|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on February 14, 2015 Pros: Sharpness excellent, well-arranged controls, weight, good battery life Cons: Sound a bit 'high especially in the shadows, the limit of ISO 1600, but large display resolution is too low, not excellent quality Jpeg Opinion: It was my first SLR, new intake several years ago. I've always found it very well, and I still use now as a tourist machine, although he also holds a D800 and a 5D Mark II, because coupled to optical ef-s is very leggera.rnrnDi followed a series of considerations derived from several years of Use: rnrn-The sharpness is very good (the antialiasing filter I think is particularly light) rn-The controls are well laid out, personally I find it very well organized and easy to use, but maybe it's just because I own for so many years. rn-The main problem in terms of picture quality is the sound of shadows, tall enough, but frankly it is a common fault for sensors Canon. rn-not being able to go beyond ISO 1600 is sometimes frustrating, the 3200 would graditi.rn-Battery life is very good, and years later still lasts about the same as when I bought it. rn-The display resolution is quite low, it is hard to see thesharpness of images magnified 100% rn-Sometimes the machine tends to underexpose, I keep calibrated default to +2/3 stop of exposure, so even if I overexpose slightly more margin to recover ombrern-The quality of jpeg is quite poor, I suggest taking in rawrn-At high ISO the machine is quite noisy, but the quality of the grain (shooting in Raw) is very good and not annoying, always if you do not pretend to retrieve too many details in ombrern-Balance White is not always accurate, especially in internirn-The highlight recovery in raw, unlike the shadows, is very buonornrnTutto all I am still satisfied with this Reflex, so much so that I have not yet replaced with an APS-C latest . The real added value is the quality of Canon lenses, especially the f-s that are usually sharp and light to carry. Especially considering the very low price at which it is now, I can only recommend their purchase, especially to usersthe beginners who want to test the functionality of an SLR "true". |
  | sent on October 30, 2014 Pros: easy-to-use sensor aps sparse Cons: a lot of noise over 800 ISO exposure is not too accurate Opinion: My first SLR, I have it since 2010 and has stayed with me in my first steps into the world of photography. Under favorable light gives great pictures like the newer models, and for this reason I will always keep the camera body as a reserve. Exposure metering and white balance does not always work as they should, but with the right precautions (worthy goals and shooting Raw) is capable of producing very nice photos. |
 | sent on September 22, 2014 Pros: Weight, display large 3 ", functionality and simple settings. Cons: Plasticky, noise even at ISO 800 Opinion: I kept my 450D for about 2 years, it is a entry level machine so you can not ask too much, it has a good sensor and an AF system fast enough, it is very light and plasticky but not so much for the 'impression of robustness, presents a loud noise at high ISO, Canon has the classic menu and then scroll down and simple to interpret. |
 | sent on June 18, 2014 Pros: Size, price, display, weight Cons: ISO, noise, a bit plasticky but it's still an entry level. Buffer slow Opinion: It 'was my first "digital" and I really loved and missed when I sold it. Lightweight, optimal weight, with my hands has a perfect grip. It gave me great satisfaction, even with the plasticotto in kit.rnGia 800 iso you notice an annoying noise. I have not heard absolutely lack the video part, of which I am really not. rnCome first car or as a second lightweight body is an excellent choice |
 | sent on May 23, 2014 Pros: Price, 3 "display, weight Cons: Building a bit 'plasticky, excessive noise, iso Opinion: It's a great machine for people like me who are beginners, simple and intuitive to use, and at the same time complete in all its functions, the 3-inch display is very bright, it also has the live view mode. It is a machine light and easy to grip, but after having picked up bodies like the 60d or higher models, it is very "toy". The quality of materials is perhaps not of choice, the plastic will wear out easily, but the price to where it is today you can not expect much. All in all, the quality of raw files is good, the only flaw noise management already over 800 iso. Limited sensitivity to 1600 ISO, but it would be unthinkable to go further, the noise would become unmanageable. Once you get a little 'experience can begin to be felt limited, but is great for practice. |
 | sent on September 27, 2013 Pros: Weight & Dimensions (is an advantage if one wants a light body and small), Ideal for learning Cons: Bad noise and considerable loss of detail (especially in the shadows) from ISO 800 onwards. Considerable noise already present at ISO 400. Buffer too small for the barrage. Low-resolution LCD (to check if a picture is a good picture). AI Servo is not exactly the best. No video. Tends to overexpose, preferring to overexposure to the fact that the picture is likely to be greatly moved. White balance spesso.rnConcordo wrong with Sarah when he says "Cons: For a neophyte of photography I would say that there are not ... for everyone else, now is the time to upgrade to a higher model: P" rnrn Opinion: I have this camera body since 2008, was the ideal entry into the world of digital SLR cameras. The defects (see "Cons") I mentioned are normal for machines canon aps-c entry level of the time, so it's no wonder. My idea is that for beginners should be just fine. Of course I had to start today with a digital SLR, I would take a 650D (improved quality of the noise, screen resolution, higher ISO) and not a 450D, for as I am, but if one wants to spend even less, and the 450D is not for not bad, I got so many beautiful foto.rnrnInoltre I think having a car with lower limits allows you to reach them more easily and it is there that one grows from the point of view of the experience and photographic knowledge, will and when you will study the everything to defeat or circumvent those limits. When you will be forced to think even more before you take the photo, or you will become able to adapt to different environmental conditions. |
 | sent on September 15, 2013 Pros: light, raw files discrete, beautiful to approach photography, livewiew, ease of use Cons: body too small, reduced buffer, screen resolution, burst, held iso, system af Opinion: are in possession of this machine for the past 6 years, and I can say I know very bene.rnè definitely a great introduction to the world body and reflex and understand basic concepts and essential. But we must not expect too much from this body: estate RNLA iso is disappointing to say the least, acceptable file to iso 400, not oltre.rnLa burst is particularly slow, but obviously given the age of the body and the frame in which is located you can not expect more. The system auto focus apathetic leaves to be desired, the AI ??Servo behaves badly, (it's almost impossible to have a sequence of photos put all or almost in focus), while the ONE SHOT mode often struggles to keep up with (even in penumbra). rnLe size and weight make it particularly suitable for those who want to star light, but personally I found it too small. |
 | sent on August 25, 2013 Pros: aps-c sensor, huge screen, light weight, easy handling, compactness and ease of use. Cons: Normally, the photos look cool, or at least you should always correct a posteriori the white balance and contrast, as a minimum. For those shooting in bursts certainly is not the best, since after just 6 photos "raw" stops. Opinion: It 's my first SLR, which was acquired at the time in a kit with the 18-50 and 75-300. It 'a complete and efficient machine, which can give very good if used with targets, vice versa when used with optical poor. Personally the photo "over" is no different from those of other superior machines. I took this after the 550d, from which it differs only in the lack of opportunity to perform in movies and see "live view". |
 | sent on August 22, 2013 Pros: Lightweight and compact, RAW files it produces are of good quality. The screen is good and does his duty. Cons: Noise at high ISO (also from 800), poor Gust (last Safari made me suffer a lot), AutoFocus (maybe my copy) is not flawless. Opinion: Really good to learn. If I had to go back the risceglierei. In my opinion the value for money is very good. After about 20-25k shots start to show the rope and I feel the need to go further. But it is still a great second body that I will continue to use. Completely misses the video, but for many, including myself, is not a point of particular relevance. |
 | sent on June 08, 2013 Pros: weight - price - ease of use for those who are starting (but becomes a counter when you pretend something more, so you have to work harder than with larger models) Cons: ISO sensitivity up to 1600 - tolerance of high iso - plastic body Opinion: Given that this is an entry level I consider it a great camera. Over the years I got to use many models, both Canon and Nikon in various price ranges, but given the price I think some compromise there might stare.rnNaturalmente to compensate certain limits have to work a bit more than with other machines, and learn to know it thoroughly, but the results can get even in difficult conditions. |
 | sent on October 15, 2012 Pros: Surely it was the cost, which gave me the opportunity to enter the world of DSLR with relative ease (I mean the ease of use), allowing you to learn how to hack fast enough, a fair quality for beginners who can get excellent results, in particular helping with optics better than those offered in kit and shooting in Raw. Cons: Noise at high iso (from just 400 in the presence of marked contrasts, the 1600 should not even be considered). Gust highly insufficient (the first time I used it I thought it was broken as the camera was slow) Viewfinder: I had to make it a habit to think that every shot I had to add a "slice" image to get a ' idea of ??what was real photography. Opinion: It 'was my first (and only when) reflex. For me it was a good buy and as I wrote is fine to start to familiarize yourself with what a camera other than a compact, learn to manage mode shooting, have the ability to create custom profiles, and so on. I've read that others have had problems of ergonomics, but personally I have not seen since the hands are not too big; Unlike the case of building materials that do not hide efettivamente least the idea of ??pure plastic. That said, the real problem is the ISO, which have a very limited range when you consider that hardly you should use the 800. A real breakthrough as the machine makes when you shoot in raw: the file would have a much greater workability than the jpg giving great satisfaction otherwise be impossible. Open secret: montateci top quality lenses and then you will get the most contemptible that this reflex can not give. |
 | sent on April 30, 2012 Pros: price (when it was in production), ease of use, live view, light, autonomy than good Cons: ISO, too small, economical construction Opinion: the 450d was my first reflex is an entry-level honest, you can not compare with more expensive models, it would not be right. At the end of the day I think the only real drawback to this machine is the excessive noise at high ISO, already 800 to situation is "complicated." Recommended for beginners to take pictures, even today is used at very low prices almost comparable with the compact ... Personally I used two years to switch to 7d |
  | sent on December 27, 2011 Pros: Lightweight, easy to use, live view, image quality quite good. Cons: High ISO (up to 400 is better not to use it!), Burst slow viewfinder (but I think this is so on all models xxxD). Opinion: This is my first and only SLR. It gave me a lot of satisfaction, after the sensor to the demands of a lover is more than satisfactory. Suffers from high ISO, up from the 400 is better not to use, especially in situations of high contrast. This burst and slow I think they represent the greatest limitations of this machine. For the rest it is a good model to start having also live view, very useful in certain situations. I'm fully satisfied even after 3 years I feel the need for a more powerful machine with high sensitivity and with a burst better. Recommended to start or as a second body easy to carry anywhere (I use mountain climbing trips in!). |
user181  | sent on September 24, 2011 Pros: Perfect for those who are approaching to photography for the first time, easy to use, small and light! Cons: For a newcomer to photography I would say that there are not ... for all others, it is time to upgrade to a higher model! : P Opinion: It 'was my first digital SLR, bought at age 18 after working an entire summer (such was the desire to have it!). I found myself immediately fine for my needs (few) was more than enough. I learned to use it very quickly, taking pictures here and there, monuments, people, parks, vacation, nothing of that. Then I went off in nature photography and then he started to Starmie a bit 'tight ... of course, if you do not have money available to change the camera body might as well keep the 450d and spend rather in optical quality (the photos will still be very good, the raw are easy processing plus), but otherwise it's worth an upgrade because the functionality of this reflex are really reduced to a minimum. There is also to say that Canon produces a xxxd every two to three, so now the neophyte with money to spend will focus on a 500, 550 or 600d ... for those who had not, the advice! |
user64 | sent on September 13, 2011 Pros: Value for money - easy to use - picture quality - lightweight - perfect for learning - easy to work with RAW Cons: Af sometimes inaccurate - burst low - too low resolution LCD (sometimes it's hard to tell if the image is in focus even zooming in at 10x) Opinion: It 'was my first SLR and I've taken all my photos so far. It 'a perfect machine for those who want to learn but will improve immediately close. It 'still generous if you look at the price. Great for landscapes, poor for photo hunting because of a burst and a very slow AF sometimes inaccurate. I did not find particularly noisy. Even if the noise is evident at ISO 800, it disappears quickly with a good PP and printing do not notice anything. At 1600 ISO the noise is clearly present but you can not expect anything more from a machine in this price range. Summing up a car that is worth all the money it costs and maybe even something more. |
 | sent on August 22, 2011 Pros: Easy to use, you hold-lights-takes aim at once with one hand having all the main controls on the right, light, strong enough, good to learn, excellent autonomy, has live view, despite his age Cons: Small body and not in material "grippy" as the 7d, I'd had the slides with the grid, it lacks the video mode Opinion: E 'was and still is my first SLR, bought used for a digit and used very honorable and satisfactory manner. Basically (and obviously) does not excel in anything but it's all the same and with dignity. Before I had a bridge that now deny and I regret that it has taken (especially I regret having lost a lot of money), I immediately took the relex .. If he had the body 1cm taller it would be perfect and would have a better handle especially for long lenses. And maybe if it were of a material similar to 7d .. But for what it costs I'm not complaining of course, I'm enjoying the 100% yet and any investment for the time being direct to the optics, the body is still ok! I can only recommend it to those looking for a good compromise for money to start but not only. |
 | sent on August 31, 2011 Pros: Price, ease of use, good RAW Cons: iso only up to 1600 and lots of noise Opinion: My first camera, bought just over a year ago, not long out of production. Since I started shooting in raw I found a great improvement compared to jpeg, raw files are very flexible and it is difficult to have sunk pixels. The only flaw (considering it is a entry level) the af a bit 'slow and difficult in low light and noise at high iso defends just as well, since the sensor is not "crowded" as well as in other machines. |
 | sent on August 30, 2011 Pros: cost, diffusion, image quality, live view Cons: size / ergonomics (comfortable but not for those who send the medium-large), iso max only up to 1600, + -2 ev exposure (I would have preferred at least 3) Opinion: the canon 450d is an excellent reflex, obviously not equipped with the features of the more famous, and expensive, but that 'excellent results in feature where a camera should be fine: the image quality. battery life is good, is lightweight and compact, and there? ² translates to? ² in poor ergonomics if the wielder has the hands of medium-large: girls and people with large hands will find it perfect. |
 | sent on August 26, 2011 Pros: Easy to use, ideal for newcomers to the world of SLR and is not interested in making videos. Excellent value for money. Cons: valid until ....... 400 iso to 800 to 1600 ...... suffers very poor. Opinion: I bought the 450d to enter the world of digital SLR and I am extremely pleased. Not makes video ..... but for me it is not a problem as I see it ..... I .... cameras are taking photos and the video cameras. The only pecca.è really poor at high iso ...... not exceed 800 ........ but if we consider that the top of the range aps-c holds good up to 3200 ISO would say that there you can definitely satisfy. Consigliatissima to make the first experience in the world of photography ;-) |
 | sent on August 01, 2011 Pros: Additional manageability excellent grip even smaller hands x - x bodied understand what is really needed in a camera (at a very affordable price) Cons: Burst ... unworthy of a camera - Viewfinder ... acceptable given the price range - lcd ... with bright external display data visually but vericare become a shooting - ISO sensitivity to 400 still ok if used x increase shutter speeds with good ambient light, but in the presence of strong contrasts can be seen ... and how! Opinion: x good start shooting with "awareness" - deserves to be accompanied by quality optics but in any case x specific requirements, see photo nature / sports is strongly limited by the painful speed burst (like the rest of the series xxxd, even in the mod. + recent) and pictures indoors, in low light digests bad high iso --- other consideration, 12 MP are Pochini x lovers ... "Croppature" |
 | sent on July 28, 2011 Pros: Good value for money. Lightweight and versatile. Cons: To date, if the comparison with newer models comes out naturally defeat. Opinion: Great body for those who looks for the first time to the world of SLR. When you understand its limitations, only then you are ready to take the next step. If you add the kit to good optics can do just about anything to become a semi-pro. Suggested to users photo enthusiasts who are now too unhappy of all compact that they used so far. To whom it may concern in this machine is the liveview. |
 | sent on July 28, 2011 Pros: Light and immediate, excellent for approach photography with SLR maintaining a reasonable quality. Cons: Noise at high ISO, recommended the battery grip to increase the autonomy and ergonomics. Opinion: The only SLR in my possession, light and easy. It allows you to practice and gradually increase the level of difficulty in the use of the same, with a good resolution, and despite becoming heavily noisy already 800 iso, can offer very RAW files workable. The screen and the cleaning system of the sensor are very good. the main flaw I found was the excessive noise at high iso despite a sensor is not particularly dense. |
 | sent on July 12, 2011 Pros: sensor, light Cons: body too minute (I had to buy a battery grip to be able to challenge the best), high iso noise, lack of rear collar Opinion: I've used it for two good years and I still use today as a second body, and I must say that I'm not regretting the 7D. Files are flexible and workable, the only real drawback is the noise at high ISO ... in 1600 (its maximum) is obvious, but it goes away with a few clicks. The screen, of course, after seeing what the 7D is lower, but still good. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
