JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Price, weight and lens hood is not removable.
Opinion:very interesting and versatile lens with its focal width. rnLe distortions are minimized, and the image quality you get is remarkable. rnDa my point of view suffers from a bit of flare especially in certain lighting conditions. rnUna lens that stimulates creatività.rnCanon has created a unique lens of its kind, a masterpiece.
Opinion:The Canon 11-24 L is the most extreme wide-angle zoom (non-fisheye) currently on the market; the angle at 11mm is really spectacular! The image quality is very good, although not to the spectacular levels of the Canon 16-35 f / 4 IS: the center is crystal clear; in corners it is good about 20-25 megapixel sensor, while on 50 megapixel sensors and over we see a bit of decay in the corners, but nothing disastrous. The build quality is at the highest level, and the autofocus is fast and quiet; the huge front lens is a beauty also to be seen :-) weight, size and price are very high, but if you like the extreme wide-angle Canon 11-24 is really the best you can get, in my opinion is a lens absolutely advisable despite being so 'difficult'.
Pros:Sharpness throughout the frame, almost no distortion, uniqueness, singularity of the lens, it's like having a puppy in your hands (you name the species) to cuddle, the images it produces are similar to caress a receipt from the person you love most, beautiful, heavy, does not disappoint, knows combat flare.
Cons:you can not fit traditional filters, the price? .... better not to talk about it .... But the heart can not control, do not speak ill of the wide-angle lenses that I had before, many photos have given me satisfaction even then ... .weight.
Opinion:Very solid tropical conditions and is not afraid of climate change, once attached to the camera, with emotions in many circumstances, we must try to understand the way, his undisputed qualities, in short, I struggle to detach it from the camera. Beautiful and unique to 11 then you need to focus for a bit of time to understand and highlight anything you want really from 'image, now that I have at hand, I think it's irreplaceable.
Pros:Sharpness, focal width, edge sharpness, distortion contenutissima, flare, uniqueness' of the lens.
Cons:Cost, weight, inability 'of the use of filters. Gels limited to focal more 'long (The rear lens group moves back towards the rear of the lens most a when the lens is Set to wide end. Therefore in order to prevent the rear lens element from making contact with a filter (a when installed ) we raccomend using a filter only if the zoom ring is not set to the wide end) rnvuol say that you can use it up to 12 with the filter.
Opinion:I changed the Sigma 12-24 II to take this 11-24. I 'happened to be a good price compared to Italy (still hard to find) in both the US (B & H) where the current dollar exchange rate does not help. The I took in Seoul in South Korea where I am part of the price for lavoro.rnA very disproportionate, should buy this lens? Generally No. 16-35 f4 IS I, and 'good, you can mount the filters, and' more 'light and handy and the quality' optical equal. Obvious that from 16 to 11 the difference '. Let's say that you buy for the gap that there is' between 11 and 16. For no other. And of course for the quality '. I think you can get good results with 8-15 fisheye purche 'is used in parallel with the horizon, and' a lens hilarious and costs the right. In 80% of cases, I think the Sigma 12-24 II do very good job, costing 1/4 and weighing less. The difference between 11:12 and not 'significant (sull'11-24 there' the notch 11 and 12 and Nos see this WOW !!) rnSe landscapers are considered good buying this lens. Costs a lot and in the end you can do everything withthe Sigma. Closed at f / 11 with excellent results. The only thing I like sharpness, distortion throughout the frame and this' much better.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
