JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:4k, no need for a license. Autonomy. Silence. Handiness. Weight and transportability.
Cons:Well... many certainly. Missing the follow me, missing the sensors, video sector not comparable to other drones (although I must say absolutely adequate for amateur use), video with little light that manifests grain to go go ..
Opinion:Given that I have the license (both A1 / A3 and A2) and that I have tried various drones .. I must say that for the use that I make of it (simple amateur passionate about photos and videos, without professional pretensions) is in the end what I prefer .. In the other reviews there is already written everything. The only thing I notice is the tendency to turn to green in the shots that are made on the sea. The water looks green even if blue (it easily corrects itself in pp). Returning to the drone: I add something that I find very important. He carries himself around for a whole day on vacation without feeling the discomfort of weight. I took a handbag that houses all the contents of the Fly More combo version and... I didn't hear I did the same with another DJI (phantom 4) and after a couple of hours I regretted having the backpack with the drone with me. It's the reason why I don't take it off in the end. Sure... the 1-inch sensor is something else (but it is only noticeable with very little light!) ... but better a video made even if with a grain of grain than a video that I would have made if I had had the drone with me ..
Pros:OcuSync 2, 250g, 4K, front colored LED, new controller, better and quieter propellers, Raw
Cons:no active track, no landscape profiles, D-cinelike, and of course no Log. No collision sensors.
Opinion:Compared to the Mavic Mini 1, the Mini 2 is a big step forward. First of all there is the OcuSync that allows a safer transmission even in places with interference. Shoot in Raw but the video is limited for color profile settings. I really wanted a D-Cinelike, but it's not there. There aren't many controls on the camera that stay a little too contrasted to do a bit of grading in post. Cute front LED. Also very convenient is the possibility to transfer files to the smartphone without the use of the RC (just press the rear LED for a few seconds until the color changes and associate it with the phone as wifi. Big step forward is the most powerful battery and the longest and stiffest propellers. This avoids the problem of the Mavic Mini 1 that often gave error on escs, and gave low power alerts. They also lowered the noise, which is very important as people hate drone noise. The use of USB-C is also excellent. I think you can also use the Smart Controller shortly, so that if you also have a Mavic 2 Zoom or Pro you can carry only that, having less weight. Compared to the Parrot Anafi remains behind because of the camera that is tiltable even upwards up to 90 degrees and above all the lack in the amphi of no fly zone (once I had to turn inside a Hangar to shoot a plane and I had to use the Parrot Anafi as the DJI lacked the engines).
Pros:OcuSync 2.0 - 4K/30fps at 100 Mbps - remote control - wind resistance - possibility to reuse the "old filters" of the mavic 1 - DJI stabilization - battery - USB type-C - weight 249g - video return on the hd remote control - Possibility to use the previous propellers - Very comfortable charging base also as a powerbank - Access to immediate microSD slots
Cons:Only no case where to insert it as they had done for the Air model. Otherwise no one if you know what you are buying. If you are looking for a larger sensor, it is better to turn to something else with different weights and sizes though.
Opinion:No one would have thought until the first rumors that DJI would release so soon and with so many important news the Mini2. First of all Ocusync 2.0 that practically puts an end to the use of wi-fi signal for drones of the Chinese house. Ocusync takes the safety in use of this drone to the highest levels, previously unreachable by its predecessor. Finally 'random' disconnections and sudden signal losses goodbye. The compatibility with some previous accessories is excellent, making cinematic filters available immediately even for the mini2 (usually with the new DJI drones it was necessary to wait some time to have filters and various accessories). The new remote control if some have been accused of being too bulky for such a drone, is actually of absolute convenience that the previous remote control could not even get close to. The controls are smooth and safe, the change in the position of the mobile phone and the cable already included in the remote control make everything much faster during setup.
Pros:OcuSync 2.0 - 4K/30fps at 100 Mbps - remote control - wind resistance - possibility to reuse the "old filters" of the mavic 1 - DJI stabilization - battery - USB type-C - weight 249g - video return on hd remote control
Cons:sensor remained the same installed on the mavic 1 - price 100 euros more expensive than the previous mavic 1 (combo version) - automatic movements only in 1080p and not 4k - 4K/30fps and not 60fps (but I understand, since he would go to compete with the older brothers)
Opinion:premise: it must be judged for the category for which it was designed. I come from a Mavic mini 1. the leap forward is abysmal with this version! only the new Ocusync 2.0 communication system conveys a feeling of tranquility in its unprecedented use. It's not a range test talk. This is a drone that was born for short-range use and where with the previous model there was a risk of signal loss or stuttering at the slightest hint of obstacles, now all this is no longer there. Be careful not to compare it however to its older brothers (air2,2 pro, etc...) because they are designed to do anything else, it would be like comparing a utility car with a sports car (I do not know if I make the idea). So my judgment is limited exclusively to him and its use. I gave 10 as a vote because, in my opinion, it fills the few weaknesses of the first version. On the other, I did not deliberately include the absence of automatic tracking systems. It doesn't have active track is true, but not having any collision sensor in my opinion would have been just a useless risk. It is a drone born for use in the city (where allowed by D-Flight), easy to transport and safe. Those who need to use it for self-shooting look at something else. everything he does, he does very well. Highly recommended for those who already own one of its older brothers not least for its possibilities of use (at a regulatory level). If I recommend it as the "first drone"?! the answer is YES but with a great premise: it is as easy to use as it is dangerous... not having any collision sensor you should always remain more than focused on driving without taking unnecessary risks. it's not a toy, nice funny but dangerous. always to be used in compliance with current regulations. To date the best drone for technology-to-weight ratio on the market. Is it worth switching from mavic mini 1 to 2? Depends on... if its use is occasional even unless you can place the "old" second hand and at a good price. For all the other people who maybe use drones not only for recreational purposes absolutely yes (and I'm not going to list the reasons now since they will surely know better than I do :)). I hope I've helped. Good flight to everyone
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
