RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 (1987 version) : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 (1987 version))




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on December 11, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, construction materials, lightness, size and price

Cons: Nobody

Opinion: This lens is part of my 1987 kit, absolutely zero problems, the autofocus is a bit slow and noisy, but since it was designed thirty years ago I would say that it does its job just fine. What to say has really left me speechless the quality of the photos taken with this lens so I did not think it was possible to get a lens for an analog camera, creates an absolutely fabulous vintage effect especially thanks to F1.8, I made other shots at f4 / 5.6 and the result was an incredible sharpness and uniformity that does not leave you at all to be desired, on the contrary. I'm starting to use a digital camera and I will certainly use this lens, proud of being its owner, excellent general performance and even straight from 1987 does not disappoint.

avatarjunior
sent on June 28, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, construction, is small and light

Cons: blurred, nervous, loud noises

Opinion: I used it a lifetime ago, almost by chance and for a few tens of euros. Only then did I realize I had to be a proud owner! It is far more difficult to find the successor (version II), and much better constructed: metal bayonet, distance windows, true manual MAF ring, in short, there is no comparison in the level of visual and tactile satisfaction. But it is in the optical rendering that this mini-lens amazes: I find it incredible that a project designed thirty years ago for the film can give today, on digital, similar results. And not only with no reverential fears towards more recent and high-end goals, but often even beating them! The rendering to TA is truly modest, and is accompanied by a vignetting, as is common to the optics with this maximum aperture: the use at f1 .8 is, in fact, limited to cases where deliberately a vintage effect is sought, accentuated by the detachment of planes very marked by the minimum depth offield, and blurry, which is so soft and pleasant in that case, because the lens uses the perfect circularity of the hole left free from the diaphragm. But just close to f2.5-2.8 to make the vignetting disappear almost and, above all, see the solution already on very good levels at the center and good at the margins. f4 The sharpness and the center-edge uniformity leaves you speechless, and f5.6 reaches a simply incredible peak across the entire frame. The yield remains gorgeous at f8 to decrease, but not drastically, only minute, such as eyelash, hair, wrinkles, grass bands etc., are returned to the native raw with an engraving which seems to have already been processed with sharpening in PP.rnThe distortion is completely absent.rnOnly you can not have everything from life, and in fact the limit of this goal is the rather nervous blur, and the only 5 lamella diaphragm, which in certain situations generate pentagons enoughbent at reflections or light spots out of focus. The AF is lense and noisy, but for me it is not a problem (I am not a professional) and in fact it makes me a bit sympathetic. With my Eos 5D old showing a certain back-focusing, which has tarnished some use and results, a problem solved with the fine adjustment of 5D MkII. With this body the lens also has a better performance than the 5D old, especially at full aperture, where the 21mpx allows you to recover a great detail by carefully treating the sharpening. In fact, I use it mostly at TA, in search of the very small PDC and of the particular blurring effect of the out of focus. RnIn conclusion: if you find one in order, take it! It's in a pocket mounted on the car seems to miss the lens, or there's only a 1.4x multiplier (thank you neck and / or shoulder), and when you look at photos on your pc you will never be disappointed.

avatarjunior
sent on April 08, 2017

Pros: Sharpness, solid construction, the price ...

Cons: AF a bit slow and noisy ...

Opinion: Bought a few months ago the modest sum of 50 euros !! (Shipping Included) ... so I took it on a whim with no claim but from the first moment has definitely left me open-mouthed for the build quality and yield. No speck of dust or anything else inside after almost 30 years of "business." rnLe pictures are already very sharp closing of 1 or 2 stop but not also disappoints at RT. optical dynamic range and yield equal to if not greater than the new model ... For everything else there's MasterCard ...

avatarjunior
sent on March 27, 2017

Pros: Sharpness and yield in general, construction, light weight, price

Cons: Shortly usable TA, maf noisy, hard to find

Opinion: Taken used 100 EUR years ago, is still my favorite lens on FF (especially for street); I also had on APSC, which is much less versatile, yet convenient for notturni.rnCostruzione shots even comparable to fifty plasticky who succeeded him, for both bayonet metal for quality plastic still visibly migliore.rnA TA it is very soft (for me difficult to use), but closed a couple of stops becomes crystal clear shots and returns certainly of superb quality; having tried it, I feel I can say how I prefer it made 50 f / 1.4.rnLa maf is a bit 'noisy, but it's still a lens of 1987 ... and for this reason is not certain with facilità.rn

avatarjunior
sent on April 24, 2016

Pros: optical performance, in all aspects. much better construction of the fifty mark II

Cons: autofocus a bit 'noisy

Opinion: This small lens was a surprise. I had read in some American forum of optical performance superior to all other 50mm canon. I never tried the 50 L series, but using other professional lenses can say that the optical performance of this lens is astonishing. beautiful colors, much more beautiful moltoo 40mm STM which also possess. The blurry at full aperture is mellow, not nervous, I would say nicer than the fifty II who also owned. On nitidizza then it is great already wide open but closing a hair leaves you speechless. In short, after a few shots went off the love with this little lens. Something that does not happen often, and you then really knows what I mean.

avatarjunior
sent on February 17, 2015

Pros: Optical performance - size - construction

Cons: AF noisy

Opinion: There is little to say about this lens, since the optical yield is equal to the current 50ino 1.8, then ottima.rnPer else is better in everything, aesthetics, construction, practicality. rnEssendo a lens old you can run into some problems with the calibration of the MAF but you can act with a bit of trade on the contact area of ??the PCB that allows a certain range of microtaratura (an operation is within the reach of anyone who is accustomed to using a soldering iron , and completely reversible as well as specified on the service manual) .rnSicuramente a purchase that will last over time to a lens of APSC intramontabile.rnPS personally do not like the 50mm focal ... you know, is neither fish nor fowl.

avatarsenior
sent on March 08, 2013

Pros: Value for money, building compared to Mark II

Cons: Blurred a bit 'harsh, not af USM, the lens hood is hard to find and expensive

Opinion: A lens that I have always held, you can do everything from macro (tube) to the portrait to landscape, good construction with metal bayonet ring and focus well positioned and not as ridiculous as the Mark II. The price of a copy in good condition up to 150 euro, for me it's worth it all, there were lenses with this quality / price ratio! My vote is nine also by virtue of the latter consideration, ever seen could also be an 8.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me