JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:resolution, good dynamic range, usable files up to 3200 ISO
Cons:until now nothing in particular considering price and apsc factor
Opinion:I state the fact that my review is based on the fact that it is a machine that costs 600 euros and then turned to an audience of amateurs. That said, I am a matrimonialist photographer and I have been able to use it in royal weddings. I was impressed, really. Obviously it has its own limits with regard to holding the ISO being apsc, but otherwise it is really good. The main body is a 5d mark 3 and I often use a 1dx, but this little apsc is very good for your own space. Obviously arrived at 3200 ISO files have an important grain size and the focus system goes a moment in crisis in areas dark areas, but for everything else, as mentioned, is really good. I will try to implement some image of the last marriage, so as to make clear the potential of this machine not bad
user128541
sent on June 22, 2017
Pros:How to Own Ferrari after having driven a ten-year old rut!
Cons:Battery wrapped in insufficient, indispensable a second, as well as the remote snap, not easily available and for now obeyed, connecting my smartphone to wifi
Opinion:Anything I can find I've bought based on reviews from other sites, and on a background experience where high precision is required when it's the optics that does the job anymore! So transforming theory into practice, I paired with the 800D, a Sigma Art. F.1.4 / 85 mm. For future imitations of portraits and macros and landscapes.
Cons:Some modest uncertainty of focus in difficult light conditions.
Opinion:I come from the 350D who has faithfully served me for twelve years. I was favorably impressed by the tactile rear screen and, of course, the quality of the photos. A bit more, though scarcely used by me, is the ability to make movies. I do not understand - frankly - the reason why in the 350D there was the possibility to resume b / n with different filter effects, which I did not find on the 800D. It is true that photos should be treated in b / n in post production (and filming in raw), but the chance to see the photo as it is taken is still important. Especially for me, I find post production a sort of falsification of photography that must be valid from the moment of replay.rn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
