|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 03, 2023 Pros: Tropicalization, robustness, burst speed, beautiful JPG, high ISO resistance, fast AF. I would say a well-armored Tanke Cons: LV dated but you can not expect after 10 years, battery life can be improved. Opinion: Exceptional camera body, on the other hand it is still a Canon flagship. It is practically a tank to be used to do everything but especially for sports or nature photos. It is to be learned to use because if you make mistakes it does not forgive but once you learn you have a war machine in your hand that makes you bring home excellent results. I also kept my 7D Mark II as a second body or fold to mount a 70 200 2.8 and have the possibility to have different shots in different situations, but the 7D II has absolutely no comparison with the 1 DX except for some more function but it is also younger. Since I bought it (December 22) I had practically only one opportunity to use it with favorable light and the result is amazing, then I found unfavorable circumstances such as rain, fog poor lighting of fields or gyms where the iso you have to raise them above 8000 and she has held the blow, clear that you see the grain of noise but it is not as heavy as the 7D II indeed compared to the most recent R6 or to a Sony a7IV is practically equal indeed better than certainly the a7IV. Excellent machine that I will hardly replace. |
  | sent on March 30, 2022 Pros: Construction, AF module, shutter speed and use, tropicalization, grip, ease of use, resistance to high iso, very beautiful jpeg, battery life Cons: No Wifi Opinion: Fabulous work machine, right amount of pixels, very fast and manages to churn out beautiful jpegs. Passed from 1d4 to 1dx, the improvements are many and are felt, especially on the af side and iso management. I use it for sportswomen together with the 400 2.8 and another together with the 70-200 2.8, both for outdoor and indoor sports (even in very dark halls it behaves very well, if you look at my galleries you will find photos of handball at 12,800/16,000 iso still excellent and usable). For the price it costs, it is a best buy for sports photography, obviously the 1dxii and 1dxiii have even more interesting features but cost much more (at the time of my intersection, its price in the used is about 1500 euros in good condition). It allowed me to take home a lot of beautiful shots, even directly in the room, which working for newspapers is a godsend, of course you have to know how to use it ... but after setting it well according to your needs it works very well (it has a very large and rich af menu and customization). |
 | sent on November 24, 2021 Pros: Pro pro Cons: You have to know how to use it Opinion: I do not list the merits of this camera body because she does not forgive what you do not know how to do and in the body that must be studied and known, still today and a bomb of critical qualities such as the weight the noisy shot and other complaints are not worthy of her, what I can say and that in any photographic situation she is always up to bringing home some beautiful shots then if you buy a Ferrari and you lament that in the countryside is not good and another speech I recommend to those who want to learn to shoot and improve themselves without making sure that they do everything and only technology |
  | sent on November 15, 2021 Pros: Excellent construction, granite and perfectly stable performance of light meter and AWB, the AF is reliable even with the extreme laterals and the tracking is very reactive, violent burst, "ready" file Cons: Mirror group induces vibrations with slow times, ignoble flash management, coded batteries, vertical ergonomics that can be improved, only central F8 points, lacks anti flickering, LV a bit dated (but it is 10 years old ...) Opinion: It is built in an excellent way, for example the mirrorbox is on iron and not on plastic like the 5D, the screen is perfectly visible even with the sun, for each function there is a button, battery and card compartment (2 CF) are blocked by a button, shutter curtains are made of carbon, the tropicalization is very accurate ... But the vertical ergonomics can be perfected, the batteries accept only the Canon otherwise it does not say the percentage of charge and with long focal lengths and times from 1/60 ha micromosso, it must be put in LV as it uses the electronic curtain. From the point of view of performance it is incredibly current, it pays pledge only to the latest ML stacked, the AF is precise and constant even with the extremes, the exposure is not wrong if you try, the tracking is good and must be calibrated to the point to make the best. The biggest flaw is how it manages the flashes, if you are in the car ISO blocks them at 400 even with the flash in M, at the last glow of the sunset I have the habit of letting the machine work in AV and I submit a stop letting the parameters adapt and managing the flashes manually, with this machine it is impossible. It has 18 MPX very clean and really little in need of PP, the GD is something more than the old Canon sensors but without approaching the Sony, it has a practically perfect contrast and holds the high ISO like fresh water, the PP is practically nothing. Too bad that the anti flickering is missing, from such a room it was necessary to work in the halls with horrible lights. |
 | sent on August 23, 2021 Pros: Burst, Af, sensor, shadow recovery, autonomy, robustness Cons: No one if you know what you are going to buy Opinion: I come from 6d 6d2, also passing through rp, here's what to say beautiful photographs, from shadow recovery to three-dimensionality. The car has a great autofocus and a beautiful viewfinder. Are you sure that the photo will take it out whatever the Condition... Chorus quality after so many years I talk about the room model I did not expect such a rendition.... Beautiful |
 | sent on July 06, 2020 Pros: All Cons: If I really have to find one at all costs then I would say the lack of silent click for certain situations of naturalistic photography. But the merits are such as to make this "defect" uninfluential or almost. Opinion: Just fabulous. Extraordinary focus (coming from a 7d Mark II that still has a very good autofocus, this is another planet), hooks the subject to the flight even with complicated backgrounds. Dynamic range that allows you to grasp details that almost escape the naked eye. Great yield at high ISO. If you need it, the gust doesn't leave you on foot. Balances the weight of fixed canvases perfectly, making it easier to use them. What about it? If you really have to look for the hair in the egg then the silent shot is the only mole. But it's a missing comma on a perfect page. Before I took it I had the doubt of the 5d Mark IV – more recent and much appreciated by those who own it – so much so that I had gone to try it. Already after two exits with the 1DX I realized that between the two there is no history – without taking anything away from the 5d. After 6 months of intense use I can conclude that for naturalistic photography the 1 DX is the best choice I could make. It's a war machine that practically doesn't miss a beat when set properly. And if you try the impossible shot you know that this machine has a good chance of doing it anyway! Rating 9.5. |
 | sent on December 22, 2019 Pros: All Cons: Nothing for me Opinion: I've been using it since 2013 and, apart from an initial problem on the mirror block (mine is imported directly from Japan) solved with a cost not even so high, it allowed me to make just under a million shots before having to replace the block again mirror and shutter. At this point my faithful workmate is left for who knows how many more hundreds of thousands of shots, all perfect. (If someone wasn't, it's certain that it's my fault) |
 | sent on August 16, 2019 Pros: Very robust machine body, af system, image quality Cons: Silent shot Opinion: Bought new in physical store in 2010, and I have to say ke la makkina is worth all the price of a top of the range, af fast and precise, nn loses shot with lens Canon 5oo L anke multiplied, battery life nice over I 1ooo shots great interior menu from real top File prodot I am of excellent quality in all light conditions, at momonto I do not note any problem of operation 120.ooo shots without problems, for my tranquility sent to assistance Canon camera service only once in 2016 x general control and calibration. GRADE makkina. |
 | sent on July 02, 2019 Pros: Shooting speed, image quality, focus system, ergonomics, autonomy Cons: Flashy camera, heavy and bulky Opinion: It has replaced the previous 1d and 1ds series, although in practice it is essentially a 1d with full-frame sensor (the role of cameras with high-resolution files was instead acquired by the 5ds and 5dsr). It is a professional model: it is true that this wording is partly due to marketing strategies, but there is also something concrete, which goes beyond the specifics of the individual components. Compared to other coevi eos models, in fact, the af system offers superior performance, the sensor is the one with the best snr side performance and dynamic range, the viewfinder offers more visual comfort, and the mechanical construction/reliability and longevity of the components is on another level, not to mention ergonomics and autonomy. It is not, of course, an ideal camera for anyone, but it undoubtedly offers a point of balance that the other eos do not reach (although maybe they offer files with more pixels etc.). The autofocus is one of the camera's strengths, although it obviously doesn't benefit from the latest technical solutions adopted on the 1dx mark II (which offers a stop advantage in low light conditions, greater stability in maintaining the put and the ability to have up to 61 af operating points, even with optics and extenders with maximum aperture of f8). Image quality side, the only advantage of the 1dx mark II is to have an extra dynamic range stop at iso 100, a benefit that rising with the iso sensitivity gradually shrinks, until it disappears. At high iso sensitivity, in fact, the two sensors are substantially on par (and outperform the various 5d and 6d currently on the market). As for the videos, apart from the fact of not recording in 4k and stopping at 30p in 1920x1080, the real limit of the 1dx, compared to the 1dx mark II, is the absence of the dual pixel cmos. In full-hd the image quality offered by the two cameras is similar, but the 1dx requires a follow-focus or similar system, to record certain types of videos, while the 1dx mark II offers a reliable and easy-to-use focus system. Buffer side, with a tab cf 1066x udma7 you can take more than 40 consecutive photos, in raw (depends a lot on the scene and iso sensitivity set), at 12fps. For those who need the wireless unit wft, i note that the 1dx is compatible with the wft-e6 model, but not with the next wft-e8 (designed for the 1dx mark II): this is annoying, since the latest unit offers several additional features, in addition to the fact that it is more easy to find. |
 | sent on February 01, 2019 Pros: Solid, ergonomic, fast, precise, complete. Finally I do not have to buy the BG to balance the optics Cons: Non-existent silent click Opinion: After so much I managed to buy it. A show! The files that churns out are among the most workable I've ever seen in the house Canon. Crazy AF, light meter and spectacular gust. The high ISO seal is in line with the sensors of the period (6d and 5DIII) as digital noise, but the recovery of shadows and lights is much simpler. The 18 mpx are more than enough, even in birdlife. I prefer to try to get closer rather than tempt crop exate. The only downside is the silent shot which is not silent at all. But it is a flaw that you will gladly forgive. |
user72463  | sent on October 13, 2017 Pros: construction, autofocus, burst, file quality, exposure meter, ergonomics, double slot, is a true professional machine Cons: weight, but I knew it well, it's superior to my skills (but I'm working) is a bit noisy Opinion: I've been celebrating it for years, since 3 years and a half ago I saw her in the hands of a professional at a baptism and it seemed like a kind of mirage. I used it by a forum user, it seems to have just left the box from so much is kept good, and it was love at first sight. It is a real war machine, robust, fast, with a high-fidelity autofocus, a burst of gunslinger style (even in sound) a meter that does not mistake a shot, the chicca (for canon, reserved only for series 1) of the spot reading anchored to the focus point, and delivers sharp, clean files even to tall iso (the 3200 sends them down like fresh water, the 6400 need just a passatina to denoise without losing details and colors) .contrast style (and weight accordingly), virtually perfect ergonomics with all finger tips even in vertical position, double slot, wide and bright viewfinder, carbon fiber shutter tested for 400,000 sca tti, everything is thought of as a function of maximum performance. especially the 1dxmark II will have surpassed the species in the yield of the sensor (this allows recovery of a better thread than those of 6d, but nothing transcendental), but honestly for an amateur like me is already too pure this, they are 18 mpx pure enjoyment Needless to turn around, the series 1 is something special |
 | sent on March 18, 2017 Pros: Robust Well Balanced Machine - Gust at 14 fts - Af Fast - Battery Life . Used at low cost Cons: a little noisy Opinion: Of the series 1 I tried many (Canon 1n in film then 1ds mk1 - mkII Canon 1D mk1 and mkIII). I must say that I have the hobby of trying out optics and machine bodies from reflex ff to aps-c - mirrorless (on my site www.zeval.org you can find many reviews). This summer on vacation I left home the fuji x-t1 to take me behind the canon 1d mk3 and I can only say that I did not regret the choice,although the fuji is smaller I did not find much difference between the two (they are both "big" ) where you go with a mirrorless there you can an give great even with such a reflex. Then the turn my friend Rudy made me try his 1DX and knowing me I did not wait long to buy a used one with a few shots (as new). The first few months I tried to try all the controls and I can say that it is fantastic ,shot in bursts af very fast, it is always a pleasure to take pictures with this machine even if it is sturdy and bulky I do not see the need to shoot a mirrorless. After a small 9-month break with a 6D mk2 (selling the 1DX) or resumed another 1DX two completely different machines the 6D quieter a toy .... 1DX .... I missed the gust. |
 | sent on June 13, 2016 Pros: Sturdiness, ergonomics, autonomy Cons: Wi Fi absent Opinion: Difficult to speak ill of a top of the Canon range. I worked a few times with 1DX and other senz this machine and a gem, despite the lack of wi fi integrated already present on other models in 2012. This type of Canon sensor ensures high quality at high ISO and allows you to really take in any situation. In my view, however, lose if you work in the studio with low ISO and flash even if you are working outdoors with strong sunlight, the rest you can not have everything. The dynamic range decreases dramatically I was very useful the use of nd filters for not to go too close to the minimum ISO. The quality of the files is impeccable both Raw and JPEG. Although the video is not his forte gets along well. Needless to emphasize the shutter speed compared to the quality and file heaviness. Duration amazing battery saw the fireball that poor batteries need food. Definitely a Formula 1 cameras; Total reliability, resistant to shock, rain, dust etc ..... Obviously not suitable for those who needtravel light or not to spend "too much." |
 | sent on March 04, 2016 Pros: It 'a number 1. I started with the Mk II, III, IV and now Dx. A crescendo of quality. Cons: Not easy AF adjustment. Opinion: Robustness is a number 1, AF speed with which the lenses range duplicators II and III series reaches the maximum. All the controls in the right place, portrait and landscape are easy to use. I do not feel the lack of GPS or Wifi. The cost does not help but the quality you pay for. Optimal sealing of Iso. Conclusion is the ultimate in the field of photography. |
 | sent on October 23, 2015 Pros: First, of course, strength, and then ... everything else! dynamic range, held at high ISO, AF speed, exposure, burst, possibility of intervention "in the car", double slot, ability to work comfortably both horizontally and vertically. Cons: Difficult to find "against" in a car in this class: exclude suffered weight and price when I bought it I knew what acquistavo and if I were not well these two parameters, let lose; so true for Wi-Fi and GPS: I can absolutely not care less (I have no need to "geolocalize" images: they are still able to remember where I made them!); actual settings are not simple (even so complicated though) but it is assumed that those who come to such a machine then knows how to manage it. Opinion: C that already at the beginning the car had an abnormal battery consumption, therefore detectable already at the factory during the testing phase, of which, however, had given fault to the fact, as reported in the instruction booklet, that the raggungeva battery full power after a few cycles of ricarica.rnNe comes, then, in my opinion, the Canon quality controls, as i said on another occasion, are low and / or there is inconsistency in the quality used electronic components. |
 | sent on May 24, 2015 Pros: All have already read. Cons: Noisy in the shot. rnNon simple adjustment AF. Opinion: Noise level shooting would say almost irritating in certain situations in which there is absolutely no need to scare the subject - see birdlife. It happened to see at full speed from the volatile to the first shot at a distance of about 8 meters. Other "against" is not easy setting of AF in certain situations -see tracking subjects faster and smaller with super telephoto. Es. Passerines. rnNel complex ... just ... tank. rn |
 | sent on March 07, 2015 Pros: Robustness, speed and gust AF, great exposure, double Sloto CF, simplicity d 'use. Battery life. Cons: Lack Wi-Fi and GPS. Opinion: New intake at Christmas 2014. The most striking thing about using it is the perfect feel of handling and robustness. Seems sewn on and the change from horizontal to vertical shooting you with your eyes closed finding the buttons to the right place without even guardare.rnInutile dwell on the speed department burst-AF-meter that is simply awesome: will be truly a sight to see the Mark II when it comes out to imagine what will be done to overcome this gem !! rnNei against have not entered the voice of the high cost because it would be like complaining that a Ferrari is dear price .... and I would like to see !! For the look of the weight is not a feather but is the other side of robustezza.rnLa battery life is impressionante.rnPotrebbero be inserted directly in the room two interesting accessories such as GPS module and Wi-fi: remedied with its accessories is true but I hope that future versions incorporate them to still have a product super professional. |
 | sent on September 16, 2014 Pros: Robustness and ergonomics, burst, ISO sensitivity, autofocus, and more !!! Cons: Cost, for many it remains a dream prohibited. Opinion: I withdrew yesterday my model but I had already had the opportunity to try it, what to say fantastic .. I come from 5D MK3 and the robustness and ergonomics despite the mk3 I used with the original bg and another thing, a real wagon armed. Autofocus is not so I had to squeeze it yet, but in the short put under pressure, while for automatic exposure control with the TV and the AV machine is not fooled and always guesses the right exposure, l ' histogram is always perfect, as well as the wb car always very loyal. Compared to mk3 there are dedicated keys for customization that are convenient, then for the rest are similar. What can I say, it is a top of the range SLR and holding it feels all the quality of the series 1, the only new price, 6000 Euros is too much despite being the best you could wish for today. |
 | sent on September 05, 2014 Pros: Sturdy, well, tropical colors made good system focusing powerful (but complicated), reach speeds elevata.rnpuò iso very high producing enough recoverable files such as photos for publishing. Cons: heavy, expensive, noisy, I would say, the shutter and pecchio produce a vibration in the room that you hear. Opinion: is definitely a professional machine that I aimed for over a year, looking between the equipment but then I got a 7d nuova.rnavevo I thought was a great camera and now I realize what it means to FF sensor, the yield is much better but anyway ... not worth all that money. I'd say € 6000.00 are far too many for the photos that produces that fail then both those produced by other lower-end machines or less costose.rnSulla history of high iso would have a little something to say because the file by comparing the 7D with those of 1Dx there is a difference of a little more than a stop sign, ie: 12800 in the 1DX has the same noise of the 7D at around 4000/5000, then you can climb up to that level yet, but the difference is that; iso to lower the quality and close to the other. |
 | sent on July 24, 2014 Pros: AF fiction, burst, "docility" of the files, made at high ISO, dual CF Cons: Weight, size, cost Opinion: The Canon 1DX is a constant surprise ... always ... always ... rnEspone engages perfectly, held in amazing high ISO (6400 ISO 1DX are treated more easily than the already excellent 3200 5DIII) Selling ... 5DIII and 1DIV hoped to arrive at a camera body itself, bringing together the best aspects of both SLR ... The 1DX goes much, much further ... has in it the better of the two, squared. Stratosferica.rnNon the slightest regret megapixel 5DIII: even crop the 1DX holds fine detail. |
 | sent on June 15, 2014 Pros: Great machine, robust, AF Great burst from fear. Cons: Price Opinion: Beautiful and truly amazing, I come from the 5D mark II which I was very happy with this camera and we are in another world. I think that was the best purchase made today. Now I just have to put on the legendary Canon EF 24-70 2.8 II.******************************************************************************************************** |
 | sent on December 09, 2013 Pros: The feeling of having in hand the ultimate in durability, ergonomics has improved a lot compared to the 1D Mark IV, the shutter no longer has that mechanical noise that distracted me when I was taking a raffica.rnIl new FF sensor provides stunning quality , the ISO is no longer a problem (up to 12800 are recovered with a few clicks). RNLA possibility to customize the menus at will, with 3 different solutions of shooting, the ability to set the AF (which is an amazing thing) you the chance to take home shots with a simple estrema.rn Cons: Weight and dimensions, which compared with the 1D Mark IV has increased, the price of course. Opinion: I come from the 1D Mark IV which I was in love but ... the transition to the 1DX was really amazing, the files that you fall in love instantly, it will be the FF sensor, it will be the opportunity to take high ISO, the menu ... I do not know but for me it's another mondo.rnrnP . S I'm not denigrating the 1D Mark IV, so I do not want the owners (I repeat that I had this too), but there is a difference! |
 | sent on March 20, 2013 Pros: Like all 1D, this is a tank and bursting strength only to look at her. The speed is one of its strengths, now combined with the FF sensor and produces files that crazy. The Jpeg seem even better for behavior at high ISO, about processors and the algorithm introduced by Canon on this and on the 5D Mark III. Up to 12,800 ISO files are widely used, a minimum of noise is known, but it is fine and does not bother. I come from 1D3, 1D4 then, 5D2 and 5D3 hours: the 1DX is insanely ahead of all of these, and only the 5D3 moves closer to the speed of MAF, but not burst, exposure and individual behavior at high ISO, where one loses stop with respect to the 1DX. Cons: It 'a tank, so it is bulky and heavy. Pe exploit it properly should definitely read the manual several times and try different settings, or you may not sfuttarne potential. I the first time I used the basket was a little 'disappointed, I did not notice big differences from the 1D4 and 5D3. Then I set up and customized well, especially in AI Servo at high ISO, the results are seen! It does not have the slot for the SD slot but 2 CF: I will use the SD WiFi and there are still bad. Luckily I found on Amazon a CF adapter -> SD law and is compatible with SD WiFi, so shooting in RAW and JPEG files on the CF SD WiFi and these transmit the real-time iPad to send to editors. It would have been better to have CF and SD as the 5D Mark III. Still costs much .... Opinion: A huge leap forward compared to the 1D Mark IV. The sensor FF stands out, is a camera that's complete. To me the 18 MP enough but I'm not sure that Canon will stop here, for those who study or weddings are perhaps 25-30 MP, and despite saying that the Canon 1DX combines the Mark IV and Ds, I think that will come with a 1D sensor exaggerated and maybe not as fast. |
 | sent on March 19, 2013 Pros: Files truly magnificent, speed, dual CF, indestructible. Cons: Price, too complex the setting of MF weight. Opinion: The flagship of Canon remains a pure machine for professionals, especially the sport.rnE 'a machine that never lets you down, you can stay there all day in the pouring rain and is flawless. The speed is at the top of the range and ergonomics has been studied in years of use by professionisti.rnTrovo that the menus that regulate the parameters of focus are too complex in common usage, penalizing the elasticity of use. Basically if you are a teacher who knows how to get out to photograph a particular sport, maybe from a fixed position, you can do all the necessary research to find the best setting, but if you're out in the bush and you have to pass by a moving subject between trees and a bird that flies you encounter ... Well, the matter becomes very complicated. Files on the step ahead of the Mark IV is abysmal. |
 | sent on November 02, 2012 Pros: The bodies of the first series are the best Canon can offer to the amateur photographer and evolved and demanding. The new sensor provides a superb image quality, the size of the photodiode is well of 6.95 microns and the processors are two Digic 5 +. The new AF module with 61 points (Canon High Density Reticular AF) is marked by a clearly professional use and provides a very high degree of Personalization. Then there is also the novelty of the exposure RGB coordination with the new AF system offers a more precise focus. The shutter speed marks the finish line a full 12 fps. With ultra-fast mode you can get to 14 fps with a continuous burst of up to 120 JPEG images of large format (36 RAW). I do not make movies, but the machine can record Full HD movies at 1080p with various methods of adjustment. A real treat is the Clear View II LCD screen with high resolution 1,040,000 points 3.2 "which allows simple and accurate analysis of images and videos. Additional property amenitiesura durable tempered glass and anti-reflective coating prevents glare even in bright sunlight. I tried and I think very useful new integrated Ethernet port that allows quick and easy transfer of images directly to a PC or via a network to clients from live events. Have a look at Reflex.it who has published online the new tests TIPA on the Canon 1D-X. The test comes out all the character of this reflex. No noise until 3200ISO. Even at the maximum setting of 51.200ISO noise can be seen but the images are still usable. The customization possibilities are many. You can use various types of multiple exposures: Additive (Additive), Average (Mean) (Comparative) Bright (Bright - Comparative) and (Comparative) Dark (Dark - Comparative). The 1D X has a body very solid and sturdy. Many functional elements are implemented in two versions to allow for a comfortable shooting horizontally or vertically. Joystick and several rings of selection to help you navigate the menus, very complete, and the setting of all parameters quickly and intuitivor. The large nut on the back helps a lot in choosing the right parameters. Cons: Only cons that I can find is the high price even though in line with similar competitive products. I speak of course of professional grade DSLR like the Nikon D4. Opinion: What about ... is undoubtedly a flagship class which I am sure will give great satisfaction to the users. I think it is the best purchase made today. A camera that will surely talk about themselves! We can only see the good work done by the technicians to give Canon a truly innovative product. It will, however, time and history to give a reason ... |
| sent on October 18, 2012 Pros: AF module, speed sensor, the quality of the files, ISO range, ergonomics, AF even at F8 Cons: It 'an SLR without the really true defects. Very balanced in all specifications. rnQualcuno might find overly structured menu options and AF in particular, but then if you want a lot of options in some way will set you need. It 'a professional camera and it is normal to be "complex". Opinion: B. I am not referring only to the obvious difference in fps from 6 to 12-14. In 1DX AF is more responsive and AI-Servo tracking is another category. Also reduced the "lag" button is well percepibile.rnUn 'other thing I noticed: the 5DIII up to 6 fps the 1dx up to 12 (14). However, the burst of 5DIII is more influenced by some settings (high ISO, noise reduction, optimization of lights, etc ...) than the 1DX. Thus, the field of the difference fps is more pronounced than in mere data (where it is anyway already the double!). RnSe, instead, a reflex with good reactivity is sufficient for you, and do not need the structure to be "war" of 1DX, the 5DIII is definitely an excellent alternative, as the quality of the files is very similar (I have not done comparative tests on recoveries dark areas - clear where in the past the series 1 have always had a bit more). rn |
 | sent on September 25, 2012 Pros: AF really beyond all limits ... ad hoc adjustments extremely precise and simple. With optical light last series 2X multiplier and third series, you do not notice any decline it will gust of quality. Impressive files that develops this camera body. Iso truly exceptional high, I could take some photographs at a wedding with 17mm at ISO 51,200 well and the picture is still very usable. At 3200 ISO, the hottest value, the machine goes there for a walk ..... is like the noise of the 5DmkII 800 iso .... practically an excellent picture. Cons: I still have not found any downside. I tried to search far and wide but I do not really want to vedo.rnse call it a flaw, what's not to like is that the magnification on the monitor goes well beyond the 100% misleading assessment of the focus .. . i did not know I was deleting several files and saying bad words because the MAF was not working .... morality?? on the computer instead were super focused and incisive beyond all expectations ..... is not a defect but you have to know and believe that the eye ricordarlo.rnAd maximum magnification even gets to 200% ... imagine the result :-) Opinion: As someone said before its release, Canon has redeemed the great and this time he's centered in the middle of the needs of users. Simplicity and accuracy. A body to which, considering the price-performance of the above, there are very few 6000 euro (metaphorically of course). Worth every euro spent. And 'the best body I've ever picked up and I do not mean just because it is my ... try it and then you'll understand what it dire.rnrnIl price? rnbeh, all in all not so high when you consider that the 1Ds mkIII out addirittua cost 9500 Euros ... This only costs $ 6100 as the first blow ... and then maybe scenderà.rnFino it comes out a 1DsmkIV this is the flagship of 1 and the price seems to me dropped |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
