|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 23, 2022 Pros: display, wi-fi, speed, file quality, viewfinder, construction, battery life, in short, a semipro Cons: unique perhaps the ISO seal not exceptional Opinion: C and little to say, as mentioned above it is a semi-professional I use it since 2018 and being an amateur to date does not give me reason to replace it, it has everything you need and if flanked by quality and bright optics even the only defect (iso seal) can be moved forward by quite a few stakes. What to say surely given the prices of the used I would highly recommend it to those who come from entry level SLRs or maybe from older machines or simply to those who approach the SLR for the first time, this camera will give you a very long carpet in front of you |
 | sent on July 02, 2021 Pros: Raw quality up to about 1000 iso, robustness, autofocus, partial tropicalization, articulated screen Cons: jpeg not up to par, held over 1000/1200 iso Opinion: I had it from 2014 to 2019. An excellent aps-c machine, performing enough to guarantee appreciable results in most situations. At the time autofocus looked really good, although for the current criteria it may seem like a slow thread. There are not many focus points, but they are well distributed, covering most needs. The burst is discreet, allowing you to take the action scenes home as well, if it is not completely hectic. Beautiful raw, fully usable up to about 1200 iso. Further it is not recommended to go further. Very comfortable, in many situations, the tiltable screen. A big car at the time. Today I still believe a very good second body or an alternative to approaching perhaps the best photograph of the 2000 or the 4000. |
 | sent on June 15, 2021 Pros: Ergonomics, fps, articulated screen and touch, file quality, colors Cons: iso seal Opinion: This was a lady machine for me. I started approaching photography in a more serious way, because I was so pleased that I could no longer do without it, despite the fact that my photographic path began many years before its purchase (my first car was purchased at the age of 12). I took it new to Amazon at a price of 946€, just out, crazy to see the prices now of the semi-pros, they have increased by at least 2/300€ and remain unchanged after months. The high iso seal is not its forte, but certainly with a little shrewdness in post, the files are still usable up to iso3200. The flurry of 7FPS is quite sufficient, in the end in 90% of cases it is difficult to want more. It is very versatile thanks also to its fully articulated display, and all in all also quite light. The tropicalization, although not at 7D&CO levels, is excellent! I've always found the AF module great, it never let me down and it's always been accurate. |
user28555   | sent on March 06, 2020 Pros: Cons: A few more points of maf would have been welcome (but already inherited the maf system of the 7D and already was not little), as well as the scope however expanded but not 100%, the second slot could be comfortable but with the reliability and quality of the sandisk memory cards c I used, I have never lost (absolutely) a frame nor with this or with any other reflex, certainly one more for backup, makes you feel more 'quiet but you get along with even one, alternating maybe the cards every now and then. Opinion: I came from 60D and the jump was a "double jump forward, on everything". First Canon photocamenra with dual pixels and live view management with reaction times and touch screen that were worth the upgrade on their own, then the exceptional versatility of the shot where, although with a not very high number of points (19 but more than double compared to the previous model and with many other compositional possibilities), points well arranged even if a little spaced apart but this was certainly not a problem knowing and being able to have some small groups of maf selectable to the necessary besides the single point and the grid of points that in live view almost doubled in number allowing you to focus on touch or with displacement of the dial, the maf almost on the periphery of the reflex, for those who preferred macros and pushed close-ups like me, this possibility to compose in live view with that quick response, already in the first version where the dual pixel was really a remarkable technological impkement and really very effective and quick to touch or intermediate press of the click button, also allowed me to assessments of focus stackng with reflex on a stable or static basis with a simplicity and expansion of composition and pesniero previously unknown, the versalitity of use expanded enormously, the improved sensor made well at low iso with excellent detail tying in spontaneous symbiosis with the 100 macro L Canon, exceptional lens that with this reflex, gave me great satisfaction and populates in combination with this trusty and stainless travel companion and with other lenses, many of the photos that I have in the gallery, but it was made appreciate great for an aps-c, even medium iso high, as much as they matched bright lenses or quality coming to make shots with good yield and noise management, after a balanced post, even at 12800 iso with poor light omin dimly lit interior, burst for me exuberant (I do not make birdy except sporadic photos in that area) but excellent resource anyway in case you wanted to take advantage in some other circumstances, fantastic grip for me and excellent ratio Canon detail and colors. I replaced it after almost 4 years and I'm a bunch with an 80D but low iso, I think this made him a beard even if the other raised the bar, being more recent and advanced, on other aspects, some of which, however, the subscriber car car cared little, great machine for me the 70D, of an absolute reliability, never a problem encountered, except a few infiltrations of dust when the change of lens was more frequent (the machine was only partially waterproofed). It will always stay in my heart and I thought of her when I got to try for a couple of months a new Canon 6D Mark II, just exit, feeling from first FF for me but from burning disappointment (I immediately regret the 70D that was also a lower category as product band and reflex, exit pelal other several years before and as sensor (aps-c vs new sensor FF...) but the ratio of quality and usableness between the two for my needs left no doubt, the cons for me were clearly superior to the pros and I was clearly freed I think a 5D Mark III that, although just released, was in my opinion at least two spans on the 6DIIperi in most of the basic functions for photography, robustness, tropicalization, ergonomics, weight, balancing, grip, sensor quality, autofocus system..., double CF and SD slots, joystick customization of menus and buttons/commands, immediate feeling, management and low iso rendering as I liked with the 70D, but this is another story... . Going back to the topic on the 70D I conclude, the ideal rating for me, even affective, is "11", but you can't assign, but a nice 9 full "true", sincere, does not take away from him anyone, always earned with honor on the field |
 | sent on August 09, 2018 Pros: Swivel and touch screen, Wi-Fi, general file quality, battery life, buttons customization, fine AF adjustment Cons: Few points of MAF Opinion: The 70d was my third SLR and the first serious camera. Very great satisfactions with this machine. When I took it I began to support only optical L series and was immediately love. I kept it several years and was a loyal companion even in adverse weather conditions. Infinite Battery, the tilt and touch screen beautiful, clear and very useful. Equipped with Wi-Fi. I highly recommend as a handyman machine coupled with quality optics that can be calibrated through the fine adjustment of the AF directly in the camera since the 70d has this fundamental function. To have a higher number of AF points and a more powerful module, maybe in the same band, you can steer on the 80d, but if you do not have excessive claims then, even today, is an excellent machine "generic" on which you can rely fully in every Condition. |
 | sent on June 26, 2018 Pros: Shooting quality, possibility of practicing any type of photography, tropicalization, burst of shots, autofocus, Wi-Fi, level Cons: Noise at higher ISO of 1600, hot pixels Opinion: Great body that I use for the past 2 and a half years, allows to explore practically all kinds of photography and gives unique emotions. At higher ISO of 1600 begins to get noticed a little ' noise, but nothing that can not be solved with a minimal post-production (at ISO 3200 you still make wonderful shots to the Milky Way without the noise annoys). Shooting for a long time and continuous (startrails), after a few shots begin to be noticed the fastidiosissimi hot pixels. Wonderful The fact that it is tropicalised, very useful when the humidity is high. |
 | sent on October 25, 2017 Pros: Rugged but lightweight body even though tropicalized, full-frame photo quality comparable Cons: High perceptible noise (from 1600 upwards) Opinion: I've been using this camera for more than two years, I'm very pleased with its quality. I got it bundled with lens 18-135 STM, with which you really do it all, and it's also quite light. Exposure meter is very reliable, it is difficult to mistake exposure if you have a minimum of practice cone the most common exposure techniques. Very easy to use in manual thanks to the double ring (exposure times and diaphragm). I would try to change the model, who goes for the new road knows what he leaves but not what he finds ... |
 | sent on October 19, 2017 Pros: Semipro, autofocus, burst body, double ring, adjustable screen, level, excellent light and shadow recovery, battery life. Cons: Noise over ISO 800, lights in the display are not reliable, 15-shot RAW buffers Opinion: I had this car for 1 year and 10 months, with her I did more than 50,000 shots and I'm currently waiting for the 80D. The 70D is an extremely interesting machine, bursting with 7FPS, 20mpx and 19 cross-over points. Its strength lies in the strength of the machine cover, durable but lighter than a 7D, the upper display is clear and all the necessary info and the two timing and diaphragm adjustment rings are indispensable. The battery makes about 900 shots, the screen is usually mounted on both 700D and 200D, the machine has a level and each function is quickly accessible. On the other hand, in my opinion, it has a buffer limited to 15 RAWs, with its burst saturated in two seconds, using 95mb / s SD quickly, but still does not go beyond 15 continuous shots. The high ISO grain is felt, especially by applying clarity and recovering shadows in post production. Overall, in its price range, it is the best in circulation, I really loved it, we hope the 80D gives the same satisfaction. |
 | sent on November 23, 2016 Pros: robust body and to tropical touch and mobile display, quality photo Cons: high ISO sensitivity Opinion: Using this camera body now 2 and a half years. E 'was the first reflex, after being shifted from a bridge (SX40 HS). For the amateur that I do, I can only be happy. The machine body is almost PRO levels for robustness, ergonomics and resistance to atmospheric agents; Excellent mobile display that allows you to take even not easy positions thanks to the touch function. The yield of the photo is good in my avviso.rnUn bad point is the yield at high ISO: I noticed that going over 1250 quality risente.rnNon they are absolutely regretted that purchase. |
  | sent on November 21, 2016 Pros: ergonomic camera, well-fairy and particularly intuitive, good sensitivity range, an extension of 110 to ISO 25600 that facilitate night photography (in part) rnOttima opportunities scatare burst (7 FPS) that they are very useful in sports photography. Cons: nobody Opinion: I recently bought the Canon EOS 70D, uma is very versatile and intuitive camera, proven on the field gave me wonderful results both in color reproduction that in the B / N.rnVolendo make a comparison with Fugji S200 EXR and fugji HS30 EXR I own and with whom today I took photos of any kind in exploiting both their functionality, with the new Canon is back interchangeable optics joy, the chance to play with the exposure, to capture people and / or scenes of particular suggestion. Personally, I have yet to test in oscebe environments of particular difficulty of recovery, which I will do in my next vacation in Austria.rnrnAntonio Delfinorn |
user24742 | sent on November 12, 2016 Pros: Handy, well done, intuitive, several steps ahead of the 60d, since I own both, as in the pictures, whereas I tried it with ob 18,135 stmrnOra kit is interessenti prices, making videos with continuous fire Cons: missing the second card slot, for the rest, and so far no Opinion: I took this camera at the end of production, as I always did when I wanted to renew the equipment, saving a lot of money and in the meantime, read reviews, criticism and praise on your model, so I did always, buying my first Canon Eos 40d when already sold the 50d, 50d for passing then when everyone was talking about the 60d, 60d, and finally the still possess when the 70d depopulated .... rnRestando in field APSC, the steps from the above models are many, if between 40d and 50d, apart from the change from 10mgpx 15, did not change much, now between 60d and 70d, the differences are noticed all right, although I continue to use my 60, (is not yet retired .. ..). The 70d, proven at high ISO, but no later than 3200 holds well the noise, then photographing in Raw and with a little intervention with Lightroom everything goes alright, the files are beautiful also led to enlargements of 60 x 40 .... proven even up to iSO 5000 .... but only proven, cmq defended well .... .... I state that I am using with 18,135 stm, as in kits, just possiBile take a more powerful optical ... The video portion then is something never seen in a reflex of this belt, continuous focusing and quiet, high-quality full HD without xò overdo the ISO, the noise in the video after 1600 shows up and in my view very annoying., touch screen, 19 focus points, fast, I really like then finely tuned sound and unobtrusive, ...... there are many advantages, some fault there will be, but for now I do not know what, I think that every camera has its pros and cons, for now I have found on my 70d many pro ..... rnOra that say ..... expect the model that will replace the ' 80d .... so saving will take the 80d .... |
 | sent on October 21, 2016 Pros: Image quality, customization and functions, weather sealing, speed, strength Cons: A little 'weight (but Tropicalised), noise above ISO 1600 Opinion: Even I came from 550D, and change to that it was like having a taste of the full frame, either in quality of returned images as build quality and shooting skills! It is indeed a bell'aggeggio, and getting it used I will delay the transition to full-frame a few years at least. Meanwhile it is a machine that will allow me to invest in lenses for FF without having to regret not to exploit them because of the limitations of the camera body, which is what volevo.rnSe there is a lot of darkness will not push beyond ISO 1600 because then the recovery PP is difficult. |
 | sent on October 20, 2016 Pros: Ergonomics, burst and tropical conditions, is a Canon! Cons: None of particularly penalizing Opinion: I know that many consider it a blasphemy, but I think the 70D even better than the 6D !! a very reactive car, the flaw evening with AF system, but single-point shooting! being an APS-C you can not ask sealing the high ISO, but gets along fine until 3200 (easily recoverable noise PP). lightweight machine and combined with the EF-S 24mm STM surprising for its speed up to not make me regret the 6D (sold almost immediately, because it is a machine designed to make using one thing and does it very well, for the rest leaves much to be desired even ). I always carry it with me and that's fine for any photographic genre. |
 | sent on April 16, 2016 Pros: overall yield, ergonomics, burst Cons: It is good but it does not excel Opinion: I had it, I was very fond of anke. Then given away to finance the 5D3 to which I added a 50D. So it is between these two aps that will make the comparison: 70D vs 50D. Speaking of video wins the 70D ... the other videos do not make them! (Li would with magic lantern but who cares, never done one) instead of talking pictures ... It's not that the 50D is best for charity, perhaps the final file is a hair better in 70D. But the problem is just that, a hair better. In the end we are there, the ISO seal is comparable. The AF module is better in 70D with its cross-type points ... but the dark was harder 50D! (Or maybe it was an impression). Certainly better ergonomics and construction in the 50D has a body like a true pro. The only aspect where the 70D wins without ifs and buts are the megapixels and the flurry. Overall the car is good. But what I think (it is my personal opinion) it is that it is not worth spending too much sOLDI on a 70d if you do not have to do the video. Why 70d (as the latest aps outputs) do not think that really offer a great advantage in terms of photography than for example to a more dated 50D. The final masterpiece is almost similar. to invest FF Council. Go read my review on the 50D to complete the picture and get an idea. Anyway, I got carried away, the 70D is still a good car, in line with other aps with a few grains more. |
 | sent on April 07, 2016 Pros: accurate autofocus, intuitive and close commands, solid despite its size Cons: Noise 1600 ISO up, shortness second card slot Opinion: only now I write my opinion, the own for about three years, he was recommended by a very good in-flight photo photographer. I followed her advice and did very well. Let's start with defects: obvious noise at high ISO, let's say that resembles the old film (which over 1600 iso was almost unwatchable). Now with a good nr program, provided you do not make crop is possible to obtain good images. Missing a second slot and could use. Now the pros: offering images, in my opinion, outstanding as the final resolution from 200 to 800 ISO; I venture to say that they are the best 7dmII that I did not have a very balanced sensor; at least to me like the most 'of the 70d behavior, I find the most real and raw with more shades of color. Autofocus can say that it is a bomb; apt their need and set in the car it is difficult that the photos are wrong. Again I find more shots hit the spot with the 70d that with 7dmII (maybe I have yet to figure out); in my opinion is the af square that in 70d is greatest while in 7dmII is more moreccolo. For the commands I find spot on them, staying with the eye in the viewfinder I can have everything under control with one hand. I brought it with me everywhere; Never sensor dirty, and so far exceptional estate in environments too wet. I I'm still excited! Of course you have to shoot when there is light !! But the picture and 'light !! The also recommend it to those who must begin with its immediacy of use. |
| sent on November 27, 2015 Pros: Autofocus, burst, screen viewing experience Cons: AF in low light Opinion: Great camera for both photos and video. Ergonomic though not quite light, it feels that there is substance (compared to younger sisters 700D and co.). The only flaw is the focus in low light conditions, with any type of lens, you can not take the point if not with the help of the built-in flash (and even with that it takes a while '). Convenient touch screen is removable for photographs in improbable positions for videos. I highly recommend you stay away from the kit, you invest some more money in the lens and machine performance will be maximum. |
 | sent on November 06, 2015 Pros: Autofocus, burst, touch screen, battery life, iso (for aps-c), tropicalization, wifi.rn Cons: Could have been a little better 'yield at high ISO, autofocus will not work with very low light (can not be used for night scenes). Opinion: I bought the 70D almost a year ago, now I can finally give a complete judgment. For me, that came from a 500D was a big leap in quality, the difference is noticeable throughout, in my opinion differs greatly from any other aps-c-end more bassa.rnA my opinion is a good point of arrival for the amateur medio.rnDifficile embarrass autofocus with lenses band 100-400 old, the burst is quite good, the battery life on the 5D Mark III, the ISO are good for a RNAPs-c but with ample miglioramento.rnInizialmente I was a bit 'skeptical rnWI-FI, but later proved to be very useful especially for uploading photos on the phone and use the installation B. Flaws are very few I recommend it to tutti.rn |
 | sent on September 28, 2015 Pros: 7fps, LCD touch, well-built camera body, the AF points, tropicalization. wi fi, quiet continuous shooting, ISO Cons: perhaps a slot memory card no longer spoiled Opinion: I bought this car for about two months and I must say that I am fine. Going from a 1,100 D to a 70D the leap is perceived much. Excellent manageability of the body and for me the 19 AF points are so many being used with 9 of my former entry level also has additional features that make it very useful. The barrage for me is the top, then the burst silent becomes very useful when it comes to photographing animals or insects without scaring them. I would have liked a memory slot for more but that's okay though, you can not have everything. I have not tried to do it by video tutorial we see that if the weel. Council to buy this car at the beginner photographer should he wish to make a change in the quality of his photos. Excellent Canon! |
| sent on September 22, 2015 Pros: Aps-c, burst, wifi, adjustable LCD, AF, according to lighting displays, LCD touch Cons: Knob controls small, key basket. Opinion: L I bought more than a month ago and is a fantastic car to use. The video quality is nothing short of fantastic. The quality of the files is great, the menu operation is very intuitive thanks to the swivel LCD SCHemo, but especially TOUCH. The estate Iso high for me is not a problem because they use them or when I do are easily modified PP. The downside is the menu key and the key for me in the trash that are somewhat small, a few millimeters more would not hurt. For the rest I can only settle this beautiful 70d. When combined with optical L series brings out the best of himself. Those looking for a APS-C and choose the 70d does not remain at all disappointed. |
| sent on September 18, 2015 Pros: Burst; autofocus; tropicalization; swivel screen. Cons: Quality at high ISO, but being a aps-c you know !; Only 1 sd slot Opinion: Great camera, really excellent quality! Coming from a 50D, which by now had his years, it has been an evolution! The only flaw the ISO but are solved in pp. It would have been better if there were two slots for SD or even one and a sd cf. rnuna perfect car for those who want to move to a higher level but at the same time remain in the "category" enthusiasts and professionals. |
 | sent on June 17, 2015 Pros: flurry, rotatable display, autofocus Cons: ergonomics, a few points af Opinion: Coming from the 550d seems another world, this in my opinion is a semipro body, not so much for holding high iso that I think is better than only half a stop, but for the many adjustments that provides the menu than the small 550 ..tra the most important af fine adjustment, auto-customization, different settings on the white balance, the ability to set the ISO to minor step for me is fundamental, gains the image quality finale.rnIl swiveling display is a godsend especially for those who make macro or intend to use the camera for shooting videos. rnPer regarding the holding at high ISO, I quietly shot up to ISO 1600, however with a bit of noise reduction in post until 3200 values ??if you do not have to crop the file can be used, of course, the quality decreases. rnPer my hands I would have preferred a slightly larger body (see that of 7d) .rnSi could better see the competition, with even more pointsmaf and the second slot. |
 | sent on June 12, 2015 Pros: sturdy, but lightweight burst ok Cons: even at low ISO noise digital Opinion: coming from the 600d sure the jump is more than great, but I would like some advice for a next step. I state that my badget not high. On general are quite happy with the 70D, the thing that I really do not like about this machine is the digital noise that very often and in different light conditions is felt! |
 | sent on March 13, 2015 Pros: good reactivity of macchiana, AF, burst, wifi, monitor swiveling Cons: I think that in this price range do not have, perhaps twice the memory slots see Nikon Opinion: The possess more than a year and continues to give me a lot of satisfaction, the focus is very good in my opinion the various goodies that initially thought superfluous type wifi, touch screen, monitor swivel get really appreciate. rnNecessità of optical quality to make bene.rnLa battery life is good unless it uses too wifi. And that does not weigh too much for me is just a vantaggio.rnA Sometimes there is the desire to move to FF but I do not find in Canon a viable alternative to a human price .... and basically every time I shot her Work does sempre.rnOttima even in movies where the focus continues doing his dovere.rnrn |
 | sent on March 03, 2015 Pros: gust, af, battery Cons: held at high iso, lack of slot x CF Opinion: well used to the nature reserve Bayerischer Wald, I could appreciate the burst more than enough to capture the most important moments and not so fast as to risk fill in the blink of an eye the sd card image sometimes too similar and thus from having to discard ..rnla battery after 1200 shots was still at 23% and with respect to iso nothing impressive .. holds good only in good light conditions .. if there is a shadow or a slight against the noise jumps out already at low iso .. but I come from a 600D and I can say that the jump is considerable. It 's always a aps-c and so you can expect the moon .. the image is still sharp, dettaglio.rnla focus okay unpretentious from 1Dx. |
 | sent on February 09, 2015 Pros: Robust, good construction, ergonomic, micro adjustments af Cons: Metering imprecise Opinion: A great reflex, well-made, coming from a 1100D the difference is immense, the I coupled to a 24-105L and the results are remarkable the autofocus is accurate and not miss a beat, a reflex suitable to the amateur who tries that something more, with the best price / prestazioni.rnMolto convenient Wi-Fi coupled to iPadmini el app you can see the photos in screen vacanza.rntouch utilissimo.rnCon very little practice you can change settings without taking your eye from the lens .rnrnForse I found a little 'l inaccurate meter rnrnConsigliata! |
user58245 | sent on January 07, 2015 Pros: LCD touch-sensitive and adjustable, it is used as the cell, very comfortable, wi-fi feature integrated burst, fast autofocus, video recording in full HD with stereo sound. Micro adjustment of focus. Cons: Volume control is not separate but only L + R, lack second memory slot. Opinion: Being my first DSLR I am very satisfied, taking account of the end product. The swiveling LCD display allows you to take pictures in live view from unusual angles. The picture quality seems good. I took away a lot of satisfaction, after I "happen". After buying the shots but I was not satisfied after experiencing and photographed some of all I must say that if the quarry in any situation, we are not at the level of Professional, but his work does it well, for a fan is a purchase guessed . Some professional photographers who know they bought it as a second body and are satisfied. |
| sent on January 07, 2015 Pros: Swivel LCD, fast AF, wi-fi, Cons: Noisy, wi-fi (I have not found The application for iPad 2) Opinion: That is, compared to the EOS 500D is a bomb I've just taken the most beautiful reflex, AF very fast, LCD touch is comfortable apart from the noise it makes when taking photos can be annoying at first not being used, more to the moment I can not say since I only used it again at a 50% capacity. |
 | sent on December 26, 2014 Pros: Compact nn cumbersome with many features beautiful video Cons: Photo not sharp Opinion: CiaornPossiedo this 70 a few months I come from a 40d of which I was very satisfied. No made this video because I can do then is Wi-Fi that really enjoy exchanging photos with your smartphone ..... but to me they are more than half photo nn nn moves seem to focus or are very satisfied all seem veiled ... .Booo the 40d is a great machine with fewer pixels but more real .... |
 | sent on December 24, 2014 Pros: Fast, lightweight, good AF in live view is lightning, swivel LCD. Cons: "Swiveling LCD", lack the second slot (as everyone has said, but it is a shame for such a car) Opinion: I bought it in early December in the coupled L. 24-105 autofocus is lightning, produces excellent file even at high ISO. unlike many of the complaints, the ring back a little smaller than usual I do not mind. I'm sorry for the lack of seconds instead slot for a second memory. The swiveling display find it convenient in some situation, but opened and closed continuously at a certain point may give the idea of ??fragility (not fragile but it is not). is one of the best aps-c market (after 7D markII probably), so I think it should be accompanied by good quality optics. It should be set for good (also the micro AF) and well designed, then it will be your faithful companion. |
 | sent on December 02, 2014 Pros: Af fast, swivel touch display, wi-fi, selections of points of MAF Cons: second x SD slot, small dial on the back Opinion: Super car with a body ergonomic and very light and thanks to WiFi and smartphone app you can make shots remote excellent, excellent stability of the ISO, exposure accurate and good color rendering, gust speed and with the objectives STM realizes Full HD movies 16/9. After a few months of hard use, and after finding the right feeling I consider it one of the best (if not the best) APSC market ^^^ |
 | sent on November 10, 2014 Pros: Operating speed, burst, AF system, ISO estate, wi-fi, touch screen adjustable ergonomics and battery life. Cons: Coming from 350D and 1000D honestly do not know. Perhaps the lack of a second SD slot. Opinion: Fantastic car for a Sunday passionate amateur photographer like me. The leap in quality compared to the entry-level models is evident throughout. Excellent sealing up to ISO 6400 and ISO 12800 also usable with a bit of PP, if you have no great pretensions. It demands quality lenses, although, for the moment, I'm finding it pretty well with 10-18 and 18-135 STM. Fantastic in the creation of video coupled with the aforementioned optical STM. What can I say? Money very well spent. The council. |
 | sent on October 10, 2014 Pros: af video, adjustable touch display, wi-fi, general ergonomics. Cons: shooting silenzionso it is little, the rear wheel to select functions is a bit small and it is easy to press the buttons adjacent. Opinion: I come from the 450d so I find it best to use tutto.rnla 4 months or so and I am very well, I find the great burst, up to 3200 iso files are very good and with little noise and not a wizard of PP this for me is ottimo.rn in acuni shots I've tried up to 6400 iso with the right conditions and I was pleasantly surprised. rnottimo the wi-fi that allows me to use the camera with the phone to click the "stolen" the little animals more difficult to avvicinare.rnottima the video function that between the screen swivel the continuous focus and the ability to select points through touch makes everything very easy and intuitivo.rnla use coupled with the 24-70 f4 10-18 and the legendary 400f5,6 and I must say I am very PLEASED even if I have to improve my technique to use to take advantage of all the potential of this camera. |
| sent on July 27, 2014 Pros: Easy management of the machine by touch display, ability to video, speed in focus, shot by touch display, software and functions extremely complete. Cons: High iso noise Opinion: Not excessively big and still right for normal hands, even with large optical keeps proportions and balance, menu 'complete af fast and accurate (optical tuned assistance) in particular find it phenomenal shooting from touch (adjustable!) With the area of ??the maf tocco.rnResa to iso not at the level of the rest (c aps), the noise rises early enough, in fact, and then 'a defect that mostly can' be filed to the PC, but compared to other solutions that limit the machine ha.rnBene in video, especially when used with optical stm, smooth and without noise 'of optical usm, after all who does not want to take a car ff too close to the professional, and' a nice car with a highly advanced software, can 'count on a large optical and high quality' although those more 'mentioned are the f s, checking the micro adjustment of focus I have solved a lot in terms of sharpness, overall satisfied. rnrn |
 | sent on May 13, 2014 Pros: Operating speed, AF, buffer underrun, noise up to 3200 ISO, touch, wifi, tiltable display, colors, dynamic range, hdr, Cons: Position dial on the back, af settings, shake-free hand .... Opinion: I come from the 40d and honestly after the first few days of pure exhilaration, mainly due to AF, I had a small and temporary setback enthusiasm. rnFacendo traveling shots with the 100-400, I could not get a decent picture quality, using any aperture. Then I got quiet, I have carried out tests to verify if the couple could have 70d/100-400 technical problems; I saw that the problems are not there and I blamed the fault of those shots to several factors: I, distance of the subject (far> 100m), do not use a tripod, mirage effect (given that I shot in hot areas of swamps and wetlands). rnSuperato that time has returned euphoria, I enjoy a lot in macro with 100 usm, both freehand with a tripod in live view (the amazing touch). RNLA use for photos in the gym at my women's volleyball team in 3200 iso, jpg direct baked for me is great. rnEffettivamente for my big hands than the 40d tends to be a bit 'small, but nothing to worry about, rather than the position of the ring multicontrollor is not comfortable. rnAnche portraits made with various apertures 50 is remarkable, dynamic range than the 40d seems much wider. |
 | sent on May 12, 2014 Pros: all Cons: absence of a second slot for sd Opinion: coming from the 400d I have to say that it really is from another planet, the thing that impressed me the most is the yield at high ISO, in 3200 is still utilizzabilissima. the burst is fast and the autofocus is never wrong. the yield with the canon 70-200 f4 and the 100mm f/2.8 macro usm is really fantastic and also with the 70d I upped the 18-55 stm that did not do much on the 400d. the videos are awesome and with the appropriate objectives stm are really fantastic. even the fairly small size and is wearable around without going to the evening with his neck broken. super recommended |
 | sent on May 06, 2014 Pros: Ergonomics, readiness, colors, sharpness, touch, wifi Cons: If we must find, I would have preferred to have the second SD slot Opinion: I state that I do not have a lot of experience but I can make a comparison with the machines that I could try (not many) that used was a 600d and the comparison seems to be a lifetime ago, the reactivity of 70d is truly spectacular Af engages the subject in a lightning even in less than perfect lighting conditions, the burst then does the rest, I like to create many GIF and AI SERVO mode with 99% of the photo is in sharp focus. Regarding the ISO (for me) are good up to 1600 then if you increase the noise becomes more obvious but can be easily corrected with a few clicks of PP seen the end grain of the files. The video function (I use a little) but it remains open mouth, a camera, I did some testing and the swivel screen .... woow ... I had already tried (very useful), but I missed the touch, phenomenal, when you get used to doing all the built-in wifi is a boon in many circumstances, especially having trees near the house, comfortably sitting at the computer and look at the picture-takingin the nests of birds and more, but the battery goes down quickly. I would have preferred to finish as I said the second SD slot helpful but not fondamentale.rnDopo have done many more tests, then more experience with the 70d I changed my mind on holding ISO, for me, the JPG that churns out the car, setting the noise reduction, are really good even at ISO 5000 and acceptable in 8000. |
 | sent on April 23, 2014 Pros: Color, focus, touch screen, key location, versatility. Cons: Construction materials plasticky. Opinion: I come from the 60d then that is its "ancestor" more direct and I have to say that the technology evolved it shows. Surely he functions as the latest generation wifi touch screen, apply various filters etc etc but what struck me most is the ability to customize the viewfinder and the sitemi different focus that you can choose from. I do not know the most advanced machines canon but I can say that this canon 70d is a small wonder. The colors that returns them I definitely improved and more preciso.Detto anchl'esposimertro I think this is the only sore point is the construction. At first glance it seems to have a toy or plastic in your hand and also the ring with the set button, it gave me an impression of something that you can easily break. Now that I use it for a while 'this sense of fragility do not feel it because I got used to it in my hands but I remember very well the initial impact which almost made me think you've got a car too little solid. I, however, a 9 lor do anything without knowing the level machines superiore.rnrn |
 | sent on March 20, 2014 Pros: Which provides more accurate predictive autofocus clear images of subjects in the lively than you get with the 7d. Less noisy sensor of the 7d especially in underexposed areas. Cons: Too small, tight controls. Opinion: Nell 'use sports or nature is very advanced compared to previous models. The 4y.o. from 'out of the 7 d led innovations incorporated by sensitive 70d which is very prompt in switching and nell'agganciare the fast-moving subjects. Light meter accurate and rational layout of the controls. The precision in the operation of the same makes the use of 70d pleasant. |
 | sent on February 26, 2014 Pros: Features wi-fi, Weight, Ergonomics, touch-screen LCD swivel; Focus (especially with the ob. STM); Customizing overall; selection of points of focus; integrated bubble; yield at high ISO; Video Cons: Materials; Location buttons: miss that comfortable joystick! The directional buttons are very close and ring between the diaphragm and the 8 directions often we are wrong (the habit should remedy this difettuccio, pity though) A little 'battery: using the wi-fi for the preview does not shock me so much even though! -> Second battery almost obligatory (LP-E6); Application for your phone: still to be improved ... the settings are not so many intuitive in my opinion Opinion: Coming from a 50D, there is an abyss. The things that are now affecting the size (smaller, acceptable) and ISO yield. This really surprising! The noise is much less noticeable even with a direct comparison with the 7D more pleasant and attenuato.rnComodi and guessed the small buttons next to the display minor, very useful for the selection of the MAF; once stored all does not come off the eye from the viewfinder ! rnPrediligendo photography and Having not ever interested in the film world I find the dual-pixel phenomenal, unfortunately for now I can not take full advantage because of my inability ;). The swivel LCD in Live View also helps a lot in the photos, allowing for shots in the easiest alternative perspectives (mandatory protective film: stay longer than 5 seconds to the viewfinder to review immediately after the picture just taken implies a continuous cleaning of the condensate, and it is quite boring shoot with the LCD closed and not having to open each time to imbrattarlo both ways ... you can not havethough!). rnCon the STM 18-135 focus in the video is really incredible: experts appreciate it! rnPer Regarding the RAW-Voni that churns and compatibility, I had the same problem Redricky, so I switched to ' processing "soft" Lightroom 5.2 which already supports RAW 70D, waiting for updates from Adobe .. (yes, converting to DNG for long sessions was a suicide!) rnrnAl the time of the review already use 2 months and in addition to the things mentioned above I have nothing to criticize ;) rnInfine I can be very satisfied with this Canon SLR camera quick enough to take anywhere. Recommended for those who want to upgrade a body that is already a bit dated series of semi-professional SLR! RnRimango to dissipate the purchase of raw to be able to convince the little one! ;) MP. |
| sent on February 13, 2014 Pros: Practically lightning fast AF, Wi-Fi: Wireless navigate photos on pc is great, swivel display, Touch Screen most perfect level ipad, EOS remote to steer the car with the phone, Video superlative quality and ability to focus simply touching the point with a finger, fantastic colors and excellent performance even with high ISO, fast burst, ability to edit the RAW files directly on camera, and much more. Cons: To edit the Raw in Photoshop you should use a format converter "Adobe DNG Converter" and it is a nuisance, I hope to update soon. But it manages to be all right. Anyway canon also provides its excellent programs like Photo Professional. For the rest of the car is perfect! Opinion: Machine simply fantastic, from slightly more compact dimensions of the competitors, so it is perfect! I personally am very pleased with the purchase and get amazing results. Even at high ISO the camera takes great with noise absent. Focus lightning flash and much much faster than a direct competitor. The videos are simply amazing! You can focus on what you want with just a touch, just take a little hand and you can make some really professional-level video. I tried to put videos on my tv and could not believe my eyes to clean the image. Will the euphoria of the new purchase but it really is a very complete and very machine technology. I am very satisfied! |
 | sent on January 21, 2014 Pros: I think I owned all seen the lower models like the 400d and 550d Cons: battery life, lcd counter shots high and limited to 999 key ativazione lcd propio where I put my nose fixed with p ... 15. Opinion: very happy with the wifi system that allows me to use an external flash as 430 former and higher without using additional repeaters, very nice app for Android in order to handle the camera as a remote control and acquisition for instant photo ... iso much improved (compared to my models) rntrovo very comopdo the shortcut key for the selection of the first thing I did regret af more slowly |
 | sent on December 25, 2013 Pros: Size and ergonomics (for me perfect), AF faster than light, convenient controls, rotatable display, high definition (with appropriate optics), EOS Remote (with wifi, beautiful to look at but is useful only with macros or photos on tripod) Cons: RAW heavy (for those who, like me, comes from a compact) from 25-30 MB each, noise above ISO 3200 Opinion: Will the euphoria caused by this purchase, but the 70D seems really good. I got it in a kit with the 18-55 to start, on behalf of a 50cc go with it as soon as possible to pull out the full potential of the sensor. I noticed, doing some shooting inside an indescribable noise above 3200 (nothing impossible to correct with Lightroom or PS) but enough to bother on camera. The autofocus is very fast, I thought at first it does not work as quickly into focus. I can not be satisfied, and I would recommend it absolutely. |
 | sent on December 22, 2013 Pros: Sensor (sharpness) when used with quality optics, af 19 cross-stitches and very fast, AI servo mode very effective super burst, good color rendering, wifi, swivel display control, video, battery, essential micro adjustment, machine body , Battery life Cons: Fast but not precise, just enough video quality, just enough dynamic range made to high ISO Opinion: Great car body and layout nice picture colors maybe a little too hot good yield up iso (max 1600) direct comparison with 7d on raw 70d generates more workable files but still opening the shadows the situation worsens much with obvious noise already at Big bass, with 17.55 2.8 excellent sharpness and crops that make it fast on all touch screen usable and convenient, wifi very useful for remote shooting with the smartphone also for portraiture, great burst with a good buffer, just video compartment Enough for video quality with a few details but with a very good dual dual pixel, overall a very complete machine but according to my opinion as pure image quality is backwards compared to the nikon competition and also as af |
user14498 | sent on December 02, 2013 Pros: Nothing Cons: Nothing Opinion: SLR from € 650.00 to 1400.00 for digital photography Canon has baked in decine.rnCome can make the photo does not matter because the 70D if I'm not mistaken it seems addressed to those who want to make movies with the DSRL with focus continues as video cameras. They have developed a Reflexcamera. Expect the 7D Mark IIrn |
| sent on December 01, 2013 Pros: I confirm that reported in previous posts. Cons: With the optic 18/135 STM notice a certain softness in the shots. The monitor takes up almost the entire back area, that happens to me shooting with the viewfinder your nose rests on the display on the left side, staining with the secretions of the skin and by sweating. In previous cameras, this was not the case since there were several left-hand buttons are now located at the top. I would like to know the opinion of other photographers if they have the same problem as you possibly solved. rnSenza turn the monitor for viewing shots. Opinion: In addition to confirming the above, I want to take, beware that the 70D raw files are not editable with Canon's DPP, for example, if you maximize the sharpness of the screen so you do not notice the increase in the unsharp mask (greater details). How it could be done for example with the 30D.rnSe using optical L-series results in terms of sharpness are superb, unlike with standard optics you have mediocre results. Known a shake-if you use the camera without a tripod with shutter speeds between 1/125 and 1/250 with good standard always. For the rest I confirm as reported by other users. |
 | sent on November 27, 2013 Pros: AF speed and accuracy - Adjustable touch display - amazing wi fi - Micro AF adjustment - live view - burst Cons: Battery Life - a slot would be more convenient Opinion: purchased about a month ago but I can already call it "sporty" given the speed with which chases and focuses on everything that comes within range, the first shots in quick burst in front of my granddaughter swinging on the swing, there was great light, but the shots were all in perfect focus, focus point on the eyes imposed by touch screen, a few days ago I shot some performances paramotor who I whirled around than 70/90 kmh in 3/20 feet tall di10/50 meters and at a distance, in this case gust slow but everything perfectly fuoco.rnNella section I defined PRO incredible feature wi-fi, comfortable, machine-placed hidden in a bush, I was shooting at about 40 yards and saw again regolavo everything from my smart, I would not know what to ask for più.rndi negative I found the poor battery life but I have to admit that I use a lot is the wi-fi that the screen in live view, a spare battery is already arrivo.rnHo chose the 70d reading various reviews but the ones that convinced me to take the step they are just quelle below, so I would recommend it to people like me who had dubbi.rnAdesso we are in February, after a few months certainly confirm what has been written, fast and precise focusing with the new Sigma 17-70, with the tamron sp 70-300 gets along well anyway, adding the x2 multiplier kenko things change, the better manual focus, I appreciate more and more comfortable touch screen, very convenient and fast, with a finger is corrected in a moment the point of focus. Up to ISO 3200 you will get some good shots, in 6400 we begin to see the noise in the dark parts. You can choose between four ways of measuring light covering an area more or less, but always referred to the center, personally I would have liked another way at the point of focus, for backlit subjects devolved from the center of the scene massimo.rnNessun would be the problem of optical miscro moved with the court, in case the system is stabilizing my Tamron sp 70-300 + kenko2x which causes a micro rough, but turned off the automatic micro adjustment and using the 10xI can shoot a wrist watch at a considerable distance with incredible results. In my opinion the 70d is defended well in the movies, the continuous focus and live view help a lot to achieve excellent shooting, in hindsight, and after a few months I'm glad I made this choice. |
 | sent on November 19, 2013 Pros: Af, operating speed, excellent quality in general to this class (aps-c) Cons: Lack joystick, rear wheel small and unwieldy, lack the second slot sd, silent shutter is not too quiet Opinion: I have a 5d mark II, in the past I've owned a 50D, I can make the comparison with these two machines. I find the 70D good in toto to be a aps-c. I remembered the 50D, especially on the iso that, in my opinion, was unusable over the 800-1000 ISO, remember the image quality in general, exposure etc.. When I took my first shots with the 70D (body according to me) I was pleasantly impressed. iimagine the quality is excellent, the use of lenses L and sigma 35 1.4 art then the lenses are doing their part. The yield iso is just as good, I think we can shoot up to ISO 3200 without posing many problems, up to 1600-2000 in peace, from 2000 to 3200 knowing that you have to put hand to the file with a minimum denoise, but the details remain even in that case are many and great, and the grain offering is quite fine and pleasant with a chroma noise tamed don the basic settings of LR. Compared to the 5d markII remains a bit behind, but do not think it's a different world, indeed. For me then fully usable up to 3200 is2C for me max 200mm equivalent then to 320, and I am one allergic to stand. If the shake-I have, on this or 5dmk2 is my fault, because you may not use the proper time for the focal length used at that time. So, again my personal opinion, I would reassure this sensorn |
 | sent on November 10, 2013 Pros: AF fantastic and perfectly usable in movies (tested with optical STM), adjustable touch display, AF micro lens, light but well built and pleasant to the touch, great burst and good image quality. Cons: I confirm that the density of the sensor and lenses demands attention in the shot with good sharpness, in this case you will get high quality images. Some key points positioned unusual ... you have to get used to it. Lack of the second slot. Opinion: AF truly shocking and running from the point of view of movies (however precise and fast in the photos), the touch screen is really noticeable and comfortable, move the fire quickly at any point of the image by tapping with your finger is very convenient and also the management of some controls is immediate ... type enlarge the photo to see if a fire with two fingers. The ergonomics seem guessed, light and full in the commands but still with a good solid feel and pleasing to the touch ... in short, is not a plasticone. All the controls seem to me that unless the right place to change the point of focus manually which is located next to the shutter button, the first few times it is difficult imbroccarlo without looking but I think it's just a matter of habit because in that position there have never been keys. Let's move on now to the most important, the quality of the photos ... before this I owned for two years and then the 7D for 6 months the Nikon D5200 (in my opinion one of the best APS as quality and gambut dynamic). The 70D seemed very similar to the 7D in terms of image quality with a dynamic range + extended slightly in the recovery of the shadows and noise at ISO 3200 with very little lower. Compared to the Nikon D5200 (and therefore also the 7100 has a quality almost identical) has perhaps a little 'less dynamic range, and a little' more (very little) noise in 3200/6400 ISO. I am very happy with our purchase because the quality difference is barely noticeable and the only imaging compared with screen magnification to 100%, hardly in common usage, but in return offers some features, especially for those who make videos, which are unattainable by others (AF and touch screen). |
user20639 | sent on November 04, 2013 Pros: Sensor that produces a lot of details, fast and precise autofocus. Practical, intuitive and fast. At the time (2500 shots, always used outside) the sensor is not dirty, never happened with the sisters. It has all the new features that help in various situations. Seal against noise, much improved. Cons: Sensor dense, Requires excellent lens and tripod for shots classics. Does not take away the freedom of the free hand, but if you demand quality of the image we want the tripod. (Shake-free hand) Opinion: Machine that will do a lot to talk about its innovations, such as the sensor and autofocus exceptional. It is not FF, but is very close in quality. It has many choices as a professional, but even more at your fingertips. Solid body and is well suited to the fast and prompt intervention. A small distances 3/4 meter is not wrong clicks. The videos are finally easy and precise autofocus single, existing at this time. rnLo touch screen is a useful quality, clarity and speed in making adjustments. rnQuesta machine is the resolution of any defect that could have passed the sisters, if you want more: there remains only the 6D and 5D III, 5D II, who have the large sensor and can be used freehand with more ease, as well as more image quality, but not by much. |
 | sent on October 10, 2013 Pros: AF very high performance, adjustable touch display, micro-adjustment for lenses, with a great detail File, 7 FPS burst of noise a bit more manageable, AF for video finally usable to 360 °. Cons: For now, I have not detected defects worth noting. Opinion: I bought this to replace my 60D SLR to have a camera body with a more powerful AF, for micro-adjustment of the goals that eventually Canon has decided to step down "as it should always be" the best tropicalizzazione.rnIl and for direct comparison with the 60D has highlighted a better sharpness and an improvement in the management of noise in equal ISO, thanks to a slightly finer grain and also thanks to the greater the detail of the file that churns which will allow a greater reduction of noise before losing the dettaglio.rn |
 | sent on October 07, 2013 Pros: Lightning-fast autofocus, touch screen very useful and fast especially for those who have the need to change settings in situations of rapid change, excellent image quality photos and video, very low price Cons: Nothing against, maybe a dual slot would not hurt Opinion: I own a 5D Mark II and I felt the need of a car APCS performance and versatility of size and weight, to bring in a comfortable and relaxed while traveling and short trips (without ballast) but I could not figure out what my bearings, I was very undecided whether to buy a 7D or get close to a 700D (due to the limited budget), in the end the only one that I had not considered was she the 70D, but when I tried it I was really impressed by the performance and value for money . rnSono very satisfied with all the results and the benefits that it offers, is no less a 7 or 6 D (you can interact with all manual settings), and significantly higher than all the models level entry and the processor d5 + for sure does its part in all respects, a system focusing lightning recommend it highly to those who love the sport and not just photos (those who can not afford a budget of over € 1,000). The WI-FI I found it quite useful with eos remote to remote control and set the machine with my Iphone (so cool) in short, noNo that has nothing to envy to the flagships, I could not expect anything better ... THE COUNCIL TO ALL |
 | sent on October 05, 2013 Pros: Camera balanced on the back of the 5D III. Its 20 MPs are right to better manage and clean image resolution. Camera body very good for construction. The AF Live View is also excellent. Cons: For the moment I do not think we can talk about something negative, except for the ergonomics which is perhaps slightly poor, so, in my opinion, it is necessary to use the bg, in fact, that I took with this accessory ... the feeling with the car is significantly improved. Opinion: I own the car for a month and I have to admit that Canon has created an excellent product. I also own the 5D III has in common (as I pointed out above) with this 70D, the right balance between resolution and image cleaning. Having a FF, I felt the need for an APS-C and I was about to get my 7D, which I previously used for two years ... I decided, however, to wait for this new machine and see what it offered in terms image quality ... the conclusion is that I take the same decision a hundred times. Surely the ergonomics and the quality of the camera body of the 7D are higher than the 70D, but the latter has a much better sensor and despite the 2 mp more, even more performance from the side of the noise ... mind you, the noise is there, but is different in some respects pleasant, because it consists of a very fine grain and this definitely worked up and then ... finally no longer see that annoying banding (vertical) always been a leader in many PICTUREine of my 7D.rnrnrnrnSaluti, rnMassimiliano. |
user22999 | sent on August 28, 2013 Pros: Everything Cons: Missing second sd card Opinion: I'm a photographer for years. With 1000 euro you have Qualitè versatility and final results equal to that which was obtained 5 years ago with top of the range, or perhaps more '..... see made to the high iso. It gets better as my 1dx but NOT worth the money it costs more '. If you can do anything you want to photograph with negligible expense. Hello to all. Jerome |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
