JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:APS-C, rotatable display, video, good range and good seal up to ISO 800
Cons:noticeable noise after 800 ISO, audio room so so, missing rings
Opinion:I state that in my opinion it's a good APS-C machine, churning out good files with appreciable general resolution (18 megapixel are more than good), has a good video industry for those who want to challenge themselves, intuitive menu and excellent display if you think that there are bodies far more expensive and PRO still fixed display. Acesssoriabile, plasticky but not lightweight, and therefore able to compensate for the weight of targets large enough (maybe we tell the limit). We say that the real limit of this canon is the ISO seal which deteriorates the images as soon as the light is less and you are forced to alzarne sensitivity, holds blow (in post production) up to max 800 but besides not recover almost nothing. This does not mean that we can work around the problem in part with lights in the studio and outside, and whereas, however, in the hours daily the problem is irrelevant. Having been my first SLR I can not fault it, he gave me the desire to photograph and get back to learn techniques and expressive researches photo / video that has long no longer considered.rnA I think the first real entry level canon for quality, now enhanced with 750. Compared unbeatable quality / price, either by buying it new finding is used at a very paltry. If you are looking for a way to enter the world of photography and video cameras you will have fun for sure.
Opinion:I have this 700d after 6 years of 1000d, the plastics do not give a good feeling, the machine behaves very well, some problem at high ISO but nothing worrying, certainly not at the level of higher-end machines, however I would not call it an entry level, I see her more like a good amateur. Excellent machine for beginners and experts looking for a second body. With battery grip is perfect and achieves a range of more than 900 shots
Pros:Lightweight, rotatable display, intuitive thanks to the touch, you learn faster operation, produces good file until 800iso
Cons:Do not give the impression of being solid, plasticky scratches easily
Opinion:My first (and so far only) SLR, bought two years ago. given my knowledge in photography initial zero, I learned using this machine, initially relying on the touch screen then as I improved my skills, I relied more and more to the buttons, dials, etc. .. RNLA file quality is excellent 100 and 200 ISO would say good 400 and still acceptable to 800. Above I used only in limited situations such as the starry heavens, struggling in post produzione.rnPunto strong is definitely the rotatable display, excellent already in itself to take with manual lenses in live vew, he has this plus nell'orientabiità. It is useful in macro photography, or when it is necessary to place the machine in unconventional ways (for example on the ground to make the most of all cm wide) or why not also for selfie, timer etc ... rnSull'utilizzo gust not I speak, however, for the photos that I have done so far proved sufficiente.rnSe tomorrow wateHister a Full Frame I think anyway I'll keep this as a reflex second body ideal for when you need the mm more capable of turning out good at low ISO file.
Pros:Light weight, excellent touch screen sensitivity is like that as resolution, high-speed focusing, especially with the objectives of type STM (STM I use the 18-135 very often). The ability to track the subject when working in Live View is very convenient, not only in the video. Great exposure meter. Excellent performance even at high ISO numbers (3200) RNLA management of external flashes wirelessly is very comfortable and I often use it with one or two Canon speedlite
Cons:The building knows a bit 'too much plastic. Sometimes you miss the double ring and the diplay on the cover, as on the EOS 60D; for what it costs you can not have tutto.rnIl viewfinder is not very bright.
Opinion:The purchase of a Canon EOS series of three digits is generally a safe purchase. I read several reviews of this machine on the Internet, in particular on dpreview.com and imaging-resource.com, before changing the way the "old" with the new EOS 550D EOS 700D. rnIl sensor "hybrid" with the central part of a double set of pixels (in advance of that of the EOS 70D) is very convenient and allows working in Live View to track the subject and keep it in fuoco.rnIl touch screen is crystal clear and sensible (is of capacitive type as that of the smartphone), over which orientabile.rnLa image quality (I shutter always in RAW) is really good, even at ISO 3200. The methods of use, both creative (P, Tv, M) that the automatic ones, making the machine very pleasant and fun to use even for a photographer esperto.rnLa management of wireless external flash is absolutely complete and is very comfortable. So, to me that I also have a Canon EOS 60D is an excellent second body, or when I go to the mountains, and aXCELLENT SLR that allows me to take pictures of everything without taking too peso.rnSono really pleased to have bought it and recommend it unreservedly to all canonists who want a good SLR at a price much less than 1000 Euro (lens included)
Opinion:I have had several entry level is that nikon canon, but I would classify this camera in the range of semi-pro. File generates excellent, clean, is very intuitive, and the touch is really great. The only thing I would say is that the build quality leaves a bit to be desired considering the competition Canon could use better materials
Pros:Swiveling display, touch screen, excellent jpg files, managing high iso.
Cons:Plastics
Opinion:I replaced my 550D. I find a lot of differences, especially the swiveling display and 'useful and effective, then, to be a APSC, if you turn up the iso is possible to obtain manageable files. Jpg The result machinable. The only drawback plastics which, although of good quality, are always the same, all the way from 350D. I think it's a good second body, in addition to a FF or a APSH, as in my case. Used with a 40mm becomes a compact class, even if the body is not of the smaller and lighter.
Pros:Easy to handle, excellent grip, very little noise even at high ISO, very fast, touch display, rotating display, the possibility of making videos, shooting touch screen and ability to focus touchscreen, presets very good, structurally very compact design in my opinion very pro!
Cons:for now nothing in particular ... the plastic on the back-screen seems a bit too thin and fragile, same thing for the plastic slot SD card, sometimes the proximity sensor off the monitor when the face approaches sbarella ... and sometimes stays off, but it happens rarely ..
Opinion:I switched from the 450D to 700D and it seems to travel on rails completely different ... pictures come out very clean and I do not feel the need for more almost post-production, raw save 4-5 shots very quickly, it is very fast overall, I must say that in my opinion is the best canon semi professional I have ever tried before d 'Now ... looks just PERFECT for those who want to upgrade then get the full frame, but I think with a 700D you can even do without a full frame, in experienced hands is definitely a hottie! 10 vote!
Pros:The word SEMIPROFESSIONAL makes the concept very well
Cons:Given the price I do not see
Opinion:Fantastic performance and ease of use in the menus. Eye on price speculation in expert hands ... Surely if he reaches incredible levels combined with optical level I'm sure would make a great deal in every circumstance perhaps the use of internal flash needs to be helped conmpensando exposure when used indoors small size
Pros:-Grip, comfortable grip! Rn-display touch: shoot, Focusing, zooming cover photos taken with your fingers, on a rotatable screen .. rn-fast, both in the fire automatic save in 4-5 photo-rawrn also excellent at high isorn
Cons:-Uhm ..
Opinion:After a couple of years with the 450D, I had the need to move on to something "new". Finding the range of EUR 899 to 700d with 18-135 stm, I also took the 8-16 sigma. What can I say, another world .. is a wonderful machine, weight and ergonomics right, autofocus with 9 cross type points that I was surprised by the speed, even in the video (sometimes serve ..) EXCELLENT image quality even at high ISO, and even without having the display higher-end SLR like the most advanced touch screen makes up for with no problems, even helping to get a better idea of ??the frame .. rnDecisamente satisfied, personal vote: 9.00.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
