|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on October 31, 2019 Pros: Possible strong crop with quality (1.3X and 1.6X). Noise with thin grain only with very high iso but easily manageable. Form af brilliant and with important news that pose justify the purchase. A burst that considers the size of the files easily compares with the 5d3 (1fps less in raw) but with a double amount of data (30Mb vs 80Mb). Absurd file sharpness as long as you take care of the snap phase. Cons: Battery life for long sessions Requires technical care at the shooting time (that's why at first it was recommended for studio photos) It requires pc discreetly plateral to decrease the processing time of more 'files not suitable for lazy and approximate. Absence Orientable Screen that would bead Hoc in macrophoto , kind of very suitable for this reflex. Difficulty finding it used at a lower price than the new one, but it doesn't directly depend on canon Opinion: Of this machine I read a lot of reviews and topics but since my considerations I draw from proven proof I decided to go deep considering how in everything what my real needs were.' I consulted sample I viewed and processed a hundred files from iso 100 to iso 6400 from 30sec to 1/8000 from f1.8 to f18 in the ranges I use most. Files worked with ACR and CS5. I believe that juza's review is the only one that really describes this niche machine objectively without taking a priori position, so I would invite you to read it . I use it mainly for naturalistic photography taking advantage of the possibility of crop 1.6x with a 300 2.8 multiplied, thus having a native file of 19mpx of the highest quality. In practice a 600mm can be modulated up to 960mm from 780mm depending on the crop factor chosen. Not suitable for those who are very approximate during the shooting phase because it requires a certain meticulousness in the choice of parameters to best squeeze the sensor avoid the micromove and any spreads. It doesn't even fit branded fanatics. The noise has a more pointy grain than the younger sister easier to handle in pp, however perceptible to eye 10/10imi only from 3200iso. If you want unnecessarily and exaggeratedly clean files switch to another sony or nikon brand with all the pros and cons. Silent shot suitable for naturalistic stalking. Detail of the absurd file as long as you use tricks to avoid micromove and diffraction of the lenses, otherwise you will be disappointed. Interpolation of a 5d3 file will NEVER give you a 5ds file as some claim. We talk about quality of image not beauty or emotions. Trust. Try to believe. The af module also in lv makes it perfect for photo hunting in-weaving but overused by stakeout. Of course it allows a customization according to the scenes filmed,but even here you have to take the trouble to devote a little time. I mean, it's not a machine for everyone. This has led to a sharp devaluation of the used and a difficult availability at fair prices. So I took it as the ultimate camera for the photo hunt to be flanked by the 5d3 and the 7d. Having no intention of reselling it and having found it at an affordable price I am aware that reselling it would be difficult even if I would miss cmq very little. I excluded the 5d4 despite coming with deep satisfaction from a 5d3, because at that price there are no big news that justifies it while remaining a nice car. Let's just say that 5d3 doesn't make you feel the need. If you use L-series optics it's obvious that the SLR will be satisfying, but I think it's an optical law that applies to all other bodies. Here all the more reason because we're talking about a monsterpixel. New machine costing 1100euro (2019) so the evaluation of the used in excellent condition should not exceed 850 euros in my opinion. Those who ask for higher prices than the new have paid as much as a utility on the time, so surely you will have to be able to get before you quit the bone. Tip: Evaluate your real photographic needs the way you take photography and your current kit before proceeding to the purchase . |
 | sent on November 14, 2017 Pros: Robustness, controls, compatibility with Canon home lenses, AF, exposure meter, file rendering if well exposed, silent and silent shutter. Cons: Huge files, slower than new machine guns, af to calibrate for good, micromoney lurking, safety times to keep at 50mpx. Opinion: What if it is used without taking care of the intrinsic weight of data behind each photo it is likely to throw it out of the hill and return to the markings because it is lighter and more similar. RnrnIt is used to today, mid November 2017, in Canon and in some respects throughout the market, there are no rivals on the 24x35 format. The well-exposed file returns impressive details and, in this version with the filter, I personally find a better thread about it microdetails that require more sharpening but never become almost as excessive as those of 5dsr; I obviously look at 100 or 200% of the file.rnPermette crop INDICABLE, sharpen the lenses as if they were sponges, but at the same time, the sharpest ones can make the final click out. rnThe 5dmkiii has a silent shutter, a better metering meter, a self-worthy self-worthy, and if you open the shadows you will never see banding; we are at the 6d but on 50mpx! rnspect the 5dmkiv? rnLent, a lower af for avifauna (i would say more for the limitation of f8 solor on the board more than anything else), but a file that slaps unresponsively with the newest sister, however, allows more exaggerated recoveries and is accompanied by a lesser Canon contrast contrast. Mostly taken under the 3200 iso not there are currently other Canon cameras you might want.rnrn Thanks to me I converted to Capture One that allows me to edit without waiting for so long at every zoom as happens with adobe; the file is clearly more alive.rnrnOcchio to the micromosus from snap without care and .. if the iso go up, just go to mraw (28mpx) or sraw (12mpx) and it also gets serene even at 12800 iso.rnrnThe main body that, anyone I know between 5ds and 5dsr, has elected primary even having the newest or the most expensive ones in your house, in your opinion, why? |
  | sent on June 01, 2017 Pros: Robustness, very silent shutter, spectacular file quality, possibility to crop the file at 1.4x and more without obvious loss of IQ, excellent signal-to-noise ratio, the file resized to 25 mpxl practically no noise up to 3200 iso and not requires special processing, at low ISO the yield is excellent even at full resolution Cons: Size of the file if the PC is not adequate, slow burst, low battery life (about 6-700 shots), the fact that the high resolution causes me to avoid the use of other machines less resolving creating almost a psychological dependence. Opinion: I also own the 1dx, but when I do not need the burst almost always use her, I consider it a multifunctional machine because it allows me to use it as an apsc cropping the file, or to avoid the use of the 1.4X on the 800 when I can not approach too much to the subjects (example the passerines can be taken 10 meters instead of 7) especially if nesting, or at close range to have a ff of excellent quality without crop. It will also be true that the 5DSr GD is so poor, in any case good shadows and lights recovers, on another planet compared to other machines that I know well: 5d3, 1dx and previous.rnRetings of the 5ds are very clean and detailed for my poor post-production possibilities, every time I tried even if for a few test shots machines also of other brands I never saw miracles and I got the idea that the current evolutionary possibilities of the sensors are at the terminus.rnIn particular the recoveries shadows of the 5ds preserve good detail and very fine grain without banding or alterationni of color, (I do not speak of the 5 or 6 stops of the tests that are still painful due to lack of detail on any sensor) but the normal needs of PP.rnrnFor these reasons a hypothetical 5dsr2 will be joined by the 5ds1 only compared to a good increase in the burst that for me is the only limit.rnConsider the 5ds a definitive machine for me, the only one that until now I never wanted to change.rnUsed with quality optics the detail is so high as to be simply wasted for most uses, because they are visible in the crop or pushed enlargements, it also has an excellent signal to noise ratio to the sesibility that I use more (100-1600 ISO) with a fine grain grapple and no chrominance noise, such to be virtually eliminated even by reducing the resolution, or shooting in Mraw when the light is poor. rnThanks to the very silent shutter is also excellent at the theater. The price to pay will be in any case a larger file, but I have adjusted & egrAve; I learned to use more trash, I had already updated the pc. |
  | sent on October 15, 2015 Pros: Much detail. Cons: Micro moved. Opinion: After taking about 2,000 photos I can say that 50 megapixels give many benefits and few drawbacks: the large files obviously have many contraindications but with good cards and a nice desktop everything is resolved; Micro moved unfortunately is always lurking forces at times much faster than a Eos 1Dx and sometimes involves an absurd raising of iso with all the consequences. For the rest only advantages: much detail when used with optical solving and up to a maximum of F.8 then the possibility to use it as Aps Aps-c-h or having still about 20 megapixels available with great advantage when using the super paintings. Then when it concerns the tonal passages the number is significantly higher than for example to that of a 1Dx. The 'AF than the 5D III is improved especially more precise. rn |
 | sent on June 17, 2015 Pros: Beautiful as the 5D3, some updates to firmware and to control picture, light, good to the touch, ergonomic ... a classic body 5D ... Cons: tightness of the iso, kneading details, enormous price Opinion: I got to use it for a whole day and I must say that, all in all, aside from an initial enthusiasm for the 50 megapixel, I was a little deluso.rnLe expectations were many but the evidence shows, the results are been poor. rnAnche 100 iso raw files are mixed when it opens 100% .rnLa same photos I shot with 18 mpx of 1Dx and interpolandoli in PP, I took them to 50 mpx ..... better 1Dx. .. paradoxical but vero.rnIngrandendo the file to 100% the photo loses incisiveness, exactly as I had seen it happen on the D800 Nikon.rnPer of everything else, is a very good car as the whole series 5 but the high ISO have made quite .... step back to 3200 ISO is identical to the 5D2 ... not bad but less than what you would buy the aspetta.rnrnSe? no ..... I take a Leica M9 rather that at least gives me emotions forti.rnLa 5Ds, in my opinion, not good even for the still life and controlled light and I say this in light of my all Canon L series lenses and all last serious, both zoom and fixed, so nothing due to factors esterni.rnrnCome already expecting,It is a camera designed to meet the marketing; Who owns a 6D or 5D3, discourage the passage ...... interpolated in Photoshop that you get the same file.rnrnqui you can download a file esempiornhttps: //www.dropbox.com/s/0g2wqqwed1y5an1/senza%20titolo .cr2? dl = 0RN |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
