JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Slow autofocus - not a handyman - to use with fast times and so with so much light :)
Opinion:On the small format (APSc - used on 400D-600D-50D) the picture quality leaves much to be desired --- on full size (6D) reserves a pleasant yield even if not "sharp" as you would like: single focal lengths are Much lower as quality to the corresponding manual fixed targets (my old Zuiko 100, 135, 200 and 300 and Hoya 300) but this also happens at the very expensive 300 2,8L
Cons:Sharpness, Darkness, AF (Considered Alternative)
Opinion:Honestly, I never really came into the world of canvases. With my first reflex, the 1000d, the 18-55 kit I always seemed to be short, often looking for portraits and close close plans, so I was able to give this cheap and lightweight piece with which I played a bit, at the beginning Stunned by the focal length, enthusiastic about the fact that I could take details of long distance, close-ups without moving, simply turning the ring. All this from a novice in experimentation. However the benefits are all there when it's your first canvass and you're under the 300mm wow effect on apsc. After doing a little bit of experience you realize the limits of the optics, which, for charity, makes it discreetly, but without stabilization it is realistically usable only in good light conditions or under 150mm. Observe the sports at the closed or high speeds unless under the direct sunshine. After 40d I inherited an old 70-210 f / 4 and I have not used it anymore. I would love to say it is a'Optic for those who are at the beginning and is experimenting with new things, looking for their place in the world of photography, if not by the fact that with a few extra euros you get an ultrasound AF faster and more powerful. In my opinion, it does not make much sense as an optician and I can not recommend it considering the alternative almost at the same price (and I talk about who CAN LOVE and VUOLE the new one). If you are interested, I can say that it would be worth it only if you are under 20 years old and has been given, for those who have more experience there are a tide (literally) of alternatives (from old canon versions to more recent third-party optics ) That work much better.
Opinion:I bought this lens as a kit with canon 550 d, and I immediately replaced with Tamron stabilizzato.rnUltimamente are switched to Fuji and tried to use it again with the adattatore.rnLa yield is' clearly improved, with possibilita'di looking up asa lack stabilizer feels much less, with peacking focus you focus without problems even in manual and is also 'leggerissimo.rnLa sharpness using more' fast times and 'improved and allows me a 450 mm focal length It serves sempre.rnConsiderando the price it deserves an 8.
Opinion:Caught in a kit with the 550d and set aside for a time. Now I try to 6D and find it reborn. The compact size allows me to always have it back together with 50stm. I actually prefer the Tamron 70-300 VC that now I no longer carry with me because of a weight and size triple and image quality not so superior. A bit 'soft to TA, with excellent color. Today I want to break an arrow to this budget that basically knows how to give satisfaction on several fronts 8 vote
Opinion:Economic objective and good construction, does his duty to a certain focus, then no stabilizer is hard to use. On stand does its job well (always compared to the price), but freehand hardly be satisfied with the results. The autofocus is quite noisy but effective enough. It does its job but you have to accept compromises .. much better than the 55-250 ...
Opinion:L I bought along with the camera and all 'objective of the kit. To start with the tele is perfect. The sharpness is not his strong point, ok, but for beginners, and as a comparison has the 18-55 kit, this zoom gives good satisfaction. L 'then zoom range is good, with a tripod you can begin to make attempts to focal length and there is a chance to experiment and learn, for who, I repeat, is the beginning, as I was when the' I bought. For the price at which it is located, would recommend to all beginners!
Opinion:It is an excellent telephoto lens for those who begin to experiment with the focal length, the price at which I would say is that is just fine. The zoom range is large, you can cover more or less all need to zoom. The focus is fairly accurate, but it is definitely slow and noisy, but the real sore point is the lack of stabilizer, which can be heard on this type of goals. A 300mm sharpness suffers a bit 'but overall the quality is acceptable. The construction seems solid enough, the bayonet is made of metal and not plastic like other objectives canon in its price class. The professionals who need the stabilizer and an aperture diaphragm greater definitely not would choose, but for everyone else it seems a good compromise, considering the price.
Cons:a disaster at focal lengths above 100 due to the lack of stabilizer, sometimes the AF makes a fuss but I'm price!
Opinion:Bought in Bundle with the 400D, but as soon as you begin to understand what a true aperture, much as mentioned by others cambiare.Come Great for starters (especially for the price, even if it did not cost so much when I got it: - (), but change it as soon as possible! rnSenza svenarsi with the Canon with the edge of the board to move Tamron just put away another 200 €!
Cons:af slow and noisy, shoddy construction, lack full time manual focus,
Opinion:I took it as the first tele, the price is attractive since the focal length in which it arrives, the construction is very plasticky, for this is very portable and lightweight. the af despite being slow and quite noisy, no mistake. Unfortunately, the front lens extends and rotates during focus, and the manual focus you are forced to disarm the af. is great in relation to the price for "deal" with the long focal length.
Opinion:I've had this canvas in a kit with the 550D and I must say that if you search for the detail and clarity is a lens to be avoided, it was useful to learn what they mean in practical terms the lengths "tele" and therefore I would only recommend to those who want to experiment a little with as few Euros you have a tele with a high zoom range.
Pros:Price, 300mm, weight, short distance of maf allows close-up.
Cons:Autofocus slow and noisy, poor quality 300 f5.6, poor build quality, lack internal focus, lack full time manual.
Opinion:It 'was my first telephoto and helped me to orient myself in the world of photography. rnrnL'obiettivo is lightweight and compact, but the build quality leaves much to be desired (surprisingly the bayonet is made of metal!). rnMancano the internal and the full time manual focus and autofocus is very slow and noisy (although quite accurate on close subjects). rnPregio of this lens is to offer a telephoto lens that reaches 300mm at a low price (130 € new). The minimum focus of 1.5 meters allows discrete close-up.rnrnIn conclusion: great start to navigate the world SLR saw the price, but for those who have quite clear ideas, I suggest you save a bit more and take the good, but cheap, Tamron 70-300 vc usd.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
