|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 08, 2021 Pros: Sorry... i still have tears in my eyes for happiness Cons: screen not fully adjustable, sliders near the edge for hands as big as my Opinion: I am a photoadamator and I can invest little budget in my passion ... after having made my bones with a canon 550d I decide it's time to find better (I knew I had reached the limit for a 2009 16megapixel sensor)... I do a lot of research on the second-hand market based on my budget and the fact that I would like to try making 4k videos... panasonic g9, canon m50, canon rp, I know I have to keep part of the budget for a handyman lens worthy of that name and ... last minute change ... fuji with the x-t20 and the leic lens. what to say ... it will be that I have never had in my hand a fullframe with a lens of 3000euro but guys ... with 500 euro what I see in the monitor seems impossible to me!!!!!!!!! what sharpness! what an ability to recover shadows! what colors! why didn't I take the panasonic g9? I didn't trust to switch to a 4/3 and spent half! then the size: I realized that many times I lost interesting photos because I didn't have a photo backpack with me... well the x-t20 with the leica kit is tiny.... is always in the purse with me ... I ASSURE YOU THAT THIS MATTERS!!! and my hard drive proves it.... |
  | sent on May 16, 2020 Pros: Overall quality. Cons: Battery life (still in line with the competition, I think it's a common problem) Opinion: After more than two years of use I can say that the xt-20 is a camera that fully satisfies my hobby for photography. Exceptional image quality, ease of use due to the ability to configure keys and menus at will. With lenses like 27 mm is in the pocket of the jacket, so you can carry it in any situation. And with its retro style it is also very beautiful... at least in my view. I saw that it is used on 450 euros, a real bargain. |
 | sent on September 07, 2019 Pros: Compact, light, great qi! Cons: crosshairs a little bit small Opinion: A great camera, compact and responsive! Perfect for almost any situation! The single autofocus is great and usable in afc. When I want to do a bit of street or light travel it's my favorite car! It is therefore recommended for those looking for a compact machine with a good image quality and that costs little (it is easily found at 400 euros used). The viewfinder, if you are used to XT3, 2, h1 etc, is a little small but still well defined! |
 | sent on September 03, 2019 Pros: Quality, both constructive and the files produced. Lightness and compactness. Cons: Slowness when on and off. Opinion: The fuji x-t20 is my first mirrorless. I convinced myself at the switch from the Nikon d7100 mainly for portability needs. I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of this machine and while on the one hand I had confirmation of the clear superiority in terms of footprint and lightness compared to traditional reflexes, on the other hand I was amazed by the quality of the resulting files (both jpeg that raw) that I didn't think were as good. To date I have absolutely no regrets about the choice made. I also had to think again about the fear about the functionality of the electronic viewfinder. The battery life of course is not comparable to those of a reflex; however, by disabling the preview of the photo taken (which I had never used before) and using the power settings of the electronic viewfinder only, you get more than satisfactory results. The ability to charge directly via usb cable is very convenient. |
 | sent on May 20, 2019 Pros: Excellent ergonomics, customizable keys good files both jpg and . Raf Cons: At the moment I haven't found any Opinion: Purchased to have a body less heavy than an APS-C Reflex but without sacrificing quality and performance. I was very happy for the handling and intuitiveness of use (after studying a little booklet and calmly set the whole thing) Optical 18-55. For convenience I bought the button to screw on the shutter button and a leather case that improves the ergonomics and if necessary makes you feel comfortable as protection. As soon as I have the first shots I will post them to have a comparison. |
 | sent on November 22, 2018 Pros: compactness, ergonomics, good files, native optical park that meets the same requirements Cons: People didn't realize it's an APS-C and not a Full-Frame Opinion: Purchased for trial thanks to a bundle at the end of last year: I was skeptical in supporting a toy like this to a full format and now the full Frame I keep it for "affection" and use almost exclusively this; Fuji has its virtues and its flaws, but most of all I hit the feeling with the camera, the almost total possibility of customizing buttons to use it "freehand" without going to lose in the menus, the good quality of the files already from JPG in the room.. . Always used with L-bracket (which improves the grip slightly) and even with small hands I have never had any particular problems: the native optical Park is more than good and with the help of some adaptor you can match almost any lens. Ultimately, if you keep in mind that it is not a full Frame is a machine that I recommend to anyone as a second body (for those who, in fact, is inseparable from a full format) for those who want a camera to learn and with which to have fun in time! |
 | sent on November 08, 2018 Pros: Quality/price ratio, material quality and construction, weight, size, quality of files (especially JPEGs), ISO hold, focus points, AF Cons: Battery life, SD slot not accessible on tripod, lack dedicated ISO ring, shutter button hideous, it would serve the illumination of the keys for night shots. Opinion: I bought this camera in hindsight to a rationalization of the previous kit (Canon 6d + 3 optics). I needed a little bulky and light camera to always carry with me, even (and above all) in the mountains. For the moment the use matched with the 18-55 in kits that I consider to be excellent, and the 55-200. Right from the start I was very impressed by the quality of the ready-made files and the variety of Fujifilm film simulation, while it took me a while to get used to the electronic viewfinder, accustomed to the optical 6d. Also the ergonomics I think is excellent, the body is really small but for me that I have pretty big hands the grip is quite solid and not tired if used all day. The menu is quite rational and with a great possibility of customization. Excellent touch screen LCD tilt, which I think is indispensable on a modern camera. I don't know how to judge the video industry since I don't care at the moment. The ISO hold up to 6400 is acceptable, besides you see a lot of disturbance. In my opinion you feel the need to dedicate a ring for the fast regulation of the ISO, without each time enter the menu of the shooting parameters. Ultimately a great camera that, for the use that I do not make me regret the reflex (at the level of ratio Pro/cons, clear that the quality of the files of a FF in some cases are not the same thing!!). For me: Rated 9. You're a weirdo! |
 | sent on November 01, 2018 Pros: Ergonomics with hand grip, file, ISO resistance, autofocus. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I have a 6d as comparison to which I match optics like the 16 35 F4, I made several shots with this machine I find it fantastic as it holds the ISO up to 8000 with low light and as photographic quality of the highest level. I match it to a 35 1.4 and I must say that the files that churn out are beautiful, I also own a xe2s but the jump is obvious. |
user62049  | sent on October 17, 2018 Pros: AF, viewfinder, color, Jpeg, tilt screen, ergonomics Cons: Not found Opinion: I own this mirrorless for 4 months and I can declare that this Fuji is really excellent! Over the years I've owned Canon DSLRs, Pentax and mirrorless Olympus, but the feeeling I've found with this machine is awesome, ergonomics (maybe because I don't have big hands and so I find it well) detail of ready-to-use jpegs, exceptional colors in fujif style ILM, autofocus very fast. When I went to buy this Fuji I was undecided between the X-T20 and the X-E3 very pretty even that but what made me lean for the T20 was the tilting screen that for the street, genre I prefer, is a must. I matched it to the 18-55 of kit, the perfect couple, I do from the landscape to the street, some portrait and architecture, a great purchase there is no telling. |
 | sent on August 25, 2018 Pros: Portability quality of JPEG files viewfinder fantastic amount of aesthetic functions..... build Quality Cons: Low battery confused ISO ring menu Opinion: The initial idea was to be next to my Nikon d810, but after a couple of outputs she became my favorite. Clear a full frame is a full frame, but the magic that has this machine.. Both in the use and in the photographic result is spectacular. I am a photographer for passion and not profession so my priority is to keep my interest in photography alive, something that my old Nikon was making me pass, many times I would leave it at home because of the size and weight, huge backpack and so many lenses. This Fuji comes with me every time I want to photograph, gives me beautiful shots and is in a handbag. Too bad for the battery that lasts very little and I had to take two more (original, recommended), pity the menu that is a bit confusing and sometimes I have to focus on it and pity that there is no ring to set the ISO fast. |
 | sent on June 02, 2018 Pros: Customizing the keys, compactness, material finishing, JPEG exceptional Cons: Focus, not immediate navigation in SW Opinion: Like several other people who have left their comment, I have also completely released from the world reflex to find more practical use and compactness. To do this I mainly have 2 configurations: a fixed 27mm pancake for trips where I must stay in "my Pocket" and the 18-55 for other cases. Nothing professional but the imported is to find a balance and find that desire to shoot at any time, especially because the machine is always with you. We add some "useless" leather customizations and Red shutter button and I feel even more satisfied from the aesthetic point of view. After a few months and 3000 shots my opinion is quite positive. Customizing the keys really allows you to use it to the fullest, such as removing the focus on the shutter button, or bringing it back as close as possible to the analogues in order to force you to "snap" only when you are sure and not take you home thousands of shots at a time that you lose in the archive. You can tell a return to the origins with the advantages of the most modern technology, even in the post with the simulation of old Fuji films that are a marvel. I recommend at least to try it.... |
 | sent on May 15, 2018 Pros: EVF, white balance, sharpness files, ready-to-go files and weight Cons: Setting the settings to vary in menus, tropicalization Opinion: At the end of the year, I wanted to update the hardware of the "dated" FF SLR Canon but always good 6d, with something more updated and high-grade. Tried the Canon 6d Mark II, I realized that I had to sell my great 6d and add Ben €1,000 to have a little something improved, while remaining perplexed on many aspects that Fuji had astonished me (read the pros of the title). Then I decided to keep it, having also 5 optics of which two Sigma Art for me unsellable! I opted to take the XT-20, cheaper model of the XT-2 but with the same functions or almost. Well after now more than 10,000 shots, I can make a personal review of myself. The XT-20 I like very much, for €919 of list I have a machine that makes it pale expensive and heavy Reflex. In addition 4k Video, impressive gust, autofocus with 325 points, I tried it with both portraits and with the Arrows Tricolori... In short, tested in various areas has left me stunned. I am very satisfied! In the time bought very good goals, essential not to buy a Maserati and not have money for gasoline:-) When I shoot important I use both without problems, if I have to go light, now the Fuji took the place of the Canon... |
 | sent on May 01, 2018 Pros: Saturated, crisp, ready-to-use JPEG files, definition, completeness of menus, Fuji Film simulation, vintage aesthetic very appealing Cons: Ergonomics, grip, some menu functions difficult to find, not tropicalized, automatic white balance not always reliable Opinion: Purchased in combination with the excellent 18-55 f 2.8-4 I liked from the first shots. Aesthetically I find it really beautiful, vintage flavor that obviously reminds the mechanical film cameras that we all loved. But I must also emphasize how many the difficulty in challenging and managing the commands (many but too close to each other). Beautiful, beautiful, but too small! At first glance it looks like a toy, then you get a little hand... The hand grip (bought soon after) is not only helpful but it is essential! And I don't have big hands. Many plastic parts, especially at the top. To those who claim that it is all metal or magnesium alloy I highly recommend that you hold some more professional body to understand the difference. Comfortable the touchscreen and the tilt monitor (perhaps my somewhat layer to tilt) and rich in ring nuts and customizable buttons. The menu provides a good dose of practice and sometimes patience. For example find and overlay to the display grid framing for me that I use often for photos of architecture and more is a real headache! Assumes a separate study! But the points in favor are many: good files and dense, jpeg ready and RAW very workable. Very comfortable to take on the road and with a remarkable chromatic rendition. I have noticed on several occasions, however, a balance of automatic white not very correct. Possibility to visualize in real time all the parameters and the resulting image through the electronic viewfinder. The 18-55 taken in kit (that one, metal) carries out its work very well and is sharp and saturated all over the frame to the edges. One of the best kit lenses you could want. And then excellent AF at 325 points (!) with the possibility of selecting the subject very precise. 4k Video, filters ADV1 and ADV2 customizable, live view very good, high ISO hold not to scream but still good, panoramic photos, filters Fuji Film simulation, in short... VERY RECOMMENDED! |
 | sent on March 28, 2018 Pros: files in line with the XT-2 I would say perfect, tilting display, touch, very beautiful aesthetic !! Cons: too small even if I do not have big hands. Opinion: My opinion is positive on the QI side because the camera has what it takes to be a great product and suitable for many uses, but I have not found myself very well, so just the time to try it and make a few shots to put it back immediately on sale on other channels, said and done already sold in a short time, it will be crazy but it is the first time that I did not find myself with the ergonomics of the camera, I had bought it as a second body to be added to the XT-2, maybe with a hand grip I would have solved, but I do not know if a single centimeter can make the difference, especially the 4-direction pad always fall under the thumb involuntarily changing the settings so logical solution is the pad lock by pressing 6 seconds ok, yes we are but when you need the pad ???, no, honestly I do not like pity that they do not make bodies like the XE-2 with a sensor of 24 Mp otherwise I would have preferred by far.rnPersonalization menu not perfect at the level of XT -2 in short, the difference in cost according to me is justified.rnFor whomit does not have problems of this type the camera proves to be an excellent purchase with advanced features that perhaps you will not find in some semi-pro SLR bodies. rating 8.8 |
 | sent on March 15, 2018 Pros: very good files, even at high ISO work well, practice, invite to take pictures Cons: without the hand grip it is not too safe in hand. Opinion: I state that I am not a professional, I wanted something more than my Lumix FZ200. Clearly this XT 20 is a whole other world. It is very exciting to take pictures with dials and buttons, the files are great and I do not have to make corrections. Small, but "full" of comfortable dials. The menu 'after a first approach is' pretty intuitive and easy, of course that there is everything and I'm' taking a big step forward than before, the FZ200 is a superzoom, very practical, light, versatile and with good autonomy, but the files are not clearly comparable with the Fuji xt 20. I had to buy a handgrip to keep it in my hand, (FZ 200 is certainly more "attached" to the hand and more comfortable and light) I'm satisfied also because it's beautiful and reminds me of my old and dear ZENITH. Excellent purchase with XF18 55, then I added an XC50 230 that gives me great satisfaction. I have only one small problem that I can not solve, someone knows howi insert the date in the files directly from the camera? Thank you . |
 | sent on February 07, 2018 Pros: Color quality and detail recovery in shadows-highlights, focus, portability, software updates, electronic viewfinder, material quality, settings, 4K video, tilt and touch screen, white balance (it's perfect in 90% of cases ) Cons: X-Trans sensor, handle, rare cases of missed focus and other small things Opinion: FIRST IMPRESSIONS: After selling the EOS M (1.0), I decided to move on Fuji. Quality and feeling of another level without a doubt, but I can not make me go down the X Trans of which many speak very well. If you shoot in RAW you will have to do research and experiment to escape the artifacts. It is not as dramatic as it seems, but they are clearly visible artifacts once zoomed to 100% (even at 75% you can see). Grip so so, from me that I come from the EOS M is still an improvement, even if I would have liked slightly more sunken. On the battery I do not say since coming from the Canon I can not be satisfied, especially for the fact that the Fuji can be recharged via USB. For the rest, all promoted with flying colors: dynamic range, portability! (at first glance it will seem fake), Fuji kit, software updates (both camera and lenses) and in general the sense of vintage and quality that the Fujifilm system transmits. |
 | sent on January 08, 2018 Pros: Compactness, file quality, lightness, af Cons: Ergonomics not at the height of SLR cameras, plastic ferrules, battery, for now RAF development system Opinion: Hello, I have the machine for a short time, then I will integrate later with a more detailed review, for now I took pictures of nerd and I checked the differences with my nikon 7100. First I can say that the 'ergonomics is very different than the Nikon , with the XT20 when you look at the electronic viewfinder is difficult to change all parameters on the fly, due to the buttons too small and close together, the dials (the front and rear wheels) are plastic and being small tend occasionally to "slip ", then to avoid more prizes the ring and takes over a function (FN), so you still need to stay light. If they had done in simil rubber would certainly have been better.rnL 'autofocus, I was not disappointed at all, indeed, certainly on the Nikon I had goals that were not lightning, but also on the XT20 I took a lens not really splinter (35 1.4 ), so I would say on par with Nikon. I think you have to take the hand, but I must say that its compactness and non-existent weight make it excellent for thestreet walks, which Nikon tended to avoid.rnI find the electronic shutter very comfortable.rnFor now I stop here, I have not done serious photos, nor photo shoots so in heavy use I can not yet say mine. For now, next to the D7100, then we'll see. |
 | sent on January 07, 2018 Pros: Lightness, file, high hold iso, af Cons: battery life ridiculous, awkward grip, vision not suited to reality, occasionally goes into the ball, explanatory booklet not clear Opinion: Machine definitely beautiful and nice, ideal for street or when you want to travel light, the files are good, however, there is always post production! Machine that I have bought with lenses 10-24 and 18-55 this for me is his field, for other campirnpreferisco my cameras .rnMi happened 2-3 times that in the vision at 55 mm the image was not steady strange effects and then when you want to shoot from the monitor and approach your finger, it turns off the image and you have to start again but rarely. The vision in the eyepiece is not pleasant to see that blue color does not reflect the reality .rnComunque overall good machine that I can recommend for its mirrorless genre, of course that if I compare it to my two Nikon (D800 and D5) I feel like " beat her. " |
 | sent on January 04, 2018 Pros: Portability, af, sensor to be an APS, aesthetics Cons: File quality when compared to an FF sensor (thanks, but there is this general idea that these files are comparable to a good FF), for long services after a while the small handle becomes painful, time needed to switch from LCD to Viewfinder, blurred given by the sensor aps Opinion: I took it to support my canon 6D and always carry it with me, for this use is perfect, the complete replacement with a FF is still not feasible for me because of the sensor, in case you get a fujifilm FF then you could to do with your eyes closed, for me the real big flaw of the xt20 is the sensor, not because it is not an excellent sensor, indeed, is that after years of FF I have a good eye, also I shoot often in low light and that's why I prefer 6D. rnqui a more complete opinion compared to my 6D: www.facebook.com/notes/luca-concas/reflex-o-mirrorless/1665184066875979/ |
 | sent on December 27, 2017 Pros: All the Pro of a mirrorless compared to a reflex: less bulk, less weight, electronic viewfinder, quality jpeg (ready) film simulation .... Cons: Against I have not yet encountered, perhaps the battery life but this is remedied with a second battery in the bag ... Opinion: I shot for 4 years with Nikon d7100 SLR and I'm certainly not a great expert in photography but I came to have 8 goals that I was tired of taking me behind, so much so that lately I was only out with 2/3 fixed, it's here I came the idea of ??abandoning the SLR world to go to Fuji, the minimal but extremely accurate look of its products combined with a good workmanship and a very pleasant sense of solidity made me quickly forget my beloved Nikon, the xt20 churns out jpeg files practically ready and this for me that I'm not a lover of the pp is a godsend, thanks to the excellent film simulation filters, the battery life is limited but this is known, and ergonomics is good if you have the hands medium size, combined with 23 f2 is portabilissima while with the 56 is slightly unbalanced but the files that come out in pairs are really special, the electronic viewfinder that initially scared me a lot instead a pleasant surprise was detected. In defiIf you are thinking of adding a Fuji ml to your SLR or as I have done to definitely replace it definitely the xt20 is a good choice at the right price. Good light and everyone |
 | sent on December 24, 2017 Pros: Shooting speed, resolution, maneuverability, weight, high hold iso ... Cons: Currently undetectable of important Opinion: Already in possession of XPROII and XT1, I felt the need for an even lighter body to combine with the aforementioned professionals. Initially I was oriented for the new born XE3, but together with this my dealer of trust placed me on the counter also the T20 and after I picked it up I was immediately in love. Small, fast and super discrete gave me, while I was on the street, excellent files worthy of the older sisters. So I can safely say that the images produced are like the other Fuji I have. The XT20 has thus become my companion every day combined with Fuji 23 f2 that never detaches, and I have saved compared to the XE3 even 80 euros .... |
 | sent on December 18, 2017 Pros: Ergonomics, maneuverability, billing, practice, ISO, detail Cons: only the lack of stabilization and in the opinion I explain why Opinion: I am a Canonist having already supplied my beloved 6D, coming from aps-c canon 7D and 80D, I wanted a second body just to avoid the disassembly and replacement of optics and then, my first opinion was to take a 5D mkII but I gave up because? many sell it for 18 carat gold who 700 or even 800 euro 950 and I honestly with a budget from 700 to 950 I would have taken another 6D and not a museum car as well as out of production since 2012 but no more talk .rnI have been always attracted to the X-T2 and the thought of switching completely to Fuji always touched me but ... on the one hand undecided so I make this choice, especially to understand and know the car, I buy the X-T20.rnVi I say ... the first shot I was shocked, reporting the file in post, there is everything that must have a file out of a professional or semi-professional photo camera, I'm not here to list everything but, despite being an APS- c creates an amazing file. I made a second choice though !!!! to couple it with otvintage adapters with adapters (this is the reason for the lack of stabilization but not a big problem) and not for system optics and with ... a Yashika 50 f1.7 and a Nikon Ai-s 85 f2 and now I'm looking of a 24 or 16mm always vintage ..rnRagazzi .. recommend the purchase strongly and in all respects a second camera body ... and if the first goes in assistance and worthy to take his place. |
user112968 | sent on December 17, 2017 Pros: Fantastic aesthetics, weight, amazing files, ISO seal, amazing Cons: Menu not exactly clear, but only to find a negative point Opinion: I sold all my equipment Nikon FF Nikon (D700 grip and various objectives) because I realized that it was a struggle to bring everything behind me and spend hours in PP and the time available to me was less and less, I looked around I read all the your considerations and I decided, I took the Fuji x-t20 with 18-55 xf and 55-200 xf. I think the best choice of my life after having made my son, really amazing car and that's all I was looking for, now I seem to photograph again and I found the joy of doing it, I really can not find fault with this little gem , an advice for anyone who wants to go back to photographing and not to fight with curves and histograms ... good light to all. |
 | sent on November 15, 2017 Pros: aesthetic, jpeg, weight, electronic viewfinder Cons: grip, a bit tricky, vertical only reclining display Opinion: I've owned this machine for a couple of months, initially working on it is a bit tricky but with time you get used to it. The jpeg files are gorgeous, the quality and the colors really unique and true to reality. rncomoda to travel because the size compared to its competitors is really small. For professional use in my opinion it is a bit limited but can be a great second body. I would highly recommend it to anyone traveling and who wants a compact camera but with big performance. |
 | sent on November 05, 2017 Pros: Weight, Sensor, Aesthetics, Electronic Viewfinder, LCD, High ISO Hold Cons: Not easy at the beginning, you have to study it a bit but just click on the shutter button, the level of satisfaction goes far beyond the frustration of running in the menus Opinion: At first impact affects the aesthetics, taking the weight one of those machines that by activating the shutter you show the pictures of Venice glued on a roller seems to be a game. It then looks like a game .. Then turning it on the approach changes the first click on a Canon ... setting up the Acros simulation for the classic BN fuji..a nikonian does outing..right quality no price comparisons .. sorry with x-t20 the photo you are wrong..impossible that misses a hit |
 | sent on October 31, 2017 Pros: Aesthetics, size, weight, sensor, portability, viewfinder, lcd, evf quality Cons: Grip Opinion: Years sell my all (beautiful) reflex equipment for a form of photographic indigestion. My re-engagement with this passion has meant to start from scratch. Discretion, essentiality, controlled weight, limited footprint, measured costs, and quality are the new philosophy. RnrnAnd I relinquished (aptly) to a full frame (for the aforementioned philosophy), I was oriented to an a6300, having already used Sony's mirrorless past ... and it would have been a wise choice with still some compatible accessories. What made me desist is the optical park, with which I have never had a particular feeling (and I'm not a vintage fanboy). Rnrn ... And so I got engaged with this x-t20, whose quality adds a choice of goals closer to my taste. rnrnThe aesthetic is eye-catching, robust, pleasing: when you ride you do the same as the old fashioned photographer's taste, and you light up the "navigated one". This also returns aits certain "why" .rnrnE 'small, very small, with all the pros and cons of the case. Transportation is no longer a problem: back pain, tiredness, laziness in the face of the prospect of taking on the equivalent of an armament are forgotten. It's just a small bag and you remember to have it right when you need it. This little thing, however, adversely affects the grip, at least in my case. Compared to Sony's mirrorless, this Fuji finds it ergonomically uncomfortable. I've associated a hand grip to make the handle more secure and easy. The files that it's working are wonderfully workable and the name of the x-trans is also to be under the torture of my post production.rnrnEvf, with which in the past had several problems (those of the first mirrorlesss made me headaches), it has become usable despite my acute photosensitivity and for now I have no side effects. The LCD screen is very enjoyable and of good definition. Its tilting may be useful in some situations. RnrnThe battery lasts long lasting. In my case it means little, because I pick the photos before taking them, and instead of 350 I take 25 ... but a couple of extra batteries really cost nothing and it's a no-problem. RnrnThe touch screen gives added value to the convenience of some settings, which can be quicker and more immediate. rnrnThrough the shutter button I added a vane button with concave surface: with the native button I did not find the correct balance, even in the hands posture.rnrnL'af i ho tested only with the Fujinon 35 mm f / 1.4, with which it probably can not express itself to the full of its qualities. In any case, it brings home what it is about to capture in one way or another. It is an expensive "toy" that deserves to be part of the kit of those who want to move light, discreet and with quality. |
| sent on October 01, 2017 Pros: Small, high sensor quality Cons: I do not know Opinion: Second body after x pro 2, allows me to expand the possibilities by covering lots of shots that I would lose in the change of optics. It's really, and strangely, small, so much to change feelings from one body to the other, here is perhaps the big difference with the older sxt 2 who is even more gifted. With a pancake-like goal becomes pocket-sized, it's extremely fast, for those who do not want to think it has a lever on the cap, coaxial to the main ring, which makes it an independent "automata" and therefore can be considered an excellent compact, certainly comparable ( and probably with something more) to the x100 sisters. Thanks to the retractable back screen allows a somewhat smarter use and some shots in different positions, the viewfinder is comparable to that of xpro 2 and I find no difference. With a triad of fuji targets from wide-angle to medium-sized canvases I can cover almost everything I like in the street and in the b & w.Lastly, considering that it costs about half (!) Of the older sister, in my opinion it is a great purchase and allows to expand the use of optics, even vintage, very easily. I do not use videos so I can not give judgments in qs sector. In my opinion, it is advisable. |
 | sent on September 20, 2017 Pros: Compact, lightweight, robust, high ISO hold, ergonomics (for hands not too large), vintage design, EVF (electronic viewfinder), autofocus Cons: Non-slip screen at the sides, lack of some important video and audio settings (lack of flat profile for video, external microphone settings are basic), microphone input jack size, uncomfortable placement of the tripod mount , optical park and flash less than other brands, very noisy (creates a strong background noise in the background), difficulty in wii-fi connection to other devices, lack of iso ring, lack of handgrips Opinion: I say that I have this car for just over a month and so I have not yet known to know it deeply, and that I am a lot of fuss, so I always try to find defects rather than merits. I come from a Nikon reflex, what I can say about this machine is that I'm fine, despite some shortcomings. Unlike those who write that the defect of this machine is the battery, I think the defects of this machine are others. 1-The screen can be tilted only downwards (about 45 degrees) and high (about 100 degrees), sometimes I would have a better mobility of screen. 2-The video / audio section is ridiculous and neglected, I would expect a lot more, being a 4k machine: there are many basic video settings such as flat profile, the possibility of a histogram being shot or a decibel scale; then the time limit of 4k and FullHD is too low in my opinion (10 min for 4k, 15 for Full); audio settings are just as neglected, only allow you to adjust the amplification level in a scale from 1 to 4 (then it lacks but you can not blame Fuji, downloading a plug-in like Magic Lantern for Canon); Also the microphone input is 2.5mm, it would be much more comfortable than it was 3.5mm as the external microphones use this jack. 3-Another problem is the tripod attachment that is positioned just next to the battery and memory slot (located at the bottom), this forces the photographer every time they unplug the platen from the stand to change the battery or the battery memory and this is a problem that is felt in certain situations (in the case of time-lapse luckily, if you use a well-charged battery, you can take it for many hours - I did timelapse of 12 h with thirty shots and I consumed about a third of the battery - without having to unplug the machine from the stand); 4-The optical and especially flash flash is pretty much reduced, but fortunately there are brands like Zeiss, Tokina and Samyang that they build compatible, while for the flash the Yongnuo Canon version is compatible with Fuji 5-The machine is very noisy (in the sense of sound noise), and this is felt noticeably in the form of buzz of background in video footage, 6-I had great difficulty connecting the camera to other devices, and very hard to find information about how to do it, 7-the lack of a big ring is felt, or simply a convenient button setting quickly change the iso without having to enter the menu (but this may be due to my ignorance and you can probably set one of the customizable keys), 8-you can not mount a hand-grip and this is a serious defect in my opinion , especially considering the problem explained in step 3.rn As for the advantages of this machine I can say ergonomics, robustness, lightness, high ISO, lcd touch screen, size (expectation or not professional in the eyes of the people, it doesthis is ideal for reportage and street photography in environments where it is best to go unnoticed), sensor quality, evf that works divinely well, autofocus. The merits are innumerable despite everything and are far more than the defects. Vote 9 |
  | sent on July 16, 2017 Pros: Rugged body, lightweight, touchscreen with AF touch, X Trans III sensor, ISO seal, ready to use JPG ... Cons: Battery life is low, but just buy a pair compatible, so it's not a real counter. Opinion: I came from many reflexes possessed over the years and various brands, the last was the Canon 5D Mark III ... I was undecided between the Sony a6300 and the T20, finally I chose Fuji, to have a superior optical drive, though Pretty expensive, but since the first thing I was looking for in my first ML was the QI ... rnAlso I like most users, I wanted to rationalize the kit, to have a camera that would allow me not to get tired at the end of the day ... i am fortunate to have small hands say Nipponico style, so for me the size problem of the T20 does not exist, it is a really good mirrorless, lightweight compact and discreet, I personally bought the "silver" version gives it no doubt A very vintage style that I like very much.rn I took it to the 18-55 optics from the indisputable quality, in fact I think the latter, already great for many of everyday uses, the sensor quality is really high, they go out File a lot Detailed with many shades on the colors, forNot to mention the choice of the Emulation of the various Fuji films, for many who, like I used them in the golden times of photography, are a must have, jpg files that come out almost never need adjustments, Various menus are very intuitive and customizable, the car holds the ISO that is a beauty, the autofocus is very fast and includes up to 325 points af, just like the older sister from which it comes, the T2 from which it also inherited the sensor As well as the af module. The lack of the joystick (which some complain about) for the selection of af points is easy to navigate, customizing one of the 4 arrows of the directional keys, activating the function and moving the point af through the 4 directional buttons without ever loosening it 'Eye from the viewfinder, facial eye recognition mode works very well, the video compartment is great not at T2 level, however, the latter has more options for video professionals, they are very sodDefeated of the choice made and I do not regret having abandoned a car like the 5D Mark III for this little Fuji. From a very satisfied user I can not recommend it, but remember to handle it with your own hands before buying it, it is not suitable for all hands, although the handgrip is for sale for a few euros, which also solves this problem for those with hands great. |
 | sent on June 30, 2017 Pros: Lightweight, size, metal, touch, 24mpx sensor, iso hold, dynamic range ... Cons: Battery .... rnMa I have bought 2 extra and I can cover all day without problems ... Opinion: I come from various full frame reflexes between sony a7r2, canon 6d, nikon d610, and stewed by weight and size I preferred to go back to mirroless not full frame but apsc and the decision dropped on the xt20 paid 1100 kit with 18-55f 2.8-f4 and I have to say that I do not regret anything about the optical quality of the fuji targets and very high no softness distortions etc, the machine and entirely metal the commands all ringing from old times and you have to get accustomed to using it and it is not immediate feeling but once Learned and love at first glance, and a machine that can be used completely in manual and allows you to reach a 400% dynamic range with both high tones and low tones in practice, clears shadows and does not burn the sky during shots with setting Correct, the quality and the hold of iso and very close to the d610 nikon with the advantage that it is click and already beautiful and ready even in raw with no 100% raw compression weight by 60 mega with a no detail no I've been feeling it for about a month since I used it very often and I have done so many testsIre a car with a great autofocus of -4ev 325 focus points almost all the frame, 12-gauge raw burst of twisted-frame autofocus per second, in jpg i did not try it and i'm not going to use it since the raw and raw 60meg The same mega a7r2 that had 42mpx and 14-bit compression instead fuji without any compression type and the difference is seen on the shades of colors, say, I'm looking forward to doing a nice kit of fuji optics, the side Video and fabulous with panasonic as well as having a fz1000 for video are equal, my opinion is that at 1100 euros with a superb optics and a car to take absolutely .... |
| sent on June 04, 2017 Pros: Sensor Generous, Constructive, Compact and Comfortable, Fastest Cons: Ridiculous battery life .... Opinion: Since I'm just a lover and not a professional, I've got this little car and I come after many years of Canon reflexes the last 7d markii .... sometimes I do not understand if I made a wise move to completely change technology by going to mirrorless, The files look good nothing to say .. jpg logically because the raw ones are heavy and for the amount of shots that i should i should use 32gb 2 card in one day ... they are a bit too large hand ;-) also If I used the xt20 for just 200 shots wide ... i will only have 18.55 by kits i do not feel like giving a thorough judgment, the files are of good quality but going to overwhelm them a little they gush out immediately and working them almost impossible , I will probably not still have a hand with this machine but I feel a bit disappointed ... I'm not one who works hard on the files, if I can not do it and with canon I'm satisfied ... with fuji not Are fully. The ISO seal is excellent cmq up to 6400 and most likely I will have to investOn high quality optics though too expensive for my tastes (these fuji's crazy) hoping to review my judgment on this room, the burst is good I have to say .. rnrnUpdate 16/6/2017, rnrn I plan to be confident with The xt20 and I really have to say that i'm satisfying, coming from refrex i logically expect things i will not have such as battery life, operating speed and other small things ... but in return i gained portability, convenience and convenience and not I'm just fine stuff. The files are nice I can not really say anything, I finally feel like I'm satisfied. I ordered the additional grip that will come in shortly so I can improve the grip ... Updates will follow !! |
 | sent on April 18, 2017 Pros: Sensor, excellent JPEG, AF with face recognition and eyes, touch screen, dell'EVF quality, usefulness to the manual focus. Cons: Handgrip (expensive) almost mandatory, lack of joystick for AF, you can not use the touch screen as a "trackpad" in Panasonic style, face recognition to improve the video Opinion: After 3 and a half years Nikon D600 I wanted to try something smaller and lighter, with EVF JPEG and good, but that did not make me regret over the full sensor frame.rnrnHo chosen the X-T20 because the X-T2 went out budget (I preferred to spend on optical), and then because the touch screen intrigava.rnLa car I was VERY small, with 18-55 already likely to be biased, so the expensive handgrip is required (already put in account) .rnrnManca the joystick for AF, but can be remedied by forcing the keys 4 of the pad in its stead (4 function keys are lost) .rnPer the rest is very customizable, both rings can also be pressed to switch to a second function (the frontal is fixed on the exposure compensation) .rnrnLa yield of JPEG is great, the sensor also to ISO 6400 looks good compared to the D600 (the difference is, of course, but not so marked as I thought) .rnrnUsata with flash Metz M400 it is excellent in portraits to:thanks to the AF very wide, and face recognition and eyes, no longer has to recompose or "work" to reposition the focus point for each picture (this was one of the major limitations of the D600, because of the reduced area AF). The machine then calculates the exposure based on the face covered, making it more facile.rnrnLa video quality is excellent, but the continuous AF is to be improved, especially because with face recognition hops abbastanza.rnSi partially solves with Single AF and using touch screen to refocus where and when needed. |
 | sent on April 08, 2017 Pros: sensor, small, comfortable (in my opinion) even jpeg files quality, color depth, fast AF, excellent high ISO seal Cons: the touch only works without taking EVF not as in other cameras, I think it is therefore useless while it is convenient in the process of play Opinion: for people like me who comes from the XT10 it is remarkable step forward, in terms of sensor and AF which is really another categoria.rnè probably true as my predecessor said that the optical park is not stocked but already with the lens kit 18-55 f 2.8-4 you have a setup of all rispettorna my humble opinion even without adapters among Fuji goals surely is all it takes, qualità.rntornando of the xt-20 is really performing well in 6400 iso in raw with no loss of quality. I had a XT2 but given the identical photo quality I decided to go on this (and the price there was also released 2/3 50/140 f2.8) giving up the double-slot (that a little 'I miss) and various things that not even remember:) rnstraconsigliata for those accustomed to FUJI world but also for those who want a compact quality APS-c and wearable (silver version) also beautiful to see |
 | sent on March 17, 2017 Pros: intuitive light Cons: Seems made for Japanese hands, the viewfinder is better than fella blowpipe Opinion: Overall it is a good car, light, handy, reliable, however, I do not fully satisfied me and I felt the uncontrollable desire to sell it is in my opinion a bad copy of xt2 although photography has a great autofocus works well but unfortunately I was not convinced completely. Then I read the excellent reviews and certainly who made them had his reasons to me instead I found no flaws from the price. |
| sent on March 08, 2017 Pros: Size and weight, excellent performance, at high ISO seal Cons: not very assorted lenses, of which few stabilized, and somewhat expensive; battery life Opinion: Review in line with the other, the 'plus' system are size, image quality, in particular the raw (now that you can deal with acr 9.9). On the other hand, the camera body is not stabilized and feels the lack of a few more in the optical system, perhaps at the most affordable price. It would not hurt even the opening of the "third party Fuji system" (eg. ART Sigma, Tamron etc ..). In any case, an excellent purchase that I recommend with my eyes closed, even to replace a aps-c system (I come from Canon and are more than satisfied). |
 | sent on February 28, 2017 Pros: Iso, 4k video, simulation films, black and white fantastic, af which is fine as well to almost dark .... fast .... Cons: for now nothing .... maybe 'too much to ask but .... not' mind the very useful internal stabilization with vintage optic .... but details are sometimes negligible! Opinion: taken yesterday coming from a full frame Nikon d600 .... after several tests under pressure does not make me regret all the former reflex.rnPosso say that the feel that transmits and 'very similar if not identical to my former Oly EM10 mk2 ... .but it does its work smoothly and files are exceptional also because 'performance is clearly superior and then this and' a aps-c .... the ISO seal and 'fantastic .... a real step forward ... even for those who want to try their hand in the video ... with 4k rnPer me .... I did not know fuji .... simulation of historical films is proving a real sorpresa.rnrnPer now I'm with the optical kit and then the try 'with vintage lenses that I just I get the adapter .... but do not rule out a future purchase of a 55-200 .... rnrn |
 | sent on February 28, 2017 Pros: small, lightweight performance Cons: at the moment no Opinion: A few days are happy owner of this little gem, first exit on the last Saturday with 55/200, plenty of juice rnNon me forwarding technical disquisitions, which can be found with ease on the web, and which actually are not able to do, but I will only give my first impressions on the use of this machine. I state that I had XE2 and XT10, X100S that I would not change (except for F), so I have some familiarity with Fuji menu, which in the latter XT20 have in my opinion been improved becoming more intuitive and immediate. I do not exaggerate by saying that anyone with a minimum of photographic knowledge, will be able to master the key shooting parameters in about ten minutes. Lcd touch, which I use mainly to move the point of focus, is not the joystick of T2, but I find it still practical. Autofocus faster and more precise than the XT10, used in C mode (continuous), once the subject engaged, would not give up! I would spend a few words on the aesthetics and l & #39; handling unit, equal to the XT10, for some it might be too small for me, it do not very large hands, the addition of a cheaply hand grip has led to a very good grip. Same sensor and T2 processor, to a virtually halved the price, make a sensible purchase, rnsenza copromessi the quality of results. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
