RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Canon MP-E 65mm f/2.8 1-5x Macro)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on January 31, 2018

Pros: Exceptional image quality and solid construction.

Cons: It should be used with knowledge of the cause for photos thought, since it is not easy, at least at the beginning, to be managed.

Opinion: I have this lens for some years and I find it superlative for enlargements over the 1: 1 ratio. Certainly it takes a solid tripod and a suitable light source, like an annular flash. Useful and sometimes essential the micrometric slide. Personally I photograph only inanimate subjects and therefore I do not have big difficulty focusing even if it takes a lot of attention and patience with every shot. I'm not good with the focus stacking but I do not think that for the photos I do is essential. I am content to say, given that with this lens at every shot I open fantastic and often unexpected scenarios. Who loves the macro push, of any kind and decides to allow himself time to capture the desired image, can not not own this masterpiece.

avatarjunior
sent on February 02, 2017

Pros: Constructive quality, incredible magnifications without the need for additional accessories

Cons: Difficulty of use, short distance focus, hard-to-get-out.

Opinion: I bought this used optics, fascinated by the photos taken. Once mounted on my 6d I had to tune not only to figure out just how to focus the subject to be framed, an operation that should be done simply by approaching or moving the lens and then the machine because the ring actually acts only on the enlargements by stretching the lens that Closed has a 1/1 ratio and elongated 1 to 5. All this freehand involves a real treasure hunt in the viewfinder. If you can never point the subject out of the "nothing" and scare you too! The depth of field is very limited already to the lens closed at 1 / 1 and photographing Very small objects like the face of a lego doll, you have to focus your eyes and you will get a portrait with a gorgeous bocked. For 1/1 it can still be used without flash or additional lights, but after 2 days I went to buy an annular macro flash that becomes indispensable also thanks to the pilot light that facilitates hunting all framedra. RnAnd working beyond the ratio 1/1 also change the relationship with the diaphragm completely disfiguring the relationship with the various "f" because, from what I understand, they also multiply .... and you have to experience the right opening finding the Best compromise between detail, diffraction, depth of field. If you photograph something bigger than the needle of a needle, you need to use the not very easy technique of focus stacking. To do this, you need to equip yourself with quality micrometric slides, because with the economical and medium-level ones (including manfrotto) you only work 1/1, after serving something stable and precise, very accurate. By contacting here some makers of the site, I found that they use lab accessories such as Newport San Diego sleds costing hundreds of euros. There are also motorized systems that speed up operations. I, while waiting to buy a motorized sled, I have realized a craftsman's bench with precision linear guides and aThreaded bar to which I then applied a large adjustment knob with an indicator, and with the help of an old stand, I started experimenting with the first stacking focus, getting encouraging results but still far from the photos you see here published . The slide works well, but the real difficulty is to place the bug properly, illuminate it etc etc. Because as already mentioned in magnifying enlargements, the focusing distance with the subject becomes dim, and so the annular flash touches the plane of support of the subject, the tailgate, etc. and hinders the operations. We need to work surgically with tweezers and a lot of patience. All this is simple by photographing dead objects or animals. With living beings, you really need to be very good and expert in speeding up all the operations, and then it is essential to have a complete micrometric equipment, a 2-axle sledge, a rackhead, etc. It is, however, incredible that it will make you spend the whole dayBorn also photograph a simple dead fly.

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2014

Pros: Quality construction, optical quality, reproduction ratio achieved.

Cons: No one.

Opinion: 6ugrave; I consider it essential to the high magnification focus stacking, of course, can only be done on a tripod, and preferably with the aid of a slide micrometer; also increases the difficulty of use in relation to the inability to close the iris over F4-5.6 in rr between 4-5: 1 due to diffraction, this turns into pdc really tiny and needs of an impressive number of shots with plans different fire for images that are easy and dettagliate.rnNon is definitely the lens for those who decide to get closer to the macro, but it represents the best way for those who want to try their hand at it, going in search of the wonderful details that only a microworld can donare.rnrn

avatarsenior
sent on April 09, 2014

Pros: Driven without additional optical magnification. rnQualità constructive livelli.rnQualità the highest optical elevatissima.rnComodo the collar to rotate the frame.

Cons: Maybe poor the distance of focus at magnifications pushed (4-5X), but the law does not allow the optics altro.rnDifficile to use for many reasons that under spiego.rn

Opinion: And 'the macro lens for excellence in my say. Born just for this, then optimized at all magnifications where always pulls out shots of the highest quality. You have to be wait to set the aperture reading the instructions because they do not correspond to what is actually set, rnmaggiore is the magnification, the greater the deviation between actual diaphragm and said impostato.rnCome therefore, not easy to use at high magnifications is very dark (light fall inevitable) and focuse is a problem and it is very helpful, if not essential, to use a slide micrometer type the Manfrotto 454.rnPer beginners advice to stay with him lontano.rnPer answer Odessosky, you can freehand Use with flash.rnIo use it with a tripod because I do not like the flash and my subjects are still stuck in the cold of the first mattino.rn

avatarjunior
sent on July 23, 2013

Pros: is definitely a Macro with a capital M, stuff from CSY

Cons: very heavy, very short depth of 1/2 mm to 4 mm with focal fully closed to 16, requires too much light, the focus trope is especially close with 3x 4x 5x magnification type, if you mount a ring flash there ' is room to move.

Opinion: I do not know how to judge it, I took this lens to start with the macro, but ... is not a lens to start, no not really. E 'extremely difficult to use I wonder how they managed to make the photos published in this review, especially to insects that do not stand still, even I read freehand with Focal 2.8, there is something not quite right because the depth is less than 1mm. rnSpiegatemi!





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me