JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I was hesitant about this lens in outfit with Eos M50... but then it turned out a good goal, with focal corresponding to a 24-72, I returned clear photos, good quality.. Objective to be managed by the camera (MF and is)... so laborious if you want to shoot in MF.. or remove the stabilizer... For the rest his duty does...
Pros:compactness, weight, sharpness at medium distances, price if purchased in Kit, AF, and is a 24-70mm, some say it's dark, find me a 24-70 also with F/4.0 weighing 130 gr.
Cons:Not sharp at the minimum distance and long distances, the key is missing to deactivate the stabilizer, however I prefer it to 18-55 not only for the wide angle, but also for overall quality.
Opinion:Recommended if purchased in kits, I was pleasantly surprised at the overall quality expressed by an optics 15-45 F 3.5-6.3 from A.C. €60 in kit, I never hung the 18-55, bought only because some cameras were cheaper with the lens in kits that With the body alone. of negative I find that the focus at the minimum distance is able to have a good magnification ratio, but with decay of quality, as well as in long distances. To conclude I find it overall excellent, for quality, price, and focal excursion starting from 15mm, if then one considers it unsatisfactory, there are the EF with other costs and weights. Recommended for an amateur and carefree use.
Pros:Good resolution in the center already at 3.5, lightness though at cost of mediocre, stabilized and silent autofocus, with the stabilizer i made 0.5 second free-of-the-go shots at 6400 iso without the slightest sign of move .. And if I say no, believe me since I counted the minutes of the clock on the wall clock in one of these ..
Cons:15mm visible vignetting, distortion, bayonet plastic attachment, tendency to collect dust in the back lens as well as other cheap stms, mediocre edge at all openings ............... ........ a shameless distortion in my opinion I just show you a photo without corrections so you realize it yourself: https://500px.com/photo/212442489/giandomenico-graziano-italy-roma-by- giandomenico-graziano? ctx_page = 1 & from = user & user_id = 4860680
Opinion:If you find it attached to a m10 I can understand it, otherwise stand out if you have to pay more than 100 euros and look for the 18-55 ef-m stm is that it was in kit with the previous eos M ... which is slightly better built , Starting right from the metal bayonet.rnrnho had several stm optics like the EF-S 18-55 AND 10-18 EF-S, 55-250 is stm. And in all I noticed the bad tendency to accumulate dust on the back lenses after a few hours of use, which as a technician always forces me to disassemble them and blow away the dust. The old 18-55 is ef-s for example i never presented this problem .. just like the old ef-s 55-250 is 2 .... This is to say that the overall design quality compared to old optics kits has been slightly shrinking. But obviously it is just my humble opinion of computer technician and graphic artist who has been taking photos for 20 years. Rnrnps not that other manufacturers are better, as a kit of kit optics. The canon is currently the one with the best compromise. The stabilizer works well and the%3Bautofocus is silent, which is especially appreciated in videos. 15mm vignetting and distortion feel when you are photographed in raw, so it's worth finding an adapter from ef-s to ef-m and buying an ef-s 10-18 is stm It goes much better at the same price almost. A novice or a Sunday user does not realize anything, especially in jpeg.rnrn In addition to reducing the size, they used the system used in the first series of olympus 14-42, you have to move a lever and extend the target first To be able to use it, therefore useless for the photo on the fly removing it from the pocket ,,,,, rnrna 45mm not known obvious defects of distortion rn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
