|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 21, 2023 Pros: Metal construction; Tropicalized; light and space-saving; fluid diaphragm ring; Fast and accurate AF; good image quality (sharpness, microcontrast); good colour rendering. Cons: It is not 1.4; lightweight plastic hood Opinion: Really successful lens for those who do Street or Reportage: good image quality and color rendering, fast AF, fluid aperture ring and with the right resistance, very suitable for lighter bodies. The flaw, if you can say so, is not being a 1.4: in fact the detachment of the floors is smaller than the older brother, but the yield of the bokeh is not bad. The plastic hood is light and small but functional. Yield to 2 a little softer especially at the edges, but absolutely acceptable. Closed two stops becomes a real blade. Advised. |
user63757  | sent on December 08, 2022 Pros: Metal construction, high yield, perfect mechanical diaphragm, backlight and excellent side light hold, small and very compact. Cons: A can of aberrations and made corners more external to the large openings coma and distortion but I would say acceptable, softness to the corners the outermost ones. Opinion: O return mandate on 27 WR ( not satisfied ) arrived on 35 2.0 + 23 2.0 a can of tests and my impression 35 2.0 Fuji. I find mechanics perfect ring nothing to criticize the AF excellent and very fast. The very high yield center even at full aperture but suffers slightly at the outer corners closing diaphragm improves, known where the very light and dark contrast to the large apertures of the aberrations however in extreme conditions of visible light then it is fine it corrects. Excellent seal with side light really excellent behavior. Excellent metal construction. Also great for my X-Pro3 optical viewfinder OVF X-Pro3 despite small hood mounted I would say excellent but this also concerns the 23 2.0. For me a perspective with small flaws I would say promoted if I look at the general package. |
  | sent on February 23, 2022 Pros: Size, fast focus, very quiet internal focus motor, excellent materials. Cons: If it had been brighter it would have been the top, but you can't have everything in life. Ridiculous hood. Opinion: I was undecided whether to take the 35 F1.4 or the F2 version, tried both, in the end I chose the F1.4 version, for fundamental factors, I use it mainly in the street, and in combination with the T30 it is really good, silent shot of the T30 + silent internal focus of the 35 f2 are a perfect match. Nothing to take away from the 35 1.4 , but it is really too noisy, and the external focus really annoying. The hood supplied with the 35 f2 is really scandalous, at this point do not put it ... Cmq for the rest is an excellent lens also for portraits, very sharp, I also experience at f2, differently from the 35 1.4 that to have a good sharpness had to be brought to an aperture of F2 or greater, further thing that made me choose the F2 version of the 35 mm. |
 | sent on January 26, 2022 Pros: Sharpness, construction, aperture ring Cons: Hood, lens that once mounted you can hardly do without it Opinion: Lens of fine workmanship as per Fujifilm tradition with the XF series. Super sharpness, very sharp from 2.8 to rise. A ta returns beautiful images, with a pleasant softness. The construction is excellent being in metal and the ring of the diaphragms returns a nice feeling in use. Had it been 1.4 it would have been perfect but it would have overlapped the already present lens with the same opening. The autofocus is also very precise and quiet. Sore note the hood, plastic, but necessary to protect the lens. The compactness of the lens (which I personally also like from an aesthetic point of view), will hardly lead you to detach it from the camera body thus having top performance for various photographic genres (especially portraits, street and some landscape). Advised. |
 | sent on June 27, 2021 Pros: Size and weight, color rendering and colors, af, is tropicalized, Cons: Do you have any? Opinion: Tried on x-s10, coupled perfect even considering machine size, it is its lens!! good on all aspects, lens yield, colors, not even so soft to f2, built well... Excellent on all aspects, I can not find defects, even the af is quite responsive, usable even in videos, finally built also well. |
 | sent on April 09, 2021 Pros: optical yield, sharpness, construction, weight, equivalent focal, tropicalization Cons: for me none Opinion: Beautiful optics for yield and colors, the equivalent focal point (about 50mm) is perfect for everything from street to portraits set to some landscape. Af precise and quiet. On the X-Pro2 it is also perfect as a size and is tropicalized. Even at full opening it is definitely incisive but improves a lot from f/2.8 onwards, to become excellent around f/5.6. Some reviews complain of chromatic aberrations, but Personally I have never noticed them, at least of such magnitude as to compromise a shot and only to f/2. What to say, for me it is one of the best Fuji optics and considering the price it is at it is difficult to find defects.. if we really want to find one (completely subjective): I don't really like the silver :) |
 | sent on March 01, 2021 Pros: Well done as usual Fuji Cons: Soft to f2 and minimum distance maf Opinion: Very well built optics, with soft diaphragm ring the right and third stop, servo-assisted manual maf that I do not mind. Personally I love extreme sharpness, which can still be reduced to pp, so at f2 I find it a little soft for my personal tastes, but from f2.8 to 16 it becomes extremely sharp and meets all my expectations. I find the minimum distance of maf a little limiting, which still remains in the norm for a 35mm (there are specific optics for the closest photo)... I had no elements to compare it with big brother 1.4, but the focus is extremely fast and the yield of 2.8 amazing and without visible distortions. Beautiful optics at low price, to be permanently mounted on the camera. |
 | sent on December 18, 2020 Pros: Compact, weather resistant, sharpness Cons: Aesthetics (really bad) Opinion: As well as appreciating the quality of its products, I also appreciate the style and aesthetics. In the aps-c series the machine bodies I consider them really beautiful and functional, as well as the objectives. This is the first "fixed" WR that happens to me in my hands. If the X-T2 finds with the 14, with the zoom 18-35, with the 55-200 the body-lens completion (all optics I have) with this conical trunk bacarozzo seems to have nothing to do with it (I do not comment on the lightguard because on this accessory in general fuji does not seem to believe it at all). This is to argue the "con". For the 'pros', I agree with all those who have spoken about it well, I cannot add anything more. To satisfy the eye I would have to choose version 1.4, but I was looking for a fixed WR to combine with the X-T2 for thoughtless exits in adverse weather conditions. And anyway, the shape of the barrel doesn't matter for the result, which is photography. |
 | sent on June 15, 2020 Pros: Opening to f2...??? Cons: Character and personality-free as about 95% of Fujifilm digital ml optics, indecent distortion from wide-angle pushed by 30 euros, free of three-dimensionality, free of contrast Opinion: I took with Fujifilm for years also on a professional level, then I moved to Leica. If it is true that good photography can also be done with a compact 50 euros, it is true that there must be pleasure in photographing (since it is not a question of splitting stones). I say that perfection (so sought after in the modern amateur...) is boring. Perfection in photography is a tedious flaw that only leads to long yawns. Having said that I can say that one of the favorite optics is the Simmicron 50mm/2 Rigid, optics far from perfect, but with character to sell. It is a poetic glass, which gives emotions. The opposite is the opposite of about 95% of modern Fujifilm optics. The latter, were conceived more with aesthetic than qualitative benefits. Having been shooting for years with Fujifilm I can say that I rarely had to deal with valid optics. Mostly they are lenses that work when shooting in jpeg, with all internal processor fixes. As soon as you shoot in raw... here comes the donkey. Distortions, lack of contrast, lack of resolution... In short, bottle funds designed exclusively to be processed by the machine. Not to mention the lack of character. Optical without personality, that bore, that make you pass the desire to photograph. And this 35mm is the summary of all these flaws, a trivial optics, which has distortion even if it was an old 24mm stall, of those you buy and use once. I shoot exclusively in raw, if I want to shoot in jpeg I use the mobile phone or the compact. If I use a Fujifilm I want to have total control over the image. After years of digital Leica and film I filmed an XE2s and this 35mm... bà, it made me return the desire for analog, where the final quality is given exclusively by glass and film. |
 | sent on December 07, 2019 Pros: Constructive quality, silence and compactness Cons: In certain conditions of light aberration of color at full opening at close range Opinion: I bought it back, after selling it in favor of the 35 f1.4, taking advantage of Black Friday at a super advantageous price, Fujifilm Italia guarantee. I missed it even though I think the first copy wasn't excellent. This copy amazes! Mounted on the X-H1 I didn't remember it so quiet and precise and sharp. Compared to 35 f1.4, it offers warmer colors with the same settings. I find it very beautiful, tropicalized, internal focus, a jewel. I decided to keep both 35 f1.4 and f2. Magic both! |
 | sent on September 29, 2019 Pros: Compactness, solid construction, WR, good image quality, autofocus, diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm with directions and right calibration. Cons: no one in particular. Opinion: It is a useful way forward; it doesn't clutter or weigh. It is very good in terms of image quality; as much as it may interest it is sharp and quite contrasted. Honestly, having even the 50 mm on FF , I do not think it is perfectly equivalent to a 50 1.8 because the 35 has something different that makes it special and maybe a classic 50 1.8 on full frame retains a bit of advantage in the blur, if we want to be fussy. The autofocus is very quiet; The MF is good though by-wire and the dial is very small. Very good diaframmi diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm, which does not move indefinitely as on 10-24 and has the correct indication of the opening value. I would say that overall it is a very balanced and well-corrected objective. I did not notice any particular difficulties or aberrations in the backlight. The price is commensurate with the quality also constructive. |
 | sent on September 25, 2019 Pros: Small, crisp and fast Cons: I don't know Opinion: I've been using it for several months now. It is a lightweight and versatile small optic, and also has a fast and precise autofocus even in extreme light conditions. Nitido already at full open. Mounted on xt-3 I use it as a primary optics for street and portraits. It never betrays, the price is in line with the build quality. I don't mind the lampshade. |
 | sent on March 26, 2019 Pros: Weight (feather), construction, AF, sharpness Cons: Aesthetics, Lens Hood Opinion: Valuable Objective in many respects. First of all very good sharpness already at TA but from 2.8 onwards it goes even better. A F4 and F 5.6 from the maximum (as Per script). Lightness, aperture ring very well calibrated and pleasantly smooth. Af silent and very fast. What I do not love instead is its design (but of course it is my opinion) that looks like that of a small trunk cone (ie with the tip Mozza) without a true why. My impression, but this generally applies to almost the entire Fuji system, is that it often seems to have to do with "toys" or with miniature collectibles (both bodies and lenses) built in an excellent way, but still "objects", almost were small reproductions of professional systems. And I'm not saying this just because I come from the reflex world to which I am very fond. The "Vintage" design I really like and the Fuji line in this sense has made it immediately very recognizable on the market. I Have the impression, however, that this sometimes plays a bit at the expense of ergonomics and practicality of use. I Can say it quietly for my X-T20, mirrorless in my opinion beautiful but better suited to "Lilliputziani" and also rather uncomfortable (the additional hand grip is almost mandatory) and also for the newer X-H1 than in an attempt to equip it with a handle Smoother results in fact as a kind of hybrid with "old style" taste and a high-tech contraption. Going Back to the lens, definitely recommended. Excellent colors and also the fuzzy (not to be scream) and to have in the outfit considering also the price very interesting. |
| sent on March 19, 2019 Pros: Lightness, dimensions, opening ring Cons: Blurred at the edges, sharpness, focus ring Opinion: I did some tests, both "chart" and photos controlled, and I found the same problems on sharpness and blurring at the edges highlighted by Cameralabs and OpticalLimits. For me it is almost a microblur that a real blur. I thought it was a defect of my specimen. In General not sharp. Then I stopped doing tests and I took some pictures. With the light reflected on a face or that enters the lens, when you should have a photo "burnt" you find yourself with a bright and intimate photo as you have never done and you understand that the tests are useless. I think it gives the maximum with subjects to at least one metre and mainly towards the center, better if put on F 2.1. Nice versatile focal and muted colors. Fire Ring in manual a bit slow. Absolutely recommended. |
| sent on March 12, 2018 Pros: Excellent optical and constructive quality, light, performing and silent AF excellent quality / price ratio. Cons: Nobody except the obscene hood! Opinion: So ... I wanted to try this lens thoroughly before reviewing it, it is an excellent lens, it is built really well, the shots of the ring of the sarm well sno frizionati, hard at the right point, I tested in the rain mounted on X-T2 without encountering any kind of problem then really well tropicalized.rnThe AF is quite silent compared to for example at 35 f1.4 XF and is clearly more 'performante.rnChe still, its weak point is the hood that Fuji it comes really ugly! I replaced it with a very well made Leica JJC style costing 39 euros on Amazon, expensive but gives it another look.rnIf you look for a 50mm equivalent focal and maybe you own a body like X-T2, H1 or Pro2 is the best choice you can make so 'a photographic means able to deal with any weather, in addition' is small, light and optically fantastic characterized by a good bokeh to be a f2 and a beautiful color rendering, recommended without reservation can ' %3B only make him "kit". |
| sent on December 30, 2017 Pros: Solidity, sharpness, colors, blurred Cons: Nobody Opinion: A little gem, with crazy clarity already at f / 2. Solid construction, exceptional rings, it is a real pleasure to hold it in your hand. The blurred is soft, really pleasant. The hood is ugly and decidedly insignificant but does its job and allows you to use the lens cover while mounted.rnThe weather resistance is definitely an added value. Promoted with full marks. |
 | sent on September 04, 2017 Pros: Solidity, sharpness, WR, aesthetics. Cons: Not found Opinion: Purchased at a lower price than used, I was hit by sharpness (crazy at full aperture), brightness, solidity and speed of focus. Compared to the kit lens I seem to have another room. I'm using it a bit for everything, from portraits to landscapes, and I'm happy with the results. Lens to have absolutely if you use the Fuji system. Only new, but of this I was already aware before buying, the unusable series hood (the Fuji would do a better shape to sell it without the right). |
user81826 | sent on January 28, 2017 Pros: compactness, weight, fast and quiet auto-focus, F/2 aperture excellent in most uses, construction, tropicalization. Cons: Correct distortion via software (for me it's not a big problem). Opinion: For set portraits It has a rather soft bokeh and a nice rendition; It will not be the 35 F/1.4 But it can satisfy most users. The autofocus is very fast, especially with the latest Fuji bodies and can also be used in low light. The construction is extremely solid, like the whole series F/2 Fuji with gaskets. |
 | sent on January 22, 2017 Pros: lightweight, weather sealed, clear, price Cons: hood obsolete Opinion: Just past the Fuji system I purchased it with the X-T10 body, a small lens but as an enviable quality to other 35mm more emblazoned houses. Sharp already at full aperture, 2.8 becomes superlative. As for the lens hood is really obscene, first because it is screwed in front of the lens and the second is plastic, it is better to buy it in part, always original metal and to be applied over the lens, for security control the Fuji site. I recommend this lens for people like me who went to this new system. |
 | sent on January 03, 2017 Pros: lightweight, small, quiet, bright, rapid fire, WR, very sharp! Cons: nobody Opinion: --- Did return with 35mm f1.4 for this 35mm f2.0 ... I have not regretted even if the focus of 1.4 was really great ... but this f2.0 focus is really quick and silent. .. indeed will not feel virtually nothing ... WR that is also paired to my XT1 is the combination ideale- the XT1 I took recently thanks to the beneficial Fuji cash back 300 euro ... (paid 1000-300 ) .... really an excellent goal! |
 | sent on October 24, 2016 Pros: Compact, light, crisp. Cons: No one for me! Opinion: Certainly one of the best goals I own Fuji, first used on XT-10 and now in XT-2.rnGià definitely good before, with the last model home fuji the af reaches a truly remarkable speed, comparable to that of an SLR good level. Particularly suitable for street photography, its exceptional clarity it still allows the use in all fields, also encroaching into the landscape. Considering the price, to be taken entirely into account. |
 | sent on October 15, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, lightness, quality construction Cons: After mounting of makes you forget the other optical Opinion: It really is a fantastic, mounted on XT10 goal makes you forget all the other objectives and makes you want to take pictures of anything and everything in focal length "normal". If you have a Fuji X series you can not not have it. Great to TA, excellent F / 2.8, is stunning, I'll leave it mounted for quite a while. At about 350 euro is mandatory purchase it. vote 10 |
| sent on October 08, 2016 Pros: Lightweight and discreet Cons: Hood - Price Opinion: Purchased by listening to various reviews regarding the slow pace of FA compared with 35 1.4.rnHo had occasion to do test "practical" of the two lenses in critical light conditions: the times I have identici.rnConsiderando seems that you can not find the '1.4 at the same price of 2.0 and that the blur of 1.4 is quite different, I leave you the conclusioni.rnrn |
 | sent on September 06, 2016 Pros: Good sharpness at TA, weather sealed, making quick, pleasant blur fire Cons: PARALUCE EMBARASSING, is not 1.4 Opinion: Perhaps the best ever had fixed on the whole (but I still have to squeeze 56). Crisp at RT, then it becomes 2.8 in a blade. Fast Focus. Got it used with the optional lens hood (cool). Great for ambientati portraits. Very compact, filter diameter not very common. I had to shoot with a single lens throughout life, perhaps that would be! Recommended! |
 | sent on February 09, 2016 Pros: Sharpness, blurred very nice, precise autofocus and fast, robust, small footprint, tropical conditions. Cons: Apart from the fact that it is addictive, no. Opinion: I made the folly of selling the old 35 1.4 for this new model and I must say I have not regretted it at all. E 'already crystal clear to TA, but at 2.8 sets new standards. The 9-blade give a yield of very nice blurry although it must be said, not "blur" as the predecessor. The real wonder is the autofocus, which is fast, responsive and precise (also because the new firmware update of my XE2). It hooks up very well even in low light conditions. And, it must be said, it is extremely quiet. Another planet compared to 35 1.4. The aim of it is strong, the aperture ring is well rubbed while they are not an avid fan of the manual focus "by wire" that this lens (like many other fuji goals) adopt. The small size and tropicalization mean that it is one of those goals that do not detach from the camera body ever. I've never been a lover of this focus on APSC. In fact, the always was either too short or too long, the previous model was per some time in the drawer. But with this little gem I have to say it is a pleasure to take and teaches you to love again the focal "normal." For me a must. |
| sent on January 12, 2016 Pros: Weight, clarity, construction. Cons: It has a defect that I explain ... Opinion: If you want to turn your machine into a compact X-light to carry anywhere, anytime (the xt1 the seals and do not fear the bad weather), then you have to buy this light. Obviously, it is a 52mm equivalent, indoors can be a bit long ... but if you step back, and you do everything: street, reportage and ritratto.rnMAF amazing for speed, accuracy and low noise: I had the 35mm 1.4 Nothing to complain about the quality of the images, but the noise of the motor gave me a sense of fragility, this f2 instead is awfully "massive", as minuscolo.rnNitido to f2, 2.8 cut yourself ... you are careful! rnBuonissimo also the blurry, but do not expect the fog f1.2.rnPerò 56, has a flaw: once screwed on the machine, you just can not take it off! In fact, my 10-24, 56 and 55-200 for some time resting peacefully in zainetto.rnAdesso the price is still higher end, otherwise the vote would have been: 11rnrn |
user26730 | sent on January 02, 2016 Pros: All! Cons: The weakness Fuji, the hood! Opinion: As owner of the 35mm f / 1.4 I thought long whether to take it or not the new 35. I finally decided to try it, also because of the fact that in KL I paid 440 USD.rnLa feeling of solidity and strength is fabulous while It is very small and light. The aperture ring has the right resistance in monovrarla. The sharpness is a reference to any opening. Scooter af works great and always engages! In the dark, where the old engages f2 to f1.4 fails. The blur is very pleasant and the overall image quality is amazing! It is weather sealed, which never hurts. The only drawback, in my opinion, the lens hood that comes down to a plastic washer that gives the feeling of having to break up just looking at it! The new 35mm mounts 43mm filters that although cost remains not readily available. rnHo given a rating of 10. Highly recommended! !! |
user6585 | sent on December 29, 2015 Pros: Construction, aesthetics, size, f, sharpness, blur, price. Cons: Nothing for now Opinion: What about ... beautiful optics, I think from the point of view of aesthetics. Small but robust, fluid rings (how nice change aperture optics). af high performance even on old x e1, whereas I chose this instead of 1.4 in order to have a faster f, as well as for the small size, I can only be happy. The sharpness is excellent even at TA, closing one stop becomes beastly ... :) From what I have seen until now, the blur is nice and creamy, about even of 9 blades. If we add that it is also weather sealed and the low price (I paid 369 ships), I think is a must to have a view ... |
 | sent on November 20, 2015 Pros: Small, incisive beyond belief, fluid movements of the past (see Leica optics), weather sealed ... Cons: Anything Opinion: Just caught this morning morning along with 90mm, I got to test it at home by clicking here and there. Well was a wonder in every tutto.rnGià just picked up I wanted to test the manual focus, moving, remember other times when I possessed the Leica with 35. Fluid, with the distinct feeling that both the micromechanics top. Focus Files and I took in af are fast and very precise, but the icing on the cake is the quality that Fuji has accustomed us. Do not forget the lightness and compactness that detract from the strength, but that I be invisible especially for street ... Ultra-straconsigliato seen the price ... |
 | sent on November 19, 2015 Pros: Small, compact, metal, light, easy to handle, nuts pasty and fluid, precise, instantaneous AF, TA crisp and clear from edge to edge, 2.8 becomes a razor obsidian, bokeh fabulous. Cons: For the moment no. Opinion: I arrived today so I had little time to test it in the field. First impressions are stunning. It 's small and compact. The collars give a nice feel and precise. Smooth but not loose, pasty but not rigid. E 'of a sharpness disarming already in TA from one end of the frame to another. 2.8 is impressive. Sticker to an almost imprecettibile. The autofocus is sniper, fast and precise and not miss a beat. Very light and easy to handle. Obviously all metal except for the hood. I found a genius the little screw-mount lens hood as the filters and the cap can be applied on the lens hood to the lens. I have a feeling that will remain permanently bonded to the X-T10. |
| sent on November 17, 2015 Pros: All Cons: nobody Opinion: Tested at an event Fujifilm. Lightning-fast autofocus, excellent color rendition, extraordinary engraving. This is the best lens Fujifilm. I have a 23mm gives me more satisfaction because of the focus, and that use a 90 for a portrait. Definitely I buy it and I recommend everyone purchase. Compared to his brother 1.4 it is considerably higher. |
| sent on November 17, 2015 Pros: All Cons: nobody Opinion: Tested at an event Fujifilm. Lightning-fast autofocus, excellent color rendition, extraordinary engraving. This is the best lens Fujifilm. I have a 23mm gives me more satisfaction because of the focus, and that use a 90 for a portrait. Definitely I buy it and I recommend everyone purchase. Compared to his brother 1.4 it is considerably higher. |
 | sent on November 16, 2015 Pros: light, bright, very detailed, very good feeling with my way of taking pictures, great and fast autofocus Cons: I have not found in the tests I've done Opinion: I got to try it during an event Fuji, along with many other lenses and optics was that struck me most of all. Lightweight, easy to handle, just comfortable to use. After the excellent impression I had using it, I was extra-happy reviewing the photos home to the detail and color rendering. The autofocus in low light has not missed a colpo..oltre to be very fast (usually use 18-55). So for me it was love at first sight and I am sure to take it also saw the great value for money. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
