JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Objective bright, stabilized video very well, fully manual, compact, very soft zoom, external charger, excellent photos without flash even at 1000 ISO
Cons:Flash pictures ugly, no 4K video, mechanical noise in focus, battery does not last long, a little 'pesantina, locking lugs goal delicate
Opinion:From late December 2015 are a happy owner of Canon G7x with which I decided to replace my Samsung NX500 (that's right, a aps-c): rnrnHo made many shots of confrontation but apart from the undoubted versatility, in my opinion wins this machine! rnrnIl most sensor in the NX500 gains in wealth and color fidelity but (there's always a but), apart from a focus that's incredible I feel much more valid and precise on this model, the NX500 kneads a lot more in a condition low light (in the shots of every day, we mean ...). Obviously, if I have the chance to make a beautiful pose on a tripod the quality is superior on the NX500, accomplice larger sensor and more megapixels. But in the shots of everyday run indoors, kind birthday parties and so on, no flash there is nothing to do in this machine is amazing! About his super goal very light (from 1.8 to 2.8, although open to itSSIMA opening of 1.8 does not produce razor-sharp photos) rn rnal contrary, the objective included the NX500 is not of good quality, so I said, because I do not want spenderci a blunder is not much better off buying a lighter machine with goal Serial much higher? Well the answer is obvious! rnAnche tracking is phenomenal (but it works only in AUTO mode). The NX500 have never managed to get it going ... rnrnL'unico precisely is the noise of the focus often is almost annoying (and also made me think of a malfunction initially) and the sound of the zoom while shooting video ( yet it is very sweet and super speed stabilized). rnCerto, in terms of video, the NX500 the waste because in addition to having the 4K has more settings resume G7x. But though .. even here there is no history in everyday use: small, light, without the need for lens coverapplicable manually, this is soooo more practice! RNLA battery life (in my opinion) the right and then additional batteries are cheap (not the original). rnrnNon is fast in the burst (and the quality of raw I never tested and frankly I do not care) but enough for the amateur photographer. rnInvece definitely are not satisfied with the quality of pictures taken with flash .. there definitely lose at shorter distances. But personally I hate the flash so I never use it (but why do one star less). rnrnQuindi, in summary: as value for money, now (waiting for the new models come out in 2016) without a doubt I consider it the best buy possible. [Add then to the disadvantage of the Samsung NX500 which has left the sector and therefore it is a segment already dead ...] rnrnE to say I (which are extra-picky) you can trust!
Cons:missing the tilt of the display down as my Pen Ep5
Opinion:Hi I bought this from a few days to accompany the compact Olympus Pen Ep5, for even better portability of the Pen, in particular also for fabulous and bright zoom lens. My only concern is for the sensor even smaller Micro 4/3. They are also undecided whether to leave the default setting of the machine in 6400 and ISO AUTO UP TO NOISE REDUCTION STANDARD I did the tests by setting the AUTO ISO up to 1600 and the NOISE REDUCTION ON LOW, but honestly I do not see a big improvement in the quality of jpeg files. Anyone in possession of G7x who made changes to the menu settings can advise me better. Thank you
Pros:Quality of the sensor and of the general construction, possibility of manual control, brightness goal.
Cons:It lacks the ability to tilt the display down.
Opinion:I was torn between Canon and Sony RX100 G7x III, thinking they can do without the viewfinder I preferred to save a bit 'of pennies. I still do not regret the choice. Taking into account the size, the quality is impressive shots that you can do. My need was to have a compact to take with me during the cycling, so this size should be the least possible while still having the ability to control the camera manual. Fully satisfied!
Pros:Image quality, large sensor, manual controls, the display reclines, build quality, size
Cons:Perhaps the lack of viewfinder on a compact but not if he misses
Opinion:After evaluating for months as compact complement my SLR, for use in holiday / outputs "read" and all trips not purely "photographic", I had identified 3 with similar characteristics: this Canon G7x, the older sister G1X mark 2 and the Sony RX100 mark IV. In the end I opted for G7x as smaller and "pocket" of the G1X, and much cheaper than the Sony. I must say that the choice I do not regret in the least, today I took about a thousand photos, the large sensor has a good yield, and the lens is bright enough and with a good range for a compact. Excellent opportunity to focus by touching the selected point on the touch screen, and the interesting ability to recline the screen up to 180 ° upwards. Each key is easily accessible, the menu is simple in style Canon PowerShot, automatically handles well the shooting settings, but coming from the world SLR always prefer the manual modeallow you to have full control of scatto.rnInsomma, a pocket camera but quality, recommended to those who want to keep in your pocket, especially when you have the opportunity to bring a reflex.rnE 'also beautiful, aesthetically speaking.
Pros:quality images, jpeg quality directly from the room, detailed with very little noise up to 1600 ISO, brightness lenses
Cons:for now I have not found, is not the viewfinder, but I still missed
Opinion:After trying and changed various high-end compacts to use as a replacement for the SLR, I think this little gem face just for me. rnSe set properly in the room contrast, sharpness, etc., produces jpg perfect that does not require any ritocco.rnL'ho used for a holiday with various stages and various types of photos, I did over 700 shots and only about a dozen I have cropped for composition, anything else, he was satisfied. rnAnche if not the viewfinder, the screen is visible even in bright sunlight then I have not missed. Good battery, and still to have a better safety seconda.rnAnche videos I like, nice detail and quality. Finally a truly pocket-sized compact that makes photo qualità.rn
Opinion:I do not know whether it is a problem only of my G7x but while doing the video you hear a mechanical noise in focus annoying, you hear a lot when I see the video seems a tractor without exaggeration, for the rest all ok wonderful machine x photos and quality ... someone who has encountered the same problem on video ????
Opinion:I have a Nikon D610 that I would not change for any reason, has a sensor nothing short of fantastic. That said, I purchased this Canon G7x with a little 'of skepticism, I am one who does not accept compromises in terms of picture quality, so I was afraid that would be a buying unnecessary and unused and that I would continue to be used only and exclusively my fabulous D610 . Not at all! It 'just the camera that I needed for events where the reflex seems out of place or in dangerous situations like a sea with half body in the water, where personally would not risk never my D610 and its goals from about 1000/1500 euro each .rnQuesto jewel returns and razor-sharp images with fabulous colors, short of an amazing quality! The build quality is also excellent! RNA my opinion the Canon G7x is superior to most SLR aps-c currently available! RNE 'was a purchase that would do it immediately, even I always carry with me wherever I go, not to miss a single one scattor, he is in the jacket, in the bag of his wife, in the dashboard. Obviously if I go on trips, or to visit an archaeological site or other special events, I take with me my whole life D610!
Opinion:From owner of Nikon wanted something light to take with me, I have chosen for this compact 30 mm more than the equivalent Sony RX100 III, Nikon is not yet a compact with this sensor (only the J5 but is a 1 then other dimensions) .rnIl sensor is definitely good: for my experience equal to or better than the Nikon D300, usable up to ISO 1600 (possibly 3200), produces only luminance noise. The RAW is very workable (I convert to DNG and open with Camera RAW). The zoom is very versatile, not great on the wide angle (but very entertaining plans to remove 24 equivalents reduced distance and brightness of maf lens) but excellent 35 equivalents up even at full aperture. Stabilization impressive stop to 1/10 sec to 100 mm equivalent. Impeccable construction metal. Accustomed to the menu Nikon not take me long to adapt to the Canon. When shooting in RAW + Jpeg Jpeg is only the "base" and no other opzioni.rnPurtroppo BW or, for me, after years of using an optical viewfinder can not fotogrADouble style smartphone with the monitor at 30 cm from the nose and zoom controlled by a lever. I put it on sale for just these reasons.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
