JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Size, quality of JPG files, price-quality ratio in general
Cons:Missing the flash slide, the selector does not have the standard shutter modes (A, S, M, P)
Opinion:For the kind of photos I do I have always been intrigued by cameras that, despite the size, to nose, seem of good quality. When, given the great price that is now proposed, (just over €300 in kit with the 15-45), I decided to buy it, I was not denied. The excellent internal processor churn out beautiful JPG ready to use and, is often tempted to use it in automatic mode. It is rather cumbersome to work in standard modes, A, S, M; You have to select them from the menu as they are not in the wheel. Given the size advice to use it with its dedicated optics; The 15-45 of the kit is not bad at all. Using a very inexpensive meike adapter, I tried to mount Optical L series lenses, the result surprised me. Recommended for travel and, all the situations in which you want to photograph without being noticed.
Pros:Autofocus, Color science, Jpeg in room, touchscreen, size, menu. Combined with the 22mm the definitive compact. Minimal but effective Grip. Continuous autofocus Tracking.
Cons:Castrate video functions. Balancing of whites indoors too hot. Lack of IBIS. Lack of electronic shutter. Facial recognition but not the eye.
Opinion:Taken for a few pennies on a foreign Amazon. Already with the optics kit reveals an excellent street car for simple controls and the touch screen tipper comfortable. The JPEGs in the room are great, the ISO hold is interesting, the autofocus is impressive for the mirrorless entry level that I had occasion to try. Combined with the 22mm is a compact that comes in spectacular pocket with an IQ in my opinion higher than any machine by an inch or M43. The noise of the shutter is slightly more voluminous than that of the gx80, but with the same gloomy and dull tone that in practice in outdoor situations does not attract attention.
Pros:Image quality in relation to pricePortability and compactnessVideo qualityThinking screen for Vlog
Cons:Menu not exactly intuitiveControl touches little practicalAssenza jack x microphoneMancanza viewfinder
Opinion:I've recently got this Canon Mirrorless Entry Level and I have to say that, coming from a Panasonic GH4 used both for travel photos and for video (vlog) I was amazed by the quality that this machine, so small, manages to get.rnCerto , missing 4k, but for me it is not a big problem and I have to say that the colors and images seem more vibrant with the Canon rather than with the Panasonic (with the same characteristics of the lens). The electronic stabilization with 18-55 then is amazing. I could make movies at 1080p 60 fps while I was walking with a level of stabilization almost equal to that of a camera with gimbal. Incredible ... especially for the price at which is now this small compact.rnI also made a video where I try to analyze pros and cons of this mirrorless Canon.rnLo find this link: https://youtu.be/bGFx4Gu0iLE and if you like ... let me know what you think
Pros:Simple and intuitive in automatic, in manual all the functions available as a reflex
Cons:Given the lack of the viewfinder, the display (large) consumes a lot. Screen brightness not quite as real as the photo
Opinion:I'm leaving on the assumption that I'm not a professional. I decided to buy this mirrorless considering its expectations on paper. I must say that everything presented is more than real. Automatically it is very simple to use, half-press to focus (less than half a second) and full pressure to take the picture, do not claim a reflex quality using it so.rnIn manual is quite another story: rnAlmost too many choices on the menu, MANUAL - TIME PRIORITY - EXHIBITION PRIORITY (these are the main ones) then we find ourselves having a range of settings that in my opinion will never be used. Oil effect, black and white, fisheye effect, etc ... To tell the truth truth I have not used them yet and I think I will not use them.rnIn total manual becomes a reflex, its 24 Mpx are all seen! Exceeded 2000 ISO here is the flaw of the mirrorless.rnUp to now I have already taken about 200 photos and slowly I realized that to have a high quality photo nI can not exceed 800 ISO, I work a lot with exposure times, diaphragm and finally if I see that it is too dark, in post with Lightroom! rnrnCONCLUSIONS: it is a magnificent machine, nothing to say, light, simple and at the same time professional . As far as I'm concerned, turning a lot in the mountains is certainly more convenient than the baggage needed for a camera.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
