|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on November 22, 2016 Pros: General features, monochrome display on the cover (abandoned since the 400d) Cons: nobody, considered age and location Opinion: He solved the many problems of the 300D. He gave the same - excellent - the coeval 30D sensor. It was the last - in the category - with monochrome display on the cover, then abandoned by the 400D. Purchased today, it is for beginners who are early connoisseurs. Why s'avvederanno than it's worth, on the field, a design wisdom. |
  | sent on May 21, 2015 Pros: Files light, a forklift, durable. Cons: Used so the only decent center AF point, the noise over 800iso, limited dynamic range, color rendering by bad 800iso on, monitor baby. Missing function AutoISO. The viewfinder seems the peephole of a door than a fullframe, but I see that the 700d my partner has not changed much. Opinion: It was my car for 10 years, I bought new in 2005 and still use. I passed a lot of the 200,000 shots and is mirror shutter still work fine. RNLA I used in the snow, the sun, the sea, the rain, and despite not being Tropicalised did not give me problems. I am extremely happy with our purchase and I will always keep with me, even when I pass in fullframe. RNLA recommend anyone wishing to approach the Photography to learn and grow. |
 | sent on December 31, 2014 Pros: bargain prices (2014), handy, important commands at hand, excellent to start Cons: much noise with high ISO Opinion: I bought recently, second hand, this camera at a bargain price (with tripod, memory cards, purse, second battery has cost less than my previous camera, a bridge samsung). I must say that I found right away well, the important controls are handy and easy to use, the second day I had understood what and how I had to crush. The only limitations, for a beginner like me, due to the car are very noisy images with high ISO, but I already knew that before you buy it and try to fix in post. For the rest of the car is perfect, I can not wait to change that lens with the 18-55 kit I feel too limited for what I would do. |
 | sent on October 05, 2013 Pros: Pixel big enough for astrophotography Cons: Lack live view Opinion: I used the 350D as the first car to do astrophotography, then I switched to the 550D but with inferior results because the pixels are more but are more 'small'!! Now I would like to return to using the 350D but I have no more ' the EOS DIGITAL Solution Disk, someone can 'help me find him?? (Would be fine also a copy of the CD) Thanks, Bergama. |
 | sent on July 19, 2013 Pros: Image quality, quality / price ratio, easy to use Cons: age, screen too small, AF is not perfect, limited burst Opinion: My first and only SLR since I photograph ... despite his seven years ago I still have fun and I do not regret most modern machines and offering performance ... the photos have excellent clarity and quality and noise at high ISO acceptable. The construction is very good seen the mistreatment suffered yet perfect ... easy to use, small and light does not bother take it dietro.rnUna flaw is the screen too small that it allows a perfect observation of the shots taken. |
 | sent on January 26, 2013 Pros: ridiculous cost, easy to use, value for money I would say almost unbeatable, lightweight Cons: old technology now, AF not great, few megapixels Opinion: I have the 350d for 2 years, I bought it used and it was my first SLR ever! rnpoco to say is fantastic to start allows you to understand the basics of photography and experience the most ... sure it's old but the value for money I think it's still unbeatable (after almost 8 years since) rnc'è think that once things were done much better .... rnpenso that shots below are a clear testimony of the potential |
 | sent on December 27, 2012 Pros: current price, battery life, overall quality of files returned Cons: display, keyboard layout Opinion: was my first and so far only reflex.pagata really a misery for the years that you still defend it pretty well: even at ISO 1600 files are still quite buoni.la penalizes the lack of live view manual focus, in return, the battery lasts tantissimo.lo screen is far too small and too low a resolution, provabilmente this is the biggest flaw. |
 | sent on November 16, 2012 Pros: It is located at ridiculous prices, image quality should not be underestimated, monochrome display, light weight, simple and immediate, CF Cards Cons: piece of plastic, high ISO files, display size, burst shots, hot pixels on long exposures Opinion: What can I say, it was my first car, I took my first steps with her in this hobby.rnSenza pretentious and conscious of my very small economic resources, I aimed at something old but decent and what to say, it was a pleasant surprise, than the selling price which is now very low, has much to offer, 8 megapixels are more than enough and offer images dignitosissime, of course the car expresses all her sisters as the best of optics well made, unfortunately I never had the opportunity to take advantage of similar quality then we can say that with the mean optical machine will not give certain performance sublimi.rnRaffica too slow for any sports photo, above 800 ISO noise can be seen how, and long exposure night shot are formed in large quantities of hot pixels on the whole is very good and then the monochrome display, which is absent in all other entry-level outputs after which condemn especially for this absence imperdonabile.rnNonostante is a piece of plastic and the grip is not at affidabile, confirm its strength, fell 2 times, even in a disastrous way, the worst damage was on the cover but no damage funzionamentornConsigliata respect to those who want to get started without spending a fortune, perhaps combining it all immediately with some optical face the difference! |
 | sent on February 11, 2012 Pros: It 'a reflex and (now) costs very little Cons: Viewfinder dark, tiny LCD screen, missing LiveView and it is difficult to focus properly in the manual. Opinion: It 's my first and only SLR. Bought for peanuts really giving me a lot of satisfaction because it has made me closer to the world of photography more seriously than it has done so far with the usual compattine. For the moment I feel cramped on the LCD of microscopic dimensions, which together with dark viewfinder and lack of LiveView (as written in the "against"), makes it difficult to MAF manual, but deep down, when photographed on film there ' was no display on which to see the result of the shots, so we can not complain too much. All in all, for what you can pay now, is an Old world purchase for those who want to approach photography with a capital F. |
 | sent on November 26, 2011 Pros: small and light, money, good image quality Cons: small and dark viewfinder, LCD screen small, lacks live view, self-timer only 10sec, AF slow, plasticky, some software bugs Opinion: It 's my first and so far only reflex and despite the flaws accompanied me on many adventures and although it is plasticky, in five years it never failed. I like her the compactness and lightness, but his being small has its cons: the screen is too small and you pay too much if you want to preview and also the histogram. The AF is decent but not great. A 1600 ISO shots are a bit 'noisy. The viewfinder is perhaps the part of the machine that the less I like it. Out of production years ago is now only second-hand, but for beginners, considering the price, I think it is a good investment. |
 | sent on October 05, 2011 Pros: Small, light, good image quality, price (now), dual screens. Cons: AF performance, slow burst, screen baby. Opinion: The 350D was my first digital and I must say I took a lot with her. As said above the image quality is all right and with its 8Mpx are you doing enough (but not too much). The AF is not the best but if Cavicchia, the exposure as well. It 'plasticky, everyone knows that, but he never succumbed to beatings and various scantonate. One thing that always fascinated me haq and that no other series XXXD does not have is the dual screen, very useful to me! The price is crazy, if you need to let us fight a little something (someone uses it only for the infrared). |
 | sent on September 25, 2011 Pros: Easy to use, good image quality Cons: Viewfinder dim, very small screen, limited ISO, AF slow Opinion: It 'was my first SLR after a compact. I bought it in 2005 and I sold it only in 2010, then about 5 years of use with this camera in which I fell in love more and more to photography. Excellent value / price, although perhaps now is a bit 'limited compared to reflex the same level that we are now on the market. The 8Mpx are more than enough to make good prints of medium size. Lightweight and compact for transport, perhaps a little 'small for those with large hands or want to use important objectives. Miss the live view (but I've never felt the tightness ...), but above the monitor is very small: it is difficult to assess the MAF one click just did. Viewfinder dark and very small. AF is a bit 'slow, but for landscape shots is moltobene. |
 | sent on September 24, 2011 Pros: Size, price / performance ratio (especially if bought used), image quality Cons: Lack live view, small screen, slow burst, slow AF Opinion: I have about two years the 350D, which is also my first SLR. I bought it used, to see if the world of digital photography, which fascinated me seen from the outside, was really intriguing. I must say I was immediately surprised by the performance of the small 350D. Past the initial enthusiasm for the leap from a compact to a DSLR, I started to explore the many functions. Outwardly is a totally plastic body (not weather sealed), good robustness and ergonomics (for hands not too large). Unfortunately has a very small LCD monitor and from which it is difficult to understand if we got a picture really sharp. The connection to the PC via USB cable and the camera is automatically recognized by Windows. The picture quality is very good (even today) and there is the possibility to take in raw + jpeg, while shots at high ISO (above 800) return a little 'noise. The AF is not the fastest and the burst stops at 3fps, making it not suitable for extreme sports photography. It should be also noted that the lack of live view, but it helps to maintain performance of the battery. At present is an excellent starting point for those (like me a couple of years ago) wants to enter the world of digital SLR photography, without selling a kidney. The capabilities of the 350D I still meet in full and if you change your body (mainly for AF and live view), would pass directly to a XXD series. |
  | sent on July 13, 2011 Pros: Image quality, quality / price ratio, ease of use Cons: Gust very limited, AF modest, obviously lacking all the latest news of the reflex Opinion: The 350D was my first Canon, chosen for its excellent quality / price ratio. The image quality was considered good at the time, and even today it can be considered fully usable: good resolution, acceptable noise within the ISO 1600, good dynamic range. Currently (2011) can be found used at bargain prices, and certainly offers a good alternative to the compact: it is a good way to enter the world of DSLR if your budget is very limited. Despite the slow AF, the lack of live view and a feature set is not huge, I took some of my best photos with this camera! Like all cameras xxxD series, it is very small and light, the construction is quite plasticky but has resisted several ill-treatment. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
