JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:For normal use makes beautiful photographs in RAW can be reworked with Photoshop Camera Raw
Cons:Screen and burst
Opinion:I loved the analog, I had the VitoB Voigtlander, Minolta SRT 101B and the X700 with lots of accessories to play with then developing and printing B / W With the Canon 300D I have always done regular photos, family, friends, holidays, essays of my daughter's dance etc.. But with friends and family has always made me look good. Now that I'm past the 6d I realize that was a nice mule for a mental reset to switch to digital.
Opinion:It was my first digital SLR camera. The bought in 2005 and used the rivendetti in June 2006. I took my first photos with a minimum of knowledge of the facts (at the same time attending a photography course organized by a circle of well-known photographers of Turin). For its time churning out pictures with good sharpness. The rivendetti to buy the 30d as for my needs was necessary for a camera with a better command configuration (in fact, the 300d was devoid of multi-ring present in the canon SLR upper class). Today I would say that is outdated in everything and think it makes sense to use it only for special purposes (infrared) or in special situations (where it is not ensured the safety of the camera like the carnival in Ivrea).
Cons:Very small screen and live view, burst very slow, technologically antiquated model
Opinion:I bought the Eos 300D used about two years ago. The camera body is made entirely of plastic, but it has always done well in any situation. The 'AF has only 7 points and is not very powerful, however, will do well in scenes not too dynamic (Landscapes, ceremonies etc. ..), certainly in fact this machine is not designed for motion pictures since the burst is very slow and can do only 4 photos in RAW consecutive. The built-in screen is very small and therefore does not allow to better view the photos. Apart from these defects the machine produces quality images and easy to work especially coupled with good optics, up to 400ISO noise is virtually absent while above must be reduced in post production, but you can still get good photos up to 1600 iso, even if they have a bit of grit. The files are also contained on the size of about 6Mb, this makes easier their conservation and does not require very large memory cards and performing. So ultimately I think it's a good machine for those who approach for the first time to photography Reflex fact with a modest investment you can achieve good results. For me still continue to shoot with this machine, and then move in the future to a XXD series.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
