Customizable to the core, you have 3 viewfinders which can then become a "5". It has the classic OVF where we see through a glass, and inside it has screened all the useful info at the click. In addition, both according to the optics that the shooting distance, the inner frames fit and help to compensate for parallax avoiding cropped pictures. When shooting with the OVF you go back in time but with a futuro.Si machine also has available an OVF size that always lets you see directly but very enlarged scene. Then there is the EVF is the classic electronic viewfinder which is also located on the X-T1 (this has more resolution). I said "5" viewfinders because with a simple movemento the front lever can be activated on each OVF a micro DISPLEI rising from the bottom of DX, where in addition to helping to focus, gives a preview of the white balance and exposure. The iso start at 200 and arrive at 12800 without extension. I did it deliberately photos in the dark at high ISO and the result is, the own and I can say, that the 5D MK3 you can really throw it in the bin. The dynamic range is very good (much higher than Canon), the colors are gorgeous and the white balance a masterpiece. But what amazes a lot is the speed of both the porcessore that focus: lightning. The focus points are either 77 or 273 and I knowno finally managed by a small joystick / button that plays very well his task. Many commands and utilities were already present on the X-T1 and improved to this body. The pain points are always the same. Price you pay for (as well as the novelty). The battery a little bit ridiculous, and so you need to stock up on Patona. so I think the designer who has designed this machine has forgotten a fillet radius between the rubber grip and magnesium body. The thumb fits into a 90 ° angle is not very ergonomic (*). And then the selectors, two small rings that rotate with the thumb and forefinger (front and back of the body) also can be crushed. The latter one, in particular s erve to activate the electronic zoom for manual focus (and not) but not protruding from the body so it has the feeling of utilize the nail to crush him. I really liked although its function is interesting. That dirre: try for in Namorarsi. I have purchased a 35 f2 WR. A little monster and I have not tried the other optical I own. Soon I am posting some shots. Hello to all







 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me