JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:MF electronic, weight, not tropical conditions and lack of stabilization.
Opinion:Optics definitely dated but still fully usable by and large very beautiful and usable nitidezza.rnColori with multipliers without large losses of unique risoluzione.rngli defects on my way to photograph are the lack of stabilization freehand and given the weight is felt and lack of tropicalizzazione.rnAttualmente Canon stopped producing spare parts and therefore given that even in manual focus the AF motor is used to focuse, if you were to break remains unusable.
Pros:Objective razor sharp, autofocus speed appropriate to the natural subjects in motion. rnDopo 25 years yet precise autofocus and optical quality insuperata.rnColori magnificent, typical of artificial fluorite.
Cons:My lens suffers from inaccuracy in the manual that do not use maf mai.rnObiettivo heavy (2850 g) when compared with the current model (2250g). RnMaf autofocus a bit 'slow 2X.rnLeggera with slight underexposure and vignetting at full aperture (1 / 3 stops).
Opinion:It was a great purchase, even considering that paid him as a family car. rnAncora today I do not feel the need to replace it. RNLA highest quality allowed me to use it almost always with the 1 .4 X old.rnCon buying the 2X III, the yield is quite good and use with this duplicator has become very frequente.rnPur having a very strong objective, we must consider before you buy that used the canon (written with a lower case c) no longer manufactures replacement parts for this model. It will be more than enough to test it thoroughly before buying, in particular the efficiency and accuracy of autofocus.
Pros:A Great image quality, which remains even with both teleconverters entered.
Cons:The weight and the lack of weather sealing.
Opinion:I believe this perspective very valuable despite his age. Sharpness also great with teleconverter, I use it for a short time but I must say that the satisfactions that has already given me are many. The lack of stabilizer do not find it a problem, just shoot at times in keeping with a telephoto lens or use the cavalletto.rnVoto 10
Opinion:A lens that despite his years he has yet to tell her, especially when it comes to defining and nitidezza.rnUn for short-haired bird without using the extender but also accopiandolo to them I do not see significant declines in quality (1.4X), especially if you used with the Canon EF 600mm 2X Series III.rnUn. F5.6 that does not betray the expectations fact, even closing of only 1 stop, sharpness remains at levels eccellenti.rnLa lack of sealing forces you to look one by adverse conditions, lack of stabilization instead feels the least especially if, like me , it is mainly used on a tripod or (freehand) in camera mode Manual with times higher than 1/1250.rnConsiglio: if you find it will not be a wrong Approach to Buy, actually a fake old man who gives a hard time to his new competitors. rnParere personal: as sharpness I find it higher than the first series stabilized .... Just try it ..!
Cons:Often short (without tc) for photography naturalistica.rnProblemi for spare parts and tropicalization absent.
Opinion:Considered the best super telephoto Canon as sharpness, until the advent of the next generation. I do not know if it's the best but it is certainly valid, I use it for 20 years and this is the second, I do not feel the difficulty of stabilizing because I use it often on the stand, excellent yield with 1.4 x that turns into a great 420 and in my case mounted on an EOS 1 Mark IV 540, made very good excellent blur the bracket to mount it on a tripod definitely superior to the new. rnCredo now to be one of the few to use it.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
