RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on November 03, 2019

Pros: Autofocus really very fast, precise and quiet, also suitable for video, stabilizer, presence of zoom lock keypad, general appreciable yield to be a handyman, images sufficiently sharp from f5.6 to 11.

Cons: Wide-angle distortion, weight an excessive but justified hair, not tropicalized with tendency to suck powder also due to the lack of glass in the bayonet, not very bright especially from half focal excursion onwards, flares and chromatic aberrations.

Opinion: New taken alongside the Canon 80D, finally a "kit all-rounder" lens appreciable unlike the basic and limited 18-55: this lens is a little more suitable both at the optical level and at the level of focal excursion with its 135 mm, and above all it is a bomb at the level of autofocus: the Nano USM is very precise, very fast and very quiet, therefore suitable for dynamic photos and also for videos, and usable even in the evening. Sharpness and overall yield are also appreciable for basic uses or afternoon outings, good from f5.6 to f11. Chromatic aberrations are everywhere, but especially at the edges, but with lightroom correction the photos are usable, the stabilizer is excellent and allows me to take freehand without moving up to 1/10 and without micromosso up to 1/15. Distortion, especially in wide angles, however, is its weak point combined with the tendency to suck powder. Ultimately it is a lens that for its versatility I love, and I use it as a handyman in the outings where I want to have fun shooting trains, landscapes and occasional photos without having to bring other lenses. For the band in which you place your vote is a full 8! Recommended to kit with machines such as 70D and 80D.

avatarjunior
sent on May 24, 2019

Pros: Autofocus, Construction, quality

Cons: Length at 135mm, Lens hood

Opinion: It is a lens that, in spite of everything, I love it. I got it in the Kit with the 77D and I use it for over two years. He always gave me good votes with excellent colors. Unfortunately the aperture of the diaphragm is the only thing that limits it... As soon as the light decreases a bit, the best thing to do is to remove it from the machine and put something brighter. The autofocus is a real bomb.. No mistake, it is very fast and ultra quiet.. Also recommended for those who want to make videos, since there is also the stabilizer. As I wrote above I think 135mm is a little too long.. And unfortunately like all Canon lenses excluding L-series, the lens hood and to buy apart.

avatarsenior
sent on May 09, 2019

Pros: -All make light, stabilized, excellent sharpness for a whole do, imperceptible focus silent! -with dual pixel of the M50 goes to the big stra.

Cons: Let me think.... Nobody! It is clear that it is f/3.5-5.6 But it is born not to be compared with the 17-55 f/2.8.

Opinion: If I had been told that it was so I really would not even believe it, to date I have 3 objectives: 22mm F/2, 50mm f/1.8 and this. To date if you ask me what goals would you recommend x APSC canon? The 18-135 is USM is the first on the list, an all make that was my biggest surprise (paid on the new €259 Bay with 4 year warranty!!!!!!) I did not have high expectations, but cabbage in outer I will hardly use another goal! I use it with the M50 + adapter, it is less cumbersome d than you can think and it is also very light! I'll give you a simple example, I got the EF-M 18-150, well I think it's bad in comparison, at the outrageous sides and the central sharpness gets to F/8. This on the sides is really really good, and a f/5.6 does its duty!!! It is clear to Ta do not ask too much, but in external will be my first lens to 100%. Effective stabilizer, and autofocus is the quietest ever heard. I will use it at 100% also for videos in the pool, recite and skating. Rating? As everything do to APSC I do not know if there is any better, for what is designed so do not compare it to the 17-55 f/2.8 eh (this is for little light), I give 9 definitely.

avatarjunior
sent on April 12, 2019

Pros: Excellent Construction for an EFS

Cons: I Don't see any... For Adesoo

Opinion: I Use this lens for a week on 7d Mk2 and Eos Rp.... For me it is fantastic especially on EOS Rp... For now I have not put it to the whip in particular light conditions... But also in the evening at dusk and fantastic... Thinking that and a whole do and use it on Ape C is full frame I can't say it's great. The smoothness of the zoom is equal to the L-series.... Fill it

avatarjunior
sent on November 14, 2018

Pros: Image quality, excellent stabiliser, AF Lightning

Cons: Not very bright.

Opinion: Taken in kit more than anything else for the curiosity of the Nano-USM. I was pleasantly impressed by the quality of the image, I feared the usual optics from kits, to try and resell after a few weeks, instead I decided to keep it. Great to go out with camera and only one goal. The Nano-USM surprised me, it goes from very close to infinity in a fraction of a second. In short, for what you pay in kit, is a lens to have absolutely.

avatarjunior
sent on January 03, 2018

Pros: Value for money, focal excursion, stabilizer

Cons: maybe a little 'bright from a certain point onwards, for the rest ... excellent

Opinion: My first lens, mounted as standard on the 60D gave me the opportunity to look for my point of view. The amplitude of the focal excursion made it easy to understand if I liked being in the scene or taking it from afar. Used in Africa for street and safari (although with many limitations in this second situation) has really given me beautiful pictures, not of the highest level, but always very clear.

avatarjunior
sent on November 20, 2017

Pros: Wide focal excursion, excellent stabilizer, relatively low weight, value for money

Cons: Light distortion in wide-angle, slightly bright from mid-focus onwards

Opinion: After the full frame transition, a young girl in the family asked me if she could use her "old" 1200D: the project to sell everything has changed to "I sell all aps-c fixed optics and look for a versatile zoom." I found it at a price that said "now or never again" and I took it on the fly. After the first shots with chandeliers, furniture, paintings, and wherever the enthusiasm was brought, I brought the new "pupil" in the middle of nature to start making some more reliable proof. Even after a few dozen freehand I really enjoyed an extremely effective stabilizer, a very quick and silent autofocus, a flare-resistance more than satisfactory, an unexpectedly good sharpness (especially a little bit of the diaphragm). There is a slight distortion at 18mm and just over, nothing since lightroom corrects it in a click. Light chromatic aberration at the ends, especially in the presence of strong contrast, even qit can be resolved in a moment. Good wide-angle brightness, which, like most "normal" zoom, decreases to 5.6 zodiac. I miss the hood (at least in my case, probably because I took it in "white box") but I solved buying one with just over one euro!

avatarjunior
sent on June 26, 2017

Pros: Good image quality

Cons: Heavy and not very bright

Opinion: I bought this lens for my Canon 100d to have a non-bulky lens with a good focal length for travels. As long as this is fine, however, the lens is a bit heavy and unbalanced in the car and needs to play a lot on the big Iso . However in the correct exposure the lens returns great quality images and 135mm magnification is more than satisfactory. They also have the autofocus that proves quick. For those who like me a Canon 18-55mm IS STM is a leap of quality In the image and sharpness ..

avatarjunior
sent on February 14, 2017

Pros: Stabilizer color rendering sharpness

Cons: maybe a little dark ...

Opinion: I took this lente..e mounted on eos 70d, and I immediately saw the quality of the picture, good quality color, making the accurate colors, good sharpness, the only comment I can make is that there is a "light" but perhaps it is a feature of the aps-c .. even the stabilizer is very good lens funzionale..un handyman, a good traveling companion ...





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me