JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:A little ' all the things already written by those who preceded me.
Cons:Nothing.
Opinion:Leaving out the 100-400 L II I use for Auto/moto, the 35mm focal is the one I use the most, both with my FF (lenses 35 and on average zooms that allow the focal) and with the M6 (22mm/35 equivalent). I also own the 35 F2 IS that I find irreplaceable for certain jobs where I am obliged to average diaphragms, times and low ISO. Coming to the objective of the review, I find it higher than the 35 F2 IS at all openings and, without prejudice to the above, I prefer it on every occasion. The sharpness and the blur at all the openings are great. And, as Peppe Cancellieri expressed in his review, allows a "posthumous zoom"...;-)) the weight... well I'll be trained using freehand the 100-400 mounted on 5d4 with BG for a whole day, so the 760 grams of this 35 are almost a relief...;-) Great optics, worthy companion of my 5d4 and 5DSR!
Pros:Construction, solidity, precision, blurred, colors, sharpness even at full aperture and long distance.
Cons:If I think about it, I can't find it.
Opinion:The 35mm are a focal length with which I am at ease: just more wide angle than the 50mm, capable of wide-ranging, without the ' risks ', for someone like me, not too expert, who can present the 24mm or the most pushed wide angles. In short: A perspective with which I can go out without feeling the need for other (on many occasions, even if not all). That being said, I add that I had the Ef 35 F2 IS USM (Excellent lens) and the Tamron 35 1.8 VC (which gave me satisfactions). But here you find yourself as ' at home ', that is, you have the feeling that you have achieved what you really were looking for. I do not love (very personal taste) the surgical sharpness of certain objectives that seem to focus only on a hyper detail, at the expense of other essential requirements. Here the sharpness is there, other than that! But that's not all. There is the color, the detail in the highlights (with 5d Mk III), the softness where it must be, the blurred gradual and ' creamy ', the right weight (does not weigh little) on a FF body. And then... there's the ' quid '!! That thing that (fortunately) you can not always explain and can arouse an unexpected amazement. It is built very well and gives the impression of an object of high professionalism and safe solidity. The yield on the whole frame is full and without decays. The usual vote? A 10 full! Is it expensive? Yes, but every valuable object is placed in a market ranking, which has its proper proportions. For technical details I refer to those who have more competence than me and the many existing reviews on the net. After many, a lot of optics, which I'm not going to list here, I found the best. We are at the level (made the due distinctions that involves the very different focal length) of the 135l F2, which I had to resell to monetize another purchase and that I will have to buy back. If you are looking for a bright set of excellence, this is it!
Opinion:Great lenses, my second 35mm, taken after years of thinking due to a "disappointment" with sigma art, the model in question had serious AF and FBfocus constancy problems, a sluggish eheh! After many photos and a long time to try slow, I realized that the 35mm is a good focal point for what I have in mind: less exasperated than 24mm and fairly wide angle to give breath. What to say: great on everything, maybe you will not have the magical blur of the 1.2 or the first version, but the quality is all there and you see. Who can take it and will not regret it.
Pros:Sharpness, fast and precise auto focus, bokeh, construction.
Cons:I have not found it.
Opinion:Hardly I write reviews but this time is a must. If some Sigma Art has always said that they were level at Otus home Zeiss, this 35mm completely redesigns the way of thinking for that focus. Precise, quiet, crisp at every opening, it is heavy, but as it should be for a view of this solid, mishandles fixed zoom colleagues and the best of all the competition. Before buying it, I had seen, test in hand, which was recorded by 35 and 50 Sigma Art, but to see it with their own eyes astounds. The price? Well, for a professional perspective of this kind it is an investment.
Pros: Exceptional sharpness even at full opening, image quality, colors, autofocus accuracy
Cons:for now none
Opinion:35mm "definitive" probably the best in circulation (probably as I have never previously had 35mm fixed but for a long time I look at everything I can of other equal focal and brightness). The construction is also at the top, I do not even find it cumbersome indeed it is very pleasant to handle it. The lampshade is of the comfortable type with the clip. It looks constructively like 16-35/4 and 24-70/4 and I really like this aesthetic. The image quality is excellent throughout the frame and the autofocus is fast and accurate. It costs a lot, indeed a lot, but it also returns a lot. I found myself again doing virtually no intervention in pp, if not marginal as some cut, which I tried only with the 70-200/2.8 L IS II. I used it with the 6D, 6d2 and now 5d4. In my opinion it does not "replace" any previous Canon optics of the same focal. For example the 35 L I which (as well as other well-known Canon optics) has a typical and recognizable imprint that is difficult to give up, economic availability allowing I would like to have both but I can choose only one. I kept this optics a few months, sold and bought back, hard to do without. The 35 Art in the interlude is a good lens but nothing comparable (leaving out the many shots to discard for the usual problems of Sigma on Canon). My opinion is this:10 and praise and it is the first time that I happen to give such an extreme judgment, if only for that ability to sharpen the whole frame even at 1.4 and also for subjects taken from afar, great quality for a 35mm that allows to carve out the part that interests among many that a 35mm resumes. Some kind of posthumous zoom.
Pros:Monstrous sharpness, bokeh, construction, precision and speed autofocus.
Cons:Obviously, weight and price.
Opinion:I begin by contrast, that really can not be considered such when you go to buy an optical TOP, built like a tank for durability with materials and top quality glass. You certainly can not expect a compact lens, cheap and lightweight that you use on FF and who wants to be a reference category. For the rest, well, a stunning glass. A surgical made, an AF precisissmo and a beautiful bokeh. I owned even 35L "old" (wonderful lens), and frankly, I find the new superior to the old in everything, even in the "magic." If you like the focal not get any better at the time.
Pros:Exceptional sharpness even at full aperture, image quality and three-dimensional, color, precision autofocus.
Cons:nobody
Opinion:In short, the best 35 I've ever avuto.rnNitido and sharp even at 1.4, with a creamy and mild blurred photos ... returns with an atmosphere and a communicative language unico.rnTutto joined a fast autofocus but also very precise ... contrary to what usually happens with optical bright, even at this 1.4 does not make a wrong, both short distances to long. Really incredible perspective coast ... a blunder, but I can safely say that they vale.rn
Pros:Sharpness, edges, colors and contrast, virtually no chromatic aberration, out of focus, building Tropicalised
Cons:Cost, weight and size, some parts are now plastic
Opinion:I wanted to change my old EF 35mm f / 1.4 L with the second version. Not that I had a particular need ', since' the version I was already 'very well his duty. The new version and 'slightly more' sharp edges species. The focus and 'good, like the old, in my opinion, but slightly different. The colors and contrast instead find them on the best again. Some parties are now plastic of good quality ', but were on the previous metal (for example, the attack of the thread for the filters). They probably have a little 'should contain the weights of this maximum weight. I do not understand how you keep doing Leitz lenses superlative limiting the rooms, while others continue to increase weight, dimensions and prezzo.rnUna nice things to have fixed, as well as the quality ', it was to have small lenses and compact dimensions. I think that we are now at the level of zoom.
Pros:Three-dimensional feeling and sharpness, a blade
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:Objective of excellent quality with blurred beautiful and large three-dimensional feeling, very clear already at maximum aperture, excellent colors and very natural, fast in focus and with 1dx is a great coupled, are already owner of a Canon lens 85 f 1 , 2, and with this new acquisition is a good couple ... for a while 'I use it with 5dsr and is excellent
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
